CONTROVERSY, ILM-STYLE: HipHop, R&B, and their influence on chilluns

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
reposted from what i wrote on a diff. thread on ile:

stupid dilemma - i find myself completely hating the "media completely shapes kids" ie. ("violent video games/marilyn manson/basketball diaries made columbine happen") pov, but at the same time i see a lot of stuff in the city that makes me worried that kids are too susceptible to dumb shit. except it's not violence so much as hypersexualized/over-chauvinistic/misogynistic stuff. like, i know this is gonna be hugely controversial and i swear i'm trying not to get all COSBY on everybody, but i see way too many teenage boys (and sometimes even pre-teen boys) of all races trying to act out what they hear in hiphop/r&b lyrics and what they see in hiphop/r&b videos. tons of creepy girl stalking, incessant harassment, humiliation/putdowns when girls aren't receptive (tho a lot of the time teen girls play into it too, which is another whole can o' worms), etc. i've seen it be really disturbing, way beyond just what i remember as a teen (ugh the "my times have changed" canard - sorry folx): seeing 14/15 yo boyz call girlz "tip drills" after nelly's song ("it must be your ass 'cause it ain't yo face/i need a tip drill" - video features nelly running a credit card thru a chix's buttox, and i've seen it multiple times unedited (lots of t&a) on local access cable), f'instance.
i'm getting to the point where i'm really sick of the "you don't understand, hiphop/r&b is a legit expression of a culture" argument. lately it seems less an expression as much as an exploitative and lame force that:

1. reinforces sexual stereotypes of the poor, and esp. that of the african-american poor
2. teaches kids (both boys and girls, of all races and classes) to disrespect women - and as such represents no alternative to mainstream american culture (as much as its defenders would like to see it as "subversive")
3. "treats objects as women" to borrow a big lebowski joke: attitude towards sex/women is acquisitive as important as bling and bentleys

i don't really propose any kind of solution, and i don't wanna sound like mr. grumpy backpacker or bill cosby or whatever (there is a ton of hiphop and r&b i like, but i'm also an adult (ha!)), but i do think that things in this sense are kinda fucked. and i find it disturbing. sometimes, esp. when on the train and i see this shit and no adults even react to it, i feel like i'm the only one. and there's nothing i can do (there's no way a 30 yo slovenly-dressed white dude has any authority over any teenager).

okay, everyone feel free to kill me now.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 06:26 (twenty years ago)

i was thinking about this because i was dancing last night at a party to grime. and i don't like a lot of grime, precisely because lyrically it's "too soft" to me, but that might mean it's not part of the problem above! also it might be why grime will fail, sales-wise.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)

there are definitely few things creepier than pre- or barely-pubescent kids using certain sexual terms with the forceful authority of having been introduced to those words via popular songs. I mean I'm not sure where I stand on your Big Question, if you have one, but yes, definitely gives me a bad vibe.

Al (sitcom), Monday, 25 April 2005 06:58 (twenty years ago)

Yeah the pre-teens using some nast mtv language is pretty creepy.

teaches kids (both boys and girls, of all races and classes) to disrespect women - and as such represents no alternative to mainstream american culture (as much as its defenders would like to see it as "subversive")

Well, i don't think that it represents no alternative to mainstream amer. culture, i think it's certainly still subversive, although with respect to misogyny etc. then i'd agree, there are very conservative threads within mainstream american culture that bubble up in popular music.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

i'm not sure where i stand on it either. otoh, it's bad and creepy and i wish i could do something about it. otoh, it's lame to think that kids can't grow up and learn, or that there's something inherently wrong with hiphop and r&b that influences kids (and let's be serious, columbine was far worse than what i'm describing) (then again sexism/misogyny/chauvinism is pretty fucking bad in and of itself and leads to other bad things like rape, etc. and i'm not interested in a continuum of realtive badness).

i'm not really sure what i would do, if i felt i could do something. tell kids to grow up? like that will work. tell them they won't get any acting like jerks to chix? that won't fly either (and let's face it - some girls (not ones i'm interested in btw) seem to like jerks - prolly a result of this sort of conditioning!).

i am interested on ilm's take on this. not sure if it's as common in other cities (i didn't really notice shit like this in chicago as much - but then i took public transportation less then too), in nyc it seems rampant. to the point that i actively hate riding the train when school lets out.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:11 (twenty years ago)

xpost - i think hiphop was once subversive/"revolutionary" etc. (in all sorts of ways - musical, lyrical, cultural) but jumped that shark a long-ass time ago.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:12 (twenty years ago)

you might want to pay attention to who runs the government now then

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

xp Dude, Bill O'Reilly! There are so many ways in which it is still subversive.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

also is the reason rock is left out of this debate cuz children (or, er, chilluns) don't listen to it?

