Jack White Attacks Everett True About His White Stripes Book

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
He really is an arrogant little Republican fuckwit, isn't he?

(by that I mean Jack White, obv, not Our ET)

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:18 (twenty years ago)

i know where my bread's buttered.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)

and i know who's buttering my bread, and it's none of this lot.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:24 (twenty years ago)

Has anybody else noticed that Jack is turning into Michael Jackson?

http://img14.imgspot.com/u/05/165/05/jackwhite100303M.jpeg

Taste the Blood of Scrovula (noodle vague), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:24 (twenty years ago)

Jack White - guilty as hell.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

Does Everett True read ILM? I'd like to know what he thinks of Jack White and this attack on his book. (Has anyone read the everett true book?)

Alain, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:27 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, ET's been known to post here in the past and certainly scans the board every so often.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:28 (twenty years ago)

He really is an arrogant little Republican fuckwit, isn't he?

He may well be, but if someone writes a book about you and you think it's shite I think it's fair enough to say so.

Thinking anyone might want to write about him in 30 years time is a bit presumptuous all the same.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:30 (twenty years ago)

Yes. we have all noticed that. Or is it, MJ is turning into JW?

Anyhow, since when does anybody have to like someone else writing their 'life story'? Either its hated as it's nowhere near the truth, or hated as it's way too close.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:31 (twenty years ago)

he's in the public eye. it was his choice. he knows the rules. he's fair game, so he shouldn't moan about it.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:31 (twenty years ago)

he's in the public eye. it was his choice. he knows the rules. he's fair game, so he shouldn't moan about it.

This (apart from the moaning about it part) equally applies to ET writing books about famous people.

Why should Jack White give a fuck about "the rules" anyway?

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:48 (twenty years ago)

why should we give a fuck about jack shite?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:49 (twenty years ago)

You shouldn't.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 09:53 (twenty years ago)

ET's heart is in the right place (christ, the man loves Scout Niblett and Daniel Johnson - he can't be all bad) but the 'discovering' (as far as the UK is concerned) Nirvana/Kurt/Courtney thing really tainted him as far as I'm concerned.

Having said that I love his magazines, which genuinely cover bands no-one else does.

Guilty Boksen (Bro_Danielson), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 10:52 (twenty years ago)

"He really is an arrogant little Republican fuckwit, isn't he?"

He's a republican? Where did that come out?

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

Anything that sends Jack White into another constipated snit is fine with me.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I suppose because he thanks God in all his albums people think he's a Republican....although I've heard interviews in which he's blasted the current government.

Who reads -- let alone writes -- books about the White Stripes anyway? The band is only about six years old, and although I think he's great, I have no desire to read a biography about Jack White.

(If someone wrote something about you that you didn't think was true, you might "moan" about it too.)

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)

beatles circa 'the white album': "they've only been around six years". i don't know why anyone would read a fucking *500 word review* of the white stripes.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)

I guess you're right N_RQ.....but even then would you have had a fair enough amount of perspective to want to delve into the history of the band? Seems to me that the only people who read up on a band that is still in its prime are fanatics who already love the band -- not critics looking for an historical perspective.

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

nowt wrong with that.

N_RQ, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

jack white was raised very catholic, but I've seen nothing to indicate that he's a republican

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

ET's book is about the whole Detroit scene, not just the Stripes. Goes back to the Gories and all that. Maybe that's why Jack doesn't like it: too much about his old pals and adversaries perhaps.

Stew (stew s), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

Presumably this is just Jack's way of drumming up publicity for the book, which certainly none of us have heard of before this, yes?

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

does mr. thackeray post here?

j. rosenberg (pukeandburn), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

Much more so four years back. That's how I ended up writing for Careless Talk Costs Lives!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

ET is the very definition of hack, what whit his shitty cut and paste quickies for Omnibus.

