Shouldn't Michael Jackson just commit suicide and get it over with?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Seriously. He should blow his brains out and end his tragic life. He's obviously miserable, clearly is addicted to all kinds of pills, and very well may be facing jail time.

End it now Michael, for you and for the rest of us as well.

shookout (shookout), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

What do you care?

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)

oh he jumped the mortal coil shark a WHILE back

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

What do I care? Are you looking forward to six months of Michael J. in court over little boys?

END IT, MICHAEL!

shookout (shookout), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm waiting for the child porn/snuff film where Jacko gets some 8 year old to tickle him into suffocation

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

an immensely talented figure has ruined his life and attempted to do the same for several children. The alternative to End It is Get Help, but it seems like he's too proud for the latter.

(x-post wow even i'm disgusted by that)

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:24 (twenty-one years ago)

http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0394751043.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

f--gg (gcannon), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

He's already a zombie, it's too late for suicide.

http://sportsmed.starwave.com/i/magazine/new/michael_jackson_a.jpg

undead undead undead

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

suicide would be a good ending for the tragic biopic (cut to shot of MJ moonwalking in heaven with Tupac and Miles Davis - or conversely go-go dancing in hell next to Fatty Arbuckle)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Arbuckle's guilt is far from proven.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael Jackson should have setup shop in Vegas a long time ago. That way he'd probably like, make money.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

(I know there are questions about Arbuckle - all I know is what I read in Hollywood Babylon - I just couldn't think of any other famous media figure rapists/pedophiles to pair MJ with. After all, R. Kelly is still alive...)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

how about this guy: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=1&u=/ap/20050215/ap_on_re_us/church_abuse_shanley_1

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

that guy's not dead for at least another week or two...

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

in fact, isn't arbuckle's guilt more or less 100% disproven?

firstworldman (firstworldman), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Kenneth Anger doesn't seem to think so. that book's old though.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I believe Arbuckle charges were proven bogus or at least very suspect. The charges can't seem to be shaken though, as witnessed above.

Garibaldianne (Garibaldianne), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

When I saw this, that was my first thought. But apparently it's just the flu.

TayBridge, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

What frightens me most about an MJ suicide is the prospect of copycats across the globe. There are many who would follow him to any length.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)

and that's a bad thing, Joseph?

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sure he already has plans in place for the eventuality that he does face jail time. Some sort of Houdini-esque exit.

ffirehorse, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

i hope its like the end of Moonwalker

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope Captain Eo comes and whisks him away in a starship to a Temporary Autonomous Zone in the sky where he can safely live out his fantasies on a holodeck or something.

He really has fucked up- it was pretty insane to flagrantly snuggle with children after the first court settlement- but then again the very intense foolishness of such behaviour in the face of public suspicion just might be a sign of how totally clueless he is, about sex, about everything. I honestly can't decide if I think he's guilty as hell or just a victim of his own "I'm a child too" partyline.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

"guilty as hell or just a victim of his own "I'm a child too" partyline. "

I'd say the two go pretty much hand-in-hand - two sides of the same coin.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, here's what I mean: Without participating in the trial or seeing the evidence, I don't think we know what we're talking about if we make a strong "Guilty" OR a strong "Not Guilty" claim. How do we know what happened in a closed bedroom of a private house five years ago? I wasn't there. Were you?

Both scenarios seem plausible: It's quite possible that he really has exploited his celebrity to get close to kids and then has molested them. Abuse is real, and sadly common. But it's also plausible that, given how rich he is and how strange he is, he's a great target for a get-rich lawsuit from parents who have cynically let their kids get close enough to Michael Jackson so that they could cook up a good story. He *IS* so damn weird that, for many, it wouldn't be hard to believe that he would do something outside the law, or morality.