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:14 (twenty years ago)

i hate to pull the "I went to a predominantly black high school" card to comment, but I don't really interact with a lot of "african-american poor" people in NYC (except for the A train, and those fabulous "homo-thugz" that hang out on the corner of astor pl. and broadway-- choice excerpt of conversation i overheard today: "i'm-a BEAT yo ASS! i told you ain't no faggot no more! i'm straight!" and he was definitely about to beat this dude's ass and definitely not straight)-- and I did go to a predominantly black high school. Anyway, SO much of the "young and black" (this all sounds so horrible) demeanor is, I think, lifted directly from rap videos: everything from dance moves and fashion to vocabulary and, well, morality. again, this obviously isn't the case for all young black people, just a healthy portion of those that subscribe to pop culture.

About three years ago, I taught theatre at this government-funded summer camp for disadvanted youth, and all the campers were black from ages seven to eleven. anyway, during every lunch break, all the campers would crowd around the base of this TV mounted way up on a wall and stare at B.E.T. They knew all the rappers, dances, signs, lyrics--everything! it was incredible.. but is that a bad thing? i never saw them "slapping their bitches" or anything like that, but I broke up a fight between two of the kids and one of them said to the other, "You gonna be dead tomorrow!" That kind of shook me up, so I asked the proposed victim if he thought the the threat was serious. He said something like, "Maaaaaaaan, he don't got no gun." Phew. "Maybe his cousin does, though."

and one time (this is going to sound REALLY weird) i stumbled on this file of all the students that the counselor at the camp maintained. it had all sorts of twisted information, like when they lost their virginity and how many sexual partners the kids claimed to have had.. ten years old!

have i said anything worthile? i'm going to stop. i don't know what the fuck i'm talking about. a night of catching up on half a semester of metaphysics turned into a night of guiness swilling... ugh..

(there's no way a 30 yo slovenly-dressed white dude has any authority over any teenager).

i'm going to hold you to that!

poortheatre (poortheatre), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:17 (twenty years ago)

what about anything regarding our government made up mostly by white men who want to ban abortion is NOT inline with misogyny? dubya may not say he wants a tip drill but you know he wants it. also, yeah, bill o'reilly aka felafelman is not a good argument for the "subversiveness" of ludacris (who recently has ads up in the nyc subways MUCH LIKE FOX NEWS CHANNEL) either.

blount, yesterday on the 7 coming back from shea (your fellow georgian john rocker once said it was something like "freaks" and "pink-hair'd faggots" or somesuch that ride it, 'member?) there was this hispanic-manic-panic kid looking about 13-14 with a kick-ass black sabbath t-shirt and bondage pants. he was just riding, sullen, by himself, not harassing anything with boobs and a vagina. kids still listen to rock, ozzy teaches respect yo' mama, etc., etc. HIGH-larious.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:19 (twenty years ago)

also it's not exactly a new development - luke skywalker and nwa were HUGE on my schoolbus - and it's not exactly like hip-hop introduced misogyny or coarseness to pop music or even kiddie culture. ts: lil kim vs. barbie dolls.

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:21 (twenty years ago)

ok so what's the reason you left rock out then?

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)

I have a number of problems with poortheatres post. Considering....

to hstencil - do you reall think that rich african-americans rapping about crime/race/culture is not subversive? Think about the implications in a country with a past like ours!

