Nothing Personal Ladies

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I know I am going to get slammed for this and deservedly so. But here goes anyways, is it just me or does a significantly higher percentage of women than men have shit taste in music?? I don't think I'm the only one who feels this way. I find most(but certainly not all) women just listen to what's crammed down their throats and do not seek out more obscure music. They tend to stay with top 40. Of course many men do the same. OK, I said it. Rip my head off now, I can take it!

Jeff, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I like women who like crappy music. Good taste doesn't matter as much as tastes good.

Curt, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Isn't this the thesis behind Hi-fidelity i.e women have interesting lives and don't feel the need to be obsessed with music while (some) men are the opposite.

I'm sure mark s could explain more fully, heh heh.

Billy Dods, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Jeff, I really hope you're very, very, very young

Mark Morris, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think shit taste in music is definitely an equal thing between men and women.

electric sound of jim, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the question is rooted in the premise "Top 40 = Shit Music": as this premise is false, we need hardly proceed (that takes care of hornby also: you can't catch me like that billy so-called dods)

also note: JeffSSSS is careful not to declare what he considers "good" music, except that it must be "obscure"

mark s, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I am a women and I tend to agree with him. It is sad, but true, and it applies to more than music - books, pursuit of their own interests, etc. Too many women focus too much on men and their interests. We all learn as we go, of course, but in general I think its true. That's my opinion anyway. T

T, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(T = shoo-in for feminist post of the year!!)

lady di to THREAD!!

mark s, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i know, i know. it pains me as well.

T, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the question is rooted in the premise "Top 40 = Shit Music"

No, his premise is that listening *only* to Top 40 isn't as good as seeking out more than that. Quite different. And true.

Which is not to say than men aren't as prone to narrow habits of a different bent.

Curt, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think Jeff needs to meet more women.

Oliver, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I agree that men have their own limitations, no question. We all do. So to address the Q of does liking ONLY top 40 = Shit? I think that if you never listen to any other songs put out by an artist, except what makes it onto the radio, it would be stretching it to say that you have a more than a superficial interest in music. Maybe you're into other things, that's cool, but music? I'm going to vote no no no

T, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

lady di to THREAD!!

outta the way, feminazi coming through ;)

well, this is kinda dumb. what is bad taste anyway? its quite subjective really. for myself, a person with bad taste is someone who is obsessed with a genre that i find unlistenable and who doesn't venture outside of that genre. the only people i know of who do this are men. (like i know a few guys who only listen to progrock, and i know lots of males of wide age ranges who only listen to pop-punk). but y'know thats my personal take. i mean, the same men i'm knockin here probably think I have shit taste in music. i know some girls who buy stuff that i wouldn't buy, but their taste isn't absolutely terrible.

maybe its true that more women like chart music than men, i don't know. but who cares? chart music isn't all bad. i'd rather listen to kylie minogue than ELP.

di, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Although this hasn't been my personal experience at all, the perception seems to be that women are less obsessive about music. That's probably a good thing. Fetishizing music is a waste of energy. You could do much worse that stay with the top 40, you could be into indie rock for example.

Kris, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, his premise is that listening *only* to Top 40 isn't as good as seeking out more than that. Quite different. And true.

i had a bit of trouble following T's last post, but maybe this is what she was saying?: not everyone is a Big Fan of music and if they ain't they shouldn't be expected to be. i would be fuckin pissed off if someone decided i had "crap taste" in art when i don't presume to know anything about it. its judging something out of context really.

di, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Please see original thread : . . .But here goes anyways, is it just me or does a significantly higher percentage of women than men have shit taste in music?? . . .

We are discussing this point, not if people who are into differenet things suck. No one is saying you have to be into music, art, reading or anything for that matter, to be validated.

Jeff is making the observation, I am agreeing with it.

T, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

well good for you, T. i was just agreeing with others who answered that the thread is based on a false premise anyway.

di, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why is it, whenever these sorts of discussions come up, that people always bring up these straw men of "fetishizing" and "obsessives"? It's a pretty tired and tedious argument, at best. Maybe I feel differently because I'm a musician, but come on -- there are ways of relating passionately and thoughtfully to music other than those of the obsessive record collector and the armchair critic. It's not all about jockeying for status and the like; some of us delve deeply into music because we love it as a thing in and of itself, not as a substitute for alpha-male-dom or whatever you care to name.

