For Bright Eyes fans ONLY: C/D Digital Ash In A Digital Urn

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

As per the title, if you hate Bright Eyes and think Conor's a douche, please dont respond. We know what you think, its all very clever (and im beginning to think justified).

But in all honesty, i really dislike this CD. It just seems like a colossal missed opportunity. Only three songs (gold mine gutted, take it easy, and Easy/lucky/free) seem to have any real merit to me. Its a shitty cure album trying desperately to be a shitty radiohead album. I would rather hear a new Desaparecidos album any day of the week, which was the plan apparently before Conor decided to go all Nelly on us.

so, what do you think? am i wrong?

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)

Delete thread, fuck this wanker for saying we can't reply

Fat Anarchy on Airtube (ex machina), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

nope, you are more or less spot on. i don't like the same three songs, but three is about it. i kind of feel that 'I'm wide awake...' might have suffered for it, too, although that it a much much better album.

you can understand why he did it, but a bit more restraint would have served him well. maybe that's a lesson he'll learn when he gets out of puberty.

fsharp (fsharp), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

No. 'I'm wide awake' is great, exactly because Conor has put his rather juvenile romance with death, nirvana (not the band), nihilism and insignificance behind him. This seems to have not affected 'Digital ash' at all, however. He constantly goes "There's happiness in death", "To the deepest part of the human heart the fear of death expands" and "I'm completely alone at a table of friends/ I feel nothing for them". Damn.

On the surface, the record seems like Conor breaking new ground (musically, that is). But in reality, it's a return to his somewhat lame death schtick. This prevents the music from sounding any more interesting to me than a half-baked, upbeat Tortoise record with a twist of death.

Jay-Kid (Jay-Kid), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

next time post a picture we can see.

Jay-Kid (Jay-Kid), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)


and Fat Anarchy, im not telling anyone what they can or can't do. its just gotten to the point that Bright Eyes is as polarizing as any politician and i only wanna hear from a certain segment of fans.

JD from CDepot, Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

I don't think Bright Eyes is polarizing

Fat Anarchy on Airtube (ex machina), Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

they rile people up more then any noize dude band!

bnw (bnw), Thursday, 17 February 2005 22:14 (twenty years ago)

Time for bed, Jonathon.

Star Cauliflower (Star Cauliflower), Friday, 18 February 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)


Those are some GREAT pictures

JD from CDepot, Friday, 18 February 2005 02:10 (twenty years ago)

next time post a picture we can see.

Jay-Kid (Jay-Kid), Friday, 18 February 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

Jon shut up and let the Bright Eyes fans reveal themselves

A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Friday, 18 February 2005 12:19 (twenty years ago)

I haven't listened to it all the way through since I bought it, but I do love Light Pollution and a couple of other tracks. They sound a bit more dynamic than I'm used to from him and it's a fine experiment. Not at all awful.

dan. (dan.), Friday, 18 February 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

I can't really stand "Digital Ash", I think the other one is MUCH MUCH better.

Adam Bruneau (oliver8bit), Friday, 18 February 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)

"Rabbit Hole" is the only DAIADU song that I've heard, but I like it. Our BX has a few copies on sale for $8.95; if they have them when I go shopping this afternoon, I may pick up one.

John Fredland (jfredland), Saturday, 19 February 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)

eight years pass...

did it all get real? i guess it's real enough

markers, Monday, 29 July 2013 17:08 (twelve years ago)

Digital Ash definitely suffers in comparison to I'm Wide Awake It's Morning but "Easy/Lucky/Free" and "Hit The Switch" are both fantastic.

The Butthurt Locker (cryptosicko), Monday, 29 July 2013 17:26 (twelve years ago)

we'll lay in bags as dead as leaves

markers, Monday, 29 July 2013 17:31 (twelve years ago)

nothing nothing nothing nothing

markers, Monday, 29 July 2013 17:31 (twelve years ago)

nine months pass...

i think it's time to re-visit this album

soxahatchee (Treeship), Wednesday, 7 May 2014 03:11 (eleven years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RozuwUlX7MI

markers, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 03:16 (eleven years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Civ21ANF3zI

markers, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 03:19 (eleven years ago)

was bright eyes one of the first of the recent batch of acoustic indie dudes to "go electric"?