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:23 (twenty years ago)

i hate to pull the "I went to a predominantly black high school" card to comment, but I don't really interact with a lot of "african-american poor" people in NYC (except for the A train, and those fabulous "homo-thugz" that hang out on the corner of astor pl. and broadway-- choice excerpt of conversation i overheard today: "i'm-a BEAT yo ASS! i told you ain't no faggot no more! i'm straight!" and he was definitely about to beat this dude's ass and definitely not straight)-- and I did go to a predominantly black high school. Anyway, SO much of the "young and black" (this all sounds so horrible) demeanor is, I think, lifted directly from rap videos: everything from dance moves and fashion to vocabulary and, well, morality. again, this obviously isn't the case for all young black people, just a healthy portion of those that subscribe to pop culture.
About three years ago, I taught theatre at this government-funded summer camp for disadvanted youth, and all the campers were black from ages seven to eleven. anyway, during every lunch break, all the campers would crowd around the base of this TV mounted way up on a wall and stare at B.E.T. They knew all the rappers, dances, signs, lyrics--everything! it was incredible.. but is that a bad thing? i never saw them "slapping their bitches" or anything like that, but I broke up a fight between two of the kids and one of them said to the other, "You gonna be dead tomorrow!" That kind of shook me up, so I asked the proposed victim if he thought the the threat was serious. He said something like, "Maaaaaaaan, he don't got no gun." Phew. "Maybe his cousin does, though."

and one time (this is going to sound REALLY weird) i stumbled on this file of all the students that the counselor at the camp maintained. it had all sorts of twisted information, like when they lost their virginity and how many sexual partners the kids claimed to have had.. ten years old!

i live in a predominantly african-american neighborhood (no "you hate black people and your neighbors" card, blount - i love where i live and think it's the best place in nyc to live).

in the early 90s i was a camp counselor (think "humpty dance" or nwa era). stuff was explicit then, but i don't remember kids acting in the way they do now. maybe it's different tho since i was an "authority figure" whereas on the c i'm just another shlump on his way to/from work.

(there's no way a 30 yo slovenly-dressed white dude has any authority over any teenager).

i'm going to hold you to that!

your posts are proof.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:24 (twenty years ago)

also it's not exactly a new development - luke skywalker and nwa were HUGE on my schoolbus - and it's not exactly like hip-hop introduced misogyny or coarseness to pop music or even kiddie culture. ts: lil kim vs. barbie dolls.

ok so what's the reason you left rock out then?

yeah but as i described i don't remember early 90s kids (having been one myself back then) acting this way despite exposure to nwa/2 live/etc. maybe kentucky kids are just more polite?

i left rock out because duh i don't see many rock/goth/metal kids acting like this (i assure you there are plenty in nyc tho! some are even minorities/poor!). they're mostly the loner type.

xpost - no, dizzle, when the status quo is reinforced, i don't see how hiphop/r&b is "revolutionary" or changing diddly-squat.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:26 (twenty years ago)

russell simmons' dreams of wealthpolitical aspirations notwithstanding.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:27 (twenty years ago)

I have a number of problems with poortheatres post. Considering....

oh man. go easy. when i started writing it, hstencil was hanging out to dry!

poortheatre (poortheatre), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:27 (twenty years ago)

and re: luda/bill o'reilly/pepsi thing - are you guys really that naive to think that wasn't about those three entities (heh he said "titties") selling more product? o'reilly doesn't give a fuck about morals, duh. neither does pepsi! i'm pretty sure luda does in his own way (tho "pussy poppin'" ain't exactly catholic - or is it?).

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:29 (twenty years ago)

maybe kentucky kids are just more polite?

probably.

no, dizzle, when the status quo is reinforced, i don't see how hiphop/r&b is "revolutionary" or changing diddly-squat.

Well what do you expect from, you know, popular music? It can ONLY be culturally subversive, its not going to create some sort of magical economic justice or something, and its very culturally subversive!

xp hstencil but O'Reilly is tapping into these "morals," his motives are irrelevent - the "silent majority" are not the ones putting O'Reilly on the pop charts, their kids are.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:30 (twenty years ago)

his motives are completely relevant! argh why are so many pop apologists (not that i know if you are one, per se) on ILM unwilling to look at pop culture thru an economic lens!? o'reilly is about, yes, tapping into morals that aren't his -- in order to increase fox's viewership which in turn affects fox's ad sales rates! duh!

