Is M.I.A. sample clearance delay a hoax? Many rumours of Major Label Signing In The Works

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I hear it is either Interscope or Island Def Jam. LA Reid and Jay Z have been courting her. The word is XL has lost her, for the USA at least....Thoughts? Surprise? Outrage?

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

i've been hearing this for a while too. the sample clearance thing was always suspect.

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i've been told that P.Diddy has signed them in the US. Seriously. The shame, the horror. The videos? Might be skin-tastic. Though Maya looks to be a bit chunky to be in a Diddy Vid.

biznotic, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)

that's juicy. she can sign to whatever she wants. i've listened to the album so many that times I've lost any quasi-rockist, "B-b-b-but she can't go overground!" sentiments I might have held. it's already a classic in my book.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Quick, what major label collabos prospects do you drool over now?

Crunk'n'b with Lil' Jon.

Matt Chesnut, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it is a better idea to be on a major hip hop label. i dont think XL are good at breaking acts that lean more towards the Urban market, but somehow only get bought by white hipsters, at least this is true for the USA. I wonder how many black men and women, who would purchase G Unit or Jay Z records bought Dizzee Rascal, or Wiley for that matter....it actually might be her best chance to get to the widest audience possible. No shame in that at all. The whole Matador/XL alliance with Urban Music (UK and US) has ultimately not been successful and this album could appeal to a much wider audience than XL might be capable of.

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

she has a much better chance of a hit w p diddy.

I was watching making the band tonight. That show isn't bad. Not great either.

but p diddy is awesome. Who heard the song he did w felix da housecat? It was weird.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

the DJ Hell collab./track was the worst. Just awful. But Making The Band is an amazing show. Series 3 starts Thursday. Those are repeats.

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I wonder how many black men and women, who would purchase G Unit or Jay Z records bought Dizzee Rascal, or Wiley for that matter....
Even more important (as market share) - how many white men and women who would purchase G Unit or Jay-Z records bought Dizzee, etc.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)

milo is right of course but that misconception is very interesting to me.

I wonder if the alignment between african american taste and popular taste when it comes to african american music has ever been more in sync.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

WAY WAY more, I would reckon. I bet almost half the sales of rap music is white kids/yound adults, where the buying audience for Dizzee is probably way more white than black. I mean it came out on Matador, not that it should matter, but they dont market to the same people in any way at all. His videos are played on Subterannean next to Interpol and The Bravery. Fat chance of a crossover!

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)

(I assume that was an xp)

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope that it's true and she signs with a powerful major. I want these songs to be real hits. I want "normal" people to hear this record and love it as much as I do. I want "10 Dollar" and "Galang" and "Bingo" and "Sunshowers" and "Pull Up The People" to be on the radio. That would be fucking amazing.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)

commercial for new making the band on mtv "p diddy has his sights set on the future of music..."

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:40 (twenty-one years ago)

re: Perpetua: That is pretty much what i am saying. And I think XL would not have the radio/marketing muscle to do such a thing. It takes a lot of experience and a lot of money. And it would be really refreshing to actually see her on TRL,not Subterranean.

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:42 (twenty-one years ago)

how will m.i.a. be marketed? as a grime artist?

who will tvt sign? lethal b?

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:47 (twenty-one years ago)

you're all completely on the pipe, but I'm not against this TRL fantasy coming true.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)

spliff not pipe. and why are we all "on the pipe"? which part?

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

anything involving MIA going nuclear just cuz she's on a major. Sure worked for Built To Spill!

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Stereolab signed to Elektra! ZOWEE!

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)

will 'galang' be rerecorded with puffy saying 'uh huh, yeah' over the chorus?

will loon do a verse on "10$"?

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:54 (twenty-one years ago)

but miccio you are taking about indie bands. a number of m.i.a. songs could fit on urban radio.

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:55 (twenty-one years ago)

uh huh, yeah

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i just don't hear a "get busy" or a "buffalo stance" or anything else that would be a real crossover.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)

again, I'm not against it doing well and in fact would love it too. But lyrically it doesn't slip into the mold and I don't hear anything with enough grab to be a novelty hit.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 03:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm tempted to agree w miccio but i'm not entirely sure i'm right. I'd need to listen to it again, and i misplaced my burned copy.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)

And I'm not saying she's gonna be cult for life, necessarily. If she actually joins some clique, collaborates with the already successful (along the lines of the "Goodies" remix) and plays the game I could see something from a later album doing big.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

well shes no emo duran duran

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:04 (twenty-one years ago)

damn straight!

