How do I get into Dylan?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm ashamed to say that I only own two Bob Dylan albums (Highway 61 and Desire), and have no idea where to begin getting deeper into his music. I suppose I should own Blond on Blonde and Blood on the Tracks.....but where should I start? What do I need? Are the Basement Tapes necessary as the rest?

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:58 (twenty years ago)

*Blonde

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

Never much liked the Basement tapes.

BonB

Live at the AlbHall.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

I found that CD where he sings "This old man" (nick nack paddywack, you know)

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

get all the pre-motorcycle crash records

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

Basement Tapes are crucial but I wouldn't start there. There are so many good Dylan albums it's hard to single out one or two. I'd think you can't go wrong with any of these (in addition to the ones you have):

Freewheelin' Bob Dylan
Another Side of Bob Dylan
Bringing it All Back Home
Blonde On Blonde
John Wesley Harding
Blood on the Tracks
Love and Theft

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

Do you like Dylan? Or do you just feel a nagging need to "get into" him?

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

Yes, get Blonde and Blood, but I also highly recommend getting "Biograph."

It's an awesome survey of the man's career. I've recommended it to others, and they found themselves vastly more interested in his music.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

Just don't fucking bother.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Biograph seconded. It's got lots of outtakes so it's worth getting even if you have all the lps. Plus the liner notes are priceless.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

Do you like Dylan? Or do you just feel a nagging need to "get into" him?

You know I'm not entirely sure. I enjoy some Dylan songs, but it seems as though I should -- given my entry-level interest in him -- get to know him as well as all those artists -- who I love -- who've covered him over the years....Byrds, Band, Nick Drake, Jeff Buckley -- you know the list.

But, yes Nick, sometimes I want to say fuck it, I hate the fucker's voice, don't bother.

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

At a minimum you pretty much need everything he did in the 60's, plus Blood on the Tracks and The Basement Tapes. Later on you'll need to get the first Bootleg Series and some other stray comps to pick up the rest of the 60's tracks. The Live 1975 album is pretty damn essential if I may say so, too.

I'd say get one of his earlier ones next, just because it will be different than the two you already have. I'm a huge fan of Times They Are A-Changin'.

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

I guess the big three are probably also my favorite releases - Highway 61, Bringing it All Back Home, Blonde on Blonde. I think his mid-70s acclaimed material is a tad overrated (and his other 70s work a tad underrated. Desire is kind of awful, though). But if you don't like Destiny's Child, I'm not sure I see you being much of a Dylan fan, either.

deej.., Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

But if you don't like Destiny's Child, I'm not sure I see you being much of a Dylan fan, either.

?

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

But, yes Nick, sometimes I want to say fuck it, I hate the fucker's voice, don't bother

His voice has changed quite a bit from album to album. For instance, his current dessicated croak bears little resemblance to the faux-Guthrie-isms of his youth. Or try "Nashville Skyline" wear he had (briefly) stopped smoking and discovered a whole new register.

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

It is possible to have a complete, happy, meaningful life without BobbyDilan in it.

peepee (peepee), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

Use plenty of lube.

Taste the Blood of Scrovula (noodle vague), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

?

...he doesn't like good pop music! 'twas a gentle jab.

deej.., Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

I say 'Blood on the Tracks', followed by 'Bringing It All Back Home' and 'John Wesley Harding'

Die Emanzipation von Baaderonixx (redukt) (Fabfunk), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

you don't have to read Moby Dick either, I guess.
But you're missing out.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

But if you don't like Destiny's Child, I'm not sure I see you being much of a Dylan fan, either.

Ha. I'm continually amazed by the thread-to-thread memories that people have around here....

PB, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

Do you like Dylan? Or do you just feel a nagging need to "get into" him?
You know I'm not entirely sure.

If that's the case it's no crime to just leave it be for a while, but you should come back. I'd keep going, though--Dylan pays such high rewards to listeners that it'd be incredibly foolish to totally write him off for good.

He is a great, great singer, btw. I agree this is not obvious at first, but he's pretty much up there with anyone else in rock as far as vocals go.

