Mojo Magazine: Classic Or Dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Everyone in the States seems to love Mojo. Whereas here I get funny looks from my friends if I buy it. Whatever is going on?

Tom, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I don't love it, I acknowledge it. ;-) Now that it seems to have ceased going through every dead bluesman and pretending Motown '63 was the sole apex of pop culture, it vaguely raises more flashes of interest, but I'm not interested in constant archaeology.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I prefer Uncut, at least you get some good free CD's with it. I dont think I ever bought Mojo, it never appealed to me although there are some good writers like Barney Hoskyns on it.

Michael Bourke, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I've only bought Mojo a few times, but I usually check it out in the bookstore. I like that their writers give a shit about music and are knowledgeable about it and don't take their readers for morons. I like the mix of old and new, and the English bias is much less grating than in any other UK mag (no "The Stereophonics: Best Band In The World" bullshit there).

Patrick, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Make that "British bias". The Stereophonics are Welsh. Oops.

Patrick, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

It's probably a good magazine, but totally not my cup of tea. If I'm in WHSmiths it's not the kind of magazine I'd look at...usually I just flick through NME and Kerrang and occasionally Classic Rock. The only music publication I make a point of buying is Robots and Electronic Brains.

jel, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Here you go, Tom. Someone in the States who loathes Mojo. Even in my English-magazine-reading phase, I hated Mojo. I never found anything I wanted to read back in the day, and those years were enough to make me never pick it up again. Godawful, the world is not about what a guitarist did 72 years ago, but even if you do want to discuss it, a COVER????

Ally, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I've been buying Mojo a lot lately. Partly it's that I'm so old it's caught up with the kind of music I should have got into when I was younger but didn't - like the latest issue has a great everything-you- ever-wanted-to-know-about-the-Pixies article. the good thing about Mojo is that when it does cover something you like it covers it well and in-depth.

Pihkal Boy, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Too much reverence for Dylan, Hendrix, Clapton... But some great articles over the years. The Kraut Rock/Byrds issue (April 96?) was good, as was the XTC article which came out just before their 'comeback'. The Cult Heroes issue last year was good even though the cult heroes were a little predictable.

Uncut is better - has better writers and an overall less stuffy outlook. They need to cut down the amount of 'Americana' though, and they seem to fall for any singer songwriter who comes along (Slaid Cleaves, Eileen Rose, Jim White -no thanks). We could do without coverage of Neil Young's every fart, too. That said, I have to say it's great as Mr. Jones the esteemed editor and doyen of rock journos is a neighbour and we use the same fish and chip shop. OK - no more namedropping in future.

Dr. C, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'm agreeing with whoever said that whenever Mojo covers something you like, it's excellent. But most of the people they cover aren't people I like. I buy it anyway, mind.

Uncut covers more of what I like but in a True Path Of Rebel Rock way I find increasingly rubbish. Too much mythology, not enough insight.

Tom, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Admittedly, it's one of the first magazines I'll flip through when standing at the rack. I'll buy it occasionally, depending on the amount that interests me or the need to read something that isn't on a screen. There are a number of bones to pick, but I've yet to glance at a periodical that approaches a truly obscene level of appeal. I don't recall the particular issue, but there was a recent one that got me pretty excited about buying records. Several years back, print magazines used to do that more often.

Andy, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Never even touched the magazine. The name already reeks of sick reverence to the same ol'white boys club. And since I refuse to read another word on the subject of Dylan, Young or Reed I wisely (so it seems) steer clear. So...dud?

Omar, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Very occasionally has something worth reading, but in the main it's middle-aged middle of the road tosh. This month's issue has a huge feature on prog rock. Says it all really.

Ally C, Wednesday, 7 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Though it has way, *way* too much coverage of the canonical 60's/70's bands - "Procol Harum: the untold story" type piffle, there is usually some nice articles to be found in it.

Take the March issue for example. Though it has a disturbing amount of space devoted to ELP and a wretch inducingly hideous front cover, there is a really fantastic article on the Pixies by David Cavanagh. It is worth buying just for that, though I did feel embarassed buying it.

