Experts Decode Coldplay

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050609/ap_en_mu/coldplay_album_cover

"Hmmm, this should prove difficult since the boringometer is off the chart"

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Thursday, 9 June 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

Is Coldplay trying to tell us something with that multicolored symbol on the cover of their new album?

"Up Middle Finger"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 June 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

LONDON - Is Coldplay trying to tell us something with that multicolored symbol on the cover of their new album? Cubelike images adorn the packaging, both on the cover and the liner notes, of "X&Y," the British band's much-anticipated third album that was released Tuesday.

New Music Express asked a number of top art experts to figure out what the geometric figure on the cover means. They've concluded that it's a 19th-century telegraphic code known as the Baudot Code, or The International Telegraph Code Number One. It was used in teletype machines in the late 1800s.

So, what does it say on the album cover? It says, appropriately enough, "X and Y." The rainbow colors are there just to make it pretty.

A message on the back of the liner notes says, "Make Trade Fair." The band is politically active, and lists several Web sites in the liner notes at which fans can get involved in global affairs.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 9 June 2005 18:44 (twenty years ago)

"Make Trade Fair."

*at a WTO meeting*

"Hey you like that new Coldplay?"

"Yup!"

"Do you get any hidden messages from it?"

"...no?"

"Same here. Let's fuck over Tanzania for shits and giggles."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 9 June 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

You can't fool us. The clues are there...

http://www.beatlesagain.com/images/drumclue2.jpg
http://beatlesnumber9.com/pal5.jpg
http://beatles.ncf.ca/tpepper.jpg

PappaWheelie (PappaWheelie), Thursday, 9 June 2005 19:05 (twenty years ago)

God I hate Coldplay. No doubt the front cover is a vague rip-off on the New Order cover designer's coded numbers, proving once again that Coldplay is the least innovative, and yet most derivative popular band of the decade. I usually hate the word derivative because it tends to imply a certain degree of laziness and dismissiveness on the part of the critic....but geez. I know they've carved out a nice, sparkly sound and seem to be nice people, but if I have to hear them namecheck another band whose sound they obviously xeroxed to begin with or see them do another calculated manuever to make themselves seem like fragile messianic missionaries, I'm gonna write a nasty letter.

Sure the music sounds nice and uplifting and all............but EVERYTHING about them is just so calculated and unoriginal.

PB, Thursday, 9 June 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

Is Coldplay trying to tell us something with that multicolored symbol on the cover of their new album?

Yes, that they think any ol' bullshit design will do.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 9 June 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Caitlin informed me it was Baudot Code the other day.

Ian Riese-Moraine. Exposing ambitious careerists as charlatans since 1986. (East, Thursday, 9 June 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

I thought they were saying Buy Apple.

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 9 June 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)

...a 19th-century telegraphic code known as the Baudot Code, or The International Telegraph Code Number One. It was used in teletype machines in the late 1800s.

Late 1800s? A similar five-bit code was used by the Telex public teleprinter network up into the 1990s. I don't know if the Telex network still exists, but it certainly did until relatively recently.

Uninterestingly, the code used on the Coldplay record sleeves isn't *exactly* the same as the "International Five-Unit Teleprinter Code" in the 1970s beginners' telephony manual I keep by my computer. According to that, the album cover actually reads "X96" instead of "X&Y", and the Speed Of Sound cover uses null characters instead of actual spaces.


(hah, xpost)

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 9 June 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

(reading further, it looks like their sleeve designer didn't really understand how teleprinter shift codes worked. Unless, of course, there were different *kinds* of teleprinter shifting systems that aren't covered in the manuals I have to hand. I'm hardly an expert - I'd imagine that most people here already have some vague idea about all this stuff even if they don't have copies of the manuals themselves)

caitlin (caitlin), Thursday, 9 June 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

*accepts Caitlin as his new overlord* Gah, knowledge is sexy.



TS: cover of Power, Corruption and Lies vs. cover of X&Y will be so easy.

Ian Riese-Moraine. Exposing ambitious careerists as charlatans since 1986. (East, Thursday, 9 June 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand why this has made the news now, The Guardian ran the story with solution over a week ago...

Citypark, Thursday, 9 June 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

Breaking news: It still looks shitty!

feminazi (feminazi), Thursday, 9 June 2005 21:07 (twenty years ago)

man, what the HELL. you guys will find ANY reason to rag on coldplay. like every other album cover in the world is SO much better. what the HELL.

guy that says stuff, Friday, 10 June 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)

HELL ANY SO HELL

Released July 14th in a gel pack that gets all over your hands.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 June 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)

No doubt the front cover is a vague rip-off on the New Order cover designer's...

can we stop there? new order covers were all pastiches, yes? you can't 'rip off' a new order cover.

N_RQ, Friday, 10 June 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)

http://www.popjustice.co.uk/images/coldplaysadface.gif

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 10 June 2005 14:29 (twenty years ago)

you can't 'rip off' a new order cover.


You can appropriate their aesthetic.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 10 June 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

the colour-coding was a genuinely original saville idea. perhaps the only genuinely original saville idea, thinking about it.

of course, it was all about the concept of the shared secret etc; something i don't think coldplay will appreciate. the album's already set for the record books, apparently: they reckon it'll have shifted 450,000 copies in a week.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 10 June 2005 14:55 (twenty years ago)

The best thing about Coldplay is that they appear to be using the Star Wars prequel font for their name.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 10 June 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)

I'd like to nominate this one for best thread ever.

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Saturday, 11 June 2005 04:02 (twenty years ago)

http://www.rom.on.ca/exhibits/aucourant/graphics/cdesign36toob.gif

feminazi (feminazi), Saturday, 11 June 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)

HELL ANY SO HELL

The Silent Disco of Glastonbury (Bimble...), Saturday, 11 June 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
wow why everyone so uptight about all this?!? i think its a pretty kewl sleeve and quite enjoyed decoding the 'make trade fair' message at the back! (or maybe i should just get out more!!) anyways i thought it pretty kewl but what does it matter anywho! :)

sush, Friday, 29 July 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

eight months pass...
Total Ripoff - the first time I saw the cover I knew it copied the ecoded message used by New Order on Power, Corruption and Lies. My girlfriend thought I was genious when I decoded the "Fair Trade" message until I showed her the New Order code.

I have to like Coldplay to "get along" with my girlfriend... but just proved what wannabees they are....

Scott Beatty, Sunday, 9 April 2006 20:52 (twenty years ago)

I have to like Coldplay to "get along" with my girlfriend

In its own tiny way, this is one of the saddest things I have ever read. Not "sad" as in "pathetic", Scott; "sad" as in "sad."

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Sunday, 9 April 2006 20:59 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, have you ever considered smacking your "bitch" "up"?

Smacked into a Trance (noodle vague), Sunday, 9 April 2006 21:06 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.