Mike (Producer SDR)
PS: Independent Rock Record Label Silver Dragon Records is based in Houston Texas and features Independent Rock Bands like our newest act Hard rock music icon and Houston indie rock band Lazarus X's . We also offer free resources for musicians. We offer tips on submitting a demo, getting signed rock music history rock CD’s and T Shirts, Download free rock mp3s recording music Houston music recording information, and much more.
― Mike Davis, Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:12 (twenty years ago)
??????
― hobart paving (hobart paving), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 10:18 (twenty years ago)
― Speedhump Bungle (noodle vague), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 11:44 (twenty years ago)
― Dr.C, Wednesday, 23 February 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)
http://ilx.wh3rd.net/newanswers.php?board=2
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 12:01 (twenty years ago)
― Speedhump Bungle (noodle vague), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 12:03 (twenty years ago)
pop-gnarled long noses-flies on broomsticks-strange outfits-casts spells
dance-invoked by full moon-hairy-can only be killed by silver bullets-mostly guys
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 12:12 (twenty years ago)
Of course the fact is that just about any and every sort of music imaginable could be and in most cases already had been released on independent record labels; so inevitably the term immediately became completely and utterly meangingless.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 12:48 (twenty years ago)
― frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 12:52 (twenty years ago)
2. Can't sing
3. Can't write
4. Records sound crap
5. Crap live
6. Look crap
7. Just crap in general
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:14 (twenty years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:19 (twenty years ago)
...the never-ending debate. I stick with the indie label definition. Until the late '80s bands were 'alternative', or whatever sub-genre, whereas the term 'indie' was applied purely to the labels. As far as I can remember, it was the C86/EEC Punkrock Mountain thing that coined the phrase for the style ... although every sinlge one of those bands was on a tiny indepdent, hencethe term. I don't think it was until sometime later when majors tried to recruit the style of band associated with C86 etc. (eg Food records signing Blur), that the term became misused. I say 'misused', because such a variety of indie labels sprang up after punk, ranging from jazz-inspired stuff, sheer experimentalism, '60s pop etc. etc. and you vcannot really bracket all of that stuff together.
― Jez (Jez), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)
Of course the term "alternative" was inevitably and predictably rendered meaningless by over-use within a matter of minutes of its introduction; although naturally this fact was not officially acknowledged until several weeks later.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:53 (twenty years ago)
it means something, to most people, even if that is no longer "independent label" etc.
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)
The drummer of a band I used to be in; which, I suppose for want of a better adjective, could have been loosely described as "indie"; used to insist quite vehemently that he hated punk - and he would get quite upset and indignant when I pointed out that most of the cover versions we did had been written by punk bands (Buzzcocks, Jam, Vibrators....) and that his own favourite bands (The Cure and U2) had both emerged from the punk scene.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:19 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)
Does what record label they're on factor into this equation anyweher and if so what's it's significance?
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)
and it's contextual at the grammy franz ferdinand = indie at ATP franz ferdinand =/ indie?
― elwisty (elwisty), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)
The idea was that this was music Major labels wouldn't touch as it wasn't deemed commercial, or universally accessible ... hence the release on an independent label.
― Jez (Jez), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)
So we ended up with a situation where the type of bands that previously would only have been able to get signed to independent record labels, were actually getting signed to the majors.
Obviously this meant that it became a nonsense to continue to differentiate between bands that were otherwise comparable in every respsect, simply because of the size of the record label that was releasing their records; so it all ended up geting called "indie".
Add in to the equation at this point - just to confuse maters further - a number of formerly "independent" record labels and distributors being acquired by "majors"; several "majors" creating a number of subsidiaries that were deliberately designed to look and act as if they were independent (except with the added clout of the "major" behind them when it was needed, of course) so that the once clearly-defined lines of demarcation between "indie" and "major" became blured beyond all recognition, and at this point all the tag "indie" actually referred was some intrinsically vague (and inherently irrelevant) concept of something that the the majors might not previously have been prepared to release historically, but which they were probably quite happy to get involved with at least to some extent now....
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)
The opposite of this is true too, with independent labels putting out non-indie style music cos they can sell it to indie fans.
I'm thinking of indie hip hop, Helen love style pop-indie stuff etc.
― mei (mei), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)
― wombatX (wombatX), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)
Strains belonging to this genus are isolated specifically from cases with black-grain eumycetoma. The fungus enters the human body via trauma and the progression of mycetoma is very slow which may take several years. Mycetoma remains localized and involves the cutaneous and subcutaneous tissues, the fascia, and the bones. Tumefaction and draining sinuses are typical.
A combination of antifungal and surgical therapy is usually preferred for treatment of cases with mycetoma. Ketoconazole yields favorable response rates when used for polonged durations of as long as 8 to 24 months. Griseofulvin may be used in patients who do not respond to ketoconazole.
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)
viagra distros? keepin' it hard and all.m.
― msp (msp), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)
xpost That seems like it may be a little closer to the mark, if heavy on value judgments;)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)
i'm not so sure of that. where do you draw the line? what about labels that appear to be independent but have major company investment? or labels that are entirely independently owned but have major distribution? or labels that are owned in whole or in part by a major but use indie distributors? what about, say, V2? etc etc blah blah can of worms yadda yadda yadda.
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)
Nevertheless there are certainly some labels that are very clearly "indie" and some that are very clearly "major" but as fact checking cuz points out above there's a huge number that fall into some grey area in the middle.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 24 February 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)
What makes a boy cry?
What makes a rock rock?
― alext (alext), Thursday, 24 February 2005 13:02 (twenty years ago)
― 57 7th (calstars), Thursday, 24 February 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)
The same people who think Spiderland is a good album like them.
― skint, Thursday, 24 February 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
What makes a man start fires?
― Ken L (Ken L), Thursday, 24 February 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 24 February 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)