I watched that Martin Bashir "documentary" again recently and the impression I got about Michael Jackson is that he's totally baffled about what sexuality is (particularly his evasions about his paternity, and his fabricated tale of Tatum O'Neale's sexual advances), and that something about him seemed to kind of freeze in place at the peak of his child star popularity: he believes that he is a child too, and that's why he doesn't bat an eye when asked about his sleepovers. His "what's the big deal?" attitude is so utterly clueless- it's not the smoothly defensive front of a mature adult who has been legally implicated in the past and is aware that he had better distance himself, that "where there's smoke there's fire" is what everyone is thinking- this immaturity about what his own behaviour means is what I cite as a *possible* sign that he's actually just insanely naive, and in turn *that* naivety could just possibly be a sign of his innocence of actual abuse charges. But, again, this is ALL speculation. We don't really know what the hell is up with that guy.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

might be over soon.

Michael Jackson rushed to hospital
The singer is 'very, very ill', according to US press reports...

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20050215/us_nm/crime_jackson_dc_21

Jackson became so sick while en route to court in Santa Maria, about 30 minutes from his Neverland Valley Ranch, that he was driven instead to a local hospital. The sudden illness caught Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville and even Jackson's own lawyers by surprise.

"I did speak with Mr. Jackson by telephone this morning on the way to court and he said he was very ill," lead defense attorney Tom Mesereau told the judge after a hushed conference with his colleagues. "I'm told he's being examined by a doctor."

whatever.

jettison him into space. skye sweetnam too.

david day (winslow), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

"His "what's the big deal?" attitude is so utterly clueless- it's not the smoothly defensive front of a mature adult who has been legally implicated in the past and is aware that he had better distance himself, that "where there's smoke there's fire" is what everyone is thinking- this immaturity about what his own behaviour means is what I cite as a *possible* sign that he's actually just insanely naive"

see, this indicates the opposite to me - his very "what's the big deal?" attitude is common to pedophiles, in that it's indicative of their inability to distinguish between adults and children's respective decision-making capabilities (and sexualities).

but you're right that from either end this is all pure speculation on our parts. I admit that my feeling that he's guilty is just that, a feeling, and one based more on my general understanding of how pedophiles operate than on the specifics of this particular case (which are indeed blurry).

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I see your point Shakey Mo, and I fear that your hunch is actually the correct one. Thing is, I like his music and think that, as a singer, he's one of the best in the history of pop music (yeah, yeah we already had a thread arguing this one back and forth) and so for that lame fan reason . . . . I don't *want* him to be guilty. But he may be guilty and, regardless of his guilt about these charges, he has only himself to blame for the trouble he's in now, as his conduct since the first settlement was just bound to alarm people. But about his actual guilt I'm reserving judgement until the trial runs its course.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

fair enough - if its any consolation, he definitely wouldn't be the first person with questionable morals and/or a criminal record to have created great art. But I'm sure yr aware of this...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 23:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I just read that MJ may call Stevie Wonder as a witness. Stevie Wonder! Witness!

Oh, and Kobe Bryant. That'll win over the jury.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 00:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I said this on another thread, but parade of celebrity witnesses = dumbest legal strategy ever.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, Shakey, this story makes me a bit more inclined to believe Michael...

schwantz, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 00:22 (twenty-one years ago)

haha yr reading Fox News!

But anyway, I agree the prosecution seems a little hystrionic in playing up the "kidnap" angle (bad choice of words). But showering yr victim with gifts, trips, etc. is totally common pedophile tactic, and in this case the prospective "victim's" response makes total sense psychologically. I posted this on another thread, from a criminology/psych site on pedophilia:

"The Target Child: The pedophile often seeks out shy, handicapped, and withdrawn children, or those who come from troubled homes or under privileged homes. He then showers them with attention, gifts, taunting them with trips to desirable places like amusement parks, zoo's, concerts, the beach and other such places.

