rank the kinks' 4 "great" albums

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
look - fine. maybe there are other great ones, maybe one of these isnt great. there is some consensus, though, that these four kinks albums are ones to have, and the only ones to have. RANK EM!

1966 - face to face
1967 - something else
1968 - village green pres socy
1969 - arthur

i say VGPS>SE>A=FTF arthur is bloated in places ("australia" is like 3 minutes too long), and face to face has some sort of boring songs (that one about the rain), and ive never really even loved "sunny afternoon", which is face-to-face-era.

peter smith (plsmith), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)

i disagree that there's any consensus these are "the only ones to have," but they probably are the four best and among the four i'd say:

1 something else
2 village green pres socy
3 face to face
4 arthur

vgps is probably a more consistent album than something else, but something else overwhelms on the strength of its blockbuster songs ("waterloo sunset," "david watts," "lazy old sun," "no return," "love me till the sun shines," "two sisters," "harry rag," jesus christ i think i'm about to name the whole album, maybe vgps isn't really more consistent, it just sounds that way) ... face to face is the toughest sounding album they've ever made and has some moments of real beauty too ("rosie won't you please come home" is a fave album cut of that era for me) ... arthur has some huge moments but drags in places.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)

face to face=something else>arthur=village green

dan (dan), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

something else
vgps
face to face
arthur

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)

Same as roxy probably.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)

Great Lost Kinks album btw VGPS and Face To Face if it counted.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

Village Green>Something Else>Arthur>Face to Face

there is some consensus, though, that these four kinks albums
but c'mon, Lola and Muswell Hillbillies > Face to Face and at least = Arthur
Consensus be damned!!

Will(iam), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)

arthur -> vgps -> f2f -> se

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:32 (twenty years ago)

Great Lost Kinks album btw VGPS and Face To Face if it counted.

not quite, though. the lost kinks album of that period was four more respected gentlemen, which was never released, but about half of which showed up on vgps. so there's not an entire missing album there. the album that was released a few years later under the title the great lost kinks album compiles recordings from both before and after that period. and is an amazing album, as well as the missing four more respected gentlemen stuff, plus some stuff that was originally intended for an also-unreleased dave davies solo album.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)

the second half of that, sequenced properly, should read:

the album that was released a few years later under the title the great lost kinks album compiles recordings from both before and after that period, as well as the missing four more respected gentlemen stuff, plus some stuff that was originally intended for an also-unreleased dave davies solo album. and it's an amazing album.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)

This is the album I was talking about. It's just about as good as anything they properly released during this period. I know its history.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)

1.arthur
2.village green
3.something else
4.face to face

To be honest, I don't really know 'face to face' that well, though I do have it. Actually these are the only four kinks albums I have. I think you're right about the consensus.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:45 (twenty years ago)

This is the album I was talking about. It's just about as good as anything they properly released during this period. I know its history.

and that IS a stellar album. it's just not an album they ever planned to release in 1967 or 1968, but rather a compilation of miscellaneous tracks from roughly that period, released in the early '70s. that's all i was trying to say.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:49 (twenty years ago)

vgps -> f2f -> se -> arthur


I've always preferred Face to Face to Something Else. So far it's just Yancey-pants and I against the world.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

Well all I was trying to say was that it rules!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

i believe we are in agreement then.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)

wtf - I always assumed the "Great Lost Kinks Album" was a collection of singles/b-sides/EPs, stuff like "Mr. Pleasant", "Big Black Smoke", "Dead End Street". But going by that amg tracklisting I've never heard a single one of those songs... I guess I have a new reason to live...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

BTW really only Arthur slips compared to the other three(or four if I count TGLKA.) I like 1-3 on my list almost equal.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

Shakey Mo if you can find it, BUY IT! It's completely worth your while!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

For some ridiculous reason most of the VGPS stuff didn't end up on the 3 disc version they just released which is IMO the most criminal stupid thing they did. Some of the other tracks are on the Castle reissues of the other albums, but they are still missing 7-8 of them that aren't available on CD>

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

I've never even seen a copy (or else I def. woulda bought it), just looked it up on Gemm - that shit is pricey...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:04 (twenty years ago)

I have a weird as bootleg German CD that collects most of it. I'll burn it for you if we ever make it to the same FAP>

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:05 (twenty years ago)

yeah, they should've totally just attached the whole thing to the deluxe version of vgps ... or they should add it to the kinks kronikles and issue a deluxe version of that.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:07 (twenty years ago)

Guys, you know that Arthur has Shangri-La on it, right? Does anything else matter?

