hipsterpod.com

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
should i buy one?

meg, Saturday, 23 April 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)

if you want to be a tool.

jmeister (jmeister), Saturday, 23 April 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)

the answer is no.

cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 23 April 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)

i've been considering selling my 40gb ipod with all the albums on ebay.

if i knew i could get £350 for it i would do it. I hardly ever use the damn thing.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Saturday, 23 April 2005 22:52 (twenty years ago)

http://www.hipsterpod.com/

hahaha, what a great fucking idea! it will be worth it for that guy if just one person buys it.

meg, if you're question is serious, then I guess it depends on your budget and how you feel about music. if you're the kind of person that buys into the whole hipster culture and you've got money to spare, then go ahead any buy one. i'd never do it, but it is a pretty good starter kit if you consider the music you listen to nothing more than a fashion accessory.. which would be a damn shame.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)

of course, real hipsters only listen to vinyl :)

poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

00 - jim o'rourke et al

04/18/2005 10:44 AM christian fennesz - field recordings 1995-2002
04/18/2005 10:44 AM fennesz - 2001 - endless summer
04/18/2005 10:44 AM fennesz - 2002 - wrapped islands
04/24/2005 07:17 AM fennesz - 2004 - the return of fenno'berg
04/24/2005 07:17 AM fennesz - 2004 - venice
04/18/2005 10:44 AM jim o'rourke + mats gustafsson - xylophonene virtuosen
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 1993 - new kind of water, with kk null
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 1993 - nitrogen 7 in
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 1994 - acoustics, improvised
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 1995 - terminal pharmacy
04/17/2005 07:49 AM jim o'rourke - 1997 - bad timing
04/17/2005 07:49 AM jim o'rourke - 2000 - computer hotel
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 2000 - halfway to a threeway
04/17/2005 07:49 AM jim o'rourke - 2000 - xylophonene virtuosen, improvised
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 2001 - i'm happy and i'm singing and a 1 2 3 4
04/24/2005 07:17 AM jim o'rourke - 2001 - insignificance
04/17/2005 07:48 AM jim o'rourke - 2002 - love liza sndtrck
04/17/2005 07:48 AM jim o'rourke - 2002 - old news vol. 1
04/17/2005 07:48 AM philip jeck - 2003 - 7
04/17/2005 07:48 AM philip jeck - 2004 - stoke

please, Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:05 (twenty years ago)

Wow. What a serious, fucking a-hole the guy must be.

bkjj40a, Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:14 (twenty years ago)

No shit. The hipsterpod is like the gravestone of our collective music youth. Or something. But then again, if you're between the ages of 12 and 15, and mommy and daddy have the big bucks to spoil you with this kind of bullshit, and you run around with a bunch of spoiled rich fucks in a non-stop commodity contest, the hipsterpod would make a great prop.

please, Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:22 (twenty years ago)

HOW COME YOUR MISSING
SO MUCH GREAT STUFF, MAN?!
Theres a few artists every hipster worth his salt thinks are great but whom I cant stand for some reason (usually its because they are cold or pretentious). Most notable on this list is: radiohead, mogwai, sigur ros, led zeppelin, nirvana, pink floyd. You wont find these shitty poseurs on my ipod dude!

i can't fault him for slamming sigur ros, mogwai, and nirvana though.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:25 (twenty years ago)

Does all of that seriously fit on one iPod?

JoB (JoB), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

I can fault him for failing to include a single Yes album. What a crock.

hipsterp-o'ed, Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

Haha

at least you get RATATAT.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)

AND ALL THE PUTAMAYO YOU'D EVER WANT, rah.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

Bright Eyes is way better than silly, overrated Led Zeppelin.

babyalive (babyalive), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

hey.. i like putumayo stuff..

jose, Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:46 (twenty years ago)

http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/shopping/fashion/columns/look/lookbook050411_275.jpg

"I never leave home without it."

poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

ihttp://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/shopping/fashion/columns/look/lookbook050411_275.jpg

"I never leave home without it."

poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

some random observations.

2005 - spoon - gimme fiction

If I'm Britt Daniel, I sue, and have this dude thrown in the clink.

Keep It Lie a Secret came out in 98.

Calexcio is not a band.