Nicole, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I totally agree about the David Cavanagh Pixies article: and I did feel embarrassed buying it. But not as embarrassed as buying Loaded for the interview with Lisa from Steps. I'd rather buy soft porn than lad's mags.

alex thomson, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I too enjoyed that Pixies article, which I encountered in the best way possible -- namely, I just borrowed a friend's copy that he happened to have with him. No money exchanged, no guilt!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Even the stuff I don't like is interesting to me to read about, so any rock magazines are OK as long as you don't actually have to buy their latest issue. (Rock magazines that they have in the library here(*) - MOJO, Q, Aussie ROLLING STONE...pretty grim selection I gotta admit. Rock magazines I read if they're lying round at a friend's place - WIRE, OPPROBRIUM, obscure American fanzines with articles about their (my friends') bands in 'em. Rock mags I have actually bought in the last few years - 2nd hand copies of old '70s ones (esp. CREEM)). By that criterion (i.e. being current doesn't matter much), MOJO is a pretty good one 'cause its bias is so largely archaelogical anyway...I don't think that's a bad thing as such...it's true of course that most of their writers have pretty old-geezerish tastes - yeah well DUH - but you know what, they're much worse when they write about modern stuff than when they're doing a career autopsy of yet another geezer icon, that's 'cause old guys have even worse taste in 'modern' music than fuckin' teenagers. (Not me tho') (* = Dunedin)

Duane Zarakov, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

...yeah & if yr going to pick on a mag merely for being old-geezerish & square, Q is about 1,000,000 time worser than MOJO. Although at least Q has jokes. (Albeit the kind yr uncle would make)

D.Zarakov, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Q is a thousand times worse, because it pretends to be up-to-date. The problem with MOJO is not what it does cover but what it doesn't - the careful research etc. is always interesting when applied to bands you actually want to know about.

Tom, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Funny. I like Nick Drake far more than I like most people Mojo covers, but the last feature they did on him, while well-written in its way, was essentially as irrelevant and nonsensical as could be parodied or imagined ("I AM LIVING IN THE COUNTRYSIDE ..."; yes, wake up, MacDonald, we know, we know). And the one before that thought it necessary to show us the fucking magazine from Drake's prep school in 1962.

But on other occasions when covering people I like, Mojo pull it off magnificently. The Gainsbourg piece was the last such example.

Tom and Dr C are right about Uncut, I think. Half the time it's fascinating (Reynolds's Kid A thinkpiece, Paul Morley's everlasting way with the language, Chris Roberts making even the hackwork of the film soundtracks roundup read as though he's taking the utmost pleasure from the whole thing), but often you feel as though those involved should get out a little more and stop thinking Americana and singer-songwriters are, like, timeless and worth covering in perpetuity. It's all Jonesy's fault, of course. I could rerun some of Taylor Parkes's jokes about Jones spending most of his spare time roaming the prairie but actually knowing so little that he thought a Jimmy Nail track was by Mark Eitzel, etc., but you've probably got the idea.

I think there'd be a consensus round here about who the good and the bad Uncut writers are. And the bad ones would be those who would fit best into Mojo.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Yeah, Q is from "look-at-us-we-know-what's-going-on-really" hell. It doesn't have Mojo's saving grace of actual knowledge and affection for the past (which is a million times better than pretending you're hip).

Whatever I may have thought of Mojo, I've never considered it to be nauseatingly smug and self-satisfied as Q is. Q, after all, is edited by the sort of people who jack it all in to write scripts for EastEnders.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 8 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Q is indeed beneath contempt. It's really intended to sit on the coffee-table underneath 'Good Housekeeping'. Except Dad gets it out and puts it on top of the pile when his 'mates' come round. (Whaddya mean - how do I know?)

Anyway let me spring to the defence of Allan Jones. I think it's to his credit that he's managed to put together so many interesting writers (Penman, McDonald, Morley, Stubbs, Roberts) on one journal. For that we should let him have the odd Waylon Jennings interview.

Does anyone else find Nigel "5 stars" Williamson as unintentionally funny as I do. Is there an artist or genre that this man does NOT like? He seems to give everything from Spooky Tooth to Sade the same cheerily favourable review.

Dr. C, Friday, 9 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Dr C:

"Anyway let me spring to the defence of Allan Jones."

