Clap Your Hands Say Yeah

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I love this band and they've been gaining steam in NYC, crowded gigs and some local press (in TONY this week, live preview section). They are friends of mine so this is kind of an unsolicited plug, sorry, (I formerly played in a band with the drummer & bass player) but I think I'd want to talk about them anyhow since they seem like they're doing something cool, Smiths and Clean comparisons notwithstanding. Anyone seen them? No record yet but mp3s at their site ihttp://www.clapyourhandssayyeah.com .

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

Playing at Sin-e on Fri and Mercury Lounge on Mon for the NYers.

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

four months pass...
Pfork reviewed a track yesterday, and it's there for the listening.

http://pitchforkmedia.com/tracks/05-06-14.shtml

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

sounds a bit like something out of a 1993 cutout bin. not entirely unpretty, but gushing over something this just means indie is old enough for nostalgic revivalism (and, arguably, conservatism).

jermaine (jnoble), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

i agree jermaine. i've met some of the guys before and they are super nice, so I wish them the best, but I'm not really freaking out about it.

breezy, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

It sounds older than that to me. Maybe 1983.

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

I downloaded the tracks that were on Said the Gramophone a few days ago. "The Skin of My Yellow Country Teeth" is amazing, I think. The other one pretty good too. Anyone else seen them live?

Maciej, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Saw them live at Maxwell's in NJ last month, opening for Rye Coalition. Very good- singer's vocals translate well in a live setting. They had problems with the keys, but I blame the soundguy.

Just got the new record yesterday and it's very good as well.

They're playing a free show at South Street Seaport in August, for those interested NYC ILMers.

cdwill, Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)

Glowing album review on da fork today.

Does this signal the beginning of the first wave of backlash or something?

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 13:39 (twenty years ago)

It got a B+ on Stylus yesterday, too.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

i'm listening to it now (bought it a little while ago, when mr clap your hands dropped them off to other friend at record store) and am listening to it. i'd heard solo stuff on cd-rs and i can't understand the pitchfork review - is it a must that one album per year be compared to neutral milk hotel for no reason at all?

how does the review not talk about television?

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

I think it's now for certain that this album will be one of the year's big indie breakthroughs. It's got the three ingredients:

+ grassroots (or blog) buzz
+ mainstream (ie, Pitchfork) raves
+ it's a very good album and when people download it, they will discover as much

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last, someone builds a mansion of song that reminds us that, at its best, the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

not MY quote

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

+ a name people can squeal about

how long until this pfm review shows up on http://indierock4eva.blogspot.com/

W i l l (common_person), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)

No comments about the band, but do any of you get the impression that Pitchfork has an inflated sense of self-importance when it comes to elevating a release into the "Best New Music" category? Do you think post "Funeral", they're just waiting to see another band sell records and sell out venues thanks to the Pitchfork stamp of approval?

Discussion points:

- Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last...the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other

- There's something really refreshing about stumbling across a great band that's trembling on the cusp without any sort of press campaign or other built-in mythology-- you actually get to hear the music with your own ears.

- Indie rock has received a much-needed kick in the pants, and we have the rare chance to decide what a band sounds like of our own accord before any agency cooks up and disseminates an opinion for us. Damn, maybe this is how it's supposed to work!

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

brooker's points are valid inasmuch as the review sacrifices the band for the purposes of some strange market metonymy, as if this band represents the winning underdog spirit of indie rock.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)

this first discussion point seems worth discussing, but the other two I could really care less about, they seem like bad industry commentary and not really that important to whether or not the band is actually any good.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

re talking points:

- Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last...the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other

This is true so long as we replace "it seems" with "I feel" and append "for me" to the beginning of that second phrase.

- There's something really refreshing about stumbling across a great band that's trembling on the cusp without any sort of press campaign or other built-in mythology-- you actually get to hear the music with your own ears.

This is true. But it's "refreshing" not because it happens so rarely, in the grand scheme of things, but rather because when it happens to you, individually, it feels really refreshing.

- Indie rock has received a much-needed kick in the pants, and we have the rare chance to decide what a band sounds like of our own accord before any agency cooks up and disseminates an opinion for us. Damn, maybe this is how it's supposed to work!

I think this is hogwash on several points, not the least of which is that Pitchfork is a major tastemaker and will leave many sheep in its wake!

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

Pitchfork: It's pretty weird that we keep getting tied together in the press. Like, a lot of the features I've read on the Arcade Fire mention Pitchfork and vice versa.

