Taking Sides: Bashing Pitchfork OR Bitching about Bright Eyes

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
In 2005 there are at least 10 threads about how much Bright Eyes sucks and/or is "overexposed". More noise please! Do you have a blog or are you a paid writer? Yay!

OR

Maybe you dig the petty jealousy and career envy that is the Pitchfork hate. They are so irrelevant but think they are so important, discuss! Yay!

And I think we know how all the regulars here feel, let's hear from the lurkers and ignored types on this one...

Terri Cloth (TerriCloth), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)

JFWOFWOGJW OJRWOJ GIOWRJIOW REFJIWJFWIO FJEWIO

JOGWJFIWFWO (eman), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)

I'm waiting for the song from Bright Eyes bitching about Pitchfork.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:19 (twenty years ago)

Pitchfork, easy. Though it doesn't happen often, occasionally Pitchfork will introduce me to something I wouldn't have otherwise encountered, and even at their worst, at least I don't have to actually hear the Fork. And nothing they've written is as bad as the album title "Digital Ash in a Digital Urn." Seriously, what the fuck is up with that? WE ARE THE EMOBOTS

Telephonething, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

Taking Sides: Sticking up for Ptchfrk versus sticking up for Brght Eyes

I am of the opinion that, since there are more people associated with Ptchfrk, and hence more hearts therefore to break, it is more ennobling to champiom them, whereas the C. Obert is just one lone mizzundatude geniis dude living a high life (perhaps) Ptchfrkrs, like the rest of us, can only dream about, that to deride betrays not just one's own bitterness but one's own inadequacies in the face of tremndous Dyalanesque talent that in any event in the name of the future of protest folk should not be discouraged or troubled by the jealousies of the little people. This is too hard for me to choose from.

dick hunter, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:26 (twenty years ago)

I like Pitchfork.

On the other hand, Bright Eyes is overrated and well-loved by hacks like Robert Hilburn.

No, I'm not a paid writer. I effin' wish.

[ducks]

ffirehorse, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:36 (twenty years ago)

the answer is "threads about rockism"

Ian John50n (orion), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:38 (twenty years ago)

Dyalanesque talent

Bobo Dyalan?

eman (eman), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:38 (twenty years ago)

what dick said, I dunno about genius but I quite enjoyed the (not very recent) stuff I heard from Bright Eyes, enough to wonder how this impressively airtight anti-BE consensus came to be. Not casting aspersions on people's motives, I just feel like I missed a meeting or something. Pitchfork I don't read enough to really sense a tone, if I got into it(or ran in the kind of circles where Conor Oberst was "overexposed") I might feel the same as everyone else but it seems ok, whatever.

tremendoid (tremendoid), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)

I would like to do Winona.

biobo dylano rooster van pealt, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:40 (twenty years ago)

I would love her well. I would play guitar for her and she could come see my concerts and we could go to parties after.

biobo dylano rooster van pealt, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)

We could stay in hotels on cross country road trip where each morning I'd write about sadness and the state of the union.

biobo dylano rooster van pealt, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:45 (twenty years ago)

if I got into it(or ran in the kind of circles where Conor Oberst was "overexposed")

That's a great point. If you don't have your dumb face in Rolling Stone/Spin/Voice/MTV news or spend all your time sitting in a pub with other blogging tools, you tend not to get overexposed to shit.

Terri Cloth (TerriCloth), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:46 (twenty years ago)

Dusted is better than Pitchfork. Bright Eyes is the greatest American poet since Phillis Wheatley.

Corporal Bunghole, Thursday, 17 February 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)

Dude, Rod McKuen.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 February 2005 04:28 (twenty years ago)

Conor's an ok guy and a great songwriter, but he just makes the kind of mistakes that most musicians his age make in a much more public setting. Writing Fevers and Mirrors at 19, fake radio interview aside, showed that he had some serious talent. He has a horrible, horrible fan base though, is mislabeled as emo, and makes some horrible, over-earnest lyrical choices like these:

While a coroner kneels
Beneath the great wooden crucifix
He knows there’s worse things than being
Alone.

And so I’ve learned to retreat
At the first sign of danger
I mean, why wait around if
It’s just to surrender

And ambition I’ve found
Can lead only to failure
I do not read the reviews
No I am not singing for you

and then wonders why rock journalists are still giggling at him behind his back.

Matt P., Thursday, 17 February 2005 06:22 (twenty years ago)

I'd like to add that every person I've ever talked to about meeting Bright Eyes in person has said that he's a rude jerk. I've never heard anybody say otherwise.

Cunga (Cunga), Thursday, 17 February 2005 06:41 (twenty years ago)

pitchfork has no higher a terrible-to-decent review ratio than any other music site or mag. it has consistency issues, i think, and it suffes a little bit from the NME disease of over-estimating its own importance and influence. but, y'know, it's something to do at work. the Bloc Party review was a new low, however.

little Conor O might be a tool, and indeed, 'digital ash...' does suck in name and perhaps in content, but you cannot deny the man 'Lifted', which was and remains lovely.

fsharp (fsharp), Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:29 (twenty years ago)

and then wonders why rock journalists are still giggling at him behind his back

I thought rock critics were slobbering all over him, giving him too much press and calling him the new Dylan?