I, personally, chase down the rarities that I chase down because I believe that they have something, musically, that I'm looking for and that will please or intrigue me. I can't deny that there's some excitement to getting a rara avis, but for me it's something perhaps more like archaeology than stamp collecting. (In that one gives us the Epic of Gilgamesh -- which still has the power to move people, after all these years -- and the other a little picture of an upside-down plane.)

And, getting back to the question that started this thread, can I say that I know many women who spend any time looking for these rarities? I suppose it depends. I do have female friends who chase things down with a fair amount of enthusiasm, but the proportion of those that do is definitely lower, even among the musicians I know (though the gap is a good bit smaller there). Why that is, I don't know. The "women tend to be socially oriented (and thus will gravitate towards well-known, common texts that are widely shared and provide a setting for and complement to social interaction)" argument seems pretty thin as an explanation, just as does the "men are obsessives who want to dominate through knowledge of trivia" argument. (And the argument that starts with something akin to "Since men are by nature explorers...")

But we certainly need something a bit better than just hurling "Obsessive!" and "Passive!" at each other ad infinitum, so...

Phil, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is it just me or does a significantly higher percentage of people who are not me than me have shit taste in music?

Please note, statistics from 2001 show that 0.01% of people who aren't me had good taste, and 98% of me had good taste that year.

emil.y, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Judging by some of the stuff I bought last year, I think about 68% of me had good taste. Can't vouch for anyone else

electric sound of jim, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why is it, whenever these sorts of discussions come up, that people always bring up these straw men of "fetishizing" and "obsessives"?

hey phil, did you mean what i was saying about boys who are obsessed with A genre? cos i tried to make it clear that i have no problem with people who are obsessed with music in general (cos i sorta am myself), and that my take on people with bad taste is purely personal.

i hope its not just cos you find me so offensive that you are determined to take issue with EVERYTHING i say.

di, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Throat not gagged by shit tasting music I will say you are WRONG Jeff and you can now consider yourself headless.

ducklingmonster, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A somewhat related broad generalization based on a very limited number of examples of mine: indie girls are much more capable/likely to enjoy candy coated MTV pop then indie boys.

bnw, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I suspect someone's bitter that their lay-dee didn't appreciate the joys of the Stereophonics back catalogue. Or some other rock/indie piffle...

Nicole, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Di: actually, it was Kris's comment that sparked my reply. I should've made that clearer -- sorry about that!

Phil, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

btw, I think the thing that's getting obscured here is the question of passionate and intelligent engagement with music. The never-venturing-beyond-top-40 thing is a red herring, in that it's only significant if it reflects the absence of that engagement. I don't think it's unfair to say that most people who lack that kind of engagement are just going to listen to whatever's closest at hand, and a lot of the time that's going to be, surprise, "whatever's on the radio", which will tend to be top-40 past or present (or, for the older set, Classics Lite).

I remember getting a ride home from my math teacher in high school, during which he turned on the radio, picking a station pretty much at random; I asked him what kind of music he liked, and he replied with something along those lines -- "whatever's on". It was pretty alien to me, but there's a world of people out there who have that same attitude, to varying degrees. I don't think it's unreasonable for a person who's passionate about music to be frustrated with people like that, although it's ultimately futile to revile them for it. It's certainly not unreasonable for that to play into a person's romantic life, and for frustrations to come of that; I've only dated a couple musicians, myself, but I can't imagine spending very long with someone who was genuinely apathetic about music. In that light, again, it's not a question of "not liking the right music", so much as a question of the underlying attitude that might lead one to choices that are either a product of apathy, or a consistent preference for the path of least resistance.

Phil, Monday, 21 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've only dated a couple musicians, myself, but I can't imagine spending very long with someone who was genuinely apathetic about music.

Should be something like: "Of the people I've dated, only a couple have been musicians, so it's not really important to me that they be as dedicated to music as I am -- but I can't imagine..." etc.