Win: They could be asking you a lot of the same questions you could be asking me: How does it feel? How's the hype? Is it weird to be mentioned in the New York Times and the L.A. Times? I'm like, "No, how's that feel?"

Pitchfork: It's really funny. It's like we can't exist independently in the press. I mean, are you as sick of that as we are?

Win: I don't know. I think that people have a narrow view of things. You definitely get a lot of lazy, weak features. And I'm sure you guys probably experience that as well.

Pitchfork: I suppose people need their angle. But I almost just feel bad for you guys. Like we tend to get really carried away when we love a record, and while that tends to help a lot of bands we think deserve attention, there can also be negative repercussions if we go too nuts.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

you guys forgot:

"I mean, really: A band that mashes together Talking Heads and Neutral Milk Hotel while also stopping in to visit the shimmering, wafting ambiance of Yo La Tengo, the harmonic trickery of Modest Mouse, and the chorused guitarwork of pre-Loveless My Bloody Valentine? What website do you think this is? We are fucking there."

b'angelo, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

Every time it seems like conventional indie rock has gasped its last, someone builds a mansion of song that reminds us that, at its best, the genre still pulls off raw, celebratory spirit more convincingly than almost any other... Color me extremely dubious.

Gotta say the reference points and comparisons in that review do NOT conjure up "raw, celebratory spirit" for me - Modest Mouse, Yo La Tengo, Interpol?? Shit, if I'd known it was gonna be that kind of party.... I'd have made other plans for the evening :-O

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

But that's obv a matter of taste, fandango.

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

Gah. I'm, gonna have to download something & find out myself. Those reference points sound incredibly misleading.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)

then PFork has already won.

Fetchboy (Felcher), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

If it's any use, the band sounds nothing at all like Neutral Milk Hotel.

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Sean M., it may have blog buzz and all that, but it's missing something else very important: a label.

Most people who would buy this album aren't going to be able to just walk into a record shop in their city and pick this up. That's going to erase this album off many people's shopping lists, no matter how good it may be or no matter how much buzz it may have.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

are you sure they weren't re-reviewing the arcade fire album by mistake?

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

Most people who would buy this album aren't going to be able to just walk into a record shop in their city and pick this up.

Most people who would buy this album probably read about it on someone's blog, and then possibly on Stylus and Pitchfork. Logic leads me to believe that anyone who finds out about an album online can buy it online.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

As for not being on a label, I wouldn't be surprised if the band's already considering a number of offers. And, if not yet, very soon.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

Johnny Fever, you're obviously right, but my point isn't that it'd be impossible to buy, just more difficult, and that's going to mean less sales and less "one of the year's big indie breakthroughs."

I hate buying albums online. I much, much, much prefer to shop in an actual store. There's so many albums on my list of music to buy that I'd rather pick up those things at a store than order something (ie this) online to satisfy my infinite hunger for noise.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

And yeah, of course they can be picked up by a label and have this album reissued. I'm just saying, as it stands right now. Y'know.

Mickey (modestmickey), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

i like it but i don't love it
but I wish them the best
pitchfork LOVES to be "first"
even when they are not

i mean they gave "best new music" to the boy least likey to

what happened then?
nothing

breezy, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)

I do mean "breakthrough" in terms of name, not in terms of sales. (cf The Unicorns, Broken Social Scene). The album's not quite likable/pop enough to take the Arcade Fire/Postal Service pedestal.

I was listening to this again on the ride home and it's not as good as I remembered - but it is very good.

Also, I really liked the feel of the writing in that Pitchfork review (if not the entirety of its substance). Such excitement, really clearly articulated.

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)

david bowie was apparantly at their show last evening in NYC ... just to see them specifically. it's like the arcade fire and david byrne all over again.

Gregory T (tubesocks), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

most likely this type of attention will just polarize people, those that love and hate. usually thats' what overzealous pitchfork reviews tend to do

i fall in the grey area on this one
not sure there is really all that much to talk about and I'm not being a hatah

breezy, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)

Sean M if you like articulated enthusiasm you've got to check out that link i posted above!!

W i l l (common_person), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

Also, I really liked the feel of the writing in that Pitchfork review (if not the entirety of its substance). Such excitement, really clearly articulated.

Citing reference points to other bands for the reader's benefit is one thing, but that review, to me, read like "this sounds like this, not this, but sort of like this." Yawn.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

David Spade has a band?

Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

Will - that is actually a cool link, although I resent the fact that the blog's frame (ie, the absurd GS quote "The Shins will change your life") appears to be making fun of me. :(

Johnny Fever - It wasn't those bits I was thinking of. But, um, I can't find any of the bits I was. Maybe the breathlessness? Maybe I made it up? I do usually like "it sort of sounds like this, but not, and also like this, kinda" reviews, though, so long as the referents are very disparate and unexpected. Sadly, that's not the case here. ('Oh look, Neutral Milk Hotel, Interpol and Yo La Tengo as indie rock touchstones!')

Sean M (Sean M), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)

These are ok, not exactly 'raw and celebratory' but there is something pleasingly loose and uncaring, unstudied (uncool) about them. Reminds me of 'indie rock' from more innocent times. It's pretty generic (for me) though.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 22 June 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
So, they're the NYC USE?

donut e- (donut), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

No, unfortunately. 33Hz is a bit closer to the NYC USE, but without the indieness.

Brian Miller (Brian Miller), Wednesday, 6 July 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Oh my god, what sloppy, uninteresting, horrendously sung shit. But what a brilliant PR campaign! Whoever masterminded that "David Bowie came to see them!" meme is a genius (nowhere, but nowhere, does it say that Bowie LIKES them).

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Thursday, 14 July 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)

Bowie does like The Secret Machines though.

I went to see TSM in March at Irving Plaza NYC and I looked up in the balcony (the VIP section) and he was really enjoying the show.

It's just cool to say "I saw Bowie really enjoying himself"

Michael Costello (MichaelCostello1), Thursday, 14 July 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)

It's just cool to say "I saw Bowie really enjoying himself"

I dunno, man. That sounds kind of dirty to me.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 14 July 2005 04:44 (twenty years ago)

someone should form a band called "Blog Buzz"

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 14 July 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

the Thin White Dudes

donuty! donuti! donuté! (donut), Thursday, 14 July 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

OTM M@tt

haha

pitchfork has oficially just turned into a clap your hands fan site
it's like costant updates in the news sections, HEADLINE: clap your hands STILL don't have label, still have nothing new to report, but we are excited to report there is nothing to report. more tomorrow about how clap your hands are playing a sold out show at southpaw

whoop!

breezy, Thursday, 14 July 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

I await PFM's "So, yeah, we're always getting linked with you in the press HOW EMBARASSING!!!" interview with Clap Yes Handymen later in the year.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)

Thank you, Pashmina!

This Clor talk proves to me that what repels you about CYHSY is all the hype, or what this band represents to you, and has nothing to do with music.

Donut you do bring up a good point. The album isn't exactly dynamic. It's like a monochromatic paint job. But if you're looking for dynamic, why even approach the indie rock genre, y'know?


mcd (mcd), Friday, 30 September 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

I haven't really dug what I've heard by Clp YR hands.....The Wilderness is the Pitchfork-hyped band with annoying vocalist that I'm digging this year.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)

WOW YOU RECORDED AN ALBUM FOR LESS THAN 10 THOUSAND $$ WOW THAT'S INDIE!

I actually don't think that $10K is that extravagant. My band just spent a few thousand. (I don't remember exactly how much: they wisely don't put me in charge of the finances.)

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 30 September 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

Clap Your Hands Say Yeah beats the shit out of the crappy Wilderness. Official.

zeus (zeus), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)

THANKS FOR YOUR VIEWS ON THE WILDERNESS YOUR OPINION IS VERY VALUABLE TO ME!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

I actually don't think that $10K is that extravagant. My band just spent a few thousand. (I don't remember exactly how much: they wisely don't put me in charge of the finances.)

what's a "few" i could see like 5K but 10K is quite a bit (to me at least)....i guess it maybe depends on what city you live in too...where are you?

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

This Clor talk proves to me that what repels you about CYHSY is all the hype, or what this band represents to you, and has nothing to do with music.

You apparently forget the 'has a shitty singer whose throat you would happily rip out' factor about Get Your Clap Right Here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

(Meanwhile, what I've heard of Clor's music was good fun, what I've heard of Name Your Band Really Badly was not, and thus we stand as we do.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

I've heard of Name Your Band Really Badly was not

haha

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

This Clor talk proves to me that what repels you about CYHSY is all the hype, or what this band represents to you, and has nothing to do with music.

It also has to do with the fact that Clor is about a gazillion times more interesting. Clor's relative weakness is the voice and lyrics -- which reminds me a bit of the Clap singer!, except not nearly as grating... but the Clor's music really couldn't be any further away a progression than that of Clap. I mean Clor's "Outlines" is the first "indie rock" song that basically acknowledges the genius of Severed Heads' Come Visit The Big Bigot as a template for a pop song, whether they intended it or not. It's finally happened at long last! Clap's songs just remind me of many things that could have been, but did not be.