I'd like to add that every person I've ever talked to about meeting Bright Eyes in person has said that he's a rude jerk

So does everyone hate the Fall as well? I agree that there is enough great music out there that if someone rubs you wrong in any way, it's easy enough to kick them out of your record collection and replace them with someone you could have a pint with. But this doesn't come into play across the board and seems a little too convenient as justification for joining the mob. Not to mention that the "he's a rude jerk" verdict could come from complete psychos for all we know, or worse, web-based music critics who never left high school.

Terri Cloth (TerriCloth), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

Eh, I don't seem to hate Pitchfork with half as much vitriol as most people. Some of the writing is atrocious, but then, a lot of Rolling Stone/Spin's writing is atrocious too. As far as delusions of grandeur, it really just seems to be Schrieber and it's fairly easy to ignore one person without deriding the whole thing.

Bright Eyes, on the other hand, is just inexcusable. The lyrics are horrible, and that just can't be ignored when you're a Sensitive Singer/Songwriter.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)

Terri, this isn't sixth grade. If some people don't like your favorite band, there's no point in starting a pointless bitchfest over it.

Leon the Fatboy (Ex Leon), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)


You assume, incorrectly, that Bright Eyes is my favorite band. Not true. He lost me at Lifted...mainly due to repetition. And I agree with the people above that the lyrics can be rough to take.

I find myself defending him in this thread because the attacks are more "6th grade", as you say, than the Pitchfork arguments, which seem fairly reasonable. This is in contrast to the other Pitchfork bashing threads, probably because I've asked for opinions from non-writers and their evaluations are more about Pitchfork and it's product than some of the personal hang ups that color the majority of the posting here.

There's plenty of immaturity here and elsewhere on the board, but thanks for stopping by.

Terri Cloth (TerriCloth), Thursday, 17 February 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)


I don't buy any argument about whether reviews are "right" or "wrong." Wouldn't we rather read decent writing we can argue with than inane buyers guides? (Career envy was a nice phrase, btw.)

Pitchfork discredits itself every time they make the "incisive" and cunning observation of the order that Gang of Four's come-back contradicts (!) the radical anti-capitalist message of its youth. Pitchfork should acquire some politics and integrity of its own before it re-opens the olde "don't preach to me" bag. As to Bright Eyes, he probably shouldn't drink so much.

Michigan J, Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

Bitching about Bright Eyes wins because no one pretends Pitchfork is a wee lil kid even though it's been an adult for six whole years the way they do with Conor.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

I like your points, Michigan J. Yeah, Pitchfork may rave about something dubious, and I've been sucked in and regretted it as much as anyone, but they are also funny and inject some life into the tired world of reviewing CD's. They are cringe-worthy whenever they touch on politics, or review someone who touches on politics on their records - I have noticed that, and rarely give those reviews much thought.

I'm surprised no one has brought up Conor's apparent drinking problem as a thread, or a blog for that matter, there does seem to be something there. But the Texas thing that got everyone riled up seemed kinda nit-picky.

Maybe that should be a new thread:

Taking Sides: Badmouthing Texas While Drunk (Bright Eyes) OR Calling Ray Charles a N***** while Drunk (Elvis Costello)

I'm sure all the people who can't stand Bright Eyes because he's a "jerk" who "hates Texas" also do not listen to "What's so Funny About Peace Love and Understanding"...

Terri Cloth (TerriCloth), Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)

The Bloc Party review was a new low, however.

(British accent) Wus' rong wit it? It was fine. It wasn't one of their best reviews ever, but it didn't stand out as terrible. Besides, Nitsuh is a pimp-- he's the only PF staff member to ever give Souvlaki any love.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

This thread should be titled "Bashing Pitchfork AND/OR Bitching about Bright Eyes" because I want to have my cake and eat it, too.

I'm just kidding. Big ups to Schreiberfork, all up in my monitor, hollerin at my (bright) eyeballz! And nothin but love for my lil man Conor O. Yer slayin em, kid, buckin down hearts, spittin mad tears. Word is bond, son!

Yo, is it time for recess yet or WHAT!?!?

Broken Hipster (Broken Hipster), Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

(Re: Bloc Party I'm still trying to figure out what was so terrible about it myself. Dear Detractors: please send carefully reasoned hate mail! I never thought you could piss so many people off by going "yeah, they're pretty okay.")

nabiscothingy, Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
I think he's pretty fucking wonderful.

But I believe that lovers should be tied together
And thrown into the ocean in the worst of weather
And left there to drown
Left there to drown in their innocence
But as for me, I'm coming to the final chapter
I read all of the pages and there's still no answer
Only all that was before I know must soon come after
That's the only way it can be

I stand in the sun and I breathe with my lungs
Trying to spare myself the weight of the truth

Saying everything you've ever seen was just a mirror
And you've spent your whole life sweating in an endless fever
And now you're laying in a bathtub full of freezing water
Wishing you were a ghost
But once you knew a girl and you named her Lover
And danced with her in kitchens through the greenest summer
But autumn came, she disappeared, you don't remember
Where she said she was going to

But you know that she's gone because she left you a song
That you don't want to sing

Singing, I believe that lovers should be chained together
And thrown into a fire with their songs and letters
And left there to burn
Left there to burn in their arrogance
But as for me I'm coming to my final failure
I've killed myself with changes trying to make it better
But I still ended up becoming something other
Than what I had planned to be

Now I believe that lovers should be draped in flowers
And laid entwined together on a bed of clover
And left there to sleep
Left there to dream of their happiness

= wonderful.

Hello., Monday, 15 May 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

Is "Hello" how you pronounce "Chloe"?

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Monday, 15 May 2006 03:41 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.