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

I think 2 albums is probably enough if you're not sure you like him, he has such a huge back catalogue that he's one of those artists you can gradually accrete and suddenly wake up with 20 records by without actually being into him. I do like him, I love him in fact, but I don't think he 'should' be listened to.

What you could do is, next time you have a yen to play one of the Dylan records you do have, don't, and go and buy one of the ones you don't instead - this would seem more fruitful than making yourself like him.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

Biograph

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

....tell me one thing I'm missing by not listening to dilan or reading MobyDick.

peepee (peepee), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

genius, dude

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

love of language

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

Blood, Blonde, Biograph, and Love and Theft supported here, as well.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

you don't have to read Moby Dick either, I guess.
But you're missing out.

OTM. I wouldn't go as far as Jack White said ("If you don't like Dylan, you don't like music"), but you are missing out on some of the best shit ever done on tape.

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

"....tell me one thing I'm missing by not listening to dilan or reading MobyDick"

You're missing Dylan and Moby Dick.

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

Sorry for the contraryness of my comments, its just that I absolutely do not think that not being into dylan is something to be ashamed of.

peepee (peepee), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:41 (twenty years ago)

I'd say "Basement." I think it's Dylan at his peak, the Band were his best backing band, gives you the best sense of his Americana-weird-ol' thing...in my opinion, it's far and away his most essential recording. With "Highway 61" the other one.

Being skeptical is nothing to be ashamed of--I've always been on the fence myself. Get some Byrds albums or even try to find the hard-to-get "Lo and Behold," the Coulson, Dean, McGuiness Flint LP of Dylan Basement-era tunes to loosen up...and shit, you got to read "Moby Dick," it's essential novel just like Gogol's "Dead Souls" or "Anna Karina," like that.

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)

Watch "Hearts of Fire" and "Masked and Anonymous" back to back. Then report back here and let us know if you understood them.

Steve K, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

Read this piece by David Stubbs:

http://www.mr-agreeable.net/stubbs/default.asp?nc=4271&id=135

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

its just that I absolutely do not think that not being into dylan is something to be ashamed of.

I don't think it is either. But if you are generally into rock 'n' roll per se, I do think it's odd. I'd say the same thing about the Beatles and the Stones.

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)

xpost: I think maybe the britz think too much about what other peoples be thinking

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:07 (twenty years ago)

its just that I absolutely do not think that not being into dylan is something to be ashamed of.

Not being into Destiny's Child, on the other hand...

deej.., Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

I'd say start with Blonde on Blonde and Blood on the Tracks. BotT is more of a concept album, BoB is less so. Try not to listen to BoB as a Dylan greatest hits album and you should be fine.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

nashville skyline

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

But if you are generally into rock 'n' roll per se, I do think it's odd. I'd say the same thing about the Beatles and the Stones

i guess i'm odd then

peepee (peepee), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

if his voice bugs you, try:

http://s26.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=1UQ9UKLYQHS2L15CW47LD84RNB

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

I'd get Bringing It All Back Home. If that doesn't do it for you, I wouldn't bother with the rest.

darin (darin), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

”. I swore that one day, I would crack encrypted, Rubrix cube lyrics such as “Jewels and binoculars hang from the head of the mule”

The worst thing you can do is try to "decode" Dylan. Because there's nothing to get--the songs are not crossword puzzles. They're just basic rock 'n' roll, with a twist--the twist being his vocal delivery and the language he uses. There's nothing inaccessible about it.

It'd almost be better to hear his debut album first, and then move forward chronologically. The first album is almost all covers, and you can focus on his voice and delivery without being bogged down in the "heaviness" of the canonized works. The subsequent moves then all make logical sense.

Keith C (kcraw916), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

I don't understand why someone would be bogged down by any Dylan if they were in any way prone to liking the stuff. If you like Highway 61 then try Bringing It All Back Home and Blonde on Blonde.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

SFJ on the latest Dylan tour is fairly droll:

http://sfj.abstractdynamics.org/archives/005434.html

o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

Didn't dylan beat the puss out of the last guy who tried to get into him...clearly, dont start rooting through his trash

b b, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

"I wanted to set fire to these people"

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

Buy him a few drinks first.