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

right now she's the indie sean paul

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, there's no novelty hit cos it's not a novelty record. If it breaks it would break without that kind of taint, which is a good thing, don't you think?

I don't think it's thaaaaat far removed. It's different, and that might be exactly the right thing right now.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess shes indie cause shes got a shitty voice. but what about sunshowers? cmon! get someone to do a good guest verse and its a hit!

just wait till she does a tsunami relief song! xpost

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

well if it ain't novelty it'd be the signifier of some nirvana-style explosion of a new politics-not-sex world culture shtick in American popular music then rah, rah, we could use it and better urban radio exposure (which is friendly to the beats) than the XL route but god aim low bros

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think MIA would be megapopular, but just to be on a real mainstream radar and get some play on pop/hip hop stations would be a big thrill. My thing is that I think there are a lot of people who would really be into it, and I'd just like for them to have easy access to her music. It always sucks when stuff you know a lot of people would like never reaches them due to the cynical nature of the marketplace. You can't blame people for not being into stuff they don't know about.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

But lyrically it doesn't slip into the mold and I don't hear anything with enough grab to be a novelty hit.

How would her lyrics stop her from having hits? Seems to me the hooks and beats are what matter. She's got the hooks. The beats could maybe use a little work, but if there was a major deal, wouldn't there also likely be some remixing? We already know how good she sounds over Lil Jon and Timbaland, and she fits in that Ciara remix just fine. I'm not saying she's a sure thing, but being on a major hip-hop label would help.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:19 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess shes indie cause shes got a shitty voice.

Yeah, there's some real golden throats on hip hop radio these days...

I think that if she had Jay-Z or P Diddy pushing her, it would go a long way. It seems like you need a sponsor to be a hip hop outsider and do well - ie, Dr. Dre and Eminem, Timbaland and Bubba Sparxxx.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:23 (twenty-one years ago)

anybody not see something really fucking bananas about the idea of Jay-Z or P. Diddy pushing refugee/terror/war shtick? A song called "10 Dollar"?

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

the ladies have nice voices!

can we talk more about puffy daddy though? someone on another thread said he likes alter ego's "rocker" - does he lurk on ilm? i think i will pretend he does.

artdamages (artdamages), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

mmmm timbaland producing a ceelo duet...fuck politics. she will be the most political major label act since chumbawamba.

ENONYMOUS, Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

It wouldn't be too shocking coming from P Diddy in light of his hit with Punjabi MC.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, meant to type Jay-Z in that last post, not Diddy.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Blindfolded under homemade lanterns
Somewhere in the Amazon, they're holding me ransom

UH!

http://highergroundonline.com/m_article_images/s_combs.jpg

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

i've been told on 2 seperate occaisions that, "this sounds like that Spice Girl, what's her name?" while playing M.I.A.

biznotic, Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Artdamages, Diddy has apparently recorded a techno/dance album and wants to release it sometime soon. When I was at CMJ last year, Tommie Sunshine was talking about it, and he said that he's heard some of it, and he thought it was really good, like really good contemporary intense dance stuff with hip hop vocals.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, he was going to be putting out the Alter Ego album in the US on his label, or something to that effect.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 27 February 2005 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it just my imagination, or do people care about M.I.A.'s success waaay more than any other "indie" (please, let's avoid a debate of what that means) act? I haven't seen this sort of "oh my god, she might get big!!" anywhere else on ILM before.

Mickey (modestmickey), Sunday, 27 February 2005 06:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, just imagine how ridiculous it would sound about the other indie acts that people here get excited about. "OH MY GOD I heard a rumor that Arcade Fire is talking to Interscope!! I hope they do some songs with Queens of the Stone Age!!"

Mickey (modestmickey), Sunday, 27 February 2005 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

That's because we all know Arcade Fire would never be interesting enough to do some songs with Queens of the Stone Age, so there's no point speculating.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Sunday, 27 February 2005 06:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Doy you think M.I.A. really has that strong a chance of having an actual chart hit with her artwork? - so far album cover too damn ugly, and the single covers are too damn anonymous.

Too be fair, the album cover might work on a large scale - far to cluttered as a small jpeg.

Jedmond (Jedmond), Sunday, 27 February 2005 06:58 (twenty-one years ago)

miccio and Mickey OTM. I think it's nice that an act like M.I.A. with a such a critical buzz that signing with a label like Matador or XL wouldn't take them beyond their built-in audience would consider signing with a major and maybe being more ambitious about their commercial prospects. but this conversation that's been happening in at least hypothetical terms for months (i.e. not just the usual indie lament of "she should be huge" but "she could/will be huge") kind of comes off weird and desperate to me. like people are so overzealous about non-rockist appreciation of something that is (at least theoritically) populist and accessible that they have to cheerlead the mainstreaming of something that (to my ears) doesn't really have serious urban radio potential.

