Dissensus--c/d?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Some good stuff on there but a little dry sometimes. Less snarkiness than ILM but also a bit humourless and less fun/playful? Also gots ppl like Noodles and Logan Sama and Plasticman posting, which is no bad thing...

What's the verdict

Swarvo forearm, Friday, 1 April 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

yes, let's do this, this is a good idea.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)

oh let's not do this.

(haha xpost)

mark p (Mark P), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:44 (twenty years ago)

Being somewhere else: Classic or Dud?
Having It: Classic or Dud?
Mike Toreno: Classic or Dud?
Ignorant cunts with no grasp of logic: Classic or Dud?

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:47 (twenty years ago)

i don't think it's less fun OR less snarky it's just too much all about one thing.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)

its too slow!

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:51 (twenty years ago)

it's just something else.

seriously, let's not do this.

mark p (Mark P), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)

Mike Toreno gives me a hard-on tho.

Ferlin Husky (noodle vague), Friday, 1 April 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)

why let's not do this mark? i don't see why not. i think dissensus is okay, but a bit wrongly named. i mean, they all basically agree, right? it has less of teh funny than ilx and is a bit up itself. but i don't hate it.

NR_Q, Friday, 1 April 2005 10:45 (twenty years ago)

messageboards discussing other messageboards is kind of lame, though.

pete b. (pete b.), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:49 (twenty years ago)

Not that that's ever stooped anyone b efore, though!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)

we have a chance for a better future, though!

pete b. (pete b.), Friday, 1 April 2005 10:52 (twenty years ago)

Earnest. Like early ILM.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 1 April 2005 11:03 (twenty years ago)

very pompous at times, and quite self important.

blahbarian, Friday, 1 April 2005 11:31 (twenty years ago)

yeah but noodles posts there!

scg, Friday, 1 April 2005 12:47 (twenty years ago)

Who's gonna start a Velvet Rope: C/D thread?

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 1 April 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

Conversation Heard Outside A Bar: C/D

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 1 April 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

Also: we shd be the Jets.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 1 April 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)

Matt Woebot, who started dissensus, and Simon Reynolds post there, but not here. Lots of grime lovers there.

Steve-k (Steve K), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

Noodles, people!

Airtube (nordicskilla), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)

Noodles!

Airtube (nordicskilla), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

mr. noodles?

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 1 April 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)

It really depends on your love for Grime, obviously.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:27 (twenty years ago)

They have a black metal thread and they are nice people who would rather not argue so I like them and am disaapointed in them.

Sami Jheryllkanyga, Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:34 (twenty years ago)

a thread i started here, got no responses

started the same thread there, got no responses either

difficult to choose

charltonlido (gareth), Saturday, 2 April 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)

Which thread was this?

Gareth have you heard/do you like Eclection?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 13:55 (twenty years ago)

cant remember. maybe it was Cosmic Michael...

who are eclection?

charltonlido (gareth), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

they were a british-based multi-nationality folk-pop group from the late '60's. One of them wound up in fairport convention, another wound up in sailor (!) I was listening to their only album, which was on elektra. (it flopped, and the singer dropped out of music altogether) and for some reason I thought of you, and some of the stuff you've been asking about. The album is 2/3 a bit great, 1/3 a bit twee in the brit-psych manner. It's kind of a weird mix up - they do these massive-sounding vocal harmonies, but they aren't "cool" sounding, they're kind of like new seekers massive, the band kind of rocks, sort of. Their kind of folky, but also bordering on cheesy mor pop. The singer, kerilee male has this awesomely powerful voice, I mean, she really lays it on, and it fucking hits you. she sounds kind of gospelly-folky. there's a cd issue, but i've had 2 copies of it, and they must have fucked up the transfer b/c it has this annoying warbling sound running through it. hit up slsk for a copy of it maybe? let me know what you think if you do.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)

"they're", not "their", argh.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

www.sailor-marinero.com/related_eclection.htm

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 2 April 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

They have a black metal thread and they are nice people who would rather not argue so I like them and am disaapointed in them.
-- Sami Jheryllkanyga

Indeed they are eager to please and maintain consensus, is this not ironic, insofar as they are called Dissensus, yet seeking consensus? This is indeed hypocrisy, and I sneer at them and walk swiftly from the room for such stupidity.