Also, can anyone tell me why none of these records are available on the iTunes store but they have 20 other ones?

caspar (caspar), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)

Weird licensing.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)

been a while but from memory:

Village Green
Face To Face
Arthur
Something Else

Some of my favorite songs are those bonus tracks so hell if I know if I'm judging the full-length itself.

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)

jeez this really brings home what a mess their discography is. WHERE IS THE COMPREHENSIVE BOX SET!?!?

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)

Well all the big British 60s bands discogs are similarly fucked up. I mean those Who albums are a disaster. That deluxe edition of Sings My Generation is missing great tracks a PLENTY (I still have my old bootleg mono CD version of the FIRST RECORD and I spent $30 dollars on that deluxe deal-y. . . I think I've spent nearly $75 on three CDs of that single album. . . bastards!) And the Stones sheesh. But at least most of the latters stuff is findable, I guess.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:22 (twenty years ago)

I mean the Stones singles boxed set is ridiculous! Why isn't more of Flowers on there instead of bizarre cuts and later non-period singles. What are they doing putting a weird orchestral version of "Out of Time" on and no original?!?! WHY?!?!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

GRRR.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

in terms of the Who I just waited until I came across those vinyl two-fers (My Generation/Magic Bus and Who Sells Out/A Quick One) and that pretty much did it for me, at least as far as the early stuff.

Early Stones' is a mess I don't bother wading into. I have a couple greatest hits collections on tape (High Tide and Green Grass and Through the Past, Darkly), some weird things on vinyl (a Russian copy of some comp called "Sing This All Together" for ex.). Which is fine, cuz I really don't give much of a shit about their stuff up until "Let it Bleed".

The Kinks tho... they were a big headache, tracking down all the random singles, proper albums, etc.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand someone saying that Face to Face is better than Something Else in exactly the same way that I don't understand someone saying that Rubber Soul is better than Revolver or that Revolver is better than Sgt. Pepper.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)

No Muswell? GAH.

Shagnri-La's a masterpiece.

Autumn Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)

Revolver >>> Rubber Soul >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergeant Peppers

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:33 (twenty years ago)

while there isn't a good comprehensive kinks box set, i'd say their catalog is in by far the best shape of all those '60s bands. the castle reissues of all the original '60s albums, with all those bonus tracks, pretty much cover everything. and they sound good and they're packaged decently enough.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:35 (twenty years ago)

I mean I don't even OWN Sergeant Peppers anymore whereas I still own and occassionally listen to the other two. Face to Face is probably a more consistent record than Something Else, but I just like the beginning and end of the latter so much that it doesn't really matter.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)

well the Stones box had a specific remit -- collect every originally released single A & B side, right? So it wasn't really conceived of as an attempt to actually collect every loose end, or even as a comprehensive overview of that period. They still need to give you a reason to buy More Hot Rocks, after all!

I can't believe that, for example, "Berkley Mews" was left off the Castle CD of Lola, and now it's on that 3 CD thing. I love that album so much but I really don't feel like I should have to buy that bloated thing.

Revolver is better than Pep. F2F is better than Something Else. Upon further review, there is not incontrivertable evidence which would overturn the call on the field. The call stands, and Tim Ellison is charged with his first time out.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)

I'd agree with FCC, but it's still a bummer that over half of GLKA is either lost or spread weirdly on redundant collections.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)

"well the Stones box had a specific remit -- collect every originally released single A & B side, right?"

