― MarkH, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Robin Carmody, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Douglas, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― DavidM, Tuesday, 8 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
As someone who is too young to remember Live Aid and the aftermath in the pop/rock landscape, I thought i'd ask ILM what was so bad about Live Aid? Everyone seems to say this was when music was at its worst and the record industry men realised that music could be 'marketed' at the older generation where previously they thought the 35+ bracket weren't interested in music. But surely Tina Turner,Phil Collins etc had already had huge sales in the 2 years procedding this and it was infact 'new(ish)' bands like U2 and Simple Minds who benefitted most? After all it didnt raise the profile of Queen in America much did it?
And was it at this point people started updating their vinyl albums to CD and thats why the older bands did better? Or do both go together?
― Andy Jay, Saturday, 1 May 2004 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)