― roger adultery (roger adultery), Friday, 4 March 2005 22:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Friday, 4 March 2005 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Will M. (Will M.), Saturday, 5 March 2005 01:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Saturday, 5 March 2005 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
I like this song in a kind of uncomfortable never-actively-want-to-listen-to-it way.
― The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.bobbyvinton.com/news.asp
Maybe he has something more to say about the song elsewhere on his site, but his creepily well-preserved mug has scared me off exploring further.
― m.e.a. (m.e.a.), Friday, 22 April 2005 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 22 April 2005 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)
heard it twice and the cringesome factor is already kicking in.
― mark e (mark e), Friday, 22 April 2005 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Its a novelty that everyone will recognise as terrible about a week after its topped the charts.
I hated Sweetie the Chick, and this rips it off in an even more annoying way. Its childish and irritating and mindless, and sure to be popular such are the monkeys of the British public.
― dmun, Friday, 22 April 2005 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― $V£N! (blueski), Friday, 22 April 2005 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Friday, 22 April 2005 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)
You seemed to have confused Akon with the Futureheads.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 22 April 2005 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― $V£N! (blueski), Friday, 22 April 2005 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah i second that. May as well use this as another chance to dig at the Kaiser Chiefs too, who could also be accused of this.
― dmun, Friday, 22 April 2005 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 22 April 2005 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 22 April 2005 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom May (Tom May), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
It reminds me a bit of Mud's "Lonely This Christmas", must say.
― Tom May (Tom May), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Roger Fidelity (Roger Fidelity), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)
just post the rant in my comments box under the name "Taco Supreme" late Friday Night along with a comparison of me to post-lobotomy Chuck Klosterman or something.
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)
x-post: he didn't challenge my convictions, though. he said I was a writer he hates to read. I pointed out how I'm easy to ignore and that his bile only inspired amusement, which I don't believe was his intent.
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:16 (twenty-one years ago)
but yeah that guy probably did come off too hostile off the bat to really take seriously. I think I took your dismissal personally because I'm an insomniac and do a lot of blog reading after 3am. in the same comments box dave gave a much better example of how to challenge your statements rationally.
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)
did dude post as the same indian dish the other times too?
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Al (sitcom), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)