The 1990's
Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Your'e on the money about the importance of context and nationalality
in constructing this list... the Pistols do represent the 1970's to a
vast amount of people....with ABBA possibly the other definitive
1970's band.... so does that mean that the its either Nirvana or
Spice Girls for the most representative 1990's musical entity?
Despite their relative paucity of time in the limelight...
The Charlatans..... an ever present sure, but despite one of the best
songs of the decade - "Just When Youre Thinking Things Over" - they
just don't make the grade in my book.... i think that they are very
average in places... they had little cultural impact on the decade
IMO - unlike the others on my list....
I forgot Radiohead... they should have been on that list , yep.
― dave C, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
In terms of chart-based pop - Take That's influence has been very
pervasive , yes i agree..... but definitive 1990's band? Nope.
Stereolab.... hmmm..... i agree with that point toothey have truly
pushed the gamut forward - in terms of innovation and influence - but
their prescence was never really felt by the masses was it?
Although im not exactly looking for a seismic group that have been
everywhere, Stereolab will never be associated with the 1990's the
way the Smiths , The Jam or the Pixies will with the 1980s.
D.
― dave C, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
If Primal Scream had bridged the gap between Xtrmntr and Screamadelica
they'd definitely be in contention. As much as I like Vanishing Point
it didn't age well and I never listen to it anymore. Whereas
Screamadelica is still great, I think I've gone through 3 copies of it
now, which also tells you how I look after my cds.
Daft Punk should be considered too, in my opinion anyway. Also s
― Ronan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
dont know what happened there. I was going to say also there must be
some major hiphop artist too.
― Ronan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
well from an american perspective this list seems really like a sliver of music,
but that's in part because 'britpop' is a genre over here (sorry!).
what about - for better or worse mind you - limp bizkit, for the obvious
'newsworthy' reasons - the pay to play idea that got their cover of 'faith' on
the radio, mook nation, etc. also there are tapes of fred d. throwing it down
ice-stylee in the early '90s - the evolution of the white rapping dude in pop?
jane's addiction can be included because their 'evolution' showed how
post-boomers could also grow up and be embarrassing in a 'they're still trying
to flog it, christ how embarrassing' sort of way.
dr dre
pearl jam, who went on the opposite career trajectory of limp b but who still
get a shitload of airplay on american radio
beck (who i am tempted to say 'bleh' to, although he is very good live)
― maura, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Of all the musicians proposed here I guess Beck would be the most
serious candidate (thanks Maura).
He has released high quality albums all over the nineties. He
represents eclecticism the best which was dominant in the nineties as
no single style really reigned the decade. He is very versatile and
created something new (innovative was the word I was looking for) by
mixing many styles. He released at least four substantial albums.
First his indie-slacker-freestyle statement "Mellow Gold". Then his
blues-roots-diy album "One Foot in the Grave". Then "Odelay" with its
phantastic style-crossing variety. And finally his songwriter
masterpiece "Mutations" which I prefer to most Dylan albums.
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
dave C i'd go with your first guess. Blur. You can't sum up
everything with one band, there's too mcuh ground. their different
regenerations, plus a couple of corking choonz they cover a lot of
pop: Girls and Boys at one end (pref covered by Pet shop Boys = ace)
to Song 2 at the other end. their pretension and various other
annoyances can stand in place for all the horrid bits of 90s.
― Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Maybe it's just me, but the critical goalposts (in general, not
necessarily on these boards) seem to be moving from the "80s were
crap, let's move straight from 79-91" viewpoint to "well the '90s
were crap, no futurism, all recycling of old sounds, thank God for
the 21st century - Air, Avalanches, Daft Punk pushing the envelope
but respectful of Trevor Horn, ELO" - so there's a slight but
significant move from, say, 83-98 as a wasteland. Such convenient
arguments do of course ignore yer
RZAs/Dres/Timbalands/dareisayitRadioheads/Bristol in general - but is
that what everyone'll be saying in six months' time: the '90s were a
wasteland for music just like the '80s were up to about a year ago?
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
--------
but is that what everyone'll be saying in six months' time
--------
My God, you're right. Thanks for the warning.
How about Tricky though, he used to be very 90s, sort of Beck but
good.