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:33 (twenty years ago)

ie. condemning pepsi while at the same time taking their ad buys.

"hey, dirtah, babee i got your money don't you worry"

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:34 (twenty years ago)

i should have mentioned in my earlier post that there's definitely no connection b/w watching BET and the sexual abuse the kids suffered. i just hadn't thought of that since it happened.. that was an unfortunate train of thought.. sorry.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:34 (twenty years ago)

ps. it's never kids adopting the still-misogynistic-but-smoother style of, say, a snoop dogg. which is a shame, because snoop rulez and nelly sucks big time (aesthetically/musically/lyrically speakin').

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:35 (twenty years ago)

OK so I want to a rather diverse urban high school (white % was under 50%, I believe) with sizeable african-american and hispanic populations, and at least the way I was treated as a nerd in middle school/beginning high school was - i got shit from ppl across the racial socio-economic divide (and as a poor kid i probably got more shit - or felt more animosity towards - the rich white kids) now my point here is i can't really see the standard "poor urban af-amer populations" being any more susceptable to harmful social input than the rich white suburban kids who also seems to have some pretty negative attitudes towards women. I don't see BET as producing any more harmful results or something. I mean in college, it wasn't the af-am student group that wore t-shirts that said "I Heart Sluts" it was one of the white fraternities. College is probably a different kettle of fish but...i donno, i just don't buy the BET-Makes-Kids-Bad thing, i guess as far as language it has some effect and its disconcerting when kids use language that seems inappropriate...i donno, it just seems like we're getting into this somewhat patronizing discussion.

xp:his motives are completely relevant! argh why are so many pop apologists (not that i know if you are one, per se) on ILM unwilling to look at pop culture thru an economic lens!? o'reilly is about, yes, tapping into morals that aren't his -- in order to increase fox's viewership which in turn affects fox's ad sales rates! duh!

What does this have to do with what I'm saying exactly? My point is that O'Reilly may not care about these so-called "morals" but he's tapping into some very REAL feelings from his viewers. Rap is subversive when you have the parents watching O'Reilly and hating the rap music and the kids just want to listen to 50 Cent.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:39 (twenty years ago)

pps. i am more genuinely interested in discussion this phenomenon (if it is one) than flinging about accusations/dick-waving of "which whitey ilxor is more down with black culture?," etc. but that's maybe inevitable, i dunno.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:40 (twenty years ago)

Rap is subversive when you have the parents watching O'Reilly and hating the rap music and the kids just want to listen to 50 Cent.

Is Bill O'Reilly subversive when the parents listen to rap music and the kids just want right-wing political dogma?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:43 (twenty years ago)

I'm not trying to claim "down"-ness, just trying to avoid the eventual patronizing whats-with-black-kids? talk. Isn't it weird how they know all these dances? And this slang? All from BET? etc.

xp dom yes obviously.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:44 (twenty years ago)

I mean in college, it wasn't the af-am student group that wore t-shirts that said "I Heart Sluts" it was one of the white fraternities

you sure it wasn't the riot grrrrls? haha just kidding.

What does this have to do with what I'm saying exactly? My point is that O'Reilly may not care about these so-called "morals" but he's tapping into some very REAL feelings from his viewers.

my point is, it doesn't matter even if his viewers "feel strongly" about these morals and act on them by watching o'reilly, because then they're supporting the very thing they're condemning.

Rap is subversive when you have the parents watching O'Reilly and hating the rap music and the kids just want to listen to 50 Cent.

i dunno. again i hate to make this a rock v. rap argument (too late! sez blount) and it'd be way specious and dumb to say this but, hey look:

50s-60s-70s - rock predominance in american music culture coincides with civil rights movement, anti-war movement, feminism, gay rights movement, la raza, etc.

80s-90s-00s - waning rock predominance, waxing hiphop predominance in american culture coincides with reagan, bush I + first gulf war (to "liberate" islamic kingdom), clinton (liberal my ass he killed welfare + monica) and bush II (we all know what a mess that is).