Kind of. It was supposed to collect every single A & B from 60's London period, but on the last disc they cheat and add stuff not from the London period rather than compress the stuff that were b-sides or rarities from that time frame. It's basically just a scam to ensure that you STILL have to buy Flowers.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

Non-British b-sides, ahem.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

Rubber Soul > Sgt. Pepper > Revolver

tremendoid (tremendoid), Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

I mean to say that the songwriting improves incrementally for both the Beatles and the Kinks on those albums. If people say that they like the earlier ones better, all I can think is that they must really prefer the styles of music on those earlier albums.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:09 (twenty years ago)

That's terrible logic.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:11 (twenty years ago)

Well, if you think the songwriting is better on the earlier albums, then we just disagree, partner.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:13 (twenty years ago)

I disagree that songwriting is the only reason WHY people like albums!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:15 (twenty years ago)

"Love You To" >>> "Within You Without You"

Stormy Davis (diamond), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:15 (twenty years ago)

Unless you mean that songwriting = everything that makes a song or record great in which case yes I disagree with you compfuckingpletely.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:16 (twenty years ago)

random question: why would someone claim that "When I Turn Off the Living Room Light" is anti-semitic? I've never heard this song - what gives?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)

I had to check myself and then I saw the second line in the song haha:

"WHO CARES IF YOU'RE JEWISH AND YOUR BREATH SMELLS OF GARLIC"

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)

just googled the lyrics meself... I guess that's a questionable line, but the whole tone of the thing is brutally depressing in a "don't we all suck" sorta way. hmmmm.

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 3 February 2005 00:29 (twenty years ago)

between 2:51 and 3:59 on Shangri-La may be the greatest 1:08 in British music history

edgeev (edgeev), Friday, 4 February 2005 08:28 (twenty years ago)

"shangri la" is the best song of the '60s, so arthur is clearly way ahead of the pack. i like something else but i never thought "waterloo sunset" was as amazing as everyone else did - i think i actually prefer "end of the season." don't have the other two yet.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 4 February 2005 08:39 (twenty years ago)

I am surprised that people like "Getting Better" so much. It, and "Fixing a Hole" ruin SPLHCB for me. Also, predictable dislike shown here for "When I'm 64", but the clarinet bit just before 'Vera Chuck & Dave' may be the best two seconds on the album.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 4 February 2005 10:31 (twenty years ago)

Village Green >>>>>>>>>>> Something Else=Face to Face > Arthur

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 4 February 2005 11:06 (twenty years ago)

"I am surprised that people like "Getting Better" so much. It, and "Fixing a Hole" ruin SPLHCB for me."

Just curious as to whether you could imagine those songs having been done for Revolver and whether you would like them more then.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)

I'm curious why you give so much of a shit.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

CURIOUS WHY YOU'RE SUCH A CRABBY ASS DUDE.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

Because you are annoying as fuck.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

TOUGH SHIT

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:50 (twenty years ago)

*Snap*

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

Anyway, the question wasn't addressed to you, fule.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

Really?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 4 February 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

Remember that time when you made an ass out of yourself about my comment regarding gothic aesthetics in psychedelic music and I declined from further engagement in dialogue with you? I think I'll do the same thing here again.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:00 (twenty years ago)

Wow, a mid-set punchout, just like the Davies brothers! Great Lost is one of the ultimate Kinks albums: not only a collection of b-sides and odds, but itself like a b-side-as-dustbin-microcosm, and a great(or very distinctively good) album, about lost people who are aspects of the great lost talent-if-not-genius of Raymond Douglas Davies, although many such do their best work early (like Einstein, and certainly Newton). Polishing up the sound and putting it on a CD or byond-CD format might ruin its ragged-trousered philanthropy, its gezundheit gift to the world! (Now I understand those who wrongly thin BRIAN WILSON PRESENTS SMILE somehow detracts or distracts from thee Meta, Grail Smile!) But remastering and bonus tracks really ehlped the *music of Muswell Hillbillies (words now seem more often bogus). Can see it prefiguring best of moments of Wilco, which are mainly (in my hearing) to be found on the Mermaid Avenue albums; also Cracker's Countrysides mostly honors MH. So xpost VGPS sound quality, thinking the reissue might've significantly improved that too?