― Omar, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yeah, Tricky. I thought for a moment he was going to be the Ornette
Coleman of hip-hop but now he gets Alanis Morrissette and Cyndi
Lauper to sing unironically on his (now very Beck-like) records. Big
shame.
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
brilliant point Marcello....i too am shocked at how the once severely
maligned 1980's are now the apex of _now_
...though im deffo in the "the 1990's were ACE!" camp.... in fact - i
think the decade was just a tad off the 1960's for overall brilliance
and fun.
As regards Blur and Beck.... yeah i kinda see where yee are coming
from... though with blur, they went halfway up their own arses when
people started critiscizing the "chimney sweepesque" nature of some
of the parklife stuff.... if they had never discovered pavement we
could have had our definitive band...
Beck - ? the guy is a 1990's stalwart... but the wwwweally wwwweally
goodstuff was more dust brothers than beck... (debra for example)
― dave C, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
the '90s were a wasteland for music just like the '80s were up to
about a year ago?
It's the opposite Marcello. Here I am on Pinefox's side. Today is the
wasteland and even the nineties were already quite a wasteland.
Especially the second half. Do you really think Daft Punk, Air and
the Avalanches are bands anyone will remember in ten years time?
Their kind of music will be made by anyone with a computer and the
right audio equipment. Their music is not original as Velvet
Underground's or The Smith's was for example. Their music is derived
and irrelevant. This must sound very conservative, stubborn and close-
minded but I really can't see the point of all this electronic
remixing stuff. If that is the future of rock music then rock music
was my past.
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
But I don't think anyone is saying the 90s were shit. On the contrary
people are going through the roof saying "we may not have had a
defined movement, but boy were we eclectic". 90s are over-rated, never
underrated.
― Ronan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
personally i loved the 90s, my favourite music comes from that decade
― gareth, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Me too. cos I grew up in the 90's probably but so be it.
― Ronan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Me too. And 1991 = my favourite year in music evah.
---------
Do you really think Daft Punk, Air and the Avalanches are bands
anyone will remember in ten years time? Their kind of music will be
made by anyone with a computer and the right audio equipment.
---------
YAWN!
― Omar, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
yes computers and audio equipment. anyone can make daft punks music,
thats why noones doing it. computers are just tools not like guitars
which are sonic dream realisers.
― Ronan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I for one will remember (and continue to listen to) Air & Daft Punk...
Moon Safari and Discovery are both very listenable records....
Maybe its a European thing? Like the way some US based folks might
consider "Hootie"/"Matchbox 20"/"Dave Mathews" (three HUGE sellers in
the states, but pretty quiet over here) as being important 1990s
bands... whereas i wouldnt go see 'em if they were gigging in the
next room....
d.
― dave C, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
This probably says more about me than it does about the 90's, but the
90's was the first decade in which I was overhwelmingly more focused
on discovering things from the past more than I was on listening to
music being made in present, the first decade in which I generally
chose the old over the new (though it was frequently an old that was
new to me). None of the bands mentioned on this thread leave me
feeling that I made a mistake by doing this.
*
Electronic music: I listened to a lot of pre-rave electronic music
from 1979 to about 1989, and progressively lost interest in most of
it. There are still exceptions, but I don't hear electronic music per
se as particularly new (though relatively speaking, yes).
― DeRayMi, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I'd say Radiohead, since they kicked both Blur and Oasis' asses.
Best thing to come out of Britain in the '90s.
― Alacran, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
alex, your whole post was brilliant self-satire, right?
― marek, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
alex, your whole post was brilliant self-satire, right?
You'd be surprised.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
alex, your whole post was brilliant self-satire, right?
Thanks for the compliment Marek. First time a post of mine is
called "brilliant". And I always wanted to make fun of myself and
laugh about myself. Thanks again that you think I succeeded. But you
know. I am much less funnier than I seem to be.
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Thinking of Daft Punk. Neil Young made an album in the 1983
called "Trans" where he distorted his voice with a vocoder. It is his
worst album but not worse than what Daft Punk does today. And he did
more or less the same almost twenty years ago.