Janne Karlsson, Sunday, 3 April 2005 01:28 (twenty years ago)

How do they seek consensus?

djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 3 April 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)

Through a process known as reasoned conversation.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 02:59 (twenty years ago)

It's this new thing.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 02:59 (twenty years ago)

haha

djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 3 April 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)

Girls, stick a big dildo in your ass.

me, Sunday, 3 April 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)

i think dissensus had an ilx thread. can't remember if it was a reasoned conversation or not. probably.

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)

i was talking about how excellent the ILM interface was on that thread then woebot locked it.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:03 (twenty years ago)

should we reciprocate?

btw thats true jed...

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)

Dissensus is not easy to look at or navigate. ILX is so simple it's transparent.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)

"How do they seek consensus?"

By not talking about Lady Sovereign. Just kidding. It's a very nice alternative, nothing dud nor classic about it. Only a bit too intellectual for my liking but that's all my *fault* (low self-esteem/intellect). :-)

nathalie doing a soft foot shuffle (stevie nixed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:36 (twenty years ago)

haha, i remember the lady sov thread being the most divisive on there too - but then the thread got, like, 7 pages long and it's not easy to skim/get the jist of a long thread if it's on several pages (and whit on black with green!) so i just lose the will to continue.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)

interesting sidenote -- poss. the difficulty of the dissensus interface encourages longer, more thoughtful posts as opposed to the chatlike quip-encouraging ease of ilx?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)

annihilating rhythms vs dick jokes and electrohouse

Ronan (Ronan), Sunday, 3 April 2005 06:49 (twenty years ago)

i dunno sterl. i go there irregularily but i don't see a lot of long thoughtful posts. i like it there though. i just find the combination of the interface and the relatively small user group/slowness of response kind of frustrating. an alternative like nat said sure.

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:01 (twenty years ago)

one interesting thing is that it shows the posts/views ratio - one current thread had 70 posts and almost 2,500 views. i find that staggering. i wonder what ilx's posts to vies ratio is?

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)

yes!

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Sunday, 3 April 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

maybe its more in the less-freqented sections -- i.e. thought, etc. they have less posters, long-live threads, & lengthy theory laden posts. sorta reminds me of early ilx but with v. difft theoretical touchstones.

could also be the "hashing out" phase of a new discussion group.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

could be some very timid lurkers

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 3 April 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

I like dissensus. I've exchanged music with people there.

djdee (djdee2005), Sunday, 3 April 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)

And off they slither again. Bye.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

alex, this would be more interesting if you learned how to formulate arguments and discuss things, actually MAKING A PROPER, SALIENT POINT instead of this incessant game of "i know you are, what am i?" i really cannot be bothered with it. once again, i cropped up here and posted because people were making idiotic suggestions that not liking a record by default makes someone at best ignorant of their own creeping racism, at worst an extreme rightist nutbag and once again i really wish i hadn't.

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

Pointing out that she's not posited herself as the Queen of the Oppressed and that your engaging in fantasy making of the highest order isn't a salient point?

Anyway I don't think you are a creepy racist or an extreme rightist nutbag. If I've implied that I apologize.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

"homeless music"

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

anyway, it was actually what blahwotsisface was implying abt simon's points that i was objecting to.

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

Am I misreading that "homeless music" line? Cuz my impression is that it sort of directly refutes the point that you are making re: positioning herself at the epicenter of these "scenes" vis-a-vis her stated inability to actually FEEL at home within them?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

Cuz my impression is that it sort of directly refutes the point that you are making re: positioning herself at the epicenter of these "scenes"

well that might be because i HAVE NEVER ONCE SAID that she is at the epicentre of anything or even that she believes that she is. stop trying being such a smartarse and read whay i'm saying. she has positioned herself, by virtue of the sources she uses alone and then by the imagery/lyrical references she employs, as a filter for dancehall, grime, favela funk etc. given the way critics (some of whom i'd have xpected better of) have jumped on this aspect of her, this is a bad thing and will work to the detriment of those artists who *are* actually working at the epicenters of said scenes. that and the fact that i just flat-out think that both the album and the mix have sounded shitty.