Telephonething, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

get the "royal albert hall" show (bootleg series vol. 4). i was already pretty into dylan, but this show (esp. the acoustic disc) pushed my love and appreciation for him into the stratoshpere. great great great. possibly my favorite thing ever.

tylerw, Wednesday, 15 June 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

Also maybe rent "Don't Look Back" if you haven't already seen it.

darin (darin), Wednesday, 15 June 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

i'm now trying to imagine what "sister ray" would sound like with reed replaced by dylan reciting one of his pop-biblical epic mid-60s lyrics over it - "well sister ray she looks so romantic/dressed up in her milkman's vest/and balancing a spoon upon her ankle/upon her head is a bird's nest..."

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:01 (twenty years ago)

In that case, I'm glad Lou sang it and not Bob

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:03 (twenty years ago)

I like that I can still 'discover' stuff nowadays. If I didn't get into the Velvets at 18, it meant I could at age 26. (leaving alone that albums were a small fortune if they were not actually on-catalogue).

Also, I liked Beefheart (what I had heared) at around 18, but didn't have any until age 37 or so.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:06 (twenty years ago)

the thing is, the dylan canon's so well-known and solidified that there isn't really any possibility of "discovering" dylan, because it's all been played to death and written about to death everywhere.

it's not like you see beefheart on the cover of q or on the radio 2 playlist. so his stuff can still be "discovered."

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

But is that so? there's about 9% of his stuff 'above the water' that gets seen by everybody, it's the 95% underneath that's ripe for 'discovery'. As I have said before, I recommend the famous "Dylan" album as a good if not great album, but it gets routinely slated as the worst album by "anyone" not just Dylan.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:13 (twenty years ago)

Anything by Dylan that Dylanbores really hate is generally quite good, I find

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:16 (twenty years ago)

yeah - saved! self-portrait! planet waves!

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:18 (twenty years ago)

I really like that song "Joey" on "Desire" and Dylanbores HATE that song

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:19 (twenty years ago)

when's that dylan/derek bailey duo album coming out then?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:23 (twenty years ago)

With Derek singing and Bob playing the guitar?

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)

one new way 'into' Dylan might be via his autobiog - he has such a unique/intense way of expressing himself that you WANT to hear more of his VOICE when you're reading

Andrew John Littlefield, Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:33 (twenty years ago)

(xpost)

exactly. but would that mean they'd have to get in evan to do the harmonica?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:43 (twenty years ago)

Derek can handle that as well, Evan can sing harmony vocals

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 09:45 (twenty years ago)

way in => listen to his songs by ppl who covered him. many great songs but dylan himself gets in the way! or at least that's why i thought when I heard 'blood on the tracks' but 'live 1966' was the turning point, both discs are equally great and makes me search everything prior to that, though i haven't. I would guess that everything up to '66 (and esp the live stuff) would be worth a listen, and everything after that not so, that wd include 'nashville skyline': that's the one where the cat is out of the bag, he's admiting he's bored of his own voice and his ego is too big to be overshadowed by any backing band. I always feel that Kan mikami or kazuki tomokawa were two dylanesques that went in directions that dylan should've gone into. Search 'fukon' or tomokawa's albs with moto yoshisawa.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:27 (twenty years ago)

(xpost)

pity, i was looking forward to EP displaying his circular breathing, multiphonic saxophonic skills in a new "harmonica" context.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

Yes but wait till you hear Derek's reinvention of the humble moothie

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

i rate 'bringing it all back home' as a 'first' dylan record. maybe because it was the first one i got.

N_RQ, Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

I find the harmonica's considerable sonic resources sadly underused in improvised music. I think I once saw Han Bennink blow into one, for a few seconds. Then he switched to trombone to play "My Old Flame."