The band name is really terrible. Trying to be clever is always a bad
thing. Daft punk is just daft punk fullstop
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Every decade hates the decade before (in the 80s the 70s were "the
decade that taste forgot") cuz pop is a more useful way to annoy your
older brothers/cousins than it is to annoy your parents. Whats
interesting is the way in which this dislike is expressed - in the
80s the lack of 'taste' was frowned upon, in the 90s the greed and
inauthenticity was disliked, in the 00s it seems to be irony which
has been picked up on as the thing to despise about the 1990s.
Personally my singles of the 90s list was already full of god-what-a-
ghastly-decade asides and rants against irony and I've enjoyed 99-01
way more. But I think my opposition was a little misplaced.
― Tom, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
"Trans" is Neil Young's best album (= the one I most enjoy, before
the anti-contrarians leap on me) but thanks Alex because I'd never
thought of it as a comparison point for DP before but actually it
does the robot-emotion thing too - if not half as well (the NY album
suffers a bit from having to carry the metaphor of NY's son's
disability, though respect to Young for having the guts and
imagination to make it).
― Tom, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I keep forgetting though that I
do like a lot of hip-hop
(including some from he 90's), musically speaking, but the content
just gets in the way for me. It was primarily the lyrical content
that turned me off to the genre in around 1992/1993. I just
downloaded Tupac's "How Long Will They Mourn Me." I kind of want to
say this is great, but at the same time, I just can't listen to it.
Also, hip-hop has become too associated with an anti-social swagger I
see all around me, which makes the world an uglier place. Well, maybe
it just make the world ugly in a different way than it already was.
If punk were born today, presumably I wouldn't like it for similar
reasons.
― DeRayMi, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
but irony came pretty late in the 90s didn't it? and how much was
there really?
― gareth, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Finally, someone's mentioned Tupac, who I think
must represent
hip-hop in any epitomizing-the-90s contest. Assigning that role to
Dre strikes me as something only someone who didn't really follow hip-
hop would do (and I say that as someone who didn't really follow hip-
hop for most of the previous decade).
― Nitsuh, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
in the 90s the greed and inauthenticity was disliked, in the 00s
it seems to be irony which has been picked up on as the thing to
despise about the 1990s.
'91 and '01 feel similar, maybe this is just what the second year of
a decade feels like. Like Tom says above, the preceding era is being
characterized as decadent and insincere (greedy for 80's/ironic for
90's), replaced by an earnest "this time we're going to get things
right" attitude. There's a resurgence of press interest in guitar
bands after an orgy of "rock is dead"-ism, both triumphant and
morbid. Not to mention a Bush in the White House & a war in the east.
― fritz, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes, Trans is the best NY album. But still dire.
― Dr. C, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Tom, you really surprise me with your background knowledge on music.
I didn't know that Trans was about Neil Young's disabled son. But
Digital Love is not so bad actually. I just listen to an mp3 for the
third time in a row. Before I listened to Homework DP's first album.
The first track Daftendirekt is so awful. But they seem to have
changed for the better. Is DL really your favourite single of last
year?
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Second favourite!
― Tom, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I seriously think Nine Inch Nails should be on the list.
― jel, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Artists that sum up the 90s for me:
The
Prodigy
Acen
Prince
Portishead
Tricky
PJ
Harvey
2Pac
Snoop Dogg
Smashing
Pumpkins
Orbital
Underworld
A Tribe Called
Quest
Deftones
Walt Mink
Sheep On Drugs
Panacea
Roni
Size
Tori Amos
Bjork
Janet Jackson
It says something that
the closest I can get to listing a group I dislike is Underworld.
― Dan Perry, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Tom now you made me curious. Who is #1 then?
― alex in mainhattan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Daft Punk = a great great name. I loved them
already before I heard them (ie they already
had a lot to live up to — and have done). I love
Trans also (but i prob. like "real" Neil
Young more than Tom or Dr C).
― mark s, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
imo, the smashing pumpkins are representative of the 90s -starting
out small and indie, reaching a crescendo then becoming a massive
blaoted artifice that shatters into mp3 transfers, small farewell
shows and guest appearences on elctro-dance outfits. it's the 90s
writ large
― Geoff, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Bikini Kill, Manics, PJ Harvey, Nirvana, Radiohead, Oasis, Spice
Girls, Ice-T, Sleater-Kinney, Primal Scream, and maybe the Geto Boys.