The Good Earth by the Feelies goes for like $150 on Amazon, and it's part of the package here. At least that's something.

the history of rock musica, Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:56 (twenty years ago)

what? why don't you consider Calexico a band? and K.I.L.A.S. (awesome abbrev) came out in '99, dude.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

Wasn't Junior Senior 2003 not 2004 as he has listed.

I mean, if you're going to do this whole hipster thing you should at least do it right. It wasn't that hard to miss Junior Senior in 2003 was it?

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Saturday, 23 April 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)

I'm pointing out a typo. He spelled them Calexcio. Shoddy salesmanship, I say.

And why are we assuming it's a him? Is their a name?

the history of rock musica, Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:00 (twenty years ago)

yeah, wtf is up w/ all that stinkin' putumayo shit?!? that ALONE would put me off from buying this thing.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:00 (twenty years ago)

and it's a shame that trife isn't here, to add his comments wr2 all the anticon stuff.

also -- if he thinks that sigur ros and mogwai are "cold and/or pretentious," then WTF is all of that godspeed! you black emperor during on his IPOD?!?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)

No Moroder, no King Crimson, no dub? What kind of hipsterpod is this?

Keith C (kcraw916), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:16 (twenty years ago)

'live a little' is a good legal disclaimer.

keith m (keithmcl), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)

I was just gonna post no Morodor. I'd like to think that dumbass from New York Magazine is really the one behind this. And Hipsterpods are pretty rockist, no?

Aaron W (Aaron W), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:32 (twenty years ago)

For some reason this device reminds me of the microwave from Time Bandits

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:44 (twenty years ago)

It's blindingly rockist. Any hipsteripod worth its salt has some Kylie, "Get Yr Freak On," "Toxic," etc.

Keith C (kcraw916), Sunday, 24 April 2005 01:38 (twenty years ago)

Just the fact that he mentions Williamsburg (where he probably lives) means he can go fuck himself.

Lemonade Salesman (Eleventy-Twelve), Sunday, 24 April 2005 01:59 (twenty years ago)

hey wait. i worked at a company that did this. legally though.

phil-two (phil-two), Sunday, 24 April 2005 02:14 (twenty years ago)

No Slayer? This Ipod is BULLSHIT!

latebloomer: But when the monkey die, people gonna cry. (latebloomer), Sunday, 24 April 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

not even any token metal bands on it? fuck this.

latebloomer: But when the monkey die, people gonna cry. (latebloomer), Sunday, 24 April 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

It's blindingly rockist. Any hipsteripod worth its salt has some Kylie, "Get Yr Freak On," "Toxic," etc.

Rockist? Look at all the hip-hop he's got on there!

04/17/2005 08:28 AM 2005 - chicarones - josh martinez and sleep are
04/17/2005 08:27 AM anticon - 1999 - music for the advancment of hiphop
04/17/2005 08:27 AM anticon - 2001 - giga single
04/17/2005 08:27 AM anticon - 2004 - anticon label sampler
04/17/2005 08:27 AM anticon-stuffed animals
04/17/2005 08:26 AM blockhead - 2004 - music by cavelight
04/18/2005 10:44 AM buck 65 - 1999 - vertex
04/17/2005 08:26 AM buck 65 - 2003 - square
04/17/2005 08:25 AM buck_65-this_right_here_is-advance-2005-jce
04/17/2005 08:25 AM clouddead - 2001 - cloudead
04/18/2005 10:44 AM deep puddle dynamics - 2002 - the taste of rain... why kneel
04/17/2005 08:24 AM dose one - 1997 - slowdeath
04/17/2005 08:24 AM dose one - 1998 - hemispheres
04/17/2005 08:24 AM edan - 2002 - sprain your tape deck ep vinyl
04/17/2005 08:24 AM mr lif - 2002 - emergency rations ep
04/18/2005 10:44 AM mr lif - 2002 - i phantom
04/18/2005 10:44 AM non prophets - 2003 - hope
04/17/2005 08:23 AM north american adonis ep
04/18/2005 10:44 AM passage - 2004 - the forcefield kids
04/17/2005 08:23 AM sage francis various
04/17/2005 08:22 AM slug - sad clown bad dub 2
04/18/2005 10:44 AM sole - 2000 - bottle of humans
04/17/2005 08:22 AM sole - 2002 - mansbestfriend
04/18/2005 10:44 AM sole - 2003 - selling live water
04/18/2005 10:44 AM themselves - 2000 - them
04/17/2005 08:21 AM themselves - the no music
04/18/2005 10:44 AM why - 2003 - the early whitney ep
04/18/2005 10:44 AM why - almost live from anna's cabin
04/17/2005 08:20 AM why - with odd nosdam - split ep!