don, Saturday, 5 February 2005 00:51 (twenty years ago)

Also, the "Jewish" line is one of those countered by "I don't have to see you (also, think it's "see things" at the end of some verses?) when I turn out the living room light." Which relates to the willfullness/escapism/desperation/schizoid tinges of other songs on here (Not that I think his whining about reactions is justified.)) And this is when the one-bedsit-at-a-time aspect of pop culture was re-asserting itself. Whether as one freak whispering into his mic, or James Taylor strumming on the couch, with his presriptions on the sidetable, or "housewife rock," as it was called, of Carole King, Helen Reddy, Carpenters, Simon & Garfunkel singing of and like (and looking like)"Bookends"(etc.)

don, Saturday, 5 February 2005 02:14 (twenty years ago)

That was a nice post. Or, as they say, OTM.

nobody, Saturday, 5 February 2005 02:19 (twenty years ago)

(Arthur > Lola) = (Village Green > Kinda Kinks) > (Something > Face)
or something like that

walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

So little love for Face to Face - can't stop playing it at the moment; all sorts of things - the sadness of Too Much on my Mind, the rage of House in the Country, the precise dissection of class and its injuries there and in Most Exclusive Residence, Sunny Afternoon, Waikiki, Rosy..... and that thing he does in Sessionman where he breaks diphtongs up 'mus-ish-ee- an' 'chord pro-gresh-ee- an' on which Liam Gallagher launched a career....

sonofstan, Friday, 3 October 2008 07:12 (seventeen years ago)

Face to Face is amazing. Rosie is prob my favourite Kinks song.

an abduction of a guy into a weird artsy world... (wilter), Friday, 3 October 2008 07:17 (seventeen years ago)

Oh, and 'Mr. David Davies' costumes by Gail of Blackburn' is superb

sonofstan, Friday, 3 October 2008 07:30 (seventeen years ago)

I prefer "Something Else". Then it's "Village Green" and "Face To Face". Ahead of "Arthur" which is still great. The two 1965 ones are also quite nice, while their 70s output is generally much weaker.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 3 October 2008 08:38 (seventeen years ago)

I think I like "Something Else" - if that's the one with Apeman on it.

dog latin, Friday, 3 October 2008 08:54 (seventeen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ea/The_kinks_lola_versus_powerman_album.jpg

Ioannis, Friday, 3 October 2008 09:01 (seventeen years ago)

for me:

ftf-vgps-se-a

all terrific.

Ioannis, Friday, 3 October 2008 09:04 (seventeen years ago)

"Apeman" is on the one that represented the beginning of the end. By the time of "Lola Vs. Powerman & The Moneygoround", The Kinks were starting to develop a more "American" and "rock" oriented style, which didn't fit them much.

Geir Hongro, Friday, 3 October 2008 09:36 (seventeen years ago)

They signed to RCA, had one hit single immediately, then vanished, chartwise.

Did any othere act from the sixties, that had considerable chart success, disappear so completely while still making albums/singles as before?

I guess they were having big US success, but still...

Mark G, Friday, 3 October 2008 09:46 (seventeen years ago)

and Ray's lyrics veered ever more towards the obviously prosaic (title track notwithstanding, natch).

xp

Ioannis, Friday, 3 October 2008 09:47 (seventeen years ago)

Despite calling myself a fan and regularly defending them in pub arguments about underrated bands of the 60s etc, it shames me to admit I only own
Village Green and a 2-CD best-of comp.

With the above facts in mind, I'm thinking of investing in this. Good call? Or should I cherry-pick a choice selection of albums?

CharlieNo4, Friday, 3 October 2008 10:01 (seventeen years ago)

Ten albums, forty quid...

I saw an ad on some other for this set, £25. So I went for it, even though it had a long lead time. Of course, closer to the release date, they said it was 'unobtainable'...

I've seen it around ont' web for £35 but ...

Mark G, Friday, 3 October 2008 10:05 (seventeen years ago)

Not a good buy I reckon. You lose the bonus tracks from the re-releases, most of which are available for a fiver or less. Actually FOPP had them for £3 the other day.