Oh, I wasn't trying to criticise him - I think even the MM writers who took the piss had a respect for him, and an admiration for him; he wrote hardly at all for the Maker in his last few years there, and he was probably wise to adopt a background role, but he's clearly the sort of person who knows how to hold the thing together (more than he actually knew the music it was covering by then), and he mercifully steered it away from dumbed-down discourse, tacky features and flagwaving during his last 3 years there (when such things were already a disease over at the NME). Jones was the sort of editor whose importance you didn't realise until he left; the speed of the MM's decline immediately after his departure in March 97 proves that, and I'm ultimately prepared to forgive him however many dodgy things he may like. Reynolds excepted, you've listed all the "good" Uncut writers I was thinking of.

"Does anyone else find Nigel '5 stars' Williamson as unintentionally funny as I do"

He was the sort of "bad" Uncut writer I was thinking of. Dreadfully gushing writing and horribly retrogressive tastes for the most part. Uncut's bland dadrock downside.

Robin Carmody, Friday, 9 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Very rarely pick it up because of the price, but I do enjoy it. It's crammed w/ so much detail, and I love how they cover all the records in an artists' career when they do a big feature. It's fun, come on! But hardly the place to look for unique commentary.

Question: How come all the obsessive mags like this come out of the U.K.? Are there ANY American mags that cover music in the manner of a Mojo? I honestly can't think of one. Somebody point me in the right direction.

Mark Richardson, Saturday, 10 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I don't think you really see anything this focused on music in the states because the media conglomerates that publish the bulk of the magazines in America want *huge* circulation figures -- it would not be considered worth their while to sell the amount of magazines that Mojo sells. That's why magazines like Rolling Stone, the music is really more of a secondary concern to cuddling up to the flavor of the moment celebrity.

Nicole, Saturday, 10 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Richard Ashcroft on the cover... a big note about "progressive music"...

DUD!!!

Marcos, Monday, 12 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Strange how the above two tendencies fit so well with each other ...

Robin Carmody, Monday, 12 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

mojo. the ramones/ny article was superb. was worth $$$ just for the cover. i prefer when they do articles on more 'recent' (ie post-punk) stuff as i can relate to it. but i have to say the articles on bands i hate (eg queen/genesis/quo) have been a blast to read. which is something i never find when i read q. thankyou. www.ireallylovemusic.co.uk

mark emsley, Tuesday, 13 March 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

two months pass...
First the Smiths, and now Cobain on the cover. The boomers must be dying off.

Mark, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

And Thom Yorke on the next one! They're not even waiting for bands to become inactive anymore. At this rate cLOUDDEAD will be on the cover in another few months.

scott p., Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

eight months pass...
more honest than "opprobrium" where nepotism is cheap equivalent to mojo-ish timed press release/CD re-release, chief culprit Nick Cain track "slam-ducking-kid" of Opprobrium Du(h)ll Too "high-brow" space rock'n'puns'n'pans

George Gosset, Monday, 18 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mojo is sometimes readable - and I have even occasionally done the odd piece for the bloody thing in the distant past - but not when it falls into "Top 100" hell, as it has done this month ("Top 100 people whose names we pulled out of a hat before lunch" - no thanks).

But the long historical pieces I do find useful, especially when regarding acts/artists about whose history I feel I ought to know more, e.g. Patto or ELO.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 18 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Slightly more to the Top 100 hell this month but also quite frustrating - what theyve done is asked loads of people their 'heroes'. A lot of this is "wow that Jimi could really play his guitar" which is fine but hardly enlightening but there are glimses of something very interesting, when they ask some of the oldest living musicians about their influences and heroes and the people reach back to a time before even Mojo-history starts.

Tom, Monday, 18 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

Mojo's a darn good read even if they do tend to suck up to the unholy trilogy of Dylan, Beatles and the Stones.

However I now avoid the letters page at all costs, it's either gee you guys are rilly great for covering (insert name here) or someone complaining about the fact that they've dared to put Abba or Michael Jackson on the cover. Especially since the articles on the 'pop' acts are often more strange and interesting than the Lennon mended my bicycle ones they usually have.

Billy Dods, Monday, 18 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

four years pass...
i want you to send me a magazines and cds
p.o.box os189
Osu Accra
Ghana

desmond abladey, Monday, 22 May 2006 15:49 (seventeen years ago) link

YOU LISTENING, MOJO?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 22 May 2006 15:58 (seventeen years ago) link

I like the special issues. You can read them pretty fast cover to cover because of so many pictures. The last I read was a Rolling Stones and it had some great shots like Keith hanging out with his dad, multiple pics from Have you Seen your Mother Baby drag photo shoot, and lounging around at Laurel Canyon house with a nude groupie and Mick Taylor serving in tennis. All with the stories behind the shots.