Phil, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

post structuralist enters the room... what is a woman?

what is taste??

what is a man?

who defines???

goeff, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Here I was all ready to agree with Jeff 100%, until I thought about it a bit more. For some reason, women aren't as initially forthcoming about how much they know, and if they REALLY don't know something they're more likely to admit it rather than bluff their way through disingenuously like guys will do, having to prove their mastery of every topic

dave q, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Isn't this the thesis behind Hi-fidelity i.e women have interesting lives and don't feel the need to be obsessed with music while (some) men are the opposite.
So I have a boring life ey? Don't think so.
Who is the judge of my taste in this situation anyway? I am quite sure that some will consider my taste to be weird. Others good. Others questionable. It's subjective and relative. Then again few women put a lot of time, energy and money in music. Although Greer was in my opinion wrong when she claimed "women don't listen to music," she still had a point. It is a luxury. I look around and only see a few women who know as much about music as I do (not to say that I feel superior). When I grew up, it never dawned on me that my gender should play a role in this. But now that I walk into a club, into a recordshop or post on this board, I do notice females aren't as *intereted* in it. And sadly yes my gender does play a role in this. Some people will always make these STUPID remarks. "Oh you just fancy the singer."
Secondly you immediately assume top 40 to be bad? You're missing out, buddy.

helenfordsdale, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

From my experience, girls who really get into music like ILMers do tend to focus exclusively on one or a handful of bands, while boys who become music lovers tend to develop a need for encyclopedical knowledge about a wider range of styles and artists. This has to do with females' vs males' natural disposition towards music, and maybe art in general. To the extreme and in simplistic but pleasant hornbyism, you can say that boys music will be digging from Abba to Zappa while girls will go 4AD ONLY...

This ultimately has nothing to do with taste but number.

Simon, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

reinforcement of stereotype that m=object oriented, f=subject oriented?

is there any truth in this? i don't know. but i agree with whoever above posted something about the way that things are actually expressed, rather than just how or what people like. worth considering anyway?

gareth, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i dunno. i think women more intense about certain bands/artists/types of music and r better at lisening than blokes who just quot catalog numbers. i think much more fun to lisen to music with women than blokes. blokes jus want to tear every record to bits with useless anal-ysis.

XStatic Peace, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I did have the thought that maybe not so many women are seen to take music 'seriously' because it's always been a predominantly male playing field. Women who want to play on it have to do so as men would (Oh my God! There's a *girl* near the stereo!), so music has never been written about/ produced by/ bought by women for women.

Anna, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

and ill tell u what, when u go into record shops, u always see women trying to get to the racks to look through them, but they always get subtly elbowed or kept out of the way by blokes - the subtext being what you doing looking at records, youre a woman, you shouldnt be in here.

XStatic Peace, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Some of the women I know combine very good taste in music with a less intense interest in it, i.e. if asked to judge the quality of a record they will generally come up with something pretty close to what I think, but they wouldn't go out of their way to offer that judgement. As Dave Q suggests, I think some people honestly don't care about letting other people know what they think of music (not the same as 'not caring about music', and I think maybe a higher proportion of these people are women.

Tom, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Working on the assumption that it *does* exist, the disparity between males and females listening to whatever's in the charts vs gettin' all alternative on yo ass is age-specific anyway, since as each group ages they tend to converge upon MOR anyway and abandon the actual charts for other radio stations. Questions here: is there a way to prove listening to radio vs listening to cds have different levels of intensity? Are there differences *between* radio stations chosen?

Also, if we were to talk about top 40 and teenage girls and boys these issues might be relevant: pop's intended audience and means of inspiring identification; socialisation of gender-related attitudes towards pop; differing gender-ratio of pop audiences dependent on time & place (early 90's grunge invasion and current hip hop dominance both = boy-heavy charts, yeah?).

Tim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

boys are scared of pop. i could turn sissy overnight so to hell with pop I want a REAL band like Ocean Colour Scene or Limp Bizkit. Now THATS real music.

Ronan, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

post structuralist enters the room...