Stockholm Syndrome : It is not unusual for the child to develop feelings for the predator and desire their approval and continued acceptance. They will compromise their innate ability to decipher good and bad behavior, ultimately justifying the criminal's bad behavior out of sympathy and concern for the adults welfare. This is often compared to Stockholm Syndrome - when victims become attached emotionally to their captors. "

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)

For my 2 cents, guilty or no, it pisses me off that THIS crap, and all the wacko jacko crap is what he'll be remembered for by the time he does kick the bucket. Like Prince & all his stupid name changes.
Why can't they just be our dancing monkeys and leave it at that?

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:09 (twenty-one years ago)

oh I think Prince's music will outlive his 90s shenanigans. But no, Jacko won't be so lucky (but then he only has a couple of great albums to Prince's 10+, the relative ratios of wacky behavior:great music are different).

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

oh come on, Prince's wackest songs are wacker than Jacko's

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:15 (twenty-one years ago)

What makes me angry is that if the allegations are true, then it seems to follow that these kids' parents basically pimped their children/turned a blind eye in exchange for houses, cars etc. "Well y'know we thought it was a bit weird but he bought us a Rolls Royce so we didn't think too hard after that..."

Ben Dot (1977), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"oh come on, Prince's wackest songs are wacker than Jacko's"

hm mmmmmmaybe. but Jacko has a lot more wack songs than Prince does. I think quantity is a big issue here. But there's gotta be a Prince vs. Michael Jackson thread already...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Taking Sides: Michael Jackson (Justin) vs Prince (JC)

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

whoops nevermind, that thread title is totally misleading...

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:34 (twenty-one years ago)

kind of *not* OTM with that thread link. :)

Prince seems to move on from the wack songs, as many as there are. (I like Musicology a lot, so I use that as my example of moving on. damn the torpedoes)...whereas with MJ, bad songs linger, nay, cling to him, like barnacles to a ship. You have to clear your head of so much of MJ's badness to recall the cool stuff.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Why can't they just be our dancing monkeys and leave it at that?

-- VegemiteGrrl

i'm sure you didn't mean any racist undertones here, but still something about this post rubbed me the wrong way.

jonviachicago, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:40 (twenty-one years ago)

an innocent man
He has plenty of gr8 music if he can find a better record company than sony.

La Camilla Henemark, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm sure you didn't mean any racist undertones here, but still something about this post rubbed me the wrong way.

how fun! I was being a coward & hoping no-one would notice, since I realised my mistake afterwards. (in fact i'm sure you heard the forehead slap from where you're sitting.)

A poor turn of phrase in retrospect, especially given the artists I referenced. In my head it was meant in a broad sense, re: performers in general. ie. why all the extra baggage. why not just great performances.

apologies for counter-directional rubbing. forward motions only from now
on...

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I started writing a long post on how MJ could make a comeback by distilling himself to his vocal and songwriting talents, but I've scrapped it. The dude, the guy who I once thought was the epitome of all awesomeness, is weird. He'll never come back. Yeah, he should take his own life.

You know what would happen? Everyone would start talking about how incredible, how influential he was. VH1 would play his videos around the clock. He'd have the biggest, most star-studded funeral you'd ever seen. Albums upon albums would be released a la 2Pac. He'd sweep the Grammies. He'd be the biggest news story of the year. Everyone would finally refer to him as the King of Pop, just like he wanted.

Wookie Rookie, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I.. highly doubt that. People never really forgot Elvis in the 70s, though there is enough cognitive dissonance among many today to ignore his latter years. I think the same would apply to MJ.

donut debonair (donut), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm inclined to disagree there. the King didn't have to publicly refute child molestation claims. He was weird, but I think MJ's situation is a little further down the road than Elvis ever got. I mean, if this trial & others like it continue, if any kind of admission was ever made, the man would become a true pariah, assuming he isn't one already (okay so he is a pariah. would you believe *more* of a pariah?) there's a love/hate
divide that's far more vehement with mj than there ever was with elvis.
It's harder for cognitive dissonance to occur in his situation.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

it'll be a footnote. didn't roman polanski rape a 13 year old? wasn't he given a standing o at the oscars? didn't elia kazan get a lifetime achievement award at some other oscars? even though he participated in mccarthyism (or something like that)? and the question is if mj did it now...and as of now he hasn't been convicted of anything.

plus i don't think people hate mj. people hated reagan, but not mj. just maybe a little creeped out by him.