Re : cherry-picking. Get the 4 'greats' then Kinda Kinks>Kontroversy>debut>Powerman (all great btw)

Dr.C, Friday, 3 October 2008 12:09 (seventeen years ago)

these four "greats", though - who decided this? ilm? damon albarn? uncut readers? or 35-odd years of precedent?

CharlieNo4, Friday, 3 October 2008 12:21 (seventeen years ago)

Well these 4 probably are the best, most people would say. I rarely agree with that sort of canonization, but in this case I think I do. What I *don't* agree with is any kind of talk that the first 2 albums are crap, which lots of people seem to think.

Dr.C, Friday, 3 October 2008 13:09 (seventeen years ago)

oh hey look i was otm 3 years ago. well, i might not go so far as to say Lola & Muswell are better than F2F, but imho they stand tall as any on this "great" list.

it does get real spotty after that...

flyover statesman (will), Friday, 3 October 2008 13:30 (seventeen years ago)

college = hits from the bong and listening & playing along with Lola v PM & MGR

flyover statesman (will), Friday, 3 October 2008 13:33 (seventeen years ago)

kontoversy killed it as well.

waht about Misfits?? I constantly see the vinyl for fairly cheap but haven't ventured there yet. i recognize nary a title on it, but still v curious

flyover statesman (will), Friday, 3 October 2008 13:37 (seventeen years ago)

How have I managed to get this far in life without ever listening to VGPS?

Of the other 3 I'd go Arthur>Something Else>F2F

I think Kink Kontroversy's a bit underrated here. xpost!

I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Friday, 3 October 2008 13:44 (seventeen years ago)

Looking at all the Beatles talk above, it occurs to me how appallingly served by theire record company the Kinks were - when i was growing up, just after the fact (early 70s) the Beatles canon was already established; jolly pop up to 'for sale', getting 'important' by Rubber Soul, essential thereafter and Pepper was the best thing evah. Similarly with the Stones; everything from BB onwards was 'classic'. This was a time, remember, before Q and Uncut and when stuff got forgotten quickly - it was damn hard to find a copy of Trout Mask or Forever changes even 5 years later. Nevertheless, Beatles and Stones and the Who to a lesser extent, were already embedded in the history that was only beginning to be written.

In contrast, the only Kinks records you saw were those Marble Arch/ MFP comps, endless repackaging of the singles and random LP tracks. I don't recall ever seeing a copy of any of the big 4 (I agree with this as the golden run - Muswell Hillbillies and Lola are good, and the first three are cool too, but these are the ones you need to know) unitl much later. To my mind, they are, unarguably, the best British group of the 60s, and these 4 records epitomise the period, while being completely different- and in a different league - from most of what was around them - much the way Chuck Berry does in relation to 50s Rn'R

sonofstan, Friday, 3 October 2008 14:01 (seventeen years ago)

To my mind, they are, unarguably, the best British group of the 60s,

Agreed.

Also, yes Pye were a pretty clueless recd company - who else did they have in the mid-60s, The Searchers, Sandie Shaw, who else? Anyway a pretty parochial affair.
It didn't help that The Kinks couldn't tour the USA between 65-9 either, hence left out of the Brit-invasion frenzy and its knock-on effects in the home market.

Dr.C, Friday, 3 October 2008 14:34 (seventeen years ago)

Pye never really got to grips with the concept of "albums."

Checking My French, Checking-Checking My French (Marcello Carlin), Friday, 3 October 2008 14:42 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.beefheart.com/datharp/albums/official/pics/yellowbrick_pyelabel67.jpg

I got this off E-bay, advertised as "totally trashed, OK for completeists" for £2, but you know what, it's nothing of the sort. Yeah, played a bit, obviously, but it's now in the kids record play box. They are good with stuff though.

Anyway, back to the kinks...

Mark G, Friday, 3 October 2008 14:58 (seventeen years ago)

They signed to RCA, had one hit single immediately, then vanished, chartwise.

