― Brian MacDonald, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Ahem...
Acker these days = burroughs imitation. Acker those days = genet theft!
bush = imitation, clinton = theft!
difference between history repeats as farce and reclamation of historical moment.
― Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― A Nairn, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Or now I'm thinking maybe it's T.S. Eliot? In which case...
― Andy, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― cw, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― XStatic Peace, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― N., Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dave225, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Imitation = flattery precisely because it debases itself before the object of imitation, reaffirming the inherent value of the original source at the expense of doing anything interesting itself - there's a certain air of pathetic servility to it. This is why any artist who talks about him or herself as carrying on a "legacy" is probably not worth listening to.
― Tim, Tuesday, 22 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)