Wookie Rookie, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 06:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I think there are a lot of people out there who hate him because they're creeped out by him. But for his sake I hope it does become a footnote.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 06:56 (twenty-one years ago)

didn't jerry lee lewis married his underage coiusin ?
mj is innocent - they haven't found anything - if they did he would be in jail by now .

homeheartsholidayharbour boy, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

so has everybody around here given up hope for Jacko besides Tracer...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 18 February 2005 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

More or less.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Friday, 18 February 2005 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. Even if he is in fact innocent, I think he should still kill himself.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 18 February 2005 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)

IF HE KILLS HIMSELF, WHAT WILL OUR CHILDREN KNOW OF "MICHAEL JACKSON, THE KING OF POP"?

cutty (mcutt), Friday, 18 February 2005 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Obviously no one here is keeping up with the particulars of the current case.

Proven beyond a doubt:
* MJ has pR0n, showed it to the kids
* MJ is an alcoholic, gave booze to the kids

You can drop the "oh michael is just a innocent child-like man he knows not what he does" crap right now.

I used to think MJ was guilty but would be aquitted, but there are many independant witnesses that corraberate much of the story.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/021505mjgrandjury.html

If anyone is in a death pool, put MJ in. Suicide is assured.

mjfan, Friday, 18 February 2005 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

IF HE KILLS HIMSELF, WHAT WILL OUR CHILDREN KNOW OF "MICHAEL JACKSON, THE KING OF POP"?

The Tragedie Of Michael Jackson will have a brilliant ending.

Jimmy Mod always makes friends with women before bedding them down (ModJ), Friday, 18 February 2005 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

If you look at that smoking gun website, what it comes down to is that Jackson had some porn in his bedroom/bathroom, and that it was common or garden heterosexual porn. If anything, that's kind of reassuring. Porn involving "nude pictures of boys" actually turns out to be an art book of Bruce Weber photos. Whether he showed porn to boys is wide open to speculation, given the pressure the boy would have been put under by his very dodgy mother and the investigators. That the boy might have known that the porn was there anyway does not mean Jackson showed it to him. After all, who wouldn't have had a good snoop around Jackson's bedroom given the chance? I don't know whether he's guilty or not but I'm amazed at the moronic lynch mob mentality on this thread.

the voice of reason, Friday, 18 February 2005 09:58 (twenty-one years ago)

If MJ kept pR0n for his own personal heterosexual masturbatory needs, where is the rest of the evidence for his heterosexuality? There isn't any that can't be easily dismissed. If he is masturbating to adult women, why isn't he fucking them instead of hanging out with little boys?

The mother is very dodgy, which I why I think MJ is likely to be aquitted, but per Larry Feldman's testimony, if she were after money, MJ would be writing her a check by now.

mjfan, Friday, 18 February 2005 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know whether he's guilty or not but I'm amazed at the moronic lynch mob mentality on this thread.
-- the voice of reason (voiceofreaso...), February 18th, 2005.
i agree - he should be innocent until proven guilty.

jichael mackson, Friday, 18 February 2005 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

If MJ kept pR0n for his own personal heterosexual masturbatory needs, where is the rest of the evidence for his heterosexuality? There isn't any that can't be easily dismissed. If he is masturbating to adult women, why isn't he fucking them instead of hanging out with little boys?
The mother is very dodgy, which I why I think MJ is likely to be aquitted, but per Larry Feldman's testimony, if she were after money, MJ would be writing her a check by now.

-- mjfan (mjfa...), February 18th, 2005.
If he is masturbating to adult women, why isn't he fucking them ?
you my friend are contradicting yourself - if he masturbares it's because he isn't fucking them

jichael mackson, Friday, 18 February 2005 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

your bully mentality of the innocence should be stopped.
i pity you meanies.
this song seems relevant,now:
MICHAEL JACKSON LYRICS

"Leave Me Alone"

Aaow!-Hoo Hoo!

