http://www.tracksmusic.com/press.jsp?ID=36589
Press
For Immediate Release
Contact: Dean TurcolWorld Publications/Tracks407-405-0097dean.turcol@worldpub.net
Frank WoodSecret Communications513-621-1600
Tracks Magazine Placed on Hiatus
New York, NY – Tracks magazine has been placed on hiatus, it was announced by CEO John Rollins and Editor-in-Chief Alan Light. The hiatus is effective immediately. The current issue of Tracks (April/May) featuring Lucinda Williams on the cover is currently on newsstands. Launched in December 2003, Tracks was founded upon the premise of music for grownups, the population of music enthusiasts 30 and older who represent the majority of music purchasers.
"We executed on nearly all of our original vision points, including our editorial and advertising goals," Rollins says. "Tracks has attracted 380 pages of advertising, averaging nearly 50 pages per issue. This includes major consumer advertising from GM to Hewlett Packard to Columbia Sportswear. Additionally, the endemic advertising category of music demonstrated tremendous support of the publication by placing an average of 30 pages of advertising per issue."
"However, within our first year of operating, we recognized that the business would take longer to grow to the levels necessary to sustain profitability, which is a circulation of approximately 250,000," Rollins says. Currently the magazine's rate base is 150,000. "As a result of more time needed, our long term cash needs were greater than our original plan and therefore greater than our investor, Frank Wood, could support. So the cash resources required for significant circulation growth over a short period of time were not available. Simply, it is this limited total funding that has led to our decision to go on hiatus."
During the hiatus period, the management team of Tracks will continue to pursue new financing support with the goal of relaunching the magazine in the future.
Light believes that Tracks will find a way. "Being an independently funded, independently founded start-up has proved especially challenging," he says. "But with the single-greatest population of music purchasers being over the age of 30 and with no magazine, indeed no media, directed at this audience, we have always maintained – and still do – that there is a market to be served by Tracks."
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)
guess he's never heard of mojo.
otherwise: yawn.
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)
― Stupornaut (natepatrin), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 23:14 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:15 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:16 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:32 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)
ok so 2 of the 3 people I know who wrote for Tracks are over 30 (I didn't actually think the entire staff was under the focus audience age or anything). It's just funny.
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)
Starbucks: For real!
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:38 (twenty years ago)
I'll be surprised if Tracks returns. If if does, Alan Light would be wise to open his ears to some outside perspective. The current mission statement was not alluring to enough potential readers. Plus, I'm convinced that trying to target music fans by age often is a useless endeavor. If you're just trying to sell ads to skateboard companies and get kids to buy glossy photos of their favorite crap bands, you can do that. Revolver and AP have proven that. But otherwise, it's becoming more complicated every day.
Whatever the case, best of luck to Tracks. I appreciate what it was trying to do. It just wasn't very appealing.
― Mr Deeds (Mr Deeds), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:40 (twenty years ago)
oh yeah where I say over I mean 2 under 30.
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 00:42 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:07 (twenty years ago)
wait, what about rolling stone? is the average age of the rolling stone reader 20-something even though they have 50-something content?
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:13 (twenty years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:25 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:32 (twenty years ago)
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:34 (twenty years ago)
but it doesn't address the issues of how boring tracks is/was. and how utterly lacking a sense of humor it is/was. they had some damn good writers who wrote some very readable pieces on some blindingly obvious topics. except for the monthly photo essay, which was often great, there was nothing entertaining about that magazine, ever. reverent, yes. entertaining, no.
also they sent me waaaaay too many pieces of mail trying to get me to resubscribe after my first year sub ran out. they could've saved themselves some money, and some trees, right there.
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:36 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)
― Steve-k (Steve K), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)
― ng, Wednesday, 20 April 2005 02:14 (twenty years ago)
― geeta (geeta), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 04:05 (twenty years ago)
― Mr Deeds (Mr Deeds), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 04:36 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 04:59 (twenty years ago)
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 09:11 (twenty years ago)
― don weiner, Wednesday, 20 April 2005 09:20 (twenty years ago)
It's definitely a leaner operation with a smaller subscription base, and I actually prefer that. They've zeroed in on the growing AAA/Americana/"Hear Music"/adult alternative + compatible indie rock audience, and they seem more focused than Tracks was (though I haven't read much of Tracks). Paste is also showing growth, with the online store, the promo DVDs and CDs, and plans to go monthly soon.