They managed a UK comeback with "Come Dancing" and "Don't Forget To Dance" in 1983. Typically, they were then sounding more English again, playing down the American "rock" sound of their 70s output.

Geir Hongro, Saturday, 4 October 2008 10:21 (seventeen years ago)

The statement about them being the best British pop group of the 60s, surely they were great, really great in fact. But that position is occupied and will always remain occupied. And claiming otherwise is just pathetic revisionism or contrarianism for contrarianism's own sake.

Geir Hongro, Saturday, 4 October 2008 10:23 (seventeen years ago)

And The Beatles' patchy solo output of the 70s and 80s is way better than anything The Kinks released in the 70s and 80s too.

Geir Hongro, Saturday, 4 October 2008 10:24 (seventeen years ago)

I've got that pye box set.

Rationally Dr. C is right that the re-releases with bonus tracks is better value, but i love it as an artifact with international CD replicas of the albums.

Bob Six, Saturday, 4 October 2008 10:39 (seventeen years ago)

I would still love a re-release of "Face To Face" and "Something Else" that includes the stereo versions.

(I have a Japanese stereo edition of "Something Else", but haven't managed to find "Face To Face" in stereo although I know stereo mixes exist of most of the tracks and were once released on vinyl"

Geir Hongro, Saturday, 4 October 2008 11:06 (seventeen years ago)

Just re- reading what Marcus had to say about Davies in Mystery Train:
'He truly didn't like it here, wherever 'here' happened to be. For a long time, Davies was genuinely only at home in his fantasies of a simpler day, where class lines were clear, where everyone knew everyone else and everyone elses place; when presumably, there was a place even for Davies'

And goes onto talk about 'dull pleas for the preservation of Village Greens'

The first sentence is bang on - the rest completely wrong, I think. Ray Davies was not deceived about the past; and the hatred for the vacant upper class prick with his House in the Country and for the forces which take Rosy away from home is clear - nor is Sunny Afternoon compassionate in any real way. Ray hates that England - what sets him apart is his completely clear eyed understanding that the new one had every chance of being much worse; the same public school flotsam would run 'swinging' London, the same vacant heiresses would waft through the 'counter' culture. The moral force in Davies' songs comes from his understanding of the hydra- headed resilience of the enemy and his refusal to be deceived even by the forces that made his career possible. Marcus is right to see 'I'm Not Like Anybody Else' as key - but wrong to think he settles -ever - for a fogey-ish ressentiment. The nearest thing to reconciliation in his work is that of the observer, unable to be happy, but able to see the happiness of others as a (provisional) validation of the world - the 'I' in Waterloo Sunset or 'See My Friends'

sonofstan, Saturday, 4 October 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)

Xpost. Come Dancing was tied for their highest Billboard chart position in the US (with Tired of Waiting for You).

Given how much I heard it growing up, I had thought that Destroyer was a bigger hit than it was. Apparently just got played a lot on the NY Classic Rock radio station that I listened to.

Anyway:

Arthur
Face To Face
Village Green
Something Else

dlp9001, Saturday, 4 October 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)

Xpost. Come Dancing was tied for their highest Billboard chart position in the US (with Tired of Waiting for You).

I know. But that song was a rather sizeable hit in the UK too. Actually their first Top 20 hit since "Supersonic Rocket Ship" in 1972.

Geir Hongro, Saturday, 4 October 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

What a difference two years makes. Anyway, ranking of their 4 "great" albums is:

Preservation Act 1
Soap Opera
Schoolboys In Disgrace
Preservation Act 2

...but they're all fucking amazing.

dlp9001, Friday, 12 November 2010 03:34 (fourteen years ago)

The Kinks Pye Albums Box Set (10 CDs) : POLL had the result as:

The Kinks Are the Village Green Preservation Society (Pye 12 track version, 1968) 12
Something Else by The Kinks (Pye, 1967) 7
Arthur (Or the Decline and Fall of the British Empire) (Pye, 1969) 4
Live at Kelvin Hall (Pye, 1968) 1

(nothing else got votes)

Mark G, Friday, 12 November 2010 15:04 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.