(the preceding socioculturalpolitical "analysis" not to be taken seriously, obv.!) (not even by you, blount!)

xpost - i wasn't accusing you dizzle, just putting that out there as a pre-emptive measure even tho this thred is pretty much designed for CONTROVERSY!

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:46 (twenty years ago)

we need this man to make things right again:

http://www.musicmatic.de/P/Prince_5a.jpg

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

pre-emptive haha:

"we" "right"

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:48 (twenty years ago)

I guess it reminds me of those "brainwashed masses" arguments about how mtv "spoon feeds" music to people. I think kids are discerning. That doesn't mean that they know how to act polite, kids are assholes and in my memory have always been assholes.

xp its ok no hard feelings.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:49 (twenty years ago)

see that's the problem! i think kids are discerning too, i'm just torn on this because the behavior is so repulsive beyond what i remembered from my kiddie-hood.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:50 (twenty years ago)

stence maybe where you grew up in kentucky people waited til they were married to have sex and they kept twelve inches of space between them when they slow danced and didn't make jokes about 'queefs' or pass playboys and other porno stolen from assorted father's/older brother's stash or make up ludicrous (and clueless) sexual jokes/rumours about female classmates habits (that in retrospect are horrifying cuz you realize they were about 13 year old girls but at the time were horrifying cuz you didn't have the first fucking clue about sex or women's anatomy beyond 'this goes in there' (or maybe there or even there if you were really hep)) but where i grew up we routinely pinched girls butts and leered down shirts and pulled up skirts and all kinds of sexual harrassment and more if possible partly cuz for the first time we'd actually noticed girls and partly cuz we were acting like we thought 'men' acted and in neither case did we know what the fuck to do. figuring out what to do or getting your shit together is part of maturing. more troubling to me than 12 year olds shouting out lyrics to 'tip drill' (which i'm not even sure is worse than 12 year olds shouting 'heee-eey we want some pusss-say' although 2 live crew >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nelly) is men 18 and up STILL acting like this.

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:52 (twenty years ago)

people call me rude, I wish we all were nude, I wish there were no black or white, I wish there were no rules

Ronnie Talks to Russia (M Matos), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:55 (twenty years ago)

i can't really see the standard "poor urban af-amer populations" being any more susceptable to harmful social input than the rich white suburban kids who also seems to have some pretty negative attitudes towards women.

i think the difference between white kids watching BET and black kids watching BET is that the performers on BET are black, and the content of so many rap videos is literally shot after shot of black people in positions of wealth, sex, and power. so i guess the assumption (whether it's bullshit or not) is that young, poor black kids see their respected, er, idols saying this or wearing this, and so they emulate them.. this all sounds so damn white of me, but is it wrong to say that white kids have a lot more varied accepted public figures to emulate?

poortheatre (poortheatre), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:57 (twenty years ago)

naw we did all that stuff too, blount. i guess it's more the tone - like the stuff seems more aggressively misogynist to me -- not that 2 live/nwa isn't, but it does seem different to me somehow, maybe because they were the originators? i dunno.

xpost exactly matos! check it:

"i wish we all were nude" /= fake tittie showing in 50 cent vid while 50's ugly mug wears versace (not that i wanna see fiddy naked either, yugh) (hell i don't even like hearing him much less seeing his ugly ass)

"I wish there were no rules" /= "keep this bitch in line, pack the sc, ban abortion, outlaw homos, buy pepsi/luda cds," etc.

(obv. my elevation of prince as anarcho-bacchanalian GOD is tongue-in-cheek, like most of this thread")

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:58 (twenty years ago)

haha maybe it's a red state vs. blue state thing!

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:59 (twenty years ago)

in the 80s/90s when i was growing up, kentucky was a blue state, blount.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:59 (twenty years ago)

(xx-post)

and i'm talking about pre-teen young here.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Monday, 25 April 2005 07:59 (twenty years ago)

ps haha blount are you trying to say i'm turning into david brooks? youch.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:00 (twenty years ago)

I agree on blount's last sentence. that might have a lot to do with media itself being aimed at the lowest common denominator, meant to be easily absorbed by those with an elementary school-level education and no more. all those news anchors and talk show hosts speak in those dulcet tones like they're kindergarten teachers, the ones without handcuffs that is.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:01 (twenty years ago)

last sentence = 18 and up still acting like that

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:01 (twenty years ago)

18 and ups mens is still trying to get in ladiez' pants but seems more smooth, less aggressive imo. not immediately yelling "suck my dick, bitch!" after a girl sez she won't give digits.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:04 (twenty years ago)

TS: "it must be jam 'cause jelly don't shake like that" vs. "suck my dick, bitch"

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:04 (twenty years ago)

but is it wrong to say that white kids have a lot more varied accepted public figures to emulate?
White kids emulate 50 Cent too! I mean, I'm all for increasing positive african american role models but positive =/ cool.

