NYT op-ed on the unavailability of early gospel recordings

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I admit I know next to nothing about gospel, especially anything that was never put on CD. Nonetheless if what he says is true, 'tis a shame. Somebody should digitize this guy's collection and put it on the web.

OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Gospel's Got the Blues
By ROBERT DARDEN

Waco, Tex.

AT the Grammy awards on Sunday, viewers saw the marriage of old-time gospel and new: the classic artists Mavis Staples and the Blind Boys of Alabama performed a medley with a young musician, Kanye West, that included Mr. West's gospel-tinged hip-hop song, "Jesus Walks."

Blessed with a rock-solid foundation, contemporary gospel is thriving. In the past decade, new releases have been selling copies in the millions - a major milestone in a musical genre that emerged in the 1930's, when the songwriter Thomas Dorsey set the words of Sunday morning to the music of Saturday night. But the early gospel may soon be lost forever. Although albums by the legendary Mahalia Jackson are easy to find on CD, of the thousands of tracks recorded by less known greats like Clara Ward, the Sensational Nightingales, the Roberta Martin Singers, Sallie Martin, the Georgia Peach and the Spirit of Memphis, only a few are available.

Why is this music so difficult to find, or even hear, today? Although small gospel labels still release classics, and reissue labels like Document Records and Collectables have repackaged some Golden Age music, these companies don't have the wide distribution of the major labels and mostly depend on mail and Internet orders. In fact, catalogs of early gospel labels are mostly owned by the large corporations that dominate the music industry. For the most part, these companies have released only a few classic albums on compact disc.

For an unabashed fan like me, it's a painful situation. I realize that no corporation is going to put out albums just to please a few aficionados, but they may not realize that many people want to hear this music. Each time I do a radio interview and play a classic gospel song, the phone lines immediately light up. The callers need to discuss what this music has meant to them. They invariably ask where they can buy it and most of the time I have to tell them they can't.

Classic gospel can experience the same success that major-label reissues of jazz and blues have enjoyed in the last two decades. It was once difficult to find the jazz masters, but reissues of John Coltrane, Charlie Parker and dozens of others have brought labels renewed sales, a new audience and critical acclaim. These reissues came about because of the aggressive lobbying by jazz lovers and the foresight of a few label executives. The same can happen with early gospel.

Music historians should also get involved: major record labels can form alliances with archivists like the Smithsonian, Rounder Records and the Library of Congress. Each day, irreplaceable master tapes deteriorate, get lost, or are simply tossed out.

It would be more than a cultural disaster to forever lose this music. It would be a sin.


Robert Darden, an assistant professor of English at Baylor University, is the author of "People Get Ready! A New History of Black Gospel Music."

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Wait, huh? Did this guy miss Goodbye Babylon entirely?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Classic albums from the 30s??? Wasn't it all 78 singles back then?

The Argunaut (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

Tracklisting of what I'm talking about. I'm not saying everyone should have it immediately in their memory but considering that this is his thing and all, I'm terribly surprised he hasn't heard about this, it just came out last year. He could have at least referred to it as a solid starting point for further investigation by others.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

Wow, I didn't know this set existed, looks great.

But none of the artists he mentions are on there...

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

A brief ILX thread on same, with further recommendations:

Should I spent $100 I don't have on the Goodbye Babylon box set?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

MASTER TAPES from the 30s deteriorating? Buddy, they're long gone. Try one lifetime of record collection and archiving.
Goodbye, Babylon is incredible, btw. Well worth the one goat cost, esp. for the disc of sermons.

The Argunaut (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

but ned goodbye babylon is a very limited collection (although it's very good). here's a good piece about gospel in the digital age.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

But none of the artists he mentions are on there...

Hm, and you're right at that (aside from Mahalia, unsurprisingly).

Also, he seems a bit suspicious of the ability of 'small record labels' relying on mail/Internet orders when that might yet be the best approach in a modern situation -- Dust to Digital is hardly a massive corporation, after all, and look what they did. I dunno, this is a useful call to arms in general 'hey this stuff is here and it's worth looking into,' but I think he's looking towards some sort of Oh Brother Where Art Thou? level of popularity as the sole approach.

but ned goodbye babylon is a very limited collection (although it's very good)

Well, you have to start somewhere, though -- the Anthology of American Folk Music (which I can only assume this fellow has in mind as an unspoken model, thus the Smithsonian invocation in part) was a solid initial first step, though again hardly everything as I'm sure you'd know far more well than I. Basically I'm just saying he seems to be ignoring some potentially striking groundwork already done -- the attention the set got would have been a significant bolster to his argument that something more could happen.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

was a solid initial first step

I should clarify -- for its 'field,' however generally defined, and for its time and place in terms of archiving the past.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)

i personally like the yazoo collections of pre-war gospel, sacred blues and bluegrass more than goodbye babylon. they demonstrate how that early mountain and gospel music was an amalgamation of everything that was being played on a guitar or harmonica at the time.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

In fact, catalogs of early gospel labels are mostly owned by the large corporations that dominate the music industry.

This strikes me as flatly wrong. *early gospel*? most of the stuff before 1940 is in the public domain now. Anyway, the Document label which he cites has been around for years and easily available on Amazon for anyone who cares. It's *not* that hard to find the stuff. I must have about 20 Document gospel titles that have been sitting in my Amazon want list for a while. Any idiot with a computer and the desire can get tons of the stuff. It's not that hard.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

Well see, Stormy, that's part of the weird tone of the article -- I'm thinking this guy is almost imagining that he'll be able to walk into his local Best Buy and find everything he wants if only those darned companies would put everything out on a major label or something. Which is a bit unfair, but he seems to be relegating the experience of purchasing (and dare I say downloading) music on the Net as being somehow secondary or not as important as the brick-and-mortar approach. These days that's an *incredibly* loaded assumption to make.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)

oh yeah, it definitely reads like an older fellow who still doesn't "trust" the internet yet. Or something.

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

also, yeah, just weird that he's seemingly asking for the major labels to come to the rescue, when the greatest recent archival work has been done by newer independents that are scouring older collections for rare and not-yet-anthologized material. Dust-to-Digital as mentioned, Revenant, and this Old Hat label appears to be doing some great work (not straight-up gospel though; I think there is some on that Joe Bussard thing.)

Stormy Davis (diamond), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

I agree it's a confusing stance: it's not clear if he's arguing that there are a large number of recordings that have *never* been put on CD (e.g. the "irreplacable master tapes" line), or if they have been remastered and are just hard to find. If it's the former, it's definitely a bad thing. If it's the latter, well, that's going to happen to almost every non-rock/pop genre sooner or later. For instance, nobody's going to be pressing CDs of minor items in the Blue Note catalog in ten years.

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

Kevin Nutt's radio show of dusty gospel on WFMU, Sinner's Crossroads, is insanely great. This doesn't have too much to do with this thread, but I thought I'd mention it.

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.