I Don't Care What You Talkin'
'Bout Baby
I Don't Care What You Say
Don't You Come Walkin'
Beggin' Back Mama
I Don't Care Anyway
Time After Time I Gave You All Of My Money
No Excuses To Make
Ain't No Mountain That I
Can't Climb Baby
All Is Going My Way

('Cause There's A Time When
You're Right)
(And You Know You Must
Fight)
Who's Laughing Baby, Don't
You Know
(And There's The Choice That
We Make)
(And This Choice You Will
Take)
Who's Laughin' Baby

So Just Leave Me Alone
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Leave Me Alone-Stop It!
Just Stop Doggin' Me Around
(Just Stop Doggin' Me)

There Was A Time I Used To
Say Girl I Need You
But Who Is Sorry Now
You Really Hurt, You Used To
Take And Deceive Me
Now Who Is Sorry Now
You Got A Way Of Making Me
Feel So Sorry
I Found Out Right Away
Don't You Come Walkin'-
Beggin' I Ain't Lovin' You
Don't You Get In My Way
'Cause
(There's A Time When You're
Right)
(And You Know You Must
Fight)
Who's Laughing Baby-Don't
You Know?
(And There's The Choice That
We Make)
(And This Choice You Will
Take)
Who's Laughin' Baby?

So Just Leave Me Alone
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Leave Me Alone
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Stop It!
Just Stop Doggin' Me Around
(Just Stop Doggin' Me)

('Cause There's A Time When
You're Right)
(And You Know You Must
Fight)
Who's Laughing Baby, Don't
You Know, Girl
(It's The Choice That We
Make)
(And This Choice You Will
Take)
Who's Laughin' Baby

So Just Leave Me Alone
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Leave Me Alone
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Stop It!
Just Stop Doggin' Me Around
Leave Me Alone
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
(Leave Me Alone)
Leave Me Alone
(Leave Me Alone)
Leave Me Alone-Stop It!

Just Stop Doggin' Me Around
(Just Stop Doggin' Me)
Don't Come Beggin' Me
Don't Come Beggin'
Don't Come Lovin' Me
Don't Come Beggin'
I Love You
I Don't Want It
I Don't . . .
I Don't . . .
I Don't . . .
I . . .I . . ., Aaow!
Hee Hee!
Don't Come Beggin' Me
Don't Come Beggin'
Don't Come Lovin' Me
Don't Come Beggin'
I Love You
I Don't Want It
I Don't Need It

jichael mackson, Friday, 18 February 2005 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

That Grand Jury transcript contains a phone number that is apparently for Neverland - you'd think that kind of thing would be edited out.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 18 February 2005 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

so did anyone else notice in the jury selection stories today that one of the potential jurors in the pool had been a guest at Neverland who's children had stayed there? WTF?!? How does someone like that sneak into the jury pool... on the other hand I don't think its a good sign that there are no black people on the jury. sorta suspicious, that.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 February 2005 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, this is Santa Barbara County, I believe -- I can't say I'm all that surprised.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 February 2005 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I do like how the story I read referred to a couple of the jurors as "a 20 year old who likes the Simpsons TV show" and a 79-year old woman who thought Deepak Chopra was a rapper. yessir, this is gonna be interesting.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 February 2005 01:27 (twenty-one years ago)

michael touched me! in my heart andf in my soul.

thats why i became atrue believer in hubcaprishuddah and potentialed my actualities.

no longer will star pay no longer more for these tears in my emotinal resonaces.

the lord saviours (latebloomer), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:12 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/LegalCenter/story?id=532585&page=1

poortheatre (poortheatre), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:42 (twenty-one years ago)

