Here's what I have to say; here's Tom's riposte.
― David Raposa, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― gareth, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
As he notes near the end, nostalgia's probably a last-gasp attempt at staying young. The reason for its pervasiveness, I imagine, is its availability. With motion pictures and television and other visual media (especially periodicals), it's easy to go back and experience something again. There's always been a market for it; these technological advances make it easier to meet the demand. (Seems obvious to say this, though.)
A lot also has to do, of course, with the relative age of those in positions of power (editors at magazine, program directors, etc.) Odd to note how some eras (50s nuclear family & 60s counterculture) are looked back on reverentially, idealized, while others (70s disco; 80s new-wave) are seen as kitschy. And this doesn't just apply to music (though my defining the 70s & 80s in terms of music might have something to do with their relative lack of serious consideration).
― XStatic Peace, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Buzzcocks and Chameleons songs inevitably come to mind to me when the word 'nostalgia' is invoked, especially the former song, which is to my mind at once hilarious and heartfelt. The Chameleons collapsed in a messy total heap and when they reunited in 2000 I sure as hell went to their shows, feeling as much of a need as it sounds like David, Sterling, etc. felt for MoB (who are good and all, to be sure).
Tom's point is a good one, though -- it can cut both ways, however. The Human League may well have kept going, but so has REM, and as that Smiths vs. REM thread showed, do they deserve more respect as well? Of course, you can argue that the whole fact REM generally do get more has something to do with...ROCKISM! Run!
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean Carruthers, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The thing I thought of when looking at this thread earlier was the difference between the world of music and the world of film, for example. If Spielberg and Lucas decided to do another movie together, would everyone say, "Aw geeze, why are they doing this? Can't they work on their own anymore? Do they really have to fall back on the glories of Raiders again?"
― Andy K., Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
That's because Jihad Tommy is with the terrorists.
― Norman Phay, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Secondly, and lastly, nostalgia can most certainly be a 'good' thing insofar as it allows people to express themselves in different ways and to imaginatively reconstruct the past. For me a good example of this is Fennesz's Endless Summer. The more intuitive our 'memory' of the past becomes, the more honestly we will be able to cope with our regrets, collective and individual.
― Laavanyan, Friday, 18 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Saturday, 19 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
The one I saw was fan-fucking-tastic, as they say.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)