30 most overrated, 8 years later

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A group of rock critics released a list of the "30 most overrated albums of the rock era" in May 1997. I was curious to see what folks thought of their pontifications nearly 8 years later. The list is inside.

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 02:56 (twenty-one years ago)

John Mayall, "Bluesbreakers with Eric Clapton" (London, 1965) - This wasn't the first white blues album to make the mistake of thinking that slick guitar playing was more important than credible singing, but it was definitely the most egregious. (Christgau)

Jefferson Airplane, "Surrealistic Pillow" (RCA, 1967) - Take away "Somebody to Love" (which belonged to Grace Slick's first band, anyway), and what you're left with are the worst sins of bohemia: Directionless jamming and pretentious hippie twaddle. (Considine)

Cream, "Wheels of Fire" (Polydor, 1968) - Pare it down to the studio sessions, and this isn't half bad. But live tracks - particularly "Toad" - are deadly. (Powers)

The Who, "Tommy" (MCA, 1969) - No, it's not an opera; it's barely even a Broadway show. And a handful of singles do not a cogent statement make. (Powers)

The Beatles, "The Beatles" (The White Album) (Apple, 1968) - The mother of all overindulgent double albums, its strengths are not enough to justify the amount of filler ("Martha My Dear," "Long, Long, Long") on hand. (Considine)

Captain Beefheart, "Trout Mask Replica" (Reprise, 1969) - Weirdness for its own sake may be worth recording, but this virtually makes a fetish of Beefheart's quirks, in the process undermining the band's musical strengths. (Considine)

The Grateful Dead, "Workingman's Dead" (Warner Bros., 1970) - Though among the band's best, it remains unremarkable countrified psychedelia larded with lumbering hippie jams. (Gunderson)

Velvet Underground, "Loaded" (Rhino/Atlantic, 1970) - Yes, it's got "Sweet Jane" and "Rock & Roll," but in general too much wimpy light and not enough heat. (Browne)

Sly and the Family Stone, "There's a Riot Goin' On" (Epic, 1971) - Except for the great "Family Affair," this aural sludge will have you nodding off faster than whatever Sly was on at the time. (Browne)

George Harrison, "All Things Must Pass" (Apple, 1971) - The all-time most overrated record, it was praised to the skies at the time, and got five stars in the first Rolling Stone Record Guide. (Christgau)

Marvin Gaye, "What's Going On" (Tamla, 1971) - Good as the singles are, the album as a whole is remarkably shallow, more a testament to the arranging skills of David Van dePitte than to Gaye's singing or songwriting. (Christgau)

Allman Brothers Band, "At Fillmore East" (Capricorn, 1971) - Their jams may have seemed timeless if you were in the audience, but on album they're simply interminable. (Browne)

Pink Floyd, "Dark Side of the Moon" (Capitol, 1973) - Dour, airless, emotionally shut down, "Dark Side of the Moon" made a fetish of a form of artistic solipsism that, in rock, came to be known by the same word that got Jocelyn Elders thrown out of the Clinton administration. (Powers)

King Crimson, "Red" (EG, 1974) - Pretentious lyrics and mock-portentous singing is bad enough, but it's the needless complexity of the riffage that ultimately sinks this. Heavy metal with postgraduate pretensions. (Marsh)

Eno "Another Green World" (EG/Virgin, 1975) - Making interesting sounds involves craft; turning them into great music demands artistry. Unfortunately, this album never gets better than crafty. (Marsh)

The Eagles, "Hotel California" (Asylum, 1976) - "Life in the Fast Lane" vividly depicts the excesses of SoCal yuppie culture. The rest is merely excessive. (Gunderson)

Ramones, "Rocket to Russia" (Sire, 1977) - Musically, the Ramones said all they had to say by the end of their first album. All this third LP adds to the equation is a patina of instrumental competence. (Marsh)

Rolling Stones, "Some Girls" (Rolling Stones/Virgin, 1978) - Apart from Keith Richards' "Before They Make Me Run," what at first sounded fiery now seems sloppy, arrogant and affected. Nor has the casual racism of the title tune aged well. (Browne)