Carlos Keith (Buck_Wilde), Monday, 22 May 2006 21:57 (seventeen years ago) link

As someone who is actually into reading about retro stuff, I have to say I prefer Mojo to Uncut.

As great as The Beatles, David Bowie, Pink Floyd, Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan and Neil Young are, there is still a limit to how much new stuff you are able to dig out about them.

Which makes Mojo more interesting because they aren't afraid to do a feature on Gerry & The Pacemakers, The Moody Blues, The Animals, Pete Seeger or David Crosby instead.

Plus Mojo does actually attempt to turn their (mainly 30-40-50 something) readers into more recent stuff too, that is, recent stuff that Mojo finds good (and the Mojo staff has a considerably broader taste in recent music compared to the Americana crazed Uncut staff)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 22 May 2006 23:11 (seventeen years ago) link

It's funny, I've stopped liking Mojo since Phil Alexander took over as editor yet i liked RAW and Kerrang when he edited them(also presented Raw Power on TV)

Stevie Chick does get some good bands in Mojo(and Kerrang too).
I suppose having read Mojo for years now ive read about every band they cover. If they stopped repeating themselves and covered some more obscure acts I either haven't read much about/or heard of, i might buy. Then again would that sell?

Its time they gave Parliament/Funkadelic a front cover and just devoted the entire magazine to them and all the spin offs. That would make great reading.

Someone should write a really good pfunk book.

Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Monday, 22 May 2006 23:21 (seventeen years ago) link

Would it make great circulation though? I doubt it, not with their demographic. I'd certainly buy it, but would anyone else?

(I speak from the perspective of someone who for two years unsuccessfully lobbied U***t to give Todd Rundgren the front cover and 30 pages inside)

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 07:00 (seventeen years ago) link

Latest odds for the first hip-hop act to get a full Mojo front cover:

4-5 Public Enemy
Evens Beastie Boys
7-4 Outkast
2-1 Eminem
4-1 Wu Tang Clan (Up from 5-1)
8-1 Jay Z
12-1 50 Cent (down from 8-1)
15-1 Run DMC/LL Cool J
40-1 Dizzee Rascal
50-1 bar

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:02 (seventeen years ago) link

Of course, if Jesus Jones ever make a comeback...

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:21 (seventeen years ago) link

hmm. People buying a magazine because Jesus Jones is on the cover....

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:25 (seventeen years ago) link

Bear in mind the Mojo IT'S ALL GONE WRONG SINCE demographic.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Mojo

Odds to appear on the front cover

Wire 20-1
Throwing Muses 40-1
The Stranglers 75-1
Underworld 100-1
King Crimson 200-1
Killing Joke 250-1
The Associates 400-1
The Chameleons 500-1
Rush 1000-1
Porcupine Tree 10,000-1

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:35 (seventeen years ago) link

Ringo Starr evens

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:38 (seventeen years ago) link

Ringo's had his own front cover already when they did one of their special fleece the punters 4 different Beatles covers.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:40 (seventeen years ago) link

Have Talking Heads had a Mojo front cover?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:42 (seventeen years ago) link

There are never enough Beatles covers as far as Mojo are concerned!

Nick Hornby - evens

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:43 (seventeen years ago) link

Have Roxy Music had a Mojo front cover?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 08:45 (seventeen years ago) link

I get a digital subscription and the music is not included, unlike The Wire.

Chevy Chase drumming mystery (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 16 August 2023 11:33 (nine months ago) link

Sometimes, when flicking through this at the big supermarket, the CD will fall off into my trolley and only be discovered once I have left the shop.

dardnest thing....

Last time that happened was the Grateful Dead live CD.

my opinionation (Hamildan), Wednesday, 16 August 2023 13:21 (nine months ago) link

I tried that with the Bob Dylan "Blonde on Blonde"

#WhatThese2LPSOfficer?

#notreally

Mark G, Wednesday, 16 August 2023 14:11 (nine months ago) link

I think people still share the cd on pirate bay regularly.

Someone has been posting the monthly PDFs of the magazine to usenet since 2015. Also, they're very easy to find on slsk, just search on "mojo 2023 pdf" (or whatever year). You can find many other mags on slsk the same way.

