― toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)
― stevo (stevo), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)
I have also tried the sennheiser ones which work pretty effectively and look reasonably low-key. To my mind the Bose ones scream "mug" in a Third Rock from the Sun goofy kind of way.
― Guy, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)
also http://www.headphonereviews.org/
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:00 (twenty years ago)
How people listen to music on the tube with earbuds is beyond me.
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:46 (twenty years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)
― don weiner, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)
― deej., Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― William Selman (William Selman), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)
i do fear getting run over wearing them, though.
― toby (tsg20), Friday, 27 May 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)
One of the buds on my EX71s is failing, at a fairly rapid rate, after only 9 months of moderate usage so I guess I find myself in the market for headphones.
Prepared to spend a fair bit to get something more reliable so recommend away. Only limitation is on leakage - I don't want to share with the office at lunchtimes.
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 23 September 2005 13:33 (nineteen years ago)
I am not sure what I am asking.
Is it worth the money, perhaps?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 20 July 2006 08:49 (nineteen years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Thursday, 20 July 2006 13:10 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 20 July 2006 13:45 (nineteen years ago)
For about half the price Sony's EX-71 variants are also very decent noise blockers, though the sound and build quality are nothing like the Shures.
― Bill A (Bill A), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
― fuckfuckingfuckedfucker (fuckfuckingfuckedfucker), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
Cancelling (e.g. Bose or Sony): "Microphones actively monitor what you hear, including unwanted outside sound. The difference between the unwanted sound and the desired sound is then electronically processed, creating a correction signal that acts to negate the unwanted noise. The speaker within each earcup is then fed the correction signal. This signal, combined with the passive noise reduction of the headset itself, dramatically reduces the outside distractions that reach your ears." LINK
Excluding AKA Isolating (e.g. Etymotic or Shure): "Works like an earplug to block background noise naturally. This enables you to listen comfortably at lower volumes-even in loud environments. And unlike bulky headphones utilizing active noise cancellation technology, no artifacts are introduced into your listening experience. Sound isolating earphones are also much smaller and don't require batteries." LINK
― Zimmer026 (Zimmer026), Thursday, 20 July 2006 14:28 (nineteen years ago)
now i prefer the FS1s... also thicker cords
― that's so taylrr (ken taylrr), Thursday, 20 July 2006 17:46 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.earphonesolutions.com/westoneum1.html
much better than the etymotics.
― toby (tsg20), Thursday, 20 July 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)
They aren't very comfortable after an hour or so, however.
― Tom Hatton (kl0pper), Friday, 21 July 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.koss.com/koss/kossweb.nsf/p?openform&pc%5Eeb%5EPLUG
― 100% CHAMPS with a Yes! Attitude. (Austin, Still), Friday, 21 July 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Damn, Atreyu! (x Jeremy), Friday, 21 July 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Johnny B Was Quizzical (Johnney B), Friday, 21 July 2006 13:05 (nineteen years ago)
Thanks BTW.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 July 2006 15:47 (nineteen years ago)
So confusing!
Maybe I should just poison the peoople who talk crap all the time.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Saturday, 22 July 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)
― lfam, Sunday, 11 March 2007 05:52 (eighteen years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Sunday, 11 March 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)
― lfam, Sunday, 11 March 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)