― Justyn Dillingham, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
No band put out more good music in the nineties than The Loud Family.
― dan, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
some 90's artists that defined electronic music:
Aphex Twin
Autechre
Jeff Mills
Carl Craig
Basic Channel
how many trends did these guys set over and over???
― mike taylor, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Also, what about Unrest?
They seem very 90's to me, I quite liked them back in the day.
― Michael Taylor, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Geoff is so OTM it hurts.
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I remember a very chaotic Geto Boys video from the early nineties
which included a shot of a car driving into a burning cross. It was
pretty good. But as a group that was representative of the 90's, I
don't think so.
― DeRayMi, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Geoff is so OTM it hurts. Hooking up with Courtney Love is
also so 90s.
― nickn, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
i vote for ARRESTED DEVELOPMETNT!@!£@!$@£$^@£!!!!
― ambrose, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
You scare me, Ambrose.
I guess I already made my list to an extent, but I wouldn't call it
representative. Indeed, the whole idea of trying to sum up the decade
defeats me.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I actually do own some 'real' Neil Young. Decades or Decade or
whatever it's called has survived all my record culls to date for no
good reason other than I find 'After the Gold Rush' either quite
pleasant in a mad sort of way or unintentionally funny depending on
mood. Not that I play it more than once a 'Decade' (hee, hee).
I can't decide whether the prospect of NY trudging on year after year
is pitiful or utterly loathsome.
― Dr. C, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
No band that people actually heard put out more good music in the
ninenties than Pulp. I'm going by strictly quality of songs, but it
works if you look at albums, or progression of sound. Separations,
His 'n'Hers, Different Class, This Is Hardcore. Why haven't they been
mentioned? Are they not in the same league as The Charlatans? Blur?
Primal Scream? Please help me to understand.
― dan, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Pulp are not in the same league as those bands. They are considerably
better. I mean,
The Charlatans? Puh-
lease.
― electric sound of jim, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Primal Scream wipe the floor with any of those in terms of ambition,
originality and everything else.
― Ronan, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Ned --
so boldly -- has Menswear at
Ned also likes to complain about the hard wrap. I meant to say:
Ned -- so boldly -- has Menswear at #36 of the
90s!!!
But how does this square with his stated disinterest in the Strokes???
― Nitsuh, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Band of the 90's - Massive Attack. Has to be - which other band has
influenced so many successive artists right the way across the
contemporary music scene? You can detect elements of their music in
even the most conservative of records these days. Likewise, they
epitomise the whole genre-mangling outlook that was so prominent
throughout the decade - although it's a shame Beck seems to take much
of the credit for this.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Primal Scream >>> originality >>> my head
just fell off
― mark s, Wednesday, 9 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Tom, I think you're right that every decade hates the previous one.
And I think that's a healthy thing. It keeps people looking in new
directions (or at least reprising old ones in new and interesting
ways) and making different and interesting music. Note that some of
the shittiest music being made now is by people who see themselves
(or at least can accurately be tagged by the media as such) as torch-
carriers for the "guitar-revival" started by grunge or something.
― Clarke B., Thursday, 10 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
fritz is right a '01 being comparable to '91. It feels like '81,
people wanting something new.
To me PJ Harvey's career
[indieangstauthenticitysingersongwriter/grungenoise/sampling/tribute
band] sums up the shifts many people I know tried during the
nineties.
I've lost interest in areas of music that just rely
on production gimmicks and I'm looking for tunes again. also sick of
loops.
gimme chiming guitars over pulsing synth and shifting
drums and i'm a happy bunny
― , Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
On PJ Harvey - thankfully (in my opinion) she's said she's
unhappy with "Stories..." and wants to return to her darker side
as explored on "Is This Desire?" A *good thing* in my book.
― Tim, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
They are original though, Primal Scream. Er except that mid 90s
business, rolling stones anyone, but xtrmntr sounds like nothing on
earth. except one song sounding like the stooges a bit.