Lethal Dizzle (djdee2005), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:06 (twenty years ago)

yargh. yer right.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:07 (twenty years ago)

ts: nelly's "tip drill" video vs. sam kinison's "wild thing" video

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)

This is relevant and funny, but I must admit it made me feel a bit anxious: Straight Outta Compton edited down to just the swearing.

Momus (Momus), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)

blount is there an unedited "wild thing"? i never got ta see hahn's playboy neither...

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 08:13 (twenty years ago)

They turned it into a military thing for that half-time special. Almost wish they'd had dancing thugs!

miccio (miccio), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

NFL thanksgiving special I mean

miccio (miccio), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

Did Michael Knowles write "Independent Woman"?

High Ranking Militant, Monday, 25 April 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

what sporting event was it where DC sang "Soldier" for an assembled group of US military? NBA All-Star weekend maybe. The crowd went nuts, like they all thought the song was really about the Army (easier if you've never heard the Lil Wayne, etc. verses I guess).

Also if you are completely unfamiliar with urban/crunk slang and don't really know much standard English, either.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)

SO UMF? How the hell can you mishear "salute" & get SO UMF?

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)

I HATE
YOU SO UMF
RIGHT NOW

I HATE
YOU SO UMF
RIGHT NOW

AUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGH!

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)


Sheesh! Confessions of a bunch of people who normally barricade themselves behind walls of LPs and CDs...

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

Ian, in my defense, I'm usually standing NEXT TO my wall of CDs & LPs.

David R. (popshots75`), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)

Ned, you realize that the "soldier" in question is a street thug and not the American troops in Baghdad, yes? Because that objection doesn't seem to make a lick of sense.

I know, but like I said, right *now* is a time where the context of What's Happening Now makes the use of such language/imagery in a pop song unsettling. Let's put it this way, I felt skeeved when I first heard what the frickin' TITLE was, not even one note of the song. That may be overreacting on my part, I don't know, but I still don't like it. (So clearly nobody should be covering Donny Osmond's "Soldier of Love" now either. ;-) ) As for the performances for the military, ay yi yi. (I'm a great loather of the whole 'for the boys' shtick.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

I sold most of my CDs and keep the rest in binders. It's a very short wall.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Sheesh! Confessions of a bunch of people who normally barricade themselves behind walls of LPs and CDs...

Speak for yourself. And LD, I'm objecting to you holding up Destiny's Child in general. They've got some of the most shallow and non-progressive lyrics out there generally. "You got cash, boy...Oh well, I do! You gotta have some floss to get with me!"

Candicissima (candicissima), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

"(I'm a great loather of the whole 'for the boys' shtick.)"

Except when it's good New Romantic homo-schlock, right, Ned? ;)

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 25 April 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

TS: Destiny's Child vs Jennifer Lopez

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

my love don't cost a thing

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)

Except when it's good New Romantic homo-schlock, right, Ned? ;)

Prove me that Kajagoogoo played a US military rally in 1983 or 1984 and we'll talk. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

Ned is making Denice Williams cry. :-(

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

What about Gary Kemp in a kilt?

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

misogyny (at least in a subconscious form) is deeply ingrained into popular music in one form or another, since 99% of it is about the male gaze

I don't get (and to be honest, I don't really want to get) how this equates to misogyny.