Al (sitcom), Sunday, 27 February 2005 07:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan are you the crazy drag granny in that "diary of a mad black woman" movie? (xp)

haha I was just about to say "and here comes the people predicting a sleeper hit, cracking the top ten by the 4th quarter", and in comes in Matos

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

although if it's true that it's not this album but future albums that will be on Interscope, then I can see the 2nd album really capitalizing on the buzz and selling well.

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

(xpost) OOOH HONEY, YOU KNOW I IS!

The Ghost of CRAZY DRAG GRANNY (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

Esp. if they get it together and release it quickly (and it has a great Neptunes/Timbaland single on it which it probably will haha.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

The hot underground sensation of the year whose debut album Arular was a hit with critics and fans the world over finally releases her long-awaited major label debut! Featuring collaborations with:

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

She could completely reinvigorate the neptunes & timbo.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)

Featuring collaborations with:

Ludacris
The Neptunes
Snoop Dogg
Eve
Jay-Z
The X-Cutioners
CRAZY DRAG GRANNY
Nitzer Ebb
Li'l Jon
Twista
Missy Elliott
(etc)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

There ain't nothing with either that needs reinvigorating.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

I do think that it's probably not them that needs reinvigorating, but the artists they're working with. Though the Nep's stuff for Snoop, i.e. Drop it Like it's Hot and Let's Get Blown, is some of their best work.

I can't honestly see her working with a lotta the artists who disrespect women much though.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

yes Al, saying it's too early to tell how a record might possibly do right after it comes out and calling it a blockbuster are THE SAME THING

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:00 (twenty years ago)

I hate ILM's fantasy footbal league collaboration lists, especially ones that involve Timbaland and the Neptunes.

(x-post, yeah, Matos, I know you weren't saying that but it felt like yours was the first post in an inevitable train of thought I was dreading)

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)

although when they involve Crazy Drag Granny I am happy.

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

the weird thing is that NO ONE I can remember on any of the M.I.A. threads said anything about it becoming a big commercial success (unless the whole "'Galang' could conceivably be played on Radio Disney" thing counts, which it doesn't)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)

I am curious exactly what Interscope thinks they are getting or going to do with M.I.A. The Neptunes/Timbaland thing isn't a dream collab. It seems more like an obvious attempt to generate a hit by a record company for an "exotic" artist (see: Sean Paul, Beenie Man.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:07 (twenty years ago)

um, scroll up some. there's a reason I revived this particular thread. granted, not everybody was saying she'd go platinum out the box, but there was a lot of optimistic sales/exposure predictions. (x-post)

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

Alex, I don't think major labels necessarily have a game plan when they sign a new artist that has a lot of underground or industry buzz. I think they just see that there's something to capitalize on, and they'll worry about how once they get the name on the dotted line.

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I understand that. Which is why I am curious what they are going to DO with her!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

this is not to say I have read all the threads very carefully, obv. (xpost dbl obv.)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)

I don't know... I played the record out last night and 3 dj's separately approached saying that they play the record. 2 other people asked what it is. they looked like normals, not hipsters.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

haha normals

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)

C.H.U.D.S.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

I played "Pull Up the People" at a small party the other day, and lots of people were interested to know what it was. (Okay, lots = like three, but it was a small party!)

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

Were they "normals"?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

*joke deleted because I suddenly became very ashamed of myslef*

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

and then the crazy drag granny dance of shame begins.

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

That will probably be her next video.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

from nerve.com :

The British press — NME and the daily tabloids — are famous for hyperbole and scandal. Have you had any trouble with them yet?
I haven't had any, thank god. I do my best to stay out of there, it's a little too hardcore. But the only people that make it into tabloids are the ones that seek it, I think. Ultimately, I think it is like that, but you can me smart and be a musician and avoid all that. As for NME, they only really cover bands, right?

Well, they cover the Streets and Dizzee Rascal.
Yeah, but they're boys. As a chick who does music, I think I confuse them too much. They definitely wrote about me when the "Galang" single came out, but since then I don't think NME knows how to write about me. They're putting really big commercial things on the cover, but most of the time they exist just to write about the Libertines.

Which, by the way, is baffling over here.
I confuse them, because I go "reggae tones, blah blah blah, Baltimore club, da da da da da," and then "dancehall blah blah blah blah" and then they're like, "what?" And that's cool, because I'll go over here with the people that do get it. And they'll eventually figure out that music is music and that we have to push things forward, which is what the Streets say: "let's push things forward." They just don't practice that philosophy.