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 24 April 2005 13:53 (twenty years ago)

No Moroder, no King Crimson, no dub? What kind of hipsterpod is this?

It's the Hipster Guide to Indie Rock + some Jazz That It's OK To Like (I Promise)

The last five or six years look suspiciously like Pitchfork's top 50 albums of the year lists.

Overall, his choice of music definitely doesn't suck. There are no surprising choices, not like it would matter for anyone who would actually buy this.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 24 April 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

If Mr. Lif finds out he keeps his stuff under "Anticon," fool is gonna get jacked.

Christopher R. Weingarten (whineyg), Sunday, 24 April 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)

I love how everyone on here is talking as if they might actually consider getting one.

Roz, Sunday, 24 April 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)

Overall, his choice of music definitely doesn't suck.

Oh agreed, of course. Even though there is some stuff missing, it's pretty hard to disagree with what's on here pre-2000, or at least pre-1995.

There are at least 20+ out of print titles on here, too. Of course, that still doesn't justify the price.

I know a lot of people just want an 'add water' music collection or whatever, but to me that misses the whole point of listening to and buying music. The point is the journey, not the destination. Says Buddha, anyway.

Keith C (kcraw916), Sunday, 24 April 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

Who would have $800 to blow and would give a shit about having all this music. . . who basically wouldn't already have most/a lot of it? How often does a deep interest in music suddenly bloom at the point that someone is a salaried 20-something? Or maybe that's the point--the prospective buyer isn't supposed to actually care about the music, just the ability to seem as though he does? But again I wonder--who gives a shit about that, and when does the opportunity arrise to pretend to care about music around people who would be impressed?

I.M. (I.M.), Sunday, 24 April 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

Assuming this isn't a joke (which I suspect it is), I think this only makes sense if you've lost your own iPod which mirrored what this one contains, technology and all. Were that the case, the iPod itself, plus the time and effort to retrieve all these albums, might actually justify $800.

cdwill, Sunday, 24 April 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

haha dude thinks he's hip. his ipod tells a very different story. I suspect real hipsters would sneer.

The Lex (The Lex), Sunday, 24 April 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

I sneered! So much boring indie crap

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Sunday, 24 April 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)

not even the late 70s/early 80s post-punk stuff, jon?

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)

What about WU-TANG?

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)

he only has one wu-tang (36 chambers) -- the only wu-projects he has are liquid swords and the last 2 ghostface cds. no raekwon, no tical, no ODB, no inspectah deck, no bobby digital, and no ironman.

even his hip-hop is totally rockist.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

Wait, last two Ghostface -- no, he just THOUGHT Supreme Clientele was his second-to-last, apparently. Fah.

Actually, to hell with it. He shits on Led Zeppelin in the blurb and doesn't include any of P-Funk's late '70s albums; why is anyone even remotely trying to defend this dickwrangler?

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)

(actually, ditch the 'why'; everyone's pissed here even if in some cases it's for the superficial 'HA HA WILLIAMSBURG INDIE ROCK' reason instead of the more viable 'hateful pretentious dick' reason)

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

"Albums from all genres" -- fuck you, Van Halen begs to differ

Stupornaut (natepatrin), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)

heh heh i forgot about bulletproof wallets. though perhaps for the best.

and "williamsburg indie rock" and "'hateful pretentious dick" are largely synonymous! i can even do a venn diagram!!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

I think it's a pretty funny joke. If it's not a joke, then it's still a pretty funny unintentional joke.

I've been given gigabytes of music free all at once and been very grateful for it - except the storage device wasn't quite as pleasantly compact as an iPod.

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 24 April 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)

i mean, sneer all you want at this dude, but if i had an extra $900 lying around, i'd very seriously consider buying this.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 25 April 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

This raises the question of whether the songs on the hipsterpod are star-rated according to hipness.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 25 April 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

this website is funny and inevitable. anyone who found themselves getting het up about any egregious inclusions/disclusions w/r/t to the hipster canon should maybe go for a walk.

mark p (Mark P), Monday, 25 April 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

I mean selling used records is still legal right? So used mp3s should be no different.