RS, Monday, 25 April 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

Men looking at women = misogyny.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)

Any position that wants to cleanse sexuality of any degree of fixation on how bodies look strikes me as being as bad and unhealthy as religious puritanism of various sorts. Sorry, tangent.

x-post

RS, Monday, 25 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

Ned is making Denice Williams cry. :-(

Haha. But that was THE boy, not the boyS.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 April 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)

Here is a link to Jessica Hopper's 'Emo: where the girls aren't' article if anyone wants to read the whole thing

http://web.archive.org/web/20040213181138/http://www.punkplanet.com/archives/00000004.html

I want to respond to this whole thread unfortunately it's going to take more time than I have at the moment and nothing I'm writing is cohering, but I think there needs to be more discussion of the economic side of things, in the sense of 'hiphop makes money selling this misogynistic image' and how women and economics are talked about within hiphop. With the rock misogyny vs hiphop misogyny, hiphop tends to have more of a narrative of 'society producing the bitch/ho', whereas rock tends more towards 'women are just like that'. With the discussion of why people aren't critising every form of misogyny in popular music, well at the moment it's kind of a triage situation (plus the fact that it's not just about music but society as whole).

allthemunchkins, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)

"one of the first songs I learned in school was "YMCA"! How fucked is that?"

Dunno. Why is it fucked up?

phil jones (interstar), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

Because it's about having anonymous sex in public?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)

Sounds pretty normal to me.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

"Men looking at women = misogyny."

Not at all.

Men looking at women sexually when women are trying to get on with other stuff (like getting or doing their jobs, travelling on the bus, hanging out in the bar with friends etc.) is just a pain in the ass. That's not misogyny.

Men thinking that this is the women's problem and men have no responsibility to stop = misogyny.

re : YMCA

"Because it's about having anonymous sex in public?"

What's wrong with that?

phil jones (interstar), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

replace "fucked up" with "ironic," ok?

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

it doesn't equal misogyny, but it results in there being a fair amount of it in music xxxxxxpost

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

Men looking at women sexually when women are trying to get on with other stuff (like getting or doing their jobs, travelling on the bus, hanging out in the bar with friends etc.) is just a pain in the ass. That's not misogyny.

Why is that a pain in the ass? Are the men masturbating while this is going on?

What's wrong with that?

Most people don't think it's appropriate for their young children (or hell, their GROWN children) to sing songs about anonymous sexual encounters.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

(You are apparently happy in MenAreAutomaticallyScumia but that doesn't mean I have to go there with you, phil.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

Should men looking at women mean less pain for other men's asses?

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)

"well at the moment it's kind of a triage situation"

is this a typo or are you suggesting that music analysis is sorting genres according to which one needs the most medical attention (ie, which one is suffering "the most" from mysogyny)?

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

I can understand why being leered at over the course of the day could be annoying and a pain in the ass (imagine having someone look over your shoulder at whatever you're doing 12 hours a day)(poss. poking you with their erection). Isn't that constant sexualization usually cited as one of the reasons younger girls succumb to societal pressure about body image? There's rarely a time when they aren't being sized up as possible sex partners.

xpost - no I think he's saying that rock gets moved down the list because no one listens to rock anymore. If Nickelback had five songs in the top-10, then their stance on women might be looked at more.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)

A subject for a future Ludacris lyric

(xxpost)

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Men looking at women sexually when women are trying to get on with other stuff (like getting or doing their jobs, travelling on the bus, hanging out in the bar with friends etc.) is just a pain in the ass. That's not misogyny.

I think "looking at women sexually" is too vague to make this sort of generalization about. If everyone followed the strictest sort of rules about these things, I wonder how often men and women would get together (as sex partners) at all. I think some sort of basic consideration and case-by-case judgment is the way to go, rather than making hard and fast rules (about looking).

RS, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

HAPPY SLAPPING
http://www.blackchat.co.uk/theblackforum/forum8/6503.html

does anyone know why there are young people around all areas doing this to innocent people?
if you dont know what i'm talking about, its those videos being sent around on phone videos showing mostly young black boys, slapping, flykiking beating up innocent passers by just for their amusement and to pass them around on phones.

what possible reason is there to do this to someone that has done jack 2 u just to impress ur boys? this kind of homo behavoiur really digusts me.

yesteday i saw one of a girl being flykiked by a group of about 6 boys and was really upset....what's that about?

how can it make them feel good to intimidate 1 girl and attack her and theres about 6 of them?

i can usually speculate why most thigs happen or have some sort of idea, but this one has got me baffed.

why would ne1 keep this and pass it around on their phone? my bro found it funny until i reminded him that could be me or his gyal it was happening to.

i know its unlikely that ne1 on this site is likely to go on like that but i was just wondering if some1 can explain WHAT could be the motvation for these 'people'.

has it happened to u or anyone u know?