What's the situation with female MCs in Britain? Lady Sovereign is getting a lot of press.
I like Lady Sovereign. She's really cheeky and quite inventive with it. But it's really difficult to say. At the time I got signed, there seemed to be a bunch of girls signed. And magazines would call me up and say "can we do a group photo of like, grime girls," and I just thought, I'm not really part of it, so I can't really rep it. I support grime, I think it's doing a great job, and if it could get out of London, it would be amazing. I want to open up the world, like an information highway thing. Like, that's why I exist. I want to bust the doors on where I come from, all my influences come from everywhere

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

Upthread, I mean of course that Craig David had a sort of abortive pop success (grammy nom, videos on MTV etc), but unfortunately no breakout (and his followup was very disappointing). I now believe that MIA will be much more popular than Craig David, but I'm not thinking Top 10.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

the weird thing is that NO ONE I can remember on any of the M.I.A. threads said anything about it becoming a big commercial success (unless the whole "'Galang' could conceivably be played on Radio Disney" thing counts, which it doesn't)

How does getting airplay on Radio Disney not equal commercial success?! She would probably make more money from regular airplay on Radio Disney (and then the inevitable movie & TV placements) than she would from record sales anyway.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

"reggae tones"? did she really say "reggaeton" and they mistranscribe it?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)

How does getting airplay on Radio Disney not equal commercial success?!

because I was specifically talking about chart position for the album

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

Haha that's so sad.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

i like nerve a lot but their reviews with musicians usually leave something to be desired (no pun intended). well, that said, i guess reggae tones is a lucky hit, we could have wound up reading it as ring tones.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

interviews, rather.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

I don't think I've seen it mentioned on ILM yet, so I guess I'm going to be the asshole that points out that she just barely made the Billboard 200 at #199 and gloat about it.

Isn't this the same chart position Zeppelin IV had after it's first week? "Sunshowers" could be the next "Stairway to Heaven"!

Vic Funk, Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

that doesn't sound right at all, can you verify that? I mean, Zep was pretty big in the U.S. from II onward, wouldn't a low debut like that be really unlikely?

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

maybe it [IV] was only released a couple hours before the end of the chart period?

chris andrews (fraew), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:14 (twenty years ago)

LED ZEPPELIN/FOUR SYMBOLS (untitled)
(1971-1972)
Released November 8, 1971: Album is released untitled, yet still hits UK #1 and U.S. #2 slots. Becomes known as Led Zeppelin IV, Four Symbols, or Zoso, after the runic images on inner sleeve.

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)

Last night, I was walked past two major record stores in Boston. As I crossed in front of the Virgin Megastore, they were playing "Hombre". When I went into Newbury Comics, they were playing Bjork's singles on one half of the store and some anonymous-sounding boring guitar band on the other side. At that moment, I desperately wished that Virgin sold comic books because it was blatantly obvious that Newbury Comics had jumped the shark and had put itself in a little musical cul-de-sac that refused to acknowledge music after 1997 and I didn't really want to be in that place anymore; I wanted to run through 2005 with M.I.A. on one arm and Stush on the other. However, it was too late for me; I wandered to the counter with my X-Men book and a copy of Actually and wistfully thought back on the days when I wasn't old.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)

(GRRRRRRR Remove "was" from the first sentence FUCK THIS ENCROACHING DEMENTIA WITH A STICK)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)

Newbury Comics jumping the shark? In this age, that seems quaint.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

I actually expanded on that post on NYPLM:

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/nylpm/2005_03_01_nylpm_archive.html#111230641046600202

There is a huge element of nostalgia inherent in the way I view Newbury Comics that likely doesn't match up to what it really is, or rather what it is no longer plays the same role in my life as it did when I was 19.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)

i am nostalgic for newbury comics too!! i bought a watchmen t-shirt there when i was 12 and i always used to go when i came back to boston!

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)

nine months pass...
WELL?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 January 2006 05:02 (twenty years ago)

Who was she again?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 January 2006 05:08 (twenty years ago)

http://www.fiftiesweb.com/tv/mia-farrow-1.jpg

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 27 January 2006 05:10 (twenty years ago)

Classical features.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 27 January 2006 05:11 (twenty years ago)

http://www.2otter.com/Cameron/images/POW%20MIA.jpg

team jaxon (jaxon), Friday, 27 January 2006 05:11 (twenty years ago)

It's a Civic.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Friday, 27 January 2006 05:20 (twenty years ago)

oh you just wait for the pazz/jop sales bounce.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Friday, 27 January 2006 08:43 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.