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 16 June 2005 11:36 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps the key to getting into Dylan's music - as opposed to his lyrics or vocals - might be to listen to one of the two excellent albums of jazz versions of his songs done by the Netherlands-based reedist Michael Moore (of Clusone 3 fame) with his trio.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:28 (twenty years ago)

Why? It's not like his songwriting is musically unusual or daring

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)

i hope that's a joke, o nate.

N_RQ, Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)

Why? I think he doesn't get enough credit for his music. He has a knack for setting a melody to a set of chords in a memorable way. His songs wouldn't be covered nearly as much as they are if they were just some poetic lyrics set to unremarkable melodies and chords.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

Wait, but I thought they were.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

This thread is turning me into Alex in NYC.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)

often the covers sound very little like the originals. hendrix's 'all along the watchtower' and the byrds' 'mr tambourine man' for example.

N_RQ, Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

The melodies and chords aren't unremarkable but I just don't see them working that well in a jazz context

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:05 (twenty years ago)

*peers at thread, moves on*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

Mind you, the chords are hardly Cole Porter

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

Well, then I suggest you give this a listen (xpost):

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000C4GJ7.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:09 (twenty years ago)

In the words of satisfied Amazon customer, J. Dennis:

Michael Moore is among the most accomplished jazz wind players alive. And unless you have very wide musical interests, as well as access to some of Europe's more esoteric labels, such as Moore's own Ramboy, BVHAAST, Between the Lines, and Hat Art, all of whom he has recorded for, you've probably never heard of him. We can be thankful that Amazon.com carries a handful of his recordings (although, alas, none of his Ramboy stuff). During nearly the whole period of the nineties, he lead a remarkable trio variously called Clusone 3, Clusone Three, or Clusone trio, producing about a record a year. Besides Moore, the trio included two of Europe's top improvisers, Han Bennink on drums and Ernst Reijseger on cello. On his own Ramboy label, he has released about 15-20 discs, all of which are certainly worth obtaining if you can find them. I especially like his little big band recording, Available Jelly, as well as a duo recording he did with pianist Alex McGuire, and a thing he did with a Brazilian quartet called Choro Combinado. Besides his own recordings, he was a member of drummer Gerry Hemmingway's group for several years, he continues to play in Misha Mengelberg's Instant Composers Pool orchestra, leads a trio that includes cellist Tristan Honsinger and piano and "Keyolin" (an invented instrument) player Cor Fuhler, and was a member of Thirteen Ways, with Fred Hersch and Gerry Hemmingway. In other words, he keeps busy.

His two main instruments are clarinet and alto sax; he also plays bass clarinet, melodica, and various percussion. He has an instantly recognizable tone on clarinet, unlike anyone else's in the history of jazz. It's very bright and meaty and solid-sounding - though he can also be quite delicate and breathy. His sound is so unique and unlike any other clarinet player (e.g., check out his multiphonics at the beginning of "With God on Our Side") that one wonders what kind of setup he has on his instrument. His alto playing is also completely his own. If one could describe his approach, it might aptly be compared to Michael Blake's tenor sound, again, very solid, somewhat breathy, huge chops lightly worn, "earthereal" (that is, earthy and ethereal at the same time), with absolute command of the entire range of his instrument.

Jewels and Binoculars, which takes its title from a line from a Bob Dylan song, is a disc of all Dylan tunes, save for the traditional song, "Two Soldiers," which Dylan recorded. The most striking thing about the disc is the vast range of emotional territory it covers so effortlessly. The band's MO is a simple one: find the optimal interpretive approach to each song, and, using its characteristic emotive center construct an apposite soundscape and perform variously straightforward or more complex improvizations as are called for on each number. The overall mood could be characterized as poignancy, and this comes through most powerfully on "Pity the Poor Immigrant," "Visions of Johanna," "Dark Eyes," "Sign on the Window," and, almost overwhelmingly, on "Boots of Spanish Leater." There are also strong evocations of dark irony ("With God on Our Side," "Two Soldiers"), wistfulness ("Fourth Time Around"), and crazy blues ("Highway 61 Revisited," "Dear Landlord").