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 17 August 2023 07:31 (nine months ago) link

one month passes...

30th anniversary edition out now

"THIS MONTH’S COVERMOUNT CD is Buried Treasures – a compendium of tracks from the secret classic albums uncovered by MOJO’s Buried Treasures column. Features The Prisoners, R.J. McMahon, Joe Meek, Nic Jones, Connie Converse, The Beau Brummels, Third World War and more!"

didn't actually pick up a copy because the contents didn't look great, Dylan, oasis... probably more

koogs, Sunday, 24 September 2023 13:42 (seven months ago) link

It’s a rather self indulgent issue. Includes a short article for each year of the magazine’s existence featuring the usual suspects among a bunch of articles on how great the magazine is and has been. The cover disc is pretty good though.

treefell, Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:22 (seven months ago) link

yeah enjoyed teh cd. Still don't have it all elsewhere which just ain't it.
Don't know why I don't have Third World War
& hadn't heard of that closing folk track.

I keep buying magazines that I don't read all of and still intend to. Mainly reading books and not keeping up with what I'm picking up there either. May be reading more tahn I did last year still though not sure.

Stevo, Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:29 (seven months ago) link

They've announced that starting with this 30th anniversary issue, the CDs will once again be available on international newsstand copies.

an icon of a worried-looking, long-haired, bespectacled man (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:49 (seven months ago) link

my experience of working on magazines when they achieve eg their 30th is that everyone (justifably) sees it as a good excuse for a little holiday

hence all the reprinting of ancient content: it doesn't need re-copyreading or re-proofing so we have time pat ourselves properly on the back for longevity and general amazeballsness

mark s, Sunday, 24 September 2023 15:55 (seven months ago) link

I'm still waiting on mine.

It's in the shops, but.

Mark G, Monday, 25 September 2023 06:36 (seven months ago) link

one month passes...

Rolling Stones and a cd of "old weird blues"

https://images.bauerhosting.com/marketing/sites/16/2023/10/MOJO-361-cover-Rolling-Stones.jpg?auto=format&w=1200&q=80

koogs, Thursday, 26 October 2023 18:33 (six months ago) link

Disappointing that "Bob Dylan's Secret Treasures" isn't a revelation that he's been burying caches of gold along the stops of the never-ending tour for dedicated fans to find after he's passed.

blatherskite, Thursday, 26 October 2023 18:57 (six months ago) link

one month passes...

was kinda hoping the people who regularly get Mojo would update this thread on every new issue, save me having to make a special trip to whsmiths every month (or whs as it is now)

anyway, i think december's cd was a roundup of the year, featuring nobody that i can remember, and january's, which is in the shops now, is another Heavy Nuggets volume

koogs, Sunday, 24 December 2023 17:02 (four months ago) link

I get the digital version which does not come with the cds or even a download, which I somewhat regret. I’m generally not a fan of the new stuff Mojo champions but I liked the heavy nuggets series in the past and other historical trawls.

Expansion to Mackerel (Boring, Maryland), Sunday, 24 December 2023 17:26 (four months ago) link

(December was a Beatles cover, Jan is Stevie wonder

i could just post this and then have to remember to click it once a month
https://www.mojo4music.com/magazine/latest-issues/ )

koogs, Sunday, 24 December 2023 17:49 (four months ago) link

Doesn't sound completely terrible xps

THIS MONTH’S COVERMOUNT CD is The Best Of 2023. Features tracks from MOJO’s favourite albums, by artists including: Lankum; Everything But The Girl; Rickie Lee Jones; The Coral; Wilco; Grian Chatten; Julie Byrne; Young Fathers and more!

groovypanda, Sunday, 24 December 2023 17:59 (four months ago) link

Last act calculated to outrage the Mojo core reader on name alone

bae (sic), Sunday, 24 December 2023 18:16 (four months ago) link

Still very “chuffed” the album I made the art for won Mojo’s Best Electronic Album Of The Year. Been reading this magazine for 20 something years, I think.

SQUIRREL MEAT!! (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 25 December 2023 00:34 (four months ago) link

Congrats!

Expansion to Mackerel (Boring, Maryland), Monday, 25 December 2023 02:19 (four months ago) link

Thanks!

SQUIRREL MEAT!! (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 25 December 2023 08:09 (four months ago) link

It's a great album (and cover).