-- o. nate (syne_wav...) (webmail), April 25th, 2005.

You may think that, but you'd be wrong. Damned copyright laws.

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 25 April 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

Everyone: Pff! What a boring list!

(next day)

Someone: Let's make a best album by year poll!
Everyone: Okay!

(next day)

Everyone: Pff! What a boring list!

(same list)

^, Monday, 25 April 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)

You may think that, but you'd be wrong. Damned copyright laws

How do copyright laws apply differently to MP3s than records? My understanding is when you buy a record you are also buying the right to enjoy the copyrighted work on it, and it is legal to sell that right to someone else by selling your (used) copy of the record. It is also legal to make as many copies of the copyrighted work as you want, as long as they're for your own personal enjoyment. However, if you make extra copies and sell them, then that is illegal under copyright law. But you still basically own the right to enjoy ONE copy of the copyrighted work, and you can legally sell that right to someone else. So if I buy an MP3, say on EMusic or a similar site, and then I decide I don't want it any more, then if I sell that MP3 to someone else, how is that any different under copyright law than if I'd sold my used records?

o. nate (onate), Monday, 25 April 2005 17:19 (twenty years ago)

anyone who found themselves getting het up about any egregious inclusions/disclusions w/r/t to the hipster canon should maybe go for a walk.

mark says succinctly what i was too marble-mouthed to express myself.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

anyone who found themselves getting het up about any egregious inclusions/disclusions w/r/t to the hipster canon should maybe go for a walk.

Preferably a walk with a hipsterpod, jamming some mellow Putumayo.

Keith C (kcraw916), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

all I know is that if I was at a yard sale and a guy was selling all those albums on CD for less than a dollar apiece I'd be pretty excited.

Al (sitcom), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

absolutely.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

This raises the question of whether the songs on the hipsterpod are star-rated according to hipness.

He should offer a maintenance plan--take it in once a year and update the ratings based on what the hipster "street" is saying. This way you're never out of date.

Keith C (kcraw916), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Why is anyone assuming that he has only one of these things? Does it say that somewhere on his website? Because to me it seems like he has a sort of newfangled pirate music operation here. He can buy the iPods at retail, burn all the shit he already has on his computer, and make obscene profit. Why WOULD he bother setting up a website to sell only one?

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 00:22 (twenty years ago)

Does this dude have friends?

Ian John50n (orion), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)

what kind of a weird question is that?

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)

I... I don't know. I can't imagine any sort of likeable person selling such an item.

Ian John50n (orion), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)

i can't imagine anyone who'd be tempted to buy such a thing NOT having an awful lot of the stuff on the ipod already. except all that putumayo.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:09 (twenty years ago)

wow you guys are full of a lot of hate. i was trying to make fun of the commodification of music taste/image and maybe be able to pay my rent at the same time. unfortunately i had to shut down the website and am being contacted by the riaa because they were tipped off by someone at this site. wow, thats pretty low guys.

hipsterpod, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)

so the solution is: write an article, don't break copyright laws (and make a website about it, designed to garner attention from *shockah* people like us.)

Ian John50n (orion), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)

wow, thats pretty low guys

Yeah, your plot was pretty brilliant. If it weren't for those meddling kids.

Keith C (kcraw916), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

this has turned into some kind of hipster tragedy

puddle, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, this is right up there with the great Amazon $1 CD sale that wasn't.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

that guy wasnt joking, the sites down. I shouldve shown more people. how would he know someone rom here tipped him off though? and is that same person giving people's soulseek tags away too? the hipsterpod sucked but shit turning him in was a bit rough dontchathink?

jmeister (jmeister), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

wow you guys are full of a lot of hate. i was trying to make fun of the commodification of music taste/image and maybe be able to pay my rent at the same time. unfortunately i had to shut down the website and am being contacted by the riaa because they were tipped off by someone at this site. wow, thats pretty low guys.

you shoulda had the "barretta" theme on yer ipod -- you know, the one that goes "don't do the crime if you can't do the time."