Sound simple? Not at all. The emotional content of this disc is as powerful as any I've ever run across, which is amazing for a record that features such spare instrumentation. One can only attribute it to the brilliance of the concept and the consummate skill of the players. The band carefully uncovers the heart of each tune, lays it bare, and communicates it directly to the listener with great artistry and sensitivity.

Ravishingly beautiful, impossibly poignant, possessed of the highest level of musical integrity, this is one of the top five disc in my collection of over 3,000 and a wonderful introduction to one of the greatest unheard jazzmen alive.

Very special, and not to be missed.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)

Jimi's version of "Watchtower" is the same as Bob's except louder/distorted/a mess at the end, big deal. JD! I didn't really mean you, yr just a victim of the disease. Some things JUST AREN'T FUNNY. What use would humour be if everything was funny?

A Viking of Some Note (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

the inflections are different. dylan said after hearing the Hendrix vers he started performing it jimi's way, huh.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

a big mess at the end my arse!!! the fucking soloing!!!

N_RQ, Thursday, 16 June 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

four years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zr8PZ3ajEWo

Dylan at the recent "Civil Rights" Concert at the White House. Smokey Robinson, the Blind Boys of Alabama, Bernice J. Reagon from Sweet Honey in the Rock, Jennifer Hudson, John Mellencamp and others also performed.

curmudgeon, Monday, 15 February 2010 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

After the song, there was an awkward pause, a handshake with the president and a hasty exit.

Chris Richards review from the Washington Post

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/clicktrack/2010/02/at_the_white_house_civil_right.html

curmudgeon, Monday, 15 February 2010 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

Dylan's voice now live versus Taylor Swift's... That should be a poll

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 19:41 (sixteen years ago)

How do I get into Dylan?

Turn left at Springsteen!

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 20:31 (sixteen years ago)

i think it helps if you are a black woman

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 20:56 (sixteen years ago)

oh man thanks that was beautiful. lovely bass on that too.

is that song always in 3/4 or did he change it?

El GarBage (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

um, no it was always thus.

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

good old Tony Garnier

Stormy Davis, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

That guy has played bass with Dylan since like 1989! I think he wins the Dylan sideman contest. No one else even comes close.

tylerw, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

i think Bob keeps him around just cuz he likes saying his last name: Tony Gaaaahn-yay!

tylerw, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

It is nice (which is why I posted it) but I have given up on trying to convince folks that are not music fanatics to listen to Dylan's voice circa 2010.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 22:14 (sixteen years ago)

um, no it was always thus.

― Mark G, Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:09 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

weird wonder why i never noticed before, i guess the sorta loping bass makes it a lot more explicit

El GarBage (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 22:26 (sixteen years ago)

well, i mean, the original recording is kinda in Dylan-time, not exactly strict time, it's not super obvious ... But I think most live versions of it do a pretty waltzy thing.

tylerw, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 22:28 (sixteen years ago)

haha dylan time, yeah the early folk ones tend to wander around a bit i guess

El GarBage (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 22:30 (sixteen years ago)

hattie carroll is the ultimate example of that. try singing along with it.

by another name (amateurist), Tuesday, 16 February 2010 22:37 (sixteen years ago)

to say nothing of clapping along..

Mark G, Tuesday, 16 February 2010 22:43 (sixteen years ago)

nine years pass...

Enjoyed his DC gig last night more than the 2 90s gigs I saw. Raspy-voiced renditions of mostly non big songs, largely on piano, but a couple on guitar & sometimes just standing. Could decipher some of the lyrics. Great piano playing & impressive vocals enunciation on “Not Dark Yet” & “Trying to Get to Heaven” from Time Out of Mind. Dylan did 4 songs from Time Out of Mind, 3 from Highway 61, 3 from Tempest; & various others from other albums. I liked when the arrangements drew from honky tonk country & rockabilly better than the blues-rock ones.

curmudgeon, Monday, 9 December 2019 13:06 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.