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)

Uh okay. As I am sure I've said many times before I can't possibly imagine how what her making her music is bad for these scenes or artists. Rather than rehash that though let's go back to discussing Dissensus and it's classic-or-dud-ness.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)

but if you thought m.i.a. wasn't shit then wouldn't her success (at getting hype) help dancehall/grime/favela/etc? (xpost)

artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)

because with the current paucity of media that will touch these other genres (i get a dancehall/grime/something interesting piece in the broadsheets here about twice, three times a year if i'm lucky and that's bloody good going) that if they have one artist that ticks all these boxes, then they'll go for that at the expense of several other pieces - all the quicker to get back to writing about coldplay. (i know what i'm talking about here - one of my editores turned down a piece from me for the 1st time in ages, saying "i can't do any more dancehall, we've just covered MIA a while ago"!). this sucks the oxygen away from other more deserving artists and is a real waste. the thing is that if MIA makes people go and buy a ward 21 album, check out macka diamond's new CD, snap up singalong by crazy titch or the forthcoming kano album, then that's all fine and dandy, but for the most part i don't see this happening coz they'll be told that she's the best of all the above and will believe it

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

so really, what you're saying is MIA's success negatively impacts your journalism career

;) kidding!

just saying, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

if i thought like that i'd have packed it in long ago

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

Even if that's true (and I don't see how it possibly could be--I find it hard to believe that Ivy and Lethal B and Ce'Cecile would have been featured in the NYTimes if not mentioned by M.I.A. and I have to imagine that mention was beneficial or at least it would be if Ce'Cecile could release a damn album--it seems far more likely to me that pieces can be SOLD piggybacked on her "success") shouldn't your REAL complaint be with these broadsheets who set asinine quotas on genres not M.I.A.?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

well i think she's the oen doing the piggybacking and it's a shocking indictment that she can be the one who "breaks" these artists because i've said it before and i will say it again SHE IS NOT VERY GOOD. 1) she makes shit beats 2) she can't rap 3) she can't sing 4) i don't admire her intentions. i am allowed to say these things, you know.

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

I would never say M.I.A. was a gifted rapper or a gifted singer but I love most of her beats to death and there's something about the way she interfaces with them that really, really works; she has an excellent sense of craftmanship and pacing, plus her off-kilter phrasing speaks very strongly to the music nerd in me.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:56 (twenty years ago)

she could use a little bit more Neneh Cherry-esque "WOSSSS EEE LIIIIIKE? WHATS HE LIIIKE ANYWAAAY?" i reckon

Buff Hallows Dance (blueski), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

ok let's call a halt to this, it's really boring

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

Grrr. Next time I'm downloading the fucking buzz album so that when I actually get to hear it and want to talk about it, everyone else won't be all, "bah, that's boring, we've already said everything that needs to be said about this piece of music even though 80% of us couldn't sing a song or play an instrument to save our lives and therefore have no conception of the musician's perspective; go away and make more dick jokes".

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

i was talking about the argument dan, not your comment, plus this isn't the right thread for it anyway. sorry for any cross-posting offence caused.

stelfox, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

"(i know what i'm talking about here - one of my editores turned down a piece from me for the 1st time in ages, saying "i can't do any more dancehall, we've just covered MIA a while ago"!)."

thats not MIA's fault, that's the idiocy of mainstream editors thats to blame.

ppp, Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

Its a beautiful day out here. Is it beautiful where you are? I think I'm going to listen to Christina Milian's "Whatever You Want" and then go play some basketball. If anyone's in the Ohio area, give me a holler, I'm up for a pickup game.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

"i am allowed to say these things, you know."

Whatever.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

"Its a beautiful day out here. Is it beautiful where you are? I think I'm going to listen to Christina Milian's "Whatever You Want" and then go play some basketball. If anyone's in the Ohio area, give me a holler, I'm up for a pickup game."

"Whatever You Want" really is the best song ever, isn't it? I fear I will play it at every party I am even slightly involved in from now until i die.

