― young girl, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― jess, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
ridiculous: REPUBLIC, MOVEMENT
― Alex in NYC, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Gage-o, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― leigh, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
i know we've done new order before, but without dredging up the old thread, i'd just like to say that i've changed my mind and consider them to be better than joy division. (this opinion to change, without notice, and then again, in perpetutity, throughout the universe.)
Apologies if I did not make this clear enough. There are threads about 'em around here somewhere.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― alex in mainhattan, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Clarke B., Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Answer: please do try.
― Alan Trewartha, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dave225, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Curt, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
New Order Substance album R rubbish, and
New Order: Search and Destroy
― N., Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Yes, but maybe I should have written naively ridiculous, as opposed to "naive to a ridiculous degree".
Ned is correct. Even their lowest moments have greatness (note "Regret" from _Republic_ - one of the best opening numbers EVAH. Of course the lyrics are largely hogwash, which has been a subject of discussion among my friends for a long time: we figure Barney knows he used to work with one of the great rock lyricists of all time and reasons that there's no point in even trying if you haven't actually got the genuine goods. Occasional exceptions to the rule only point up just how weak most of N.O.'s lyrics are.
Which does not detract even a whit from their total, total, total, total greatness. Everything's worth getting, and if you can get somebody to burn you all the good stuff from the Electronic records, that's worth it two -- "For You" from _Raise the Pressure_: Johnny Marr's single best post-Smiths moment.
/rant
― John Darnielle, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dr. C, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Oh, likely enough. But even The Great AntiLyricist that is me has all the time in the world for:
"Just wait till tomorrow...I guess that's what they all say...Just before they fall apart."
i often love the intentional triteness of barney's lyrics, i think there's a strong sense of irony there ... he knows what he's saying is naive but here's a man who has obviously been through enough to know what's what. that naivete for me actually gives his lyrics a hard edge ... it's unusual. i think part of it may be also a conscious choice to force himself to not continually tread the path of his lyrical predecessor.
― fields of salmon, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
This Movement apologist is aboot to obtain a region-free DVD player. Is the New Order Live DVD worth it?
Tks in adv.
― Andy K, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nelly, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Vinnie, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I agree that _Substance_ is really the starting point of choice (even now I'm getting the shivers thinking of "Everything's Gone Green" and that miraculous opening that veers off in a completely different direction six bars into the song).
I also wonder why there wasn't ever a "Substance II": let's see, "Touched by the Hand of God," "Fine Time," "Round & Round," "Run 2," "World in Motion," "Regret," "Ruined In A Day," "World," "Spooky," throw in "Crystal" and the single version of "1963" and maybe even "Blue Monday '88" and you'd have something way better than that dodgy best-of. Of course, 20 years from now when Rhino puts it together they'll probably add "Getting Away With It" and "Tasty Fish" and I won't mind a bit.
― Douglas, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― PreviousSteve, Thursday, 7 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dr. C, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alan Trewartha, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Marty, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But on the whole you are right, not as influential as people write/say. esp as the hi-nrg stuff that BM rips off was already out there, just less popular.
― Tom, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Most prescient of Robert, then, since that came out two, three years previously to "Blue Monday." Further proof of the Cure's genius!
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Also: let it be noted that The Cure (who I nonetheless love) were anything but forerunners to NO. In fact The Cure's doom throughout the eighties was to always be about two years behind the Joy Division/New Order axis.
― Tim, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Tim, could you expand on this...
YES THEY DO. Give in, Dan, give in. 1985 was the switchoff year. "Sunrise" -- Cure tribute. "Inbetween Days" -- New Order tribute. HA!
― DG, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I recall Bernard saying he was having trouble with the lyrics for the new album, so, I have no reason to believe anything will change in that respect. Don't like it? Too bad. That's New Order.
― Bimble (bimble), Sunday, 1 August 2004 21:22 (twenty years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Sunday, 1 August 2004 21:41 (twenty years ago)
Anyone else going to see them in Hyde Park? Anyone else already seen them this year/seeing them somewhere else?
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Friday, 8 April 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Friday, 8 April 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)
― Jay Vee (Manon_70), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)
― roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Thursday, 14 April 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 14 April 2005 20:48 (twenty years ago)
Anyone else already seen them this year/seeing them somewhere else?
Saw them for the first time last weekend at the Fuji Rock Festival. It was worth every minute of the 15 year wait. They did Krafty in Japanese on MTV Japan and then repeated the feat in front of 20 000 people later that evening. The set-list was very well balanced and also included 4 Joy Division songs. I don't know what else can be said about these guys, but I love the hell out of them.
