How much do you think they could charge? Could they get away with more than what you would pay for a conventional audio CD, considering the dramatically increased volume of material on the format? This would presumably require some changes in the law regarding royalties on a track-by-track basis and subsequent allocations to all the people involved in each recording. I can't think of another reason why it hasn't taken off but I wish it would.
― $V£N! (blueski), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 13:55 (twenty years ago)
I's support such a move - especially with some dance labels say AREAL 12"s 1 - 25 all on one CD - satisfy cost effectiveness/usefulness of MP3s/desire for physical posession/liner notes (thinking of AREAL notes on their releases. + With with vinyl's hold on dance (though changing) I think you argue a reduced royalty rate with the artists - it'd be targeting a different market.
― Jedmond (Jedmond), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)
― A / F#m / Bm / D (Lynskey), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)
― Jedmond (Jedmond), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)
actually, it's almost four days of material
Lesser also released his entire pre-Matador catalog on a single mp3 CD ROM in 2002.
I'm not sure most people would go for paying more than than what they're already used to for CDs/DVDs, it's the medium not the content.
I'm definitely interested in extended length formats, there's a lot of music that only starts making sense after it's been playing for half a day or so.
― milton parker (Jon L), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)
― John 2, Friday, 22 April 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)
― milton parker (Jon L), Friday, 22 April 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)