I'm not sure if we've discussed this before, but I don't really care. Discuss it now.
It seems to me that some story about musicians 'maturing' or 'making the transition into maturity' is popular when talking about lots of kinds of music, but specifically rock, because of its associations with immaturity. I've seen talk like this now and then about hip-hop artists or records, but perhaps we're just now coming to a point in history where we could expect to have lots of records where the artists are moving from youthful immaturity into maturity. Do you think this is so? Would there be anything special about this as regards hip-hop? Like, would it be harder or easier, or would it matter at all that it's hip-hop? Are there lots of records like this out there right now that I just don't know about? Etc. Discuss in any related way you want.
― Josh, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― ethan, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
i'm just gonna go balls out with this theory: hiphop's "sonic pallette" is not refined enough to support the sort of "maturity moves" that josh is talking about, that we see in rock. (nb: i don't see this as a bad thing. not one bit. i'd rather a music be emotionally stunted and still exciting than capable of expressing "any emotion the artist wishes" and a big old stinky pile of 80s don henley crapola.)
― jess, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Honda, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
upon rereading later in the day, "sonic palette" was probably the wrong phrase. i do believe that the reliance on the beat sometimes leaves hiphop hamstrung by it's own construction. but then again it's essential to the proceedings, so hiphop doesnt = hiphop without the beat? (it seems on the surface like that's an obvious statement, but i think it bears examination. could hiphop as such exist without "the beat?") in many ways the content of hiphop has "matured", since we've gone from ghetto kids chatting about the party and getting funky fresh to multi-millionaires chatting up their watches, trousers, and stock options. but the worldview of hiphop is still located at crotch-level, like most pop. nb: again, i don't see this as a negative. it is what it is.
― Ian, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dare, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sterling Clover, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
but isn't mocking yrself just another mask?
regretting the life of gun cuz of yr dead homies then closing the album with a gun tale ain't regret.
and i agree about ms. jackson, 100%. also the "black cadillac and a pack of pampers, stack of questions with no answers" line.
― Kara Fig, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Rock gets called "mature" when it nicks folk, essentially, and hip- hop gets called "mature" when it nicks jazz.
― Nitsuh, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Jordan, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Which leads me to my answer: Pete Rock & CL Smooth.
― Tim, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
josh's question comes with a lot of baggage because i think most people around here will agree that maturity moves ala nitsuh's "appropriation of folk" are a bad thing, and most pop genres are much better "immature" and being what they are rather than striving for "more." (not sure that the theory holds up in practice across the board; i can't hear much "folk" in the 80s don henley i reference earlier, but i can think of few musics more noxiously "mature" in the sense we're talking.) when taking "maturity" as an essentially bad thing (be it henley and james taylor singing paens to their yoofs or chuck d and fucking ice t intellectually vamping - beyond their capability - on national tv), we're immediately put on the defensive, hence nasty cocktail jazz-hop like us3 being referenced. but what about someone like bob dylan - who's new album i would assume is doing what he's always done more or less (i havent heard it), but tempered and obviously shot through with his age and place (unselfconsciously.) guru's new "teacher/maturity" schtick seems close, but still a schtick. i can't decide if jay-z's own "love and theft" thirty odd years from now would be a good thing or not...
But is that objectively the case or just yer take on it? Which may seem obvious, I grant.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 20 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I hope I live long enough to see a 60-year old rapper make an interesting album about getting old.
― Mark, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tim, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
new c-murder?last petey pablonew beanie sigel
- maybe i had it totally off before, and in hip-hop SOME maturity signifiers (not all of them, obv.) can come way earllier because of what it is
- i think i may have originally had in mind, though i never mentioned it, attributions of 'maturing' to punk and indie and etc. records; i didn't mean to confine the range of examples to like uh mick jagger solo albums
― Josh (Josh), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 07:00 (twenty years ago)