The irony of course about Stelfox's complaints is that they map onto a critique of rockism not popism. There's nothing about M.I.A. that makes her more likely to shift across the board; there's a million things that make her more interesting from a broadsheet angle - only, funnily enough it's not that far from the stuff that made dancehall interesting from a broadsheet angle in '04 - good beats + dodgy politics - and from the four or so articles I've seen not many in the media are likely to give her politics a free ride. The extent to which she'll fare better than dancehall in such articles boils down to the following:

1) the liberal media condemn homophobia universally and uncategorically, but approach country-specific civil warfare and insurrection on a case-by-case basis and with a great deal of handwringing
2) plus critics have been waiting for booty music to become more vaguely lefty political since Public Enemy's demise so they're primed to liked M.I.A. (Public Enemy had a lot of dodgy politics too, lest we forget, and have historically also been given more latitude for their attitudes than their less revolutionary rap peers).
3) As an individual, M.I.A. can't really be equated with the negative side of her politics (obv she is not behind the latest Tamil Tiger bombing etc.), whereas the dancehall scene's rootedness in its own geographical/social/cultural collective identity makes it harder to distinguish between the artistic and practical expression of their dodgy politics (or, obv, also makes the two easier to conflate).
4) The combination of the above means that it's a lot easier for people to mediate between their enjoyment of the music and their uncertainty wrt to the politics and find a compromise between the two; this is distinct from the radical disjuncture which is required for an educated liberal Western individual to enjoy most dancehall, where the dodgy politics form a sort of black hole in the enjoyment.

Whereas perhaps the "Dissensus Position" is the opposite of this: having spent so long acclimatizing to the dodgy politics of dancehall/grime/hip hop and working out "strategies for enjoyment", having accepted that enjoyment becomes difficult in this fashion, M.I.A.'s more palatable (to the liberal media) version of the same seems suspicious and cynically seductive. I've always had the same problem with my friends who automatically liked Public Enemy and automatically disliked all gangsta hip hop! But I recognise that my resentment doesn't stem from some objective flaw in Public Enemy's music itself.

I have some more thoughts on this but I'll have to come back.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

W/r/t your most important point: I think "Whatever You Want" would have been so much bigger if they had released it before "Dip It Low." I believe DIL was released in late summer and "Whatever You Want" a bit later, when "Whatever You Want" is clearly an early summer track at the latest. As dr. bill said, you don't release your "baby boy" before your "crazy in love."

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)

"i am allowed to say these things, you know."

Whatever.

Alex do you absolutely positively HAVE to have the last word in everything. I just said, let's quite it because it's boring. If you want to be a cock, then you can do it on your own. I'm not playing any more.

stelfox, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)

The irony of course about Stelfox's complaints is that they map onto a critique of rockism not popism.

I'm not seeing any irony here at all, tim. i'mnot seeing this as a rockist v popist thing at all. It's just about liking and not liking a record and the reasons behind it. I think rockism and popism are pretty unhelpful red herrings in this context, anyway, especially given my feelings on the pop thread on dissensus.

stelfox, Wednesday, 6 April 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)

"I'm not seeing any irony here at all, tim. i'mnot seeing this as a rockist v popist thing at all."

Oh I didn't mean because you personally were attacking popism. Rather because Simon has framed that M.I.A. debate in those terms but yr particular elaboration of the anti-M.I.A. position (originally invoked on this thread as a sort of skeleton key for decoding his new take on the rockist/popist split) kinda contradicts him while agreeing with him, if you know what I mean. This is a fundamental root problem with Simon's assertion that popists or M.I.A. fans (whether or not you conflate the two) will adopt and discard any justification to protect their enjoyment: if you treat the anti-M.I.A. camp as having a "position" it too will look entirely contradictory and anti-theory.

" It's just about liking and not liking a record and the reasons behind it. I think rockism and popism are pretty unhelpful red herrings in this context."

I totally agree!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 03:09 (twenty years ago)

O this is cool: I opened this thread thinking 'o god ilm discusses dissensus worst idea ever' and instead there's lots of Tim being fantastic.

I find Dissensus' slowness frustrating, and I'm a little too scared of the people there (o man they have blogs I read, they know about stuff, they can drop philosophy/crittheory into their discussions...) to ever think of joining/posting, but I'm very glad it exists and I like reading it, except when I get annoyed at eg the lady sov thread.

lundy fastnet irish sea (cis), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

Is BorderPolice an ILM regular? She/He is doing amazing things on that there Pop thread.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

clearly the entire debate rests on who out of the lex and k-punk gets to be bree van de kamp.

hold tight the private caller (mwah), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

wow, and i thought this was gonna be an 'us against them' thread.

ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 15:51 (twenty years ago)

For those of us who haven't watched enough "Desperate Housewives" episodes to know about Bree, or read enough Foucault, can ya school us on who K-punk will be on the show...

steve-k, Tuesday, 12 April 2005 19:26 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure if hold tight/prima has a deeper point than the fact that both Alex and Mark K-Punk use Bree as an avatar.

...I'd be fascinated to hear it if he did though!

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)

As would I! I agree with a lot of what K-Punk says though.

Who is borderpolice? they are indeed amazing on that pop thread. A while ago I tried to register and get into it but it wouldn't let me and now the thread has taken a direction which makes me kick myself that I didn't choose a more interesting degree and thus be able to contribute.

The Lex (The Lex), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)

Stelfox I have always thought a lot of both yours and Simon's work but when he started on the whole MIA thing he should have said exactly what you said up thread.

"i've said it before and i will say it again SHE IS NOT VERY GOOD. 1) she makes shit beats 2) she can't rap 3) she can't sing 4) i don't admire her intentions"

That is a valid argument. However that was not the way he chose to phrase his argument. He made it kind of creepy and a wee bit racist. I have not followed Dissensus so maybe he better articulated his position there but from his blog posts and the voice article it felt as if she had not "suffered enough" for her art.

He then went on to post the fact that he was in fact part Sri Lancan (see I can't be racist cause I am one too) and make a point to show that her politics (whatever they are: something about purple haze and galang alang alang) were flawed by pointing to articles about how bad the Tamil tigers are.

or maybe I just didnt read the work correctly...

hector (hector), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

ten months pass...
dissensus is fucking hilarious
lots of intellectual posing and people being really smug and haughty with their intellectualism (they even said in one thread 'if you cant cope with the intelligence here, then dont post' or something similar)
its lots of 'you suck me off, ill suck you off' type of exchanges
brilliant
woebot needs to stop his desire for simon reynolds to finger his rectum as well

hahaha, Friday, 3 March 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

i'm sorry that no-one reads your blog.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Friday, 3 March 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

pwnt.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 3 March 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

Who are these people?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 3 March 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.woebot.com/2008/01/farewell.html

No more Woebot blog or posting, but dissensus continues.

curmudgeon, Monday, 7 January 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)

as all that kind of stuff went, i rather liked woebot. haven't read anything he's written in about two years, mind.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 January 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)

He hasn't really written that much in two years actually, just a lot of record cover posting and the Woebot.tv thing.

Alex in SF, Monday, 7 January 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)

oh, magic! i've missed sod all, then.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 January 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)

d

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 7 January 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

furthermore it's one of the most tortuously-written, indulgent crocks of shite I've ever struggled through

I'm saying nothing.

Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 8 January 2008 09:13 (seventeen years ago)

one year passes...

Hi everyone! I hope you are well? Dissensus is, I'm sure we can all agree, brilliant.

-

In a weeks time on October 12th 2009 I need to pay $500 to keep this place open. Please see this thread for a more in-depth technical discussion and explanation for the reason of the steep cost.

Last year people dug deep, however although I achieved my basic aim, I paid more than I would have liked to. If you use and enjoy the forum please remember that many small contributions amount to a generous sum of money.

Please send dollars to my Paypal account al✧✧✧@hollowea✧✧✧.o✧✧ and make sure to post on this thread and tell everyone how much you have contributed.

Best wishes,
[Your Janitor] Woebot

curmudgeon, Monday, 5 October 2009 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

Dissensus is, I'm sure we can all agree, brilliant.

xhuxk mangione (deej), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:32 (fifteen years ago)

I luv Woebot and all that but I never look at Dissensus anymore.

CosMc (Raw Patrick), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:37 (fifteen years ago)

some lol posts from their 'hip hop references that fly over your head' thread

xhuxk mangione (deej), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

craner
Beast of Burden

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,753
Posted 16-09-2009, 05:24 PM #72
Why did Prodigy go to jail? I thought he was a nice middle class chap.

xhuxk mangione (deej), Monday, 5 October 2009 23:49 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.