What's the verdict
― Swarvo forearm, Friday, 1 April 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)
(haha xpost)
― mark p (Mark P), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)
― Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:47 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:51 (twenty years ago)
seriously, let's not do this.
― mark p (Mark P), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)
― Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)
― NR_Q, Friday, 1 April 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:49 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:52 (twenty years ago)
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:03 (twenty years ago)
― blahbarian, Friday, 1 April 2005 11:31 (twenty years ago)
― scg, Friday, 1 April 2005 12:47 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 1 April 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 1 April 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)
― Steve-k (Steve K), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)
― Airtube (nordicskilla), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― Airtube (nordicskilla), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)
― Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:27 (twenty years ago)
― Sami Jheryllkanyga, Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:34 (twenty years ago)
started the same thread there, got no responses either
difficult to choose
― charltonlido (gareth), Saturday, 2 April 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)
Gareth have you heard/do you like Eclection?
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 13:55 (twenty years ago)
who are eclection?
― charltonlido (gareth), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)
Indeed they are eager to please and maintain consensus, is this not ironic, insofar as they are called Dissensus, yet seeking consensus? This is indeed hypocrisy, and I sneer at them and walk swiftly from the room for such stupidity.
― Janne Karlsson, Sunday, 3 April 2005 01:28 (twenty years ago)
― djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 3 April 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 02:59 (twenty years ago)
― djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 3 April 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)
― me, Sunday, 3 April 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:03 (twenty years ago)
btw thats true jed...
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)
By not talking about Lady Sovereign. Just kidding. It's a very nice alternative, nothing dud nor classic about it. Only a bit too intellectual for my liking but that's all my *fault* (low self-esteem/intellect). :-)
― nathalie doing a soft foot shuffle (stevie nixed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:36 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:49 (twenty years ago)
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)
could also be the "hashing out" phase of a new discussion group.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)
― djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 3 April 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)
Anyway I don't think you are a creepy racist or an extreme rightist nutbag. If I've implied that I apologize.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)
well that might be because i HAVE NEVER ONCE SAID that she is at the epicentre of anything or even that she believes that she is. stop trying being such a smartarse and read whay i'm saying. she has positioned herself, by virtue of the sources she uses alone and then by the imagery/lyrical references she employs, as a filter for dancehall, grime, favela funk etc. given the way critics (some of whom i'd have xpected better of) have jumped on this aspect of her, this is a bad thing and will work to the detriment of those artists who *are* actually working at the epicenters of said scenes. that and the fact that i just flat-out think that both the album and the mix have sounded shitty.
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)
;) kidding!
― just saying, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)
― Buff Hallows Dance (blueski), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)
― stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)
thats not MIA's fault, that's the idiocy of mainstream editors thats to blame.
― ppp, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)
― Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)
Whatever.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)
"Whatever You Want" really is the best song ever, isn't it? I fear I will play it at every party I am even slightly involved in from now until i die.
The irony of course about Stelfox's complaints is that they map onto a critique of rockism not popism. There's nothing about M.I.A. that makes her more likely to shift across the board; there's a million things that make her more interesting from a broadsheet angle - only, funnily enough it's not that far from the stuff that made dancehall interesting from a broadsheet angle in '04 - good beats + dodgy politics - and from the four or so articles I've seen not many in the media are likely to give her politics a free ride. The extent to which she'll fare better than dancehall in such articles boils down to the following:
1) the liberal media condemn homophobia universally and uncategorically, but approach country-specific civil warfare and insurrection on a case-by-case basis and with a great deal of handwringing2) plus critics have been waiting for booty music to become more vaguely lefty political since Public Enemy's demise so they're primed to liked M.I.A. (Public Enemy had a lot of dodgy politics too, lest we forget, and have historically also been given more latitude for their attitudes than their less revolutionary rap peers).3) As an individual, M.I.A. can't really be equated with the negative side of her politics (obv she is not behind the latest Tamil Tiger bombing etc.), whereas the dancehall scene's rootedness in its own geographical/social/cultural collective identity makes it harder to distinguish between the artistic and practical expression of their dodgy politics (or, obv, also makes the two easier to conflate).4) The combination of the above means that it's a lot easier for people to mediate between their enjoyment of the music and their uncertainty wrt to the politics and find a compromise between the two; this is distinct from the radical disjuncture which is required for an educated liberal Western individual to enjoy most dancehall, where the dodgy politics form a sort of black hole in the enjoyment.
Whereas perhaps the "Dissensus Position" is the opposite of this: having spent so long acclimatizing to the dodgy politics of dancehall/grime/hip hop and working out "strategies for enjoyment", having accepted that enjoyment becomes difficult in this fashion, M.I.A.'s more palatable (to the liberal media) version of the same seems suspicious and cynically seductive. I've always had the same problem with my friends who automatically liked Public Enemy and automatically disliked all gangsta hip hop! But I recognise that my resentment doesn't stem from some objective flaw in Public Enemy's music itself.