― Ronan, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Assigning that role to Dre strikes me as something only someone who
didn't really follow hip- hop would do (and I say that as someone who didn't
really follow hip- hop for most of the previous decade).
but why? didn't he help break snoop and eminem, two quite-prominent
figures in hip-pop, into the mainstream—and he achieved this after
'efil4zaggin' was the first album to be #1 on the soundscan chart, way back
in 1991? if anything, that achievement alone should say something about
the way music was measured in the 1990s—the introduction of
soundscan did shake up the album charts in a very big way, especially wrt
the higher sales rates of hip-hop.
― maura, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
But how does this square with his stated disinterest in the
Strokes???
Because I very much like the one and think the other has a good song or
two at most. Also, Menswe@r dress a hell of a lot better than the
Strokes (at the very least, Johnny Dean could take Julian Casablancas
on a catwalk).
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
xtrmntr sounds like nothing on earth. except one song sounding
like the stooges a bit.
except:
my bloody valentine
miles davis circa
jsck johnson
bad grand royal-style whiteboy indie/rap (as opposed to undie rap.
bobby g. + rapping = where's my gun?)
the mc5 circa "sun/starship"
middle period p.i.l.
early 90s acid + late 90s trance
u2
late 80s/early 90s adrian sherwood/on-u-sound records
themselves
the chemicals
the pop group & mark stewart solo records
― jess, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
It doesn't sound like My Bloody Valentine really. Don't really see
the U2 thing either, but that could be due to my hatred of them.
Having said that you may be right about the rest but at no point does
it sound completely like all of them or any one of them and it's a
pretty diverse list you must admit.
― Ronan, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Actually that was complete bollox. you're probably right.
― Ronan, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I, too, fail to recall any U2-esque bombast. If you remove
that "angry" track (with Bobby, you big man, telling everyone to FADE
AWAY), that album would be nearly unbeatable (if it weren't already
hopelessly derivative, and all the better for it, a la Garbage's best
work).
― David Raposa, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I love the way he rhymes truth with you and then you and then true.
― Ronan, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
i think i heard u2 in the BIG BALLAD which comes right after the john
barry/jack johnson killer spy-theme. actually, it may not sound like
u2 at all as i have Never Listened To It, but i was searching for
some sort of emotionally Grand, lighters aloft @ the quiet moment
stadium band.
― jess, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
No, that one sounded like Suicide.
― cw, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
just to expand the spashing pumpkins = 90s, must include obligatory
appearence on the simpsons.
― geoff, Saturday, 12 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(Dr Dre) achieved this after 'efil4zaggin' was the first album to
be #1 on the soundscan chart, way back in 1991
Actually the first number one album on the Billboard charts after
Soundscan came into effect was whatever Michael Bolton record was out
at the time (or was it Mariah Carey?). Efil4zaggin came out a
few months later (and debuted at number 2 before hitting the top spot
the following week). Doggystyle was the first debut album to
debut at number one if that helps yr arguement any.
― Vic Funk, Saturday, 12 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Easy canuck answer is Sloan. From the 'grunge' beginnings, their
label problems, their breakup, their problems with breeaking through
in the states, being a one hit wonder to a whole diffirent generation
and recently remebering how to write pop songs again. Every album
they get slotted as being like another band: Nirvana, Beatles, Rolling
Stones, Television or Kiss.
Harder answer for me to defend would
be Tragically Hip but for most of my peers it would hold true.
Starting the nighties with Road Apples and filling it with Fully
Completely and Day For Night. Instead of breaking up they put out a
crappy mccrap crap album (Trouble at the Henhouse) just intime for
more then a few high school kids to get infatuated with coke/E fueled
rave culture that had recently surfaced from the underground and its
former home in adandoned warehouses in Toronto. Then, as all fads
start to die off with people, it was a well timed return with Phantom
Power in 1999. My friends view going to their travelling festival,
Another Roadside Atraction in the same manner as I held seeing Neil
Young & Crazy Horse live. heck I even climbed onto my roof to listen
to one of those concerts from 10km away when they played the Markham
Fairgrounds.
I guess international isolation made something
easier for once. Sigh, me and my lexicon of can con hereos.
― Mr Noodles, Saturday, 19 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
three years pass...
Wow - the 90s!
― the bellefox, Sunday, 27 November 2005 13:28 (twenty years ago)
Yes - the 90s!
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
Teehee - the 90s!
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
ugh - the 90's!
― AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)
*searches thread*
nope, not there.
SUEDE, people!
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)