― J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:41 (nineteen years ago)
!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:45 (nineteen years ago)
― J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Telephonething (Telephonething), Monday, 8 August 2005 05:58 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 8 August 2005 21:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Telephonething (Telephonething), Monday, 8 August 2005 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
22 JUN 82 Rollingstone - Milan, Italy 60
Truth, Dreams Never End, Chosen Time, ICB, Leave Me Alone, Denial,Procession, 586, Temptation, Everything's Gone Green, When I'm With You
Some absolutely brutal performances of Movement-era stuff -- and it's all topped off with a performance of Sparks' "When I'm With You!" What a band.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 18 March 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 18 March 2006 21:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 18 March 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 18 March 2006 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― paulhw (paulhw), Saturday, 18 March 2006 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 19 March 2006 00:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 19 March 2006 00:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Le Baaderonixx de Benedict Canyon (baaderonixx), Sunday, 19 March 2006 00:21 (nineteen years ago)
this comparison doesn't really hold water, unless you're seriously wanting to equate formal objections (NO) with objections to content (misogyny)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 19 March 2006 00:49 (nineteen years ago)
there.
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)
I dunno, I just object strenuously to the notion that bitching about misogyny in any lyrics, hip-hop or otherwise, is somehow misguided - whereas the case against bitching about New Order lyrics is rather clearer: they obviously don't mean anything, you can just ignore them, even if you don't ignore them they're not likely to do much, textually
I do understand that this is a pointless argument, don't get me wrong, I just hate it when people wanna equate saying nothing in particular with saying (say) that it's cool to treat women like shit
x-post Alfred you'll go a long ways to find a more devoted formalist than me, but to conflate/equate form & content doesn't relieve content of its various burdens
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)
Fine. I retract my analogy. I was playing devil's advocate, in part because it's so tiresome to read bitching about NO's lyrics in 2006.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Sunday, 19 March 2006 03:29 (nineteen years ago)
Anyone still have the Japanese version of Krafty?
― roxymuzak, Monday, 26 November 2007 05:58 (seventeen years ago)
They always sound a little unfamiliar, like I'm listening to them for the first time. I think I've put off listening to them in the past because I want to preserve the newness of the songs and the feeling they give me (when I hear them, my stomach knots up -- I don't want that to go away).
these two sentences are kind of perfect. i am going to use them as my excuse for never remembering what any individual new order song is called.
― king lame (c sharp major), Saturday, 24 January 2009 16:13 (sixteen years ago)
Cripes, did I really suggest that Movement is ridiculous? I should be flogged for that.
― Alex in NYC, Saturday, 24 January 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)
Milan show Ned mentions ^^^ is crazy. Some aggressive presentations of Movement songs - Lots of echoes, kinda dubby in parts. One of my favorite live bootlegs ever.
― Capitaine Jay Vee, Saturday, 24 January 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)
Haha, Alex, this is the second time you've apologized for that on this thread!
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 24 January 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)
Movement is great, Republic is even better.
No, I'm serious.
― ilxor, Saturday, 24 January 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
One forgets these things as one ages, alas.
― Alex in NYC, Saturday, 24 January 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)
A google image search for "new order" "gay sperm" is pretty OTM.
― David Allah Coal (sexyDancer), Friday, 17 September 2010 14:54 (fourteen years ago)
Two Lone Swordsmen named one of their tracks after that famous bass cabinet phrase.
― brotherlovesdub, Friday, 17 September 2010 15:12 (fourteen years ago)
what the hell: New Order gigs this Fall, w/o Peter Hook?!?http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/news/20110905_neworder.shtml
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Monday, 5 September 2011 14:58 (thirteen years ago)
well, for a good cause, so that's nice, and nice the gillian is back too.
― akm, Monday, 5 September 2011 15:18 (thirteen years ago)
playing right here in Brussels - so might be my chance to finally see these guys live.
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Monday, 5 September 2011 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.slicingupeyeballs.com/2011/10/10/new-order-peter-saville-posters-paris-brussels/
― piscesx, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:12 (thirteen years ago)
The reunited New Order — Bernard Sumner, Stephen Morris and Gillian Gilbert — also released a video statement promoting the sale of the posters, which you can watch below. They do not, however, respond to their surly former bandmate Peter Hook’s recent accusations that they’re actually reuniting for profit and have a future U.S. tour in the works.
...because of course Hook's tour is about charity.
Anyway I presume Spencer has already ordered both of those posters.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:32 (thirteen years ago)
You know, it's odd that the last couple of chapters of New Order live have largely been Gillian-free. And then Hook is out and suddenly Gillian reappears. Hmmm....
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:35 (thirteen years ago)
Surely they've been seen in the same room before...
― Franz Kappa (S-), Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:53 (thirteen years ago)
I think I meant maybe more that they really didn't like each other?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 12 October 2011 17:08 (thirteen years ago)
Because of course Hook has claimed that he's only playing two gigs and they're just for charity, and not openly said at every stage that he's doing it to earn a living.
― front-man for British post-punk turned pop chart-topper’s, Scritti Polliti (sic), Wednesday, 12 October 2011 23:01 (thirteen years ago)
Stephen Morris ranks the New Order discography...
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/new-order-rank-your-records
― Turrican, Friday, 4 September 2015 03:23 (nine years ago)
Isolation pic.twitter.com/PJlcHVawvJ— Paul Quarantine Duane (@MrPaulDuane) May 19, 2020
― calzino, Tuesday, 19 May 2020 10:53 (five years ago)
answer to thread q is clearly “yes”
― an incoherent crustacean (MatthewK), Tuesday, 19 May 2020 12:51 (five years ago)