Gang of Four, "Entertainment!" (Infinite Zero, 1979) - Funk for people who wouldn't be caught dead with a Rick James album in their library. (Marsh)

Pink Floyd, "The Wall" (Columbia, 1979) - "We don't need no double album / We don't need psychology / No dark glimpses at rock star's childhoods / Hey! Pink Floyd! Leave that stuff alone." (Gunderson)

Frank Zappa, "Shut Up and Play Yer Guitar" (Barking Pumpkin, 1981) - On second thought, just shut up. (Powers)

Minutemen, "Double Nickels on the Dime" (SST, 1984) - Sloppy punk-jazz and even sloppier sub-beat poetry from the most overrated band of the '80s indie rock scene. (Browne)

The Jesus & Mary Chain, "Psychocandy" (Reprise, 1985) - Retro-rock melodies laced with ear-wrenching distortion may work for a single. It does not justify an entire album. (Considine)

Prince, "Sign "o' the Times" (Paisley Park, 1987) - Though there are moments of brilliance ("U Got the Look," for example), others, such as "The Ballad of Dorothy Parker" and "The Cross," are enough to make you doubt Prince's sanity. (Considine)

Guns N' Roses, "Appetite for Destruction" (Geffen, 1987) - It's fine to endorse the cathartic and menacing qualities of the L.A. band's savage rock, but too many fawning pundits ignored the obvious Spinal Tap parallels and, worse, turned a deaf ear to misogyny, bigotry and racism. (Gunderson)

Don Henley, "The End of the Innocence" (Geffen, 1989) - As instrumentally overblown as the worst art rock and as lyrically shallow as any psychobabble. Proof that if you say something stupid with a straight enough face, people will think you're a genius. (Christgau)

Liz Phair, "Exile in Guyville" (Matador, 1993) - Cussing girl singer meets blushing boy critics and a rock queen is crowned. And did anybody ever explain how, exactly, this was supposed to equal "Exile on Main Street"? (Anderson)

Dr. Dre, "The Chronic" (Death Row, 1993) - Some albums seem better in retrospect; this one seems great only because we've heard the singles in remix. (Christgau)

Guided By Voices, "Bee Thousand" (Scat/Matador, 1994) - Badly recorded, Beatlesque song fragments may make for an interesting aesthetic statement. But great rock? Get serious. (Powers)

Smashing Pumpkins, "Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness" (Virgin, 1996) - The only thing more pathetic than wallowing in teenage angst is doing so when you're in your 30s. Billy Corgan's every-note-is-sacred approach to recording doesn't help matters, either.

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Everyone will have huge problems with at least a couple of these.

peepee (peepee), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

help the aged

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I have huge problems with about four, some problems with two or three more, and no problems/indifferent about the rest.

HUGE

The Beatles
VU ("Loaded" is overrated? Compared to their other albums?)
Greatful Dead
Eno

SOME

GnR
Smashing Pumpkins
Rolling Stones

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Marsh is nuts.

a banana (alanbanana), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm actually kinda surprised none of Bowie's 70s albums are on that list. (I mean, I'm thoroughly happy they aren't, that decade of his was peerless.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I am sick to death of everyone always going on about John Mayall's Bluesbreakers, how they were such a genius band, blah blah blah.

Mark (MarkR), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Who wrote the Pumpkins one?

Whenever people pick examples to prove how much filler there is on the white album, they're always songs I love. "Long Long Long"?!

The Sly one seems the second-most mental to me.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

The Chronic comment is pretty right on.

dan. (dan.), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"Long, Long, Long" is filler?!

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

(that was x-post, etc.)

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:14 (twenty-one years ago)

(I hate "Martha My Dear" though.)

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Gang of Four, "Entertainment!" (Infinite Zero, 1979) - Funk for people who wouldn't be caught dead with a Rick James album in their library. (Marsh)

Who might these strange beasts be? NAME NAMES.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm one. Rick James = meh.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:20 (twenty-one years ago)

That Eno blurb should be punishable by strangulation.

greg ginn thought neubauten was bullshit, why don't you? (smile), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, Gang of Four is funkier than Rick James, if you ask me.