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=534515

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Sunday, 27 February 2005 05:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know what to think anymore:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0228051jacksonopenings1.html

schwantz, Monday, 28 February 2005 22:48 (twenty-one years ago)

this is a horrible, horrible thread title, so I'm just goin to post this instead:

"Undermined by obvious expectation — anticipated noise is ritual not disruption — the Gallery achievement can only ever be meagre. Yes, Oswald can mock the pop icons he parasites off, but his slash-free technique — his insight, such as it is — never takes wing against his fellow radicals. As long as he can’t and won’t turn the same techniques inward, the context ain’t abundant, but inert: the physical collage of intention and necessity delivers nothing but obscurantist rustle, and (in Oswald’s case) rampant flesh-eating envy. Michael Jackson is the target which put Oswald on the avant map: at the heart of Jacko’s vast Mad Ludwig II fairycastle, circled as it is with grim yokel villagers bearing flaming torches (and that’s just his FANS haha), might not Michael, this very weird, monstrously gifted fellow — ruinous faults and all — nevertheless actually be sculpting message-in-a-bottle sound art, hidden in the plainest sight, that’s better, deeper, stronger or stranger than ANYTHING in Boom? If even the risk that he might be is a priori ruled out — if Gorguts and Cryptopsy are by definition as disbarred from the Hayward as — oh, I don’t know — So Solid Crew and Eminem, then what exactly does the inclusion of Oswald achieve, except bad faith?" ('NOISE pt.II')

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 28 February 2005 22:55 (twenty-one years ago)

> I don't know what to think anymore:

> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0228051jacksonopenings1.html

"Mom is scam artist" and "MJ diddled the kids" are not mutually exclusive.

I think the defense has a huge problem if it can't explain the very strong evidence that MJ gave the kids booze and pornography. Attacking the mother is not enough.

mjfan, Monday, 28 February 2005 23:49 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah as far as I'm concerned, both sides accusations about the other seem pretty well grounded, but they are def. not mutually exclusive.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 28 February 2005 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I say the mom as scam artist evidence will have more of an effect than the circumstantial drinking evidence. MJ's attorneys could exploit the fact that nobody saw him personally giving booze to these kids at neverland at this specific timeframe.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)

guilty.....as....fuck.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I was in the MJ is guily as anything camp, but I wasnt convinced by the DA's opening argument. Or at least the reinterpretation of it by the smoking gun. Perhaps thats the problem.

Either way, Mr. Jackson needs to go to a mental hospital for a long, long time.

Dude, are you a 15 year old asian chick? (jingleberries), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)

well yeah, burden of proof's on the prosecution. However, MJ's defense strategy doesn't seem too bright to me - and they've already lost in terms of the evidence that's been admitted (porn/liquor), so that doesn't bode well. Parade of crackpot celebrity witnesses may totally offset whatever gains the defense makes in vilifying the accuser.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah...given how well hollywood/celebrity endorsements worked for john kerry in the election, i'd be careful if i was the prosecution on parading a bunch of washed up wingnuts before the jury.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

uh, it's the defense that wants to call Kobe Bryant, Deepak Chopra, and Macaulay Culkin...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)

JACKO'S CHIMP TO TESTIFY... DEVELOPING...

No, really.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 02:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say - that from what I've read about this trial - Mike might well be innocent. He seems to have a fondness of straight porn, perfectly acceptable straight porn at that, and so it doesn't make much sense that's he's going to get his jollies out of young kids. If he was then surely a man of his wealth might have filmed or taken pictures as many peds do?!

He has admitted to sleeping in the same bed as young kids, which shows how dumb he is (if he was really guilty would he even have admitted in that first place??)... but I am just not sure he's involved in touching them up.

With the porn and the alcohol he sounds drastically lonely. Maybe he is a closet Smiths fan?

Zarr, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)

"controversial"

Who did release magic family out from the base of $499 (deangulberry), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

It doesn't really matter what the mother's motives were or whether it was straight porn or gay porn ( there were men's magazines confiscated too, apparently) . A grown man getting little kids drunk and watching porn with them is pretty damning to me. If the jury is convinced he actually gave them alcohol, well, he's doomed.