soxahatchee (Treeship), Wednesday, 7 May 2014 03:31 (eleven years ago)

but yeah, those two tracks are incredible. i think they're as good as anything on "i'm wide awake, it's morning." i actually prefer the stark, electro production to the acoustic stuff because it foregrounds his divisive voice and lyrics and strips those elements of any cutesy indie accoutrements. on these earlier records oberst sounds like the voice of arrogant self-righteous youth incarnate. like shelley in queen mab or like someone distilled early bob dylan to just those elements that people found most unbearable. like, this sense of moral purity and precocious world-weariness, an unearned disappointment with the world. it's brilliant and every teenager should be like this.

soxahatchee (Treeship), Wednesday, 7 May 2014 03:49 (eleven years ago)

i'm heading to bed in a minute, but i bookmarked this to get back to tomorrow

markers, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 03:52 (eleven years ago)

i rly liked "light pollution".

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 11:21 (eleven years ago)

the alcoholism song's great too, with the verses that speed up. i've got a friend who says, hey anytime. unless that offer's expired. i have been less than frequent. she's under no obligation to indulge every whim.

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 11:29 (eleven years ago)

or like someone distilled early bob dylan to just those elements that people found most unbearable.

lol.

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 7 May 2014 11:32 (eleven years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJxi1Odfjk

soxahatchee (Treeship), Thursday, 8 May 2014 04:14 (eleven years ago)

sort of wish we were polling this instead of just a bump. just looked and i still own this CD. liked both album at the time but really these were no way close to as good as his masterpiece Lifted or The Story Is in the Soil, Keep Your Ear to the Ground.

Bee OK, Thursday, 8 May 2014 04:24 (eleven years ago)

Let's poll!

Funk autocorrect (cryptosicko), Thursday, 8 May 2014 04:56 (eleven years ago)

Cannot listen to this guy after his defamation case against a woman who accused him of rape.

boxedjoy, Thursday, 8 May 2014 07:00 (eleven years ago)

whoa. i hadn't heard about that.

soxahatchee (Treeship), Thursday, 8 May 2014 12:55 (eleven years ago)

Yeah, that was unpleasant. Like, I don't think he's a rapist and I do believe that he was genuinely hurt/offended by the accusation, but this is exactly the most irresponsible way to go about refuting the charge.

Funk autocorrect (cryptosicko), Thursday, 8 May 2014 12:57 (eleven years ago)

what is the responsible way to go about refuting the charge?

Mordy, Thursday, 8 May 2014 13:06 (eleven years ago)

Well, probably just 'ignoring' it after the verdict..

I remember P.Weller was once accused of the same, but was found not guilty (or was not actually trialled, more likely), nobody thinks of him as having 'got away with it' but how do you know?

Mark G, Thursday, 8 May 2014 13:45 (eleven years ago)

is it irresponsible because it discourages those who were actually raped from speaking out?

the glimmer man (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 8 May 2014 13:56 (eleven years ago)

Yes.

Funk autocorrect (cryptosicko), Thursday, 8 May 2014 17:26 (eleven years ago)

gotcha, thanks. sorry for being a bit dense and coming across as dude asking if obviously correct answer is the right one. but I had to ask because I haven't done the reading (I should do the reading).

the glimmer man (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 8 May 2014 17:54 (eleven years ago)

It's a horrible situation to be in if it is a false accusation but anything that would actively discourage victims of a crime coming forward is so wrong.

boxedjoy, Thursday, 8 May 2014 18:37 (eleven years ago)

i can't fault him for bringing a defamation suit against his accuser. i don't think he should have to sacrifice his reputation, or jettison any tools he might have to address the hit his reputation has already taken, bc of considerations about other unrelated rape victims. if you accuse someone of a crime you can't expect them to martyr themselves.

Mordy, Thursday, 8 May 2014 18:44 (eleven years ago)

As I recall, he made a pretty strong public statement prior to the defamation suit. It got the point across, and if I were him, I would have left it at that. Perfect? Hell, no. But better than doing something that encourages further victimizing victims.

Funk autocorrect (cryptosicko), Thursday, 8 May 2014 19:00 (eleven years ago)

So I just went ahead and polled it.

Funk autocorrect (cryptosicko), Monday, 12 May 2014 03:51 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.