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

hipsterpod, quick, sell the site to Roxio! (any publicity is good publicity!)

poortheatre (poortheatre), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

What a bastard, whoever got that site shut down! If selling warez is what it takes to "make fun of the commodification of music taste/image" then I say - LET THE MAN SELL HIS WAREZ! Bastards!

Mickey (modestmickey), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

I think p2p and such is morally fine, but...

Selling other people's copyrighted works? Making money off warez? That is not okay. It's LOW to not want somebody to do that? Please.

Mickey (modestmickey), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)

And hipsterpod dude, just be happy. The fact that the RIAA contacted you means that you're off the hook. As long as they, or the FBI, didn't buy one from you means that you can't be criminally prosecuted. It still is a "joke", right?

If the wrong person paid you for one, and you actually mailed it to him, you could be facing years in prison now.

Sorry you can't pay rent dude. Try to find a smarter way next time. Shit, if you get busted, you'll have a lesser penalty if you're selling drugs.

Mickey (modestmickey), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

wow you guys are full of a lot of hate. i was trying to make fun of the commodification of music taste/image and maybe be able to pay my rent at the same time. unfortunately i had to shut down the website and am being contacted by the riaa because they were tipped off by someone at this site. wow, thats pretty low guys.

-- hipsterpod (hipsterpo...), April 26th, 2005.

Yeah, it was all about the statement I was making -- maybe make a little money on the side, but the statement. Yeah.

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

ps I did NOT tip of the RIAA -- in spite of my self-righteousness, my comradeship with my working brothers and sisters comes first.

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

No match for "HIPSTERPOD.COM" in the registrar database.

Registry Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:28 (twenty years ago)

what a bunch of snitches (and snitch lovers, i guess)

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

i didn't snitch, either!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

I am full of hate. Which is why I spend time with a website spoofing hipsters . . . no, wait. . . .

please, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)

a lot of people read ILM who don't post.

Ian John50n (orion), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

as witnessed by perpetual drama! like people emailing threads to my girlfriend! or people's whole fucking writing classes!

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

It seems weird that the domain registrar locked the domain, not his host.....

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)

a lot of people read ILM who don't post

This should probably be in massive letters at the start of the FAQ.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

We should code threads to blink once more than some number of non logged in IP addresses access it in some time interval.

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

http://www.judas-priest.com/images/7insingles/breakin7.jpg

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

wow you guys are full of a lot of hate. i was trying to make fun of the commodification of music taste/image and maybe be able to pay my rent at the same time. unfortunately i had to shut down the website and am being contacted by the riaa because they were tipped off by someone at this site. wow, thats pretty low guys.

Still, you've got your rap albums to keep you company.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)

rooby rooby roooo

latebloomer: But when the monkey die, people gonna cry. (latebloomer), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 23:41 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

whatever happened to this dude, anyway?!?

Eisbaer, Monday, 21 May 2007 00:09 (eighteen years ago)

The website, if you missed it first time around.

If I had never heard of Slsk/oink and had lots of money to spend, it wasn't really a bad deal. His claims that his choices are "obscure" are a bit unfounded, though.

musically, Monday, 21 May 2007 00:57 (eighteen years ago)

I'd love to see this guy's sales figures.

Jena, Monday, 21 May 2007 01:03 (eighteen years ago)

i'd love to see who actually bought it

latebloomer, Monday, 21 May 2007 03:27 (eighteen years ago)

i'd track down their address, sneak inside and give them a noogie, a wedgie, and a titty twister in their sleep.

latebloomer, Monday, 21 May 2007 03:28 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if we would have had the same response if the iPod had been filled with classical music? a lot of old recordings are public domain, and the classical canon is much more defined/manageable.

poortheatre, Monday, 21 May 2007 05:26 (eighteen years ago)

AND YET INFINITELY MORE EDIFYING

poortheatre, Monday, 21 May 2007 05:27 (eighteen years ago)

If I had never heard of Slsk/oink and had lots of money to spend, it wasn't really a bad deal. His claims that his choices are "obscure" are a bit unfounded, though.

i suppose -- but as i said way back when, i presume that most of the folks to whom he'd be marketing his hipsterpod would already have most (if not all) of what he had on his ipod already.

Eisbaer, Monday, 21 May 2007 05:29 (eighteen years ago)

except the putumayo ... i would've paid him to get ridda that shit if i was interested in buying.

Eisbaer, Monday, 21 May 2007 05:29 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.