My guess is he'll plead guilty to a lesser charge with the condition that he seeks help. He'll either get house arrest or probation but I'd be very surprised if he went to prison.

Jeff K (jeff k), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1278711.jpg

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah if the alcohol+porn+kids all together scenario sticks to Jackson, he's well and truly fucked.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)

The accuser's little brother "acknowledged having lied in a deposition taken in 2000 as part of a lawsuit by his family against a J. C. Penney store. The boys' mother had complained that she was sexually assaulted and the family beaten by security guards there after the older brother - Mr. Jackson's accuser - apparently took some clothes without paying for them. The family received a $100,000 settlement."

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)

ah ye olde "the rape victim was a slut!" defense.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)

seriously I don't see any reason why *everyone* can't be guilty in this case. extortionists and child molesters - like chocolate and peanut butter!

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

Proper thieves too, don't forget that.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

Is "Daily Star" roughly the same kind of mag as "Midnight Star" as describes by Yankovic in that song?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

I wonder if Jacko has visitors to the ranch investigated, so he can molest only those that will never be believed. Didn't the earlier case (about 10 years ago) have a similar deal with the kid's family?

nickn (nickn), Thursday, 10 March 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)

uh, it's the defense that wants to call Kobe Bryant, Deepak Chopra, and Macaulay Culkin...

yes...that was a supposed to be "defense" not "procecution"...my bad. no jesus juice or rides on the ferris wheel for me.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 10 March 2005 01:47 (twenty years ago)

http://photos6.flickr.com/6222272_dd85a251a3.jpg

my friend quintin is the court reporter for the santa maria times. he is the only reporter allowed in the courtroom during the trials. this blows my fucking mind.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 10 March 2005 01:50 (twenty years ago)

Is anyone watching the acted-out recaps on the E! network?

(BTW, it's a copy editor's nightmare to cast that sentence as, "Is anyone watching the acted-out recaps on E!?")

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Thursday, 10 March 2005 02:46 (twenty years ago)

>(BTW, it's a copy editor's nightmare to cast that sentence as, "Is anyone watching the acted-out recaps on E!?")

My favorite observation of the week. My fave line of the week goes ro Steve Schneider re: The Jacket:

"It's always a good thing when a movie exploits the universal fear of being tortured by Kris Kristofferson."

ianinbrooklyn, Thursday, 10 March 2005 05:24 (twenty years ago)

people like to sneer at the author, but this is worth reading esp. the last couple paras...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22015-2005Mar9.html

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Thursday, 10 March 2005 11:55 (twenty years ago)

the "scientists will discover" bit of the second last para is vintage tina: "oh will we ever know what goes on the minds of the LITTLE PEOPLE?"

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 10 March 2005 12:01 (twenty years ago)

Reading Tina is a glimpse into something above and beyond my little world, not sure exactly what. I appreciated the bits about "the outer limits of narcissicism" and the Oscar Wilde comparison. Anxiously awaiting MJ's letters from Redding (CA) Gaol or maybe Michael Jackson Live at Folsom Prison.

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Thursday, 10 March 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)

"i am the damned/i am the dead
i am the agony inside a dying head"

MJ's LPs since thriller have all been sort of inadvertent (?) postcards from inside the horrible prison of his own mind/life: how many clues did he need to give us, really, that All Was Not Well? celebrity seems to fuck w.the wits even of those totally contemptuous of it

i wish he had the self-knowledge and guts to turn all this* into the strongest, weirdest, punkiest, dancin'est music of his life, though i am kinda certain he doesn't and won't

*ie whatever the outcome

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 10 March 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)

don't forget the immortal lyric: "jew me/sue me."

shookout (shookout), Thursday, 10 March 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)

four weeks pass...
ihttp://www.jest.com/current/0402CoverPic.jpgi

shookout (shookout), Thursday, 7 April 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.