Blackthought
Member


Posted: Tuesday December 14th, 2004 14:56 -
Reply
I have seen them, in fact I have them on my phone, just like u I was shockingly surprise, must admit the first time I saw, I bust out into laughing, but "it was of a man sleeping on the bus", I haven't seen a female geting beating up.

On the serious note its quiet sadistic thing to do, I can't imagine any of my family member having that been done too. Those boys that are doing that kinda of things to girls for fun, obviously don't have a female in there life that they respect, and God forbid they are the ones that probably grow beating there female partners.

Posted: Tuesday December 14th, 2004 15:44
I have seen it too (on peoples phones) and quite a few different ones. All people going about their business and a group of schoolkids comes up and one slaps them followed by laughing.
From chatting to peoples lil brothers its getting more and more popular.


Posted: Tuesday December 14th, 2004 15:48 -
respec Blackthought, it's funny i hadn't thought of that. when you are raised to respect people around you you tend to think that everyone has morals, is deep down decent and does't cross those kinda lines. i would ask people not to keep those sickos on your phone, cos in a in their sick minds thats their claim to fame.

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

"flykiking"? what the fuck kinda term is that?

this reminds me of this black kid, maybe 10 or 11, who zipped by me on the street the other day, stole a grapefruit off a fruitstand (okay no biggie), and then subsequently hurled it with all his strength at a nearby sleeping bum (also black), hitting him in the head, and yelling "wake up motherfucker!" then running down the street laughing. I wanted to wring that little bastard's neck...

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

It is a misspelling of "flykicking".

This phenomenon is really fucking stupid and lame, to the point where I am almost distracted from the egregious homonym abuse in the quoted thread. I want to shake those little bastards until they bleed, then give the people complaining about it spelling lessons.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

Wow! That "happy slapping" thing scares me. Hadn't heard of it before.

The worst thing is this isn't something you can lay at the door of big media. It's a product of all that "democratic", "bottom-up", peer-to-peer media that I'm normally so enthusiastic about.

Actually that link makes me totally depressed. (and disinclined to go back to the UK) :-(

phil jones (interstar), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

I need to remember to buy a handgun while it's still easy to do so in Pennsylvania.

RS_LaRue (RSLaRue), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
xposts(i think when you wanted to bring up an anti woman sexist destinys child song you were really thinking of 'cater 2 u' rather than 'soldier')

minna (minna), Friday, 27 May 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

oh shit i somehow thought this ws a current thread. please do not start this up again!

minna (minna), Friday, 27 May 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

wait, how could you think this was a current thread? you revived it!

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 27 May 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE

miccio (miccio), Friday, 27 May 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

http://www.thegreenhead.com/cool-stuff/images/self-destruct-button-dx_2.jpg

miccio (miccio), Friday, 27 May 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

it ws so long i forgot i ws reading an old thread ok! we will now let it drop.

minna (minna), Friday, 27 May 2005 20:04 (twenty years ago)

I used to be an innocent kid. I knew right from wrong. I listened to clean and wholesome classic rock groups like Led Zeppelin and Aerosmith, and lived in the suburbs with my mom and dad who were still together.

Then I discovered hip hop. I learned from listening to hip hop that women were to be referred to as bitches and hoes, and that I was to treat them like the inferior sub-humans they are. I used bitches for sex and status, and when I was finished I would throw them away. This is how black men relate to bitches as well.

Just recently I realized that I am gay.

mcbottleneck, Friday, 27 May 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
That may quite possibly be the absolute pinnacle of posts.

The Reverend, Sunday, 25 March 2007 06:19 (nineteen years ago)

Whoa. Waht? Whoa.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 25 March 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

There's this guy called the Lex who you might want to talk to.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 25 March 2007 15:26 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.