BBC: "Online music lovers 'frustrated'"...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
...it says here, with the parallel story they're rewriting coming from here. Either way, stuff that isn't surprising at all but is still interesting to see documented. From the second article:

'What people don't understand is that when they buy an iPod or other digital music player, they're being tied into a system,' believes Deputy Labs Editor, Nick Ross. 'Many of our readers have already been caught out, buying tracks but being unable to play them on their player.'

One PC Pro reader spent £40 downloading music from an online store only to find that although his MP3 player played Windows Media Audio (WMA) files that he created, it wouldn't play the copyright-protected WMA files he'd bought. 'What was I supposed to do,' he said, 'take them back to the shop? It's way too confusing.'

To make matters worse, we report that people are paying too much for tracks. 'Digital music only accounts for 2 per cent of the market because the stores and music industry are being greedy, paranoid and treating customers with contempt,' according to Ross . 'A song bought in the USA on iTunes or Napster costs 79 cents but in the UK costs 79 pence - ridiculous when the exchange rate is almost $2 to £1.'

In our conclusive round-up of the online sites, we found that the only online store worthy of recommendation was an American site - www.audiolunchbox.com - that had struck deals with independent music labels. 'Its prices are reasonable, as you can buy in US dollars, there's no restriction on what you can do with the music, and it's high quality encoding too,' said Ross.

But PC Pro believes the best business model comes from Russian site, www.allofmp3.com. 'This sells a huge variety of music, in the format and quality of your choice. Unfortunately, the royalties it pays are miniscule making it little better than illegal file swapping. However, where the illegal Napster pioneered the world of online music delivery, allofmp3.com is pioneering the business model that big business should follow.'

The venting at the end of the BBC piece is worth a skim.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 April 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

anyone who downloads wma files is a bleepin' idiot.

my friend flicka (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 25 April 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

Converting WMA to MP3 isn't exactly rocket science.

He needs to read some more issues of PC Pro, clearly.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 25 April 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

PC Pro is our friend.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 April 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)

i haven't been able to convert the "protected" WMAs though. i'm sure there is a way.

my friend flicka (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 25 April 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)

I've never had a problem using 'Magix Audio Cleaning Lab'. You can either rip from a cd into mp3 or covert WMA/WAV to MP3. And do some remastering type stuff too.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

this is the thread where i plug my favorite new online music store of 2005: http://www.smithsonianglobalsound.org/

my friend flicka (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

It's essential that industry heads drop the 'pay per track' idea and go for subscriptions instead. Paying a set amount every month to download as much as you want would really be the way forward.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)

as for wmas, i simply won't allow them in the house.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

That's a very good idea stevem.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

xpost

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

i always wish my employer got mentioned in these articles. we're the second-biggest download store, and we offer unprotected mp3s!! 25 cents a track!!

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

Well, who's your employer, then?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)

That's a very good idea stevem.

would no doubt be seen as bad for business but if given the chance may well prove to persuade downloaders to keep it legit much more often. viewing individual tracks as commodities is sooo 2001 and just as bad as trying to flog albums to people that only contain 3 or 4 genuinely good songs.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:09 (twenty years ago)

emusic, ned. and we're a subscription model, too.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)

Has anyone ever used www.allofmp3.com? I'm tempted but the thought that some Russian mafiosi is emptying my credit card springs to mind.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

£40 a month to download as many 44.1khz 16bit wavs as you wanted. I would probably go for that in all honesty, provided the choice was huge and included deleted material as made available by individual participating labels and artists.

$V£N! (blueski), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)

i've used it a few times. the meta data for the tracks is often screwed up -- wrong or incomplete song names -- but otherwise it's pretty great. last time i tried to deposit money to buy something their credit card section kept giving weird errors, which scared me. haven't been back since. but it basically works out to $1.50 an album.

Jams Murphy (ystrickler), Monday, 25 April 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

I've said this ad infinitum on ILM, but eMusic is wonderful. 3 years (maybe more?) and counting of active membership.

stephen morris, Monday, 25 April 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

If emusic could just get major labels onto their system, they would take over the world and we would all be their slaves.

Keith C (kcraw916), Monday, 25 April 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

as for wmas, i simply won't allow them in the house.

Do you refuse them like vampires so they just stand there at the door? ;-)


http://www.zittware.com/Products/CDMaster32/Tutorials/CopyProtected_WMA_to_MP3.html

helps you to convert prot. wma files to mp3 format.

nathalie in a bar under the sea (stevie nixed), Monday, 25 April 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)


Emusic is excellent - I especially like that they have very deep 'ethnic' music catalogs.

You Work For Irene (dymaxia), Monday, 25 April 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand Americans wanting to use Allofmp3.com.

The only incentive I can imagine to using a pay-per-track service, such as Napster, iTunes, etc, is the peace of mind that you aren't breaking the law.

Allofmp3.com isn't legal in the United States though. So what's the advantage of it? If you're going to pay for songs, why not pay a little more and do it through a legal service? Or, if you're going to do it illegally, why not do it for free with a p2p client?

Mickey (modestmickey), Monday, 25 April 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.