I agree pretty strongly with most of the list, except for Entertainment, Dark Side, There's a Riot Goin On, The Chronic. Way to go Christgau for taking on sacred cow What's Goin' On.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I disagree with several (Beefheart, Eno, Go4, Prince, Stones), but that's what lists like this are for. More interesting is what was thought ripe for de-pegging back in the day: Don Henley? Shut Up & Play Yer Guitar??

briania (briania), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)

HUGEST PROBLEM

Considine hating on "Ballad Of Dorothy Pakrer".


I'm gonna use the line in general too much wimpy light and not enough heat in every review whether or not it applies.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't Eric Weisbard & Ann Powers sit around listening to John Cale & The Silos and shit like that? People shouldn't refer to "great rock" anyhow, but especially if their tastes are as placid as that.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)

where was this shit published? I'll give it props for being a lot shorter than Kill Your Idols.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Whoops. Should've included the identities of the haters, uh, critics (and their then-affiliations):

J.D. Considine [Baltimore Sun]
David Browne [Entertainment Weekly]
Dave Marsh [Playboy]
Ann Powers (Spin]

Everyone knows Christgau. My favorite line of his from that same article is "I would love to say Black Sabbath is overrated, but I don't think anybody takes them seriously."

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd like to believe these were released as a series of telegrams.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh no the minutemen were 'sloppy'!

tipustiger, Friday, 25 February 2005 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

where was this shit published?

It was published in several rags, including the Tampa Tribune, the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, and the Buffalo News (the occasion was responding to Rolling Stone's 200 Top Albums list).

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

ah, I remember that 200 top albums list. Now I get why Henley got acknowledged.

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 February 2005 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)

They're wrong about these.

The Beatles, "The Beatles" (The White Album)
The Grateful Dead, "Workingman's Dead"
Marvin Gaye, "What's Going On"
Pink Floyd, "Dark Side of the Moon"
Eno "Another Green World"
The Eagles, "Hotel California"
Rolling Stones, "Some Girls"
Pink Floyd, "The Wall"
Liz Phair, "Exile in Guyville"
Guided By Voices, "Bee Thousand"

They're right about these.

The Who, "Tommy"
Captain Beefheart, "Trout Mask Replica"
The Grateful Dead, "Workingman's Dead"
Velvet Underground, "Loaded"
George Harrison, "All Things Must Pass"
King Crimson, "Red"
Ramones, "Rocket to Russia"
Gang of Four, "Entertainment!"
Minutemen, "Double Nickels on the Dime"
The Jesus & Mary Chain, "Psychocandy"
Prince, "Sign "o' the Times"
Guns N' Roses, "Appetite for Destruction"
Dr. Dre, "The Chronic"
Smashing Pumpkins, "Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness"

Couldn't say about these.

John Mayall, "Bluesbreakers with Eric Clapton"
Jefferson Airplane, "Surrealistic Pillow"
Cream, "Wheels of Fire"
Sly and the Family Stone, "There's a Riot Goin' On"
Marvin Gaye, "What's Going On"
Allman Brothers Band, "At Fillmore East"
Frank Zappa, "Shut Up and Play Yer Guitar"
Prince, "Sign "o' the Times"
Don Henley, "The End of the Innocence"

a sthenic daimon, Friday, 25 February 2005 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)

More pointless list-making for it's own sake. One contrived negative opinion of "Loaded" 35 years after the fact = the most impotent thing I can think of.

everything, Friday, 25 February 2005 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate this shit. I'm so susceptible to lists like this. They make me want to break down and sob, "It's true! I never listen to There's a Riot Going on! Someone tell me what's wrong with me?!" I hear one bad thing about an album I think I love, and, "Oh no--they've got a point there." I can't decide it this is a character flaw, or if lists like this help me decide what music I actually like, as opposed to what the hive mind tells me to like (although I finally got the balls to come out against Daydream Nation--what a relief). ILM has toughened me up a bit. There doesn't seem to be a single album or artist that at least one person doesn't think is total shit. Oh well.

