Picking the right computer for music making

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So I've been given a £500 present at work and I really want to get back into making music, teaching myself Cubase/Logics/Pro-Tools/whatever I can get my hands on. I've already got a piece of shit PC to surf the net and do word processing and fill up with MP3s and viruses etc, but I am trawling dabs.com and the Dell website for an affordable computer with which to use solely on my music projects.

The thing is my knowledge of computer hardware is lacking. I don't know the advantages of an Athlon over a Celeron processor (or vice versa), nor do I know what cards, speeds and memory I will need to avoid issues like latency incompatibility.

I realise £500 is never going to buy me a mega-dega Apple laptop with all the trimmings (actually I'd like a PC really), but I'm looking out for a machine as close to £500 as possible that I can perhaps upgrade and add to until it does what I need. As long as the basics are there and it works properly I'll be quite happy.

I am unsure as to go for a laptop or a workstation. Obviously a PC gives more for my money and I'll be able to upgrade it more easily but a laptop will let me move around for gigging and doing remote projects like taping things outside or going round a mate's and sampling his drumkit or whatnot. Also with a laptop I won't have to buy a monitor for so that's another advantage, but it's what works best that's important.

I would quite like a DVD writer and CD drive on my computer, a soundcard that isn't rubbish, and quite a lot of memory for storing samples and projects on. It has to be fast enough to cope with up0to-date midi programs too.

So:

Is there anywhere online (pref UK), like dabs.com that I may be able to make such a purchase? Again remember I may be able to add and upgrade at a later date. Please help me pick a computer!

Thanks ILM, and whoever recommends me a computer will get a CD of my work :-)

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:10 (twenty years ago)

I think £500 will be pushing it if you want a decent soundcard and stuff like a monitor & DVD writer are going to be part of that £500. But I am interested if anyone knows different as I am in a similar position (with the handy difference that I have £500 for the computer as well as already having a good monitor and soundcard).

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

Here were a couple I was thinking of:

http://www.dabs.com/uk/channels/hardware/desktops_and_workstations/productView.htm?quicklinx=3K6C
(flashy but maybe a bit naff and not what I need?)

http://www.dabs.com/uk/channels/hardware/notebooksandtablets/productView.htm?quicklinx=3LQ3&mc=5
(Laptop - don't know if it's got the rght specs or not)

There are umpteen PCs on Dabs but I'm really worried about getting the wrong thing and being disappointed.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

I guess I can shell out for a DVD writer and monitor seperately because these go for quite cheap secondhand. Soundcard I can get seperate too if it means the computer is going to benefit specs-wise.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

I've been doing just fine with a cheap, relatively new pc. Decent amount of memory, cd/dvd-r drive, nothing too special all-around but it's only used for music and it runs Cubase just fine. For an interface/preamp I've got a PreSonus Firepod (8 inputs).

A laptop would be cool for remote stuff, as long as it was high-powered and stable (for instance, I could never use my Dell laptop that I got a year or two ago for recording because of memory and overheating issues).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

A few thoughts...if you are sure you don't want a mac (which I would encourage you to reconsider. Stability is king when recording).
1. Pay attention mostly to hard drive speed (High RPM's are key)
2. Remember that RAM is cheap and easy to upgrade
3. If your primary use isn't field recording, don't get a Laptop. Performance vs. price simply isn't worth it.
4. Try to find a machine with am operating system and NOTHING ELSE. Kill all firewalls and disk utilities running in the background. Never go on the internet with it. Never transfer files from another machine into it if you can avoid it.
5. Save money on the soundcard and spend the money on an outboard interface (Firewire if possible) to avoid latency problems.

I'm going to go look for a link to more info...more later.

John Justen (johnjusten), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

"Obviously a PC gives more for my money..."
Gives more what? Viruses and system crashes? I mean, you get what you pay for when you buy a PC, and they're just not the best option when performing any kind of multimedia work. How many albums were recorded on Macs compared to Windows-based computers?
It's no laptop but if you want a real deal, consider a Mac Mini (http://www.apple.com/macmini), which you can use with your existing monitor and keyboard.

Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Amen to what Jazzbo said. However, if you are still locked into PC, I'll respect that.

This article will give you a lot of worthwhile links, and scare the bejeezus out of you pricewise. Still, it gives you some idea of what to look for...

http://emusician.com/mag/emusic_daws_us/index.html

John Justen (johnjusten), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

Viruses and system crashes

If you never go online, this isn't an issue.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

I am not a rich man. This £500 is a godsend but really I can't afford to spend loads on Mac software rather than get it ripped by my friends, plus I'm unused to the Mac interface.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

that was supposed to be a strikethrough rather than an underline - eek, I'm in trouble!

