― Andy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― electric sound of jim, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― tyler, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Curt, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Indigo Boy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
On 'Townies': "Aprechiate and respect people’s tastes is what I’m saying, afterall one person’s disgust is anothers tasty treat."
Link: here
― Brian MacDonald, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Truer words were never spoken. In fairness, this site appears to be written by schoolchildren.
― Sean Carruthers, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Drowned in Sound is now my favorite reviews site.
― Nicole, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Prude, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― A Nairn, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― electric sound of jim, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― goeff, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― iain, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Laurie, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
There's a lot of music I'd rather not lick.
More to the point, I think the objection was not so much over the fact that you like Remy Zero as it is that your review reads like a piece of fluff direct from the record company. The trick is to be positive about something without sounding like you've received a payoff from the band's paymasters.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
I knew someone was going to make fun of that.
The things I wrote in the review were the way the album made me feel. The wording was pretty touchy-feely, but again, that's the way it made me feel. If that's fluffy, so be it. Let's see each of you write a review and see if your writing style gets att
― laurie, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Colin Meeder, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Okay, let me act as editor here -- taking one of yer paragraphs:
Maybe it's something that grows out of people who've known each other for a long time. The guys in Remy Zero have been friends since childhood, and have an easy, family-style relationship that provides an ideal environment in which to nurture creativity.
This is the promo fluff stuff I'm talking about. This is the type of thing that record companies *love* to say about their bands -- 'known each other since they were kids, have struggled together,' etc., all in order to help sell their product as something 'real.' Is it relevant to the music per se? I don't care about whether the bandmembers first met over cafeteria lunches at school playing with Pogs or whatever, as a listener I'm not hearing their life story, but their work.
Also, 'easy family-style relationships' need not be the standard for creativity. Musicians and producers and more can all hate each and come up with some pretty damn good stuff -- and for that part, I know more than a few families whose relationships are the stuff of nightmares. Again, this is an image you're selling here which says little about the music and why we should care as readers of your review.
"The Golden Hum" is the product of an intense year-or-so in their lives together, with their profile growing fast and furious, tours with Travis, their song featured as the theme tune for a new TV show (Smallville, shown at 6 pm, Wednesdays on Channel 4), and general expansion of their horizons.
Again, fluff! Really, that's how it reads -- I'm not saying you're * intending* to read as fluff, but this sounds like eight million band bios from promo flacks, down to the Travis namedropping (and the reference to Smallville feels like clunky advertising).
Their history, combined with all this hustle, has produced (I almost want to say birthed, bred, or something organic like that here) a solidly brilliant album.
Okay, great, you like the album -- but interestingly, you're saying that it's the band's background and work ethic that made a great album. There's no mention of the music! Again, you're selling, however unintentionally, an image, that of the Honest Hardworking Rock Band -- which is very sweet and all, but two plus two does not automatically equal four.
I'm not saying that my own take on your writing is the right one, and others may well find bones to pick with my suggestions. But here's my thought -- you have the passion to talk about bands you like, which is fantastic. But there's more you can do with a review than just act as cheerleader, and to simply revive what are longstanding cliches to explain why you like something so much.
Since you're here now, I'd suggest visiting this board's more-or-less parent site Freaky Trigger for some examples of great essays and reviews. Try the music weblog associated with it in particular, New York London Paris Munich, along with all the associated weblogs and sites linked from it. And then there's this board itself, where you'll find a lot of amazing writing. You'll find a lot of opinions you won't agree with, but look beyond that to see how people are writing, conveying enthusiasm. There's much to love!
― fritz, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― static, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Both instances ("KIDDO" and "sugarplum") you cited were attempts at self-satirizing irony. Honest. No shit. It's actually no big damn deal to write reviews, and even get paid to do it -- which is why I find the counter-criticism "YOU do it!" so obnoxious, as it implies that the very act of doing (reviews, paintings, music, etc) is so very special that any criticism directed toward it is a result of envy or lack of comprehension.
I would also like to point out that I have not yet offered any criticism of Laurie's work, only of her argument.
Laurie: no offense was meant. I actually find your article extremely well-written -- just not critical in tone.
― Lord Custos, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
STEVE LUKATHER SAYS NEW TOTO ALBUM IS KILLER!: I mailed Steve Lukather for my usual Toto album update and got another great reply. Steve said: "Things are great. The new CD is killer....It's all good here and I am very excited about the new CD. I just wish we could agree on a title. That's real hard and then the cover art and then we gotta get this sucker out before the summer so our work is cut out for us!" On the subject of recent record label upheavals and the band's own decision to go it alone, Steve added: "Fuck all these major labels. I predict they will all be dead in 5 years. Licensing is the future. That's what were doing territory by territory. I don't need some asswipe, zit faced 20 year old A+R puke telling ME how to make records!"
Unbelievable - Toto go indie ! - after years on major labels. Can anyone think of a title for Toto's upcoming opus?
― DJ Martian, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dare, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
just kiddin'
― Sean, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
That was my first ILM emoticon, I think! I feel like Dickon after he said "riff". Or was it "lick"?
More importantly--hello Laurie, hope you stick around.
― Arthur, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
aww shuddup you bunch of miserable fucks :-) I know the quality of the writing is a bit shall we say varied, but we do have some good writers (check out david merryweather/tom eyers/various others on the staff list), and the whole thing is more about enthusiasm for the music scene than smart arse professional comments. having said that our better reviews are being printed in a 20,000 distribution free music paper that we're working with (probemusic). and we provide useful features like gig listings for london and various other towns in the uk, band profiles, database of new releases etc.
i'm the webmaster, by the way. I might like to add that that cheesy 'our philosophy' thing was not my responsibility...hehe. It's also due for the scrapheap when I put up the new index page/layout (coming soon). but anyway. bye.
― matt, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
DAMMIT. ;-) This is the type of spirit I like.
I know the quality of the writing is a bit shall we say varied
Ah, no worries, we all have our faves and unfaves on certain sites -- you should see the arguments over Pitchfork.
the whole thing is more about enthusiasm for the music scene than smart arse professional comments.
It's good to have a goal -- but remember, positive need not mean obsequious!
i'm the webmaster, by the way. I might like to add that that cheesy 'our philosophy' thing was not my responsibility...hehe. It's also due for the scrapheap when I put up the new index page/layout (coming soon).
Hurrah!
It's really helpful to be reminded that a review of an album should focus more on the MUSIC, rather than having to tell the story of the band.
Say, Colin-- I am actually doing something that could beat you: I'm curing cancer in my PhD project in medicinal chemistry. So there! ;) ;) ;) (notice the lots of winking, to communicate that I am being cheeky and kidding rather than trying to insult... etc...)
:)
― Laurie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
;);););););););););););););););););););););););););););););)
actually i'm quite serious
― mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― laurie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
No worries! But don't just rely on my thoughts, there are plenty of others here who can offer them up.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Andy, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Curt, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― laurie, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Hey, another Minnesota person. :-) That makes at least three now, since we also have Dan Perry and a fellow US expat now in UK, Suzy. Y'all need to swap notes.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Sean Carruthers, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)