Does anyone else have this problem? Did anyone used to have this problem? Ugh. I'm going to lock the door, turn on the lights, and listen to Spiderland at full volume.

NIHILO SANCTUM ESTRE?!?!

(Oh, and, for the record: OTM Loaded, What's Going On?, Psychocandy, although they all feature some classic tracks.)

poortheatre (poortheatre), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Do people actually opt for Entertainment! as a fix of "funk"? They may be somewhat funky but that doesn't seem to be what they're selling at all.

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

way to go rock critics--those Smashing Pumpkins needed a good talking to.

Uh, like who in the world really considers John Mayall's Bluesbreakers "rated" at all--some moldy old bluesniks in Ohio?
The Allman Brothers?

I don't know what to say about Sly's "Riot." If you don't get that, you got some problems, in my book. Ditto poor old "Trout Mask Replica," I mean what's the problem there? I never gave too much of a shit about Van Vliet's lyrics, some of them are OK, I just like the drums and guitars on that one. I'm old, I started listening to that record in about 1978, and it was already nine years old at the time, and it never even sounded that weird to me even then, and sounds less strange now. It's a given Van Vliet was trying to be weird on that record, and thank the Lord he didn't totally succeed. And right, must remember that Dave Marsh owns funk music, and that we are obligated to consider bands like Gang of Four as "funk" because that is what we know and love. Dave Marsh is takin' it to the streets, man.

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah man. Besides, I find Rick James' critique of post-Marxist economics wholly unconvincing.

Nag! Nag! Nag! (Nag! Nag! Nag!), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, Rick James was stronger on Bahktin, the carnival-esque....

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

What is "needless complexity" anyway? Does a piece of music 'need' to be any level of complexity?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

did they really hate all this stuff or were they trying to be funny?

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

"Others are enough to make you doubt Prince's sanity."

This fool actually thinks Prince is -- sane!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

HUGEST PROBLEM
Considine hating on "Ballad Of Dorothy Pakrer".

funny, i was gonna say hugest problem: considine hating on "the cross."


fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:41 (twenty-one years ago)

did they really hate all this stuff or were they trying to be funny?

Maybe they just hate it ironically?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:43 (twenty-one years ago)

They're too stupid to be ironic.

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Gang of Four, "Entertainment!" (Infinite Zero, 1979) - Funk for people who wouldn't be caught dead with a Rick James album in their library. (Marsh)

funnily enough, entertainment gets five stars -- from one j.d. considine -- in the last dave marsh-edited version of the rolling stone record guide, while every rick james album gets three stars.

funnily enough also, it's possible no reader of marsh's own assessment of rick james in that same book would be cajght dead with a rick james album in their library because marsh writes off seven rick james albums in a total of four sentences that boil down to "skillful, if not terribly inspired."

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)

What do you think all these critics have in common? I'll bet they all love Yo La Tengo.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:48 (twenty-one years ago)

funnily enough, entertainment gets five stars -- from one j.d. considine -- in the last dave marsh-edited version of the rolling stone record guide, while every rick james album gets three

wait a minute, that might not be j.d. considine. i jumped to that conclusion that that's what "j.d.c." stood for in that book. but j.d. isn't listed as a contributor. then again, neither is anyone with the initials j.d.c. so i have no idea who wrote that gang of four review. either way it doesn't get marsh off the hook.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 25 February 2005 04:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Doing a quick spot check of Amazon, I think the "j.d.c." is indeed Considine.