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

Viruses and system crashes?

I've used PCs for years for music recording, manipulating and mastering. Computer viruses have never been a factor. If you are a ninny, I suppose they could be. And the system is very stable for my purposes.

George Smith, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

It's no laptop but if you want a real deal, consider a Mac Mini (http://www.apple.com/macmini), which you can use with your existing monitor and keyboard.

I sell computers and Digital Audio Workstations for a living. The whole Mac versus PC thing is a strawman. Windows XP works perfectly fine, as does Mac OS X. It's really down to what software you want to use, as there are music programs that are platform-specific.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

Moreover, you can build a PC with a decent audio box and software package for well within 500 pounds. For what it's worth, I use both Mac and PC extensively.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to go with searching out a buil-it-yourself option if you go PC. If nothing else, you won't spend the first 3 weeks uninstalling all the crap they shove in new machines these days.

One thought on the mac mini and the various minitowers. Don't limit your ability to expand/replace components. It might make you sad at a later date...when they invent some new USB/Firewire and nothing uses current tech anymore.

John Justen (johnjusten), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

One thought on the mac mini and the various minitowers. Don't limit your ability to expand/replace components. It might make you sad at a later date...when they invent some new USB/Firewire and nothing uses current tech anymore.

This is my biggest caveat about the Mac Mini. OTM.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

If you've got the cash, nothing beats a G5 tower of power w/ 2x2.5ghz processors, but you might want to stick with a G4 laptop if you'll be performing out & about. For home use, the G5 is fucking ace!

Steve Gertz (sgertz), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

If you committed to a PC (whcih is the best option to go for price performance wise) get an athlon based system over intel, as they tend to be cheaper than intel and tend to work better for music based applications (as their are problems with hyper threading on the P4's, and the clerion are garbage for anyhting serious). I use a laptopwith a AMD 2800+ processor, 512 megs of ram (get as much ram as you can) and a 40 gig hardrive, and i'm able to pretty much run anything (right now i'm using reason 3, FL studio 5 and an Edirol UA-20 audio interface, and it works perfectly).

AMD (AMD), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

I just went through the exercise you're going through.

Here's some things I learned:

- Don't buy into the "Mac is superior" argument. A Pentium 4/Win XP is comparable on every level. Don't buy a Celeron. There are distinct advantages to the bus speed on a Pentium 4.

- A high-end laptop makes for a good live unit, but getting a desktop will give you far more upgradability. I've swapped out soundcards and replaced my CD burner with a DVD burner with no problem. Laptops are expensive to upgrade.

- If you decide to go Mac, don't go for the Mac Mini. There are a lot of early indications that it doesn't make for a good DAW.

- John Justen is OTM above.

- Don't buy an OEM PC (Dell, Gateway, etc.) Get one built if you can, and specify that you want to use it as a DAW. They may have components that will improve your machine (Sturdy chassis, noiseless fan, etc.)

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)

Best option is to build it yourself, it's not really very hard. These guys update their recommendations pretty regularily:

http://arstechnica.com/guides/buyer/system-guide-200504.ars

Sure. If money is no object a Mac will give you stabilty out of the box, but a properly built PC will be just as stable, will cost much less, and will be much more upgradable.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:04 (twenty years ago)

But you will need to get a decent soundcard.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

The whole Mac/ PC issue is easily solvable depending on what software one wants to use, as certain packages work better on one or the other and some SW is simply not available on both platforms. There are great hardware set-ups on both sides, but software should be the #1 concern.

Steve Gertz (sgertz), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)

heheheheheh, go mac. go mac.

sorry, i have nothing sensible to add to this thread at all. it's just it was obviously going to descend into mac v pc part 3,547,124 after approximately one second, and i thought i'd have a look to see how it was going.

right. i'm off again now.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

I have nothing sustantive to add that Brooker and John haven't already said.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

I would sink a good portion of whatever you're spending into a quality soundcard. If you won't need more than 2 (mono) inputs, the Audiophile 24/96 (from Midiman) is an *excellent* value that, if I'm not mistaken, came down alot in price recently. (my friend got it for $100 less than I did, anyway)

The system specs are important, obv. (especially RAM), but the moment you try to record or trigger anything w/ MIDI, it doesn't matter what your specs are if you don't have a good ASIO soundcard. The latency on most stock soundcards is so bad that if you have monitoring turned on in your host program, you can play a note, then hear it doubled well afterwards. Makes it hell to sync anthing up.

kix4trids, Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

as long as we're on the subject ... i've got a mac laptop and i'm going to put some version of protools on it (probably using digi 002). i'm going to get an external hard drive, and have been urged to specifically buy a glyph hard drive, which costs more than the average hard drive but allegedly is designed specifically for music. is this a load of crap and can i get any hard drive, or is there actually something to this?