I have some more thoughts on this but I'll have to come back.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)
― Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)
Alex do you absolutely positively HAVE to have the last word in everything. I just said, let's quite it because it's boring. If you want to be a cock, then you can do it on your own. I'm not playing any more.
― stelfox, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)
I'm not seeing any irony here at all, tim. i'mnot seeing this as a rockist v popist thing at all. It's just about liking and not liking a record and the reasons behind it. I think rockism and popism are pretty unhelpful red herrings in this context, anyway, especially given my feelings on the pop thread on dissensus.
― stelfox, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)
Oh I didn't mean because you personally were attacking popism. Rather because Simon has framed that M.I.A. debate in those terms but yr particular elaboration of the anti-M.I.A. position (originally invoked on this thread as a sort of skeleton key for decoding his new take on the rockist/popist split) kinda contradicts him while agreeing with him, if you know what I mean. This is a fundamental root problem with Simon's assertion that popists or M.I.A. fans (whether or not you conflate the two) will adopt and discard any justification to protect their enjoyment: if you treat the anti-M.I.A. camp as having a "position" it too will look entirely contradictory and anti-theory.
" It's just about liking and not liking a record and the reasons behind it. I think rockism and popism are pretty unhelpful red herrings in this context."
I totally agree!
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 03:09 (twenty years ago)
I find Dissensus' slowness frustrating, and I'm a little too scared of the people there (o man they have blogs I read, they know about stuff, they can drop philosophy/crittheory into their discussions...) to ever think of joining/posting, but I'm very glad it exists and I like reading it, except when I get annoyed at eg the lady sov thread.
― lundy fastnet irish sea (cis), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)
― ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)
― steve-k, Tuesday, 12 April 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)
...I'd be fascinated to hear it if he did though!
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)
Who is borderpolice? they are indeed amazing on that pop thread. A while ago I tried to register and get into it but it wouldn't let me and now the thread has taken a direction which makes me kick myself that I didn't choose a more interesting degree and thus be able to contribute.
― The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)
"i've said it before and i will say it again SHE IS NOT VERY GOOD. 1) she makes shit beats 2) she can't rap 3) she can't sing 4) i don't admire her intentions"
That is a valid argument. However that was not the way he chose to phrase his argument. He made it kind of creepy and a wee bit racist. I have not followed Dissensus so maybe he better articulated his position there but from his blog posts and the voice article it felt as if she had not "suffered enough" for her art.
He then went on to post the fact that he was in fact part Sri Lancan (see I can't be racist cause I am one too) and make a point to show that her politics (whatever they are: something about purple haze and galang alang alang) were flawed by pointing to articles about how bad the Tamil tigers are.
or maybe I just didnt read the work correctly...
― hector (hector), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)
― hahaha, Friday, 3 March 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Friday, 3 March 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 3 March 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 3 March 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.woebot.com/2008/01/farewell.html
No more Woebot blog or posting, but dissensus continues.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 7 January 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
as all that kind of stuff went, i rather liked woebot. haven't read anything he's written in about two years, mind.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 January 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
He hasn't really written that much in two years actually, just a lot of record cover posting and the Woebot.tv thing.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 7 January 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
oh, magic! i've missed sod all, then.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 January 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)
d
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 7 January 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
furthermore it's one of the most tortuously-written, indulgent crocks of shite I've ever struggled through
I'm saying nothing.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 09:13 (seventeen years ago)
Hi everyone! I hope you are well? Dissensus is, I'm sure we can all agree, brilliant.
-
In a weeks time on October 12th 2009 I need to pay $500 to keep this place open. Please see this thread for a more in-depth technical discussion and explanation for the reason of the steep cost.
Last year people dug deep, however although I achieved my basic aim, I paid more than I would have liked to. If you use and enjoy the forum please remember that many small contributions amount to a generous sum of money.
Please send dollars to my Paypal account al✧✧✧@hollowea✧✧✧.o✧✧ and make sure to post on this thread and tell everyone how much you have contributed.
Best wishes,[Your Janitor] Woebot
― curmudgeon, Monday, 5 October 2009 23:31 (fifteen years ago)
Dissensus is, I'm sure we can all agree, brilliant.
― xhuxk mangione (deej), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:32 (fifteen years ago)
I luv Woebot and all that but I never look at Dissensus anymore.
― CosMc (Raw Patrick), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:37 (fifteen years ago)
some lol posts from their 'hip hop references that fly over your head' thread
― xhuxk mangione (deej), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:49 (fifteen years ago)
cranerBeast of Burden Join Date: Oct 2004Posts: 2,753Posted 16-09-2009, 05:24 PM #72Why did Prodigy go to jail? I thought he was a nice middle class chap.