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

well j.d. definitely wrote for a later, entirely different version of the rolling stone guide. but i'm not so sure about the first two, 1979 and '83 versions.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)

wrong:

Captain Beefheart, "Trout Mask Replica"
Sly and the Family Stone, "There's a Riot Goin' On"
George Harrison, "All Things Must Pass" (Apple, 1971)
Marvin Gaye, "What's Going On"
King Crimson, "Red"
Eno "Another Green World"
Ramones, "Rocket to Russia"
Rolling Stones, "Some Girls"
Pink Floyd, "The Wall"
Frank Zappa, "Shut Up and Play Yer Guitar"
The Jesus & Mary Chain, "Psychocandy"
Prince, "Sign "o' the Times"
Guns N' Roses, "Appetite for Destruction"
Dr. Dre, "The Chronic"
Smashing Pumpkins, "Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness"

right:

Jefferson Airplane, "Surrealistic Pillow"
John Mayall, "Bluesbreakers with Eric Clapton"
Cream, "Wheels of Fire"
The Who, "Tommy"
The Beatles, "The Beatles" (The White Album)
The Grateful Dead, "Workingman's Dead"
Velvet Underground, "Loaded"
Allman Brothers Band, "At Fillmore East"
Pink Floyd, "Dark Side of the Moon"
The Eagles, "Hotel California"
Gang of Four, "Entertainment!"
Minutemen, "Double Nickels on the Dime"
Don Henley, "The End of the Innocence"
Liz Phair, "Exile in Guyville"
Guided By Voices, "Bee Thousand"

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I left off the name of the Smashing Pumpkins hater: it was Marsh.

ffirehorse, Friday, 25 February 2005 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Considine and I are on opposite ends of the universe.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)

What do you think all these critics have in common? I'll bet they all love Yo La Tengo.

OTM. Other guesses would include:
Favorite book: The Sound & The Fury
Favorite author: Heidegger
Favorite instrument: (tie) harpsichord/xylophone
Favorite movie: The Seventh Seal
Favorite vacation spot: MoMA

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

there's not a chance marsh is a yo la tengo fan. and if i was a betting man, i'd also bet against j.d.c. being one.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 25 February 2005 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"loaded" is my favorite v.u. album, perhaps because i'm still too wimpy and suburban to handle the rest.

"mellon collie" was actually a good album, pavement s.p. disses notwithstanding.

gang of four hardly needs my accolades.

the white album? only one of the top three reasons i ended up here, anyway. hardly matters what considine thinks.

marc h., Friday, 25 February 2005 05:26 (twenty-one years ago)

ROBERT CHRISTGAU IS A FUCKING MORON!!! Why do you people give him so much respect? It seems like whenever I read any of his stuff I wanna just punch him in the face! WHEN the FUCK was The End of the Innocence ever EVER critically praised?!?

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Friday, 25 February 2005 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Frank Zappa, "Shut Up and Play Yer Guitar" (Barking Pumpkin, 1981) - On second thought, just shut up.

This is funny but, as an album, who exactly rates it? Other than Zappa fans, who we can obviously disregard.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 25 February 2005 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I was pretty young at the time - and these were among the first reviews I ever read so my memory may be distorted - but I definitely remember that Henley as being critically revered that year. That and Lou Reed's New York. It was the start of a lifelong fascination with the perversity of rock criticism.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Friday, 25 February 2005 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

WHEN the FUCK was The End of the Innocence ever EVER critically praised?!?

The Rolling Stone Top 200 albums list referenced upthread

miccio (miccio), Friday, 25 February 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Informational points: This story originally appeared in the Baltimore Sun. I wrote it, and gathered lists and comments from the others. It later moved on the wire, and was reprinted in other newspapers.

I am indeed the J.D.C. in The New Rolling Stone Record Guide, edited by Dave Marsh and John Swenson (Random House, 1983). Contrary to what some in this thread apparently believe, it is not uncommon for critics to disagree with one another and respect that disagreement.

Other points: I don't know that any of us particularly "hate" the albums listed. The key word in this piece is "overrated": works that are considered great but aren't. I suspect the lists would have been different had everyone been asked to list the albums they hate. Also -- and I'm kind of surprised I need to point this out -- the basic intention of articles like this one is to be provocative and get readers to reconsider their views. It is almost by definition impossible to call something overrated if a certain amount of the readership isn't going to say, You're crazy! That's a great album!!

I can't speak for the others, but personally I don't love Yo La Tengo. (I'm assuming Vegemite Grrrl is merely trying to be funny.)