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

I have a cheap Maxtor drive that I've been using the last year for backing up and transferring recording projects. It's huge and while I've read complaints by other people about drives failing and whatnot, I haven't had a problem.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

when i bought my Digi 002R i put together a PC based on the recommendations at the DUC and it's a dreamy machine. protools is notoriously cunty and fussy when it comes to your computer specs but this configuration works very very well indeed.

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

(sorry that link should be this one)

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)

On Glyph drives:

http://www.sweetwater.com/feature/glyph/

Do I buy into it? Hmmm. Not really. I suppose if you've got the money, the hot-swap deal might be cool...and if your noisy hard drive is the biggest problem in your studio, you're doing better than anybody I know. As for using the highest quality components...funny, that's what EVERYONE says about whatever product they're shilling.

I've had good luck w/my lacie 160 GB, for what it matters. I don't archive to HD anyway...

John Justen (johnjusten), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 00:25 (twenty years ago)

Wow! Thanks for all the help everyone. I'll see if I can't maybe compile something from the different pieces on Dabs or Mesh, if not just get one pre-made.

Thanks again :-)

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:50 (twenty years ago)

Re: Original question
I'm trying to boil down exactly what I need to get now. I'm going to get all the essential bits I need and get a friend to help me assemble them.

---------

From what I've gathered I need:

- Processor: Athlon 64 (not P4 or Celeron or Duron or anything else)

- PCI-E & PCI (sorry to be thick but what is this?)

- Firewire (and what is this exactly?)

- USB 2.0 midi interface

- sound card which can be turned off (so I can replace it with a better card - an Audiophile 24/96 in the future)

- minimum 512Kb ram (or less and then I can buy extra seperately)

- A processor of some sort (not sure about this)

- A decent HDD with a good RPM and pref 80Gb memory or more if possible. A SATA drive is good for what I want. I may need two HDDs, a smaller one for the operating system and a larger one for music files and stuff.

- DVD writer (I can add this later but I will need one)

- Video - not too important as I am not doing any gaming or anything. Just music applications.

- Monitor - Don't care, although in the interest of space I wouldn't mind a TFT but of course this can be got secondhand from somewhere.

---------

Can someone help me get my notes a bit clearer here and pref add anything else I need like casing etc. I know a lot of this may sound really obvious to a lot of you but I'm new to this, having only ever used PCs, not fixed or built them.

Cheers!

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

this lot specialise in home studio pc's, the prices seem a bit steep initially but you can probably customise the build to your requirements:

http://www.sub.co.uk/


bg (creamolafoam), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)

i think you've been steered towards a P4, not athlon. i haven't been around the recording bbs' for a while but i remember people recommending staying to stick with intel for music.

i say spend $50 or so on a kvm switch and forget about a new monitor, keyboard, mouse. you can get those later.

if you can, get a video card with two outputs. if you someday have the $$ to run two monitors, you'll find it is especially handy for music work. it's common to be running multiple programs that you want to be able to see simultaneously

under no circumstances should you have less than 512 RAM.

ronny longjohns (ronny longjohns), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

[boggles at this horror talk of different processors and sound cards and general utter misery]

are you sure you shouldn't just invest in a mac mini/second-hand G4? i'm being deadly serious here. this just sounds like so much horror when, you know, you're wanting to make some music, not get yourself a degree in engineering. i know you said upthread that you'd prefer a PC, but believe me: after you use OS X, there's no going back.

believe me, i'm not trolling/being a twat. this is absolutely my last word on the matter. but having just spent a miserable afternoon flitting betwixt mac and PC, i really couldn't let this one go.

good luck, whatever you decide!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)

I'm not blind to the Mac, but really I'd end up spending more time learning OSX, saving up for software, getting headaches when I want to upgrade. I don't know anyone who knows anything about Macs yet I know loads of PC geeks who can jump in if it all goes tits up. Plus I know what software I need and can get on PC.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)

My experience is, both Pentium and AMD will work fine with Windows music software. Advantage for AMD 64 will be, when Microsoft comes out with the Windows XP 64 operating system, you will be capable of running your music software faster.

Bob Crain (bobcrain), Thursday, 28 April 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)

doesn't intel have a 64 bit chip?

ronny longjohns (ronny longjohns), Thursday, 28 April 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.