Donut you do bring up a good point. The album isn't exactly dynamic. It's like a monochromatic paint job. But if you're looking for dynamic, why even approach the indie rock genre, y'know?

I
can't
believe
I
just
read
that

INDIE = GRAYSCALE!

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

I'm in Chicago, Matt.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:40 (twenty years ago)

Dude do u know Steve Albini

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 18:41 (twenty years ago)

After listening to Clor, I don't really see any similarities. Though, I will say none of it reaches the best moments on CYHSY. Something about the Clap record seems free wheeling and effortlessly good, while Clor sounds more calculated. To me, that doesn't equal more fun, but less fun.

Plus, like I said earlier, the vocals that people seem to point out as making it annoying, is what gives it that extra something for me. I don't think anyone could by annoyed by the vocals with Clor, but they definitley aren't interesting and add nothing to the overall effect.

As far as Wilderness, it's just crap.


James Morris (HorrayJames), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

is what gives it that extra something for me

Why, exactly?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

Why, exactly?

Because if it's just some generic indie fuck, I doubt it would really grab me. It sounds more unique. No different than the fact that a Morrissey cover by anyone other than Morrissey somehow sounds like shit. I don't even mind that he sounds like David Byrne, because the music doesn't sound like Talking Heads, so it's not exactly rehashing.

It's definitley a risk to sing in a voice that could easily be labeled as annoying, but I think it's a risk worth taking if it adds character to the music for people who actually aren't annoyed by it. If that makes sense.

But, it's important to note, that I'm merely stating that this is an enjoyable record. In a couple of months, it might just be collecting dust. Just wanted to counter a little of the hate.

James Morris (HorrayJames), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

It's definitley a risk to sing in a voice that could easily be labeled as annoying, but I think it's a risk worth taking if it adds character to the music for people who actually aren't annoyed by it. If that makes sense.

The reasoning's a bit circular but I see what you're trying to get at. But surely you don't need the 'labeled as' part, if you get my drift. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 September 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

Haha. This could easily turn into something similar to the Coldplay discussion. Do I like it BECAUSE it's annoying? Is it pleasently unpleasent?

James Morris (HorrayJames), Friday, 30 September 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

I hope I'm not saying that "annoying voices" are bad. I just can't resonate with the Clap singer's voice.. just in this instance.. that's all.

I mean, I enjoy Gunnar's voice in Bless and Dr. Gunni. I like Jad Fair's voice. I like Doc Dart's voice in the Crucifucks. I like Nardwuar's voice in the Evaporators. All of those voices are "grating", but who finds them endearing and who finds them annoying and horrible is just pure random chance based on the listener's taste.

donut hallivallerieburtonelli omg lol (donut), Friday, 30 September 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
I heard this band on the radio last night. When the DJ announced the band, I was kind of half expecting an advert for texas hold-em poker to play halfway through the song.

the music was OK, but the singers voice, to echo comments upthread, was kind of whiny and unlikeable.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:15 (twenty years ago)

I took my brother and his friend to see a sold-out(boggled) Clap 'em on Tuesday.
The show was an ear-awful experience.

Honestly, I really did not expect much--the record is pretty flavorless--but I hoped for at least some enjoyment out of the night.

I think what parched my perspective of the ordeal is that Alec as a frontman appeared to be such an asshole. Call it judgment, but *I* felt nothing endearing about his presence, which is why his cry *might* have worked for me. That's why odd-to-the-ear voices work, because they have character, or reality, or conviction, or any slightly redeeming quality. But Ounsworth's sort of pompous attitude caused his delivery to resonate as the most noisome drivel...
By the end of the set I was enough with the monotony and had to walk out of the performance area.

I mean, this is just my view, maybe the distate was of some psychological disconnection that caused me inability to endure. But I don't think I'll be supporting anything more of the Yeah platitude.

mox twelve (Mox twleve), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Quod Erat Demonstrandum, bitchez

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the lack of online poker spam in this thread threw me off.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Friday, 21 October 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
so how did wichita get the deal in europe in the end and not 4AD?
did they gamble?

joan vich (joan vich), Saturday, 11 February 2006 13:14 (nineteen years ago)

all i know is that their edinburgh gig was terrible.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 11 February 2006 13:21 (nineteen years ago)

I listened to the disc wondering what the hype was all about. As bemused as I was to hear a band ape the Talking Heads (a lot of people claimed the band an influence but few actually sound like 'em - kinda like Kiss and to a lesser extent, VU) I was just as unamused at how average they were whilst aping.