Finally, I'd be curious to know how this came to be rediscovered. I'd long forgotten the piece, but then, that was years ago and in another country...

jdconsidine, Friday, 25 February 2005 15:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, everytime I read a blurb and thought, "that guy is a complete fucking moron" it was somehow always written by David Browne. To wit:

Velvet Underground - Loaded
Sly Stone - There's a Riot Goin' On
Rolling Stones - Some Girls
Allman Brothers - Live at the Fillmore
Minutemen - Double Nickels

Josh Love (screamapillar), Friday, 25 February 2005 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

JD Considine, welcome. Redicovery of obscure pieces=symptomatic of musical obsessive compulsion. You would be surprised at many of the things you'd read here.

Science & Steepleflower, Friday, 25 February 2005 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree that many of these are overrated, but often for different reasons than they give here.

For example, many people might agree that the White Album is indulgent and has filler - though it is perhaps telling that no two people will agree on exactly which part is the filler.

Also, hating on Sign O Times because it makes you "doubt Prince's sanity" seems kind of like hating on Nevermind the Bollocks because it makes you doubt Johnny Rotten's allegiance to the monarchy.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 25 February 2005 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Needlessly complex riffage is King Crimson's whole appeal!

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Also -- and I'm kind of surprised I need to point this out -- the basic intention of articles like this one is to be provocative and get readers to reconsider their views.

I don't think you do need to point this out -- it's pretty much assumed around here.

W i l l (common_person), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"All Things Must Pass" sure does deserve a whacking. George's voice was only tolerable in two-song doses (reason # 4678 why John/Paul had to be in command).

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Needlessly complex riffage is King Crimson's whole appeal!

OTM

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Contrary to what some in this thread apparently believe, it is not uncommon for critics to disagree with one another and respect that disagreement.

i certainly understand and respect that! i also understand and respect that critics sometimes change their mind. i just found it amusing that dave marsh would select entertainment as an overrated album, and use rick james as a counterexample of an actually funky (and presumably worthy) artist, when he himself was the editor of a canon-creating guide (i grew up calling it "the bible," for whatever that's worth) that gave entertainment its highest rating and treated rick james as a middling afterthought. i happen to love a lot of marsh's writing. but it's still amusing to me. and interesting.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Apparently Bruce Springsteen & U2 have never been overated. Surprise!

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:34 (twenty-one years ago)

yo chuck they must be on the pipe -- RIGHT?

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Friday, 25 February 2005 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I find these kinds of exercises entertaining, but also kind of silly in that ALL critics/publications worship their own sacred cows. Me 2.

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

What are you talking about sir, JUST because Depeche Mode and the Cure and Creation-era MBV and the Chameleons have never ever done anything wrong ever ever.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

... for instance deciding not to record anything for 10 years

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

These clowns are just lucky that Killing Joke isn't included.

Dave "Moses" Marsh's judgements always make me reconsider the music in question. i.e. if he hates it there must be something good there.

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Friday, 25 February 2005 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad someone brought up Never Mind the Bollocks, the be-all-end-all of overhyped singles-plus-filler record albums, ever and this list's most inexplicable ommission.. I know it's mostly a historical context thing, and that the singles between the filler are fucking brilliant, but take away "Pretty Vacant", "Holidays in the Sun", "Anarchy in the UK" and "God Save the Queen" and it's obvious that pretty much every other punk/punk-esque debut going ca. 77-78 was far, far more solid -- including but not limited to the ones from the Damned, Television, The Clash, the Saints, Richard Hell and the Voidoids ("Another World" notwithstanding), Radio Birdman, Wire, Elvis Costello and the Cars.

You know what other '77 album is better than Bollocks? Animals. Deal with that shit.

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Friday, 25 February 2005 18:35 (twenty-one years ago)

no "pet sounds", no "sergeant pepper", no "never mind the bollocks", no clash, no springsteen, no dylan. come on that list is a joke. that marsh guy seems to be especially off. his writing isn't even crafty whereas "another green world" is a stroke of genius, a parallel world. a list where all critics agree on famous albums being overrated would have been much more insightful than this narrow-minded personal crap.