It is even more bland.
I'll just leave that as "eye of the beholder" - I wouldn't normally have written for a magazine in that space, but the editors are terrific and they cover what they cover very well. I have some (30+ old) friends who love AAA radio and listen to stations like Phillie's WXPN, and when they flipped through a recent issue of Paste, they just kept saying, "These are all artists I love." Which suggests that they know what they're doing.
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)
― anyanon, Wednesday, 20 April 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)
If not could it expand to fill the gap which Tracks has left, taking a more American flavour to the brand? Much like Maxim did following the collapse in sales of the 'top shelf' magazines back in the 90's.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)
I also recently found out they're a magazine writing about music from a "Christian" prospective. According to people I’ve talked to and information that's been going around, they've been known to turn down pieces on lesser known artists that have more “liberal” views. They also won’t print any profanity. Not that that’s a horrible thing – just goes along with the pretentious and humorless comment above. A large number of their writers also write for Christianity Today Magazine and Jeffrey Overstreet, one of their film reviewers, is another big contributor to Christianity Today and other online Christian mags. He's written articles about "cleaning up Hollywood" and "producing films from a more "Christian perspective". I met another writer of there's in San Francisco a couple weeks ago who boasted about how the staff is Christian and the magazine is written from that perspective. I really felt like the guy was a slime. The whole thing just doesn’t sit right with me.
BTW, I’ve picked up issues of No Depression and Harp in airports before. They are there, just not in big numbers like Tracks.
Mark
― Mark Pfitzer, Wednesday, 20 April 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)
This isn't really about having an "all Christianity is bad" reaction. I do know they have ties to some very controversial evangelists and Rev. Joe Kirk - one of the owners of the magazine is an outspoken christian pro-lifer. He claims he only wants to "save the children" but I think there's more to it than that.
― Mitch Alpern, Wednesday, 20 April 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)
Finally, we'd like to offer a shout-out (ie. "fuck you") to the cowards and thought-cops in the Ad Dept at Paste Magazine who have deemed our proposed advertisement for 'Face The Truth' to be beyond the bounds of "good taste." God forbid that anything might challenge the sensibilities of Paste's Yep Roc-loving, Starbucks-guzzling, Wes Anderson-worshipping readership. Seriously, if there's anything we or SM have done that is a poor fit with Paste's Ad Dept's narrow worldview, that is the highest compliment we've been paid since the last time Spin refused to run one of our ads.
The precise ad is reproduced here (you saw an alternative version of it as a poster, in the last news update):
ihttp://www.matadorrecords.com/images/news/sm_paste_ad.jpg
― asl, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)
― asl, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)
― save the robot (save the robot), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 3 May 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/print/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000962174
Paste Buys Tracks' SubsJune 15, 2005By Stephanie D. Smith
Atlanta-based music magazine Paste announced today that it will acquire the subscriber base of the defunct Tracks. The move will triple Paste's subscriptions from 15,000 to 50,000, and will now guarantee advertisers a circulation of 120,000.
Paste's August/September issue will be the first to be received by Tracks subscribers. Tracks, launched by former Vibe/Spin Ventures executives John Rollins and Alan Light in December 2003, folded in April after the magazine ran out of funding.
“We’ve admired Tracks since they launched in 2003. Like Paste, Tracks focused on the music, rather than the over-the-top celebrity 'news' with which we are constantly inundated," said Nick Purdy, Paste publisher. "Our readership has a lot in common with Tracks'. They are selective taste-makers in tune with popular culture - they're fans of Coldplay, The White Stripes, and Aimee Mann, they own the Garden State DVD - but they also want to know what's just under the radar."
Paste is an independent bimonthly magazine that covers underground as well as mainstream music, films, and pop culture for 18- to 49-year-olds. The three-year-old title polybags a CD of new music with every issue and mails a DVD sampler with movie trailers and music videos to subscribers. Paste also has a weekly "Paste Picks" segment, where Paste's editors discuss new music and movies, that airs Tuesdays on CNN Headline News.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Friday, 17 June 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 17 June 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)
― La Monte (La Monte), Sunday, 19 June 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)
in this month's Paste, members of Slipknot discuss various retirement fund options!
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 19 June 2005 02:16 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Sunday, 19 June 2005 03:48 (twenty years ago)
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Sunday, 19 June 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Sunday, 19 June 2005 10:08 (twenty years ago)