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

http://thecia.com.au/reviews/c/images/charlie-and-the-chocolate-factory-1.jpg

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

Does ET talk about Jack's days in The Go?

donut e-goo (donut), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

It's not his style at all, and while I wouldn't wish him to do it, Long Gone John would probably write the best book(let) about the White Stripes, I'd think. I would buy that sucka in less than 60 seconds.

donut e-goo (donut), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

"Note to anyone interested in writing books about us: Why don’t you wait thirty years first… and then write about a band that you actually like,” he advises.

I think we can all agree with this - especially if we widen it to include record companies, record shops and radio stations, who should stop putting out, stocking and playing White Stripes records, wait thirty years, and then put out, stock and play record by bands that I actually like.

Flyboy (Flyboy), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I suppose because he thanks God in all his albums people think he's a Republican

Haven't you heard? Republicans are all white Christian bigots who lock "faggots" in their basements and all Democrats are really atheistic pedophiles who seek to kill people who say God in public. You can spot them out pretty easily.

Cunga (Cunga), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)

People, NOTHING Jack White says publicly should be taken at face value, or taken as sincere. My guess is that he hasn't read any of these books.

Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Haven't you heard? Republicans are all white Christian bigots who lock "faggots" in their basements and all Democrats are really atheistic pedophiles who seek to kill people who say God in public. You can spot them out pretty easily.


Yes. Republicans usually wear red shoes, tight red and black pants, a red t-shirt, play guitar in a rock band, and listen to Blind Willie McTell. Spot 'em a mile away.

Actually, I doubt Jack White has voted an election in his life....he just doesn't seem like the type.

Now, Meg on the the other hand.....

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 20:50 (twenty years ago)

I can't imagine the man I'll always remember as THE LEGEND! has a fucking thing to say to me about the White Stripes. I'm sure Jack is quite self-conscious enough to have read every word of his paste-up, and if I was THE LEGEND! I'd keep well clear of him.

Soukesian, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

ET's book is about the whole Detroit scene, not just the Stripes.

Does like look like a White Stripes book or a Detroit scene book?

http://www.musicroom.com/images/catalogue/fullsize/OP49456.jpg

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)

"Yes, but why did you burn the rum?"

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

Well, sure it's primarily about the Stripes but it goes much further. And anyway, nowhere as many people are gonna buy a Dirtbombs biog are they? (More's the pity)

Stewart Smit (stew s), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)

Reading between the lines, here are my thoughts:

1) The actual slag-off comes at the end of Jack laying into another book on the Stripes, written by former Henchmen drummer Chris Handyside. Jack's bile towards Chris was clearly partway written in answer to an article Chris wrote on the new Stripes album in Detroit Metro Times that week (you can find it online). So...well, first - I suspect it's more of a case of Jack being riled up and lashing out at all and sundry.

2) Prior to this blog of Jack's, Ben Blackwell had told me his uncle had given my book the 'thumbs up' - which surprised me cos I knew Jack thought it was too early in the White Stripes' career for books. I happen to agree. Despite the shit title and cover that were foisted upon both me and my designer, mine is quite clearly a book about both The White Stripes and the context from which they sprung (ie: Detroit), as even a cursory flick through the pages would prove. (See also the MOJO review of my book.) I probably do praise a few too many musicians within its pages that Jack probably doesn't approve of no more - and hell, it does say 'White Stripes' on the cover, so of course he feels entitled to comment.

3) He probably has read this book, simply cos Ben Blackwell was so heavily involved in helping me write it. And he's probably read Chris's, cos Chris is a Detroit folk.

4) It's Jack's perogative to like and dislike whatever he chooses.

Jerry (Jerry), Saturday, 18 June 2005 10:40 (twenty years ago)

Er...that's Hentchmen with a 't'....

Jerry (Jerry), Saturday, 18 June 2005 10:42 (twenty years ago)

...or maybe he's right. Maybe the book is crap. MOJO sure didn't think so, though.

Jerry (Jerry), Monday, 20 June 2005 09:44 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.