"animals" is great, btw.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Friday, 25 February 2005 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, the exclusion of Springsteen, U2 and Dylan, just to name three, makes the inclusion of the Minutemen even more ridiculous than it seemed on first blush. And it seemed pretty frickin' ridiculous on first blush.

Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Friday, 25 February 2005 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Music criticism has never seemed more pointless and tired than on that list.

57 7th (calstars), Friday, 25 February 2005 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

i.e. if he hates it there must be something good there.

Hahah. All too true.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 25 February 2005 21:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Wasn't the "misogyny, bigotry and racism" of Appetite part of its point?

nader (nader), Friday, 25 February 2005 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

nate! "solid"? ew who the fuck wants punk to be "solid"?

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 February 2005 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)

also bodies is better than all the singles and pretty vacant is the worst song they record w/o eddie tenpole

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 February 2005 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, hating on Sign O Times because it makes you "doubt Prince's sanity" seems kind of like hating on Nevermind the Bollocks because it makes you doubt Johnny Rotten's allegiance to the monarchy.

Brilliant. You should be a music critic! :)

Richard Hell and the Voidoids ("Another World" notwithstanding)

Poppycock. What's wrong with it?

poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 26 February 2005 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Dave Marsh is a great critic and editor, but he never got punk and postpunk, and is totally wrong on a number of these, specifically because they're punk and postpunk. On soul or funk I'd take his word very seriously. His 1001 greatest singles thingee is brilliant up until about 1975 or so, after which his choices are eccentric (although he unearths some gems and his defence of Madonna is OTM).

plebian plebs (plebian), Saturday, 26 February 2005 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)

also his piece on "sweet child o mine"

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 26 February 2005 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Shortchanging 'Psychocandy' in any way at all is simply ridiculous to me. I distinctly associate dropping the needle anywhere on that record in 1986 at 16 years old to be a key reason ILM. Particularly the beginning, yes, but it's all amazing.

bkjj40a, Saturday, 26 February 2005 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"All Things Must Pass" sure does deserve a whacking. George's voice was only tolerable in two-song doses (reason # 4678 why John/Paul had to be in command).

-- Alfred Soto (sotoal...), February 25th, 2005.

A good solution for you, then, would be to only listen to two songs from All Things Must Pass at a time. There sure are a lot of good ones on that album from which you can choose!

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 26 February 2005 04:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Hi JD! I have this wonderful, lingering image of you using really inspired language in someone's sun-dappled backyard to convince me that Radiohead were good. I still hate(d) them, but that was a nice day in Balto.

iang, Saturday, 26 February 2005 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i'll never understand this "NMTB has only 4 good songs" business. there aren't many albums in this world i love every song on, but that's one of them.

i found dave marsh's singles book really useful as a guide to old r&b, doo wop, that kind of thing. but he is SUCH A FUCKING AWFUL WRITER that i have to be careful about actually reading those entries before listening to the song so i don't get turned off beforehand.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 26 February 2005 05:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't speak for the others, but personally I don't love Yo La Tengo. (I'm assuming Vegemite Grrrl is merely trying to be funny.)

You assume correctly. Serious use of such an insult (ie: loving Yo La Tengo) is reserved for close personal friends & people who cut me off when I'm driving.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 26 February 2005 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Can I please whine and bitch about how godawful this article is again?

"Dark Side of the Moon" made a fetish of a form of artistic solipsism that, in rock, came to be known by the same word that got Jocelyn Elders thrown out of the Clinton administration. (Powers)

Hmmm. Wasn't she that old Surgeon General that said kids should jack off into condoms more often? Or something to that effect. Erm... what exactly does that have to do with Dark Side of the Moon? I sure as hell don't hear any jackoff guitar solos when I listen to Dark Side of the Moon! You wanna hear jackoff guitar solos go listen to Yngwie Malmsteem or Steve Vai or someone like that.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

powers seems (there) to be acknowledging a cliche as a cliche b4 hogtyin herself to it — and as snrub says, it's a REALLY misconceived (ha!) cliché at that

a. this is bcz masturbation (in the solo context) always happens alongside imagination: a fevered dream of a glorious better version of the world-as-it-exists