Shouldn't you be questioning the inside / outside distinction as well?

alext, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Wahey -- first post with italics, and it WORKED!!!

alext, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

deconstructionist questions the hierarchies of interiority inherent in the notions of here and there by DANCING ON THE CEILING while SPITTING ON THE FLOOR!!

hurrah! or indeed boo! (since by assuming they are distinguishable WHAT ELSE ARE WE COMMITTING OURSELVES TO? EH!?)

mark s, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why is it true that only listening to the top 40 is bad? Quite frankly, I'd rather listen to 99% of the top 40 than anything by "obscure bands", which when said on this board usually means ass indie rubbish, not even halfway decent indie rubbish cos no one thinks those bands are obscure.

What's already been said that's true: women don't care as much about ramming their opinions everywhere. If someone said to me, Kylie Minogue is shit, just walking around down the street in real life, I'd be like, Oh what about this song? And if they said I hate that song, I'd leave it at that. I don't care, there are much better things to argue about. I fail to see how that means women have shit taste in music.

If anything, I find women have better taste in music because they're much more willing than men (stereotype alert, yes) to listen to a bigger variety. A lot of the men I know tend to fall into "This is what my mates listen to so I shall impress them with my knowledge" stereotypes, at least until they're around 25. Most of the women Iknow are like "I listen to this and fuck you if you don't like it", and just shrug it off if their friends don't also like, say, Jay-Z or something.

And yes, who is anyone to really say "XYZ is shit taste"? We all say it, but I find it a bit weird to lay out a blanket statement because you don't personally like the top 40 (which is extremely varied, for what it's worth, maybe Jeff should try branching out...)

Ally, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

poststructutralist questions, as much as answers, who is this we?

goeff, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Why is it true that only listening to the top 40 is bad?"

Because that's like walking into the grocery store and telling them to just fill you cart with whatever items take up the most shelf space. It's better to get off your ass and pick something out for yourself. (My apologies to anyone who shops that way.)

Curt, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That reminds me, I can never find my favourite soap or moisturiser in shops these days. Plus, several of my favourite flavours of various foodstuffs seem to have been discontinued. I need to seek out my local indie grocery.

electric sound of jim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Because that's like walking into the grocery store and telling them to just fill you cart with whatever items take up the most shelf space.

This is a very poor analogy. What if Pabst, at 25 cents a can from the grocery store around the corner, works well enough for me that I don't actually feel like driving 10 miles to some beverage botique and paying more for some carefully brewed specialty beer? Or what, even, if I decide I prefer Pabst to the carefully brewed specialty beers, regardless of cost or convenience? Does that mean I don't like beer as much as some goateed ale-snob? Where do we get the idea that people who only listen to the top 40 don't listen critically to the top 40? I've never met anyone, male or female, who likes everything they hear on the radio.

Kris, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm talking about an uninformed choice, not the informed choices you describe, Kris. Sure, I know people who like hardly anything they hear on the radio and yet they keep it on all day. It's not that they're keen, critical listeners who have tried other music and deemed it all rubbish - they just can't be bothered to see what's out there. I can find other things to talk about with them. *urp*

Curt, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one month passes...
Women have no taste at all. Just look at the fashion shows, who the hell would pay for half that stuff and a few grand for each aswell, come off it!

Fashion is a tool of the media, and if you follow that then you are a conformist! Conformists are idiots who have no brain for them selves!

The One Armed Man, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Conformists are idiots who have no brain for themselves!

Oh, everyone says that!

Dave225, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

and ill tell u what, when u go into record shops, u always see women trying to get to the racks to look through them, but they always get subtly elbowed or kept out of the way by blokes - the subtext being what you doing looking at records, youre a woman, you shouldnt be in here

i was going to say the same thing. i dared to walk into the one specialty hip-hop shop in melbourne (that i'm aware of) a while ago, and it felt like walking into a freemasons meeting. not doing that again! similarly, shops with an emphasis on vinyl and deejaying are likely to be intimidating to women. i started asking the men behind the counter at 'rhythm and soul' (which is, by the way, a crap record shop) questions about records they had obviously not heard of, although they feigned knowledge. they made no attempt to help me track the records down once we'd sorted out what they were, and instead stood there with blank expressions waiting for the girl to leave. djing is for boys. didn't you know?

minna, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.