Still think of James Holden as a progressive/trance DJ so didn't realise he was now making albums like this

groovypanda, Monday, 25 December 2023 11:25 (four months ago) link

Thanks, groovypanda.
His albums have morphed and progressed over the last few releases. Check out his Animal Spirits project if you haven't. It was a huge honor and surprise to be asked to contribute since I've been a fan of his recordings for a while.
As for the artwork - I also made a 12 page booklet that comes with the vinyl and cd (and pdf with Bandcamp digi) versions of the album.

SQUIRREL MEAT!! (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 25 December 2023 11:48 (four months ago) link

It's a lovely sleeve, Captain - congrats!

impostor syndrome to the (expletive) max (stevie), Monday, 25 December 2023 13:23 (four months ago) link

one month passes...

I'm obliged to mention that someone Out There is posting most/all of the Mojo CD comps to alt.binaries.sounds.lossless.rock. If you know what that is, you'll know how to find them.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 27 January 2024 03:40 (three months ago) link

three weeks pass...

Feb was Wings, including a compilation called Jet

Mar is The North Will Rise Again with a compilation of Manchester bands and liam on the cover. didn't entice me to buy it.

koogs, Thursday, 22 February 2024 15:16 (two months ago) link

sucks so bad that as a digital subscriber I don't have access to the CDs.

B. Amato (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 22 February 2024 16:16 (two months ago) link

Must have been in another thread that I posted this, but it also sucks that Mojo and Uncut seem to have largely disappeared around here. Between a nearby killer newsstand and the local Barnes & Noble I was always able to pick these up, but I haven't seen a new issue of either in many months.

Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 22 February 2024 16:18 (two months ago) link

two months pass...

supermarket stocks mojo so i do notice when they change. anyway the new one.

Jun 2024

Kate Bush – The Early Years is this month’s cover story. Everything from her early demos through Wuthering Heights to Never For Ever. Plus! An insider relives the incredible Tour Of Life. Also in the issue: The Yardbirds – the whole story; Scott Walker’s Climate Of Hunter at 40; Beth Gibbons returns; Tangerine Dream’s synth madness; Labi Siffre – famous at last. And: Crowded House; Curtis Mayfield; Anita Pallenberg; Steve Harley; Nirvana; Leyla McCalla; Richard Thompson; Lou Reed; Buzzcocks; Minutemen.

THIS MONTH’S COVERMOUNT CD is MOJO WORKING!: 15 slices of raucous, raving, rumbustious British R&B by The Yardbirds, Manfred Mann, Graham Bond, Cyril Davies, Geno Washington, Alexis Korner and more!

koogs, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 11:35 (two weeks ago) link

I wrote the Minutemen story - 4-page oral history on the making of Double Nickels, with new/unpublished interviews with Mike Watt, Bob Mould, Kira Roessler, Joe Baiza, Joe Carducci, Ray Farrell and David Fricke.

Buy magazines, they rule.

Big Bong Theory (stevie), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 13:58 (two weeks ago) link

Greatt article! Gotta go back and listen to the album

Are you addicted to struggling with your horse? (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 14:30 (two weeks ago) link

Haven't read it in age, but I was at an airport, saw it and thought now is the time. Enjoyed all of it, but especially the Minutemen article - nice work stevie! Quite moving tbh.

woof, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 14:37 (two weeks ago) link

Yeah Mojo and The Wire have just completely disappeared around here, haven't seen an issue in bookstores or newsstands for many, many months.

Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 15:10 (two weeks ago) link

For me it's that I don't really go into newsagents much any more - I never see it to think about buying it. Anyway, just subscribed.

woof, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 15:17 (two weeks ago) link

Ah thanks Boring and Woof! Have interviewed Mike W a number of ties and he never fails to leave me verklempt - the thing about thinking Ulysses was a happy, exciting book until rereading it when he was 40 ("The book didn't change, but I had") hit me hard on this one.

Big Bong Theory (stevie), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 15:17 (two weeks ago) link

yeah it was very insightful. I love autodidacts

Are you addicted to struggling with your horse? (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 15:26 (two weeks ago) link

[xp by which I mean when he reread it at 40 he found it to be a sad book]

Big Bong Theory (stevie), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 15:33 (two weeks ago) link

I wrote the Minutemen story - 4-page oral history on the making of Double Nickels, with new/unpublished interviews with Mike Watt, Bob Mould, Kira Roessler, Joe Baiza, Joe Carducci, Ray Farrell and David Fricke.