b. roger waters IS a depressive solipsist, w. a tendency to take wilful pinched pleasure in shutting out the world-as-it-exists = he's NOT MASTURBATORY ENUFF

c. haha plus also what does it mean if the record you are dismissin as "masturbatory" wz famous for stayin at no.1 for 100000000000 months cz word-of-mouth sed it wz great MUSIC-TO-HAB-SEX-TO

d. PF's prob is surely more that a group of foax consisting in the main of NON-depressive NON-solipsists (the others are amiable and sensible, generally) shd be willing (at least in the context of DSotM) (and the wall, which is worse) to be so subsumed w/i the MOST recessive and self-imprisoned of their various minds and styles...: it's a kind of world-class virtuosity of denial

b. and c. make for an interesting creative contradiction, but it feels like the listeners brought this in: certainly the creators never grabbed the baton (ha!) and ran w. it

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

ps i hate the word "overrated"

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 26 February 2005 17:51 (twenty-one years ago)

> "The Ballad of Dorothy Parker" and "The Cross," are enough to make you doubt Prince's sanity

This is the equivalent of a self-professed art critic writing of Guernica, "omigod what kind of drugs was Picasso on when he drew this? look, both of that guy's eyes are on one side of his face lol".

Palomino (Palomino), Sunday, 27 February 2005 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

what's the point of saying an album is not as good once you remove 4 of the best tracks on it !? ok, pet sounds is not that classic without "wouldn't it be nice", "god only knows", "caroline no" and "sloop john b". so what does that say ??

AleXTC (AleXTC), Sunday, 27 February 2005 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Entertainment!, Psychocandy, Another Green World - classic albums, enough said.

zeus, Sunday, 27 February 2005 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

what's the point of saying an album is not as good once you remove 4 of the best tracks on it !? ok, pet sounds is not that classic without "wouldn't it be nice", "god only knows", "caroline no" and "sloop john b". so what does that say ??

"I Just Wasn't Made For These Times", "Don't Talk (Put Your Head On My Shoulder" and "It's Not Me" are great. "EMI" and "Submission" and "Seventeen" are meh.

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Sunday, 27 February 2005 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)

ps i hate the word "overrated"

I think you overhate it.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Sunday, 27 February 2005 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

where is the love-disgust for BODIES!!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 February 2005 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, i think there are enough great songs on NMTB to justify its "classic" status. that some trax are weaker, ok but that's the case of most of the albums, no ?
besides the singles, i also like bodies, problems, no feelings... that's 7 great songs out of 12. pretty good ratio !

AleXTC (AleXTC), Sunday, 27 February 2005 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)

(nmtb is the only mainstream lp i can think of where everything APART from the song-making and recording - like running order, sleeve design etc etc - was made deliberately to sabotage its status as a "nice object to own") (ie done deliberately lazily and randomly and slapdashly)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 27 February 2005 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

That list is shit.

billstevejim, Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)

In spring 1980 Dave Marsh did a book tour for his first Springsteen bio, piggybacking on the Bruce's tour. So my college newspaper sent a delegation of three aspiring reporters to interview Marsh, including yours truly. While I wasn't a big fan of his writing (or the Boss' music), I was way enamored of the Creem/MC5/Stooges aesthetic and legitimately wanted to meet him. I couldn't wait to hear what he thought of my latest fave rave, the debut album by Gof4. Punk/funk/left wing politics -- right up the guy's alley I thought. WRONG! He snidely put down Entertainment (see above) and launched into a lecture about I don't know, Motown or something.

He spent the afternoon sipping from a bottle of Cognac, a beverage I associated w/my parents, rather than a quart of Stroh's. FWIW...

lovebug starski (lovebug starski), Sunday, 27 February 2005 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I like Marsh.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"EMI" and "Submission" and "Seventeen" are meh.

Says you.
(ok I'm not that big on "Submission" either, but the other two fuckin rock!)

Anyone Who Can Pick Up A Frying Pan Pwns Death (AaronHz), Sunday, 27 February 2005 20:57 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.