Brian O'Neill (NYCNative), Saturday, 11 February 2006 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

yes yes very good

more disappointed testimonials, please.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 11 February 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

I am going to see them tonight in ::shudder::: Brooklyn. Anyone else going?

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 22:58 (seventeen years ago)

C'mon!

Alex in NYC, Wednesday, 14 November 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)

Seriously, am I going to want to eat a grenade at this show at take huge swathes of the crowd out with me?

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 15 November 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)

I wonder how many people Alex will take with him.

circles, Thursday, 15 November 2007 02:01 (seventeen years ago)

"It was horrible...bloody headbands everywhere."

circles, Thursday, 15 November 2007 02:02 (seventeen years ago)

I still love the first album. I gave the second one too many fruitless chances out of respect for the first.

nicky lo-fi, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

Take the crowd out, Alex, but save yourself. We like you.

Jazzbo, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

my girlfriend went said it was a bipolar thing, loved some songs, BORED next 2

Surmounter, Thursday, 15 November 2007 17:47 (seventeen years ago)

Ugh.

Note to self: don't post on ILM after I end a job. What a spaz I was (is). No regrets about the Sonic Boom story and the "For Every 20 Backlashers" theory...

Alex, if it's any comfort, the Clap Your Hands album from this year sounded much better than the first one. It sounds more Tall Dwarfs-y. Or maybe the singer is now undulating in that Chris Knox/pop-ero Eno frequency that makes it sound rad. Shrug.

Mackro Mackro, Thursday, 15 November 2007 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

they are TERRIBLE live, this from someone who likes them.

sean gramophone, Thursday, 15 November 2007 19:47 (seventeen years ago)

Actually quite enjoyed it. Should you care, <a href="http://vassifer.blogs.com/alexinnyc/2007/11/clap-your-hands.html";>you can read all about it</a>.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 15 November 2007 19:51 (seventeen years ago)

Whoops, let's try that again: click here to read my review-of-sorts.

Alex in NYC, Thursday, 15 November 2007 19:52 (seventeen years ago)

Alex, if it's any comfort, the Clap Your Hands album from this year sounded much better than the first one. It sounds more Tall Dwarfs-y. Or maybe the singer is now undulating in that Chris Knox/pop-ero Eno frequency that makes it sound rad. Shrug.

-- Mackro Mackro, Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:01 PM

I liked their first album a lot and was disappointed by the second. That said, of the handful of other albums I bought this year which I'd describe as "disappointing," Some Loud Thunder is the one I keep returning to. There is something about it...

pgwp, Thursday, 15 November 2007 21:27 (seventeen years ago)

they are TERRIBLE live, this from someone who likes them.

-- sean gramophone, Thursday, November 15, 2007 2:47 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

yea i saw them last year at central park, they sucked. but that venue's kinda tough i guess.

sleep, Thursday, 15 November 2007 22:05 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

i'm gonna see these ppl tomorrow

Surmounter, Friday, 13 February 2009 05:29 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

their debut was so good u_u

ksh, Sunday, 11 July 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

Wank Your Dick Say Pitchforkmedia

― Mickey (modestmickey)

buzza, Sunday, 11 July 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

ten months pass...

"Let the Cool Goddess Rust Away"
"Details of the War"
"In This Home on Ice"
"Gimmie Some Salt"

listened to the first album again, and these songs still sound like classics to me.

too bad the band never went anywhere with this stripped down sound.

the second album was a huge disappointment for me.

nicky lo-fi, Friday, 13 May 2011 17:10 (fourteen years ago)

should i trust all the rust that's on tv, y'all!

http://pitchfork.com/news/42577-clap-your-hands-say-yeah-announce-new-album/

markers, Thursday, 19 May 2011 18:36 (fourteen years ago)

three months pass...

New album streaming at Luisterpaal if anyone at all still cares about these guys.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:09 (fourteen years ago)

was listening to bits & pieces of the s/t like, yesterday

markers, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:11 (fourteen years ago)

the first record is genuinely good, i don't even know if i ever made it through all of some loud thunder, but i really like the title track

markers, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:12 (fourteen years ago)

There are actually a couple good songs on this new one, I like "Into Your Alien Arms".

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Tuesday, 6 September 2011 01:34 (fourteen years ago)

Aghhhh. Couldn't get through it. Was really hoping for a return to form--couldn't do the second album, either, but the s/t was really something to me back when it came out. Next time around, maybe.

Was any of the solo/side stuff they did worth hearing?

Darvin H.A.M. (AlexPh), Tuesday, 6 September 2011 02:51 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.