Wonderful. I was actually hoping for this earlier this month when I played through all of their records after seeing so many people on social media commemorate D. Boon's birthday on April 1. Still frustrating that Mike Watt was never able to release an uncut remastered edition of Double Nickels - he definitely tried but I guess Greg Ginn blew him off.

birdistheword, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 19:33 (two weeks ago) link

Have yet to hear anyone (other than Mugger) speak fondly of Ginn.

Big Bong Theory (stevie), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 19:52 (two weeks ago) link

How did other bands get their masters back? Offer Ginn a lot of money or go through the courts? Money something I assume Watt and others don't have.

Toshirō Nofune (The Seventh ILXorai), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 20:21 (two weeks ago) link

Mojo is absolutely killing it as of late. I know rock is dead and all but it's kind of wild that there's no American magazine left that's going to put Pearl Jam on a cover in 2024

The SoyBoy West Coast (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 20:26 (two weeks ago) link

xp I think you just need to get some solid lawyers to confront SST and Ginn rolls over. A couple of catches: doesn't work if the band members can't agree to terms and clear the way for lawyers to move forward (see Hüsker Dü) and even if Ginn concedes, he hasn't done shit to properly maintain or store the masters, so even though you get back the rights, the physical masters may be lose (see Meat Puppets)

birdistheword, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 20:29 (two weeks ago) link

*lost

birdistheword, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 20:29 (two weeks ago) link

I know it's the wrong mag, but Select has a cover mount of Can Live tracks this month..

Mark G, Tuesday, 30 April 2024 21:21 (two weeks ago) link

I think that's Uncut, didn't Select go away a long time ago?

Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 30 April 2024 21:24 (two weeks ago) link

Oh yeah. Uncut. Opps.

Mark G, Wednesday, 1 May 2024 13:13 (two weeks ago) link

xp I think you just need to get some solid lawyers to confront SST and Ginn rolls over. A couple of catches: doesn't work if the band members can't agree to terms and clear the way for lawyers to move forward (see Hüsker Dü) and even if Ginn concedes, he hasn't done shit to properly maintain or store the masters, so even though you get back the rights, the physical masters may be lose (see Meat Puppets)

― birdistheword, Tuesday, April 30, 2024 3:29 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

i spoke with this directly with terry katzman about the husker du stuff (terry ran reflex records for the huskers) before he died, they did have lawyers - the same lawyers that dino jr. and meat puppets used i think he said -- but the husker contract was different and had some more onerous language in it that they could not overcome. the band was actually all fairly united (at least as united as huskers get) and behind the project. ginn does not just roll over by any means.

so they could do the savage young du boxset, because that was largely based on terry's tapes and pre-sst. the original plan was to work with numero on a reissue series of the entire catalog - i think he said the idea was to have sets where it would be a remastered album then another disc of outtakes and/or live performances of that era.

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 1 May 2024 13:22 (two weeks ago) link

^^^ oh maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan

Are you addicted to struggling with your horse? (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 1 May 2024 13:31 (two weeks ago) link

yeah it's a tragedy that it never happened and now that Terry is gone it never will, he had so much energy to make it happen he cared way more about that band than the members did

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 1 May 2024 13:41 (two weeks ago) link

Yeah, the impression Bob gave me last time I interviewed him is that they had lawyers, they'd approached Ginn, but that it was just too hard, and in the end he's just written it all off as a lost cause. It's such a shame.

SST seem to have bumped up their vinyl represses over the last couple of years, but I don't see them doing any deluxe reissues with outtakes, etc, and that's a shame. I remember telling Carducci when I was researching my Flag book that it was a tragedy they weren't celebrating the back catalog that way, and that the CDs didn't sound great and could do with a remaster at the very least, but he argued that they sound fine. Still...

Big Bong Theory (stevie), Wednesday, 1 May 2024 13:44 (two weeks ago) link

Interesting and very sad. I was going by that interview Grant did where he claimed Bob was asking for too much control and too big of a share of the catalog in order to get it away from SST, but I guess a lot happened after that bump in the road.

birdistheword, Wednesday, 1 May 2024 20:56 (two weeks ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.