Is there something musically fundamentally WRONG with the high notes that Mariah Carey attempts/plays around with?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
We always referred to them as Gratuitous High Notes. I admire them in the way I admire _Gadsby_, the book that doesn't have the letter 'e'--it certainly takes skill to produce, but I don't find the actual product very pleasing.

Nackles (Nackles), Wednesday, 27 June 2001 03:10 (twenty-four years ago)

four years pass...
I was convinced of this earlier tonight.

Hydrochloric Shaved Weirds (Bimble...), Saturday, 16 July 2005 06:01 (twenty years ago)

They make dogs' heads explode.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 16 July 2005 06:17 (twenty years ago)

Doesn't attempt, HITS. Give her that, at least. She fucking hits those notes.

charles groden has a face on his head (David Allen), Saturday, 16 July 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)

...with the chip they planted inside her vocal chords...

Hydrochloric Shaved Weirds (Bimble...), Saturday, 16 July 2005 08:52 (twenty years ago)

Wasn't her mother an opera singer? If so, maybe she learned her daughter some colorature. I think in some cases it really works, but to use it in every single frigging song is a bit much.

nathalie's body's designed for two (stevie nixed), Saturday, 16 July 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)


Doesn't attempt, HITS. Give her that, at least. She fucking hits those notes.

That doesn't make it right! .

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 16 July 2005 10:56 (twenty years ago)

technically, they are correct. musically, they are correct as well. some may not prefer the style. the material may not be that great, but the execution is pretty damn good.

bahtology, Saturday, 16 July 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)

I don't think Mariah cracks out those impossibly high notes much at all these days, at least not on singles. In fact I think she noticeably toned down the glass-breaking stuff from Music Box onwards as far as I can tell.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 16 July 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)

yes, you're probably right. never bothered to check out her last two cds.

nathalie's body's designed for two (stevie nixed), Saturday, 16 July 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

yes mariah we know you can sing but stick to 5 octaves.
i liked her first cd but ended there.

cariah marey, Saturday, 16 July 2005 13:14 (twenty years ago)

Tim, download "Bliss" from Rainbow now. Even though she took a break from them (she said in an interview that it was from all the dogging they got), after Butterfly they became as much a part of her music as ever. All over Charmbracelet and Mimi.

Rich (Rich), Saturday, 16 July 2005 14:14 (twenty years ago)

No more fundamentally wrong than, say, Tuvan throat singing.

M. V. (M.V.), Saturday, 16 July 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

I liked it much better coming from Minnie Ripperton.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Saturday, 16 July 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

Using it to cover "Bringing On The Hearbreak". THAT is all kinds of wrong.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Saturday, 16 July 2005 17:16 (twenty years ago)

Dan to thread!

Jordan (Jordan), Saturday, 16 July 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

Is there something musically fundamentally WRONG with the high notes that Mariah Carey attempts/plays around with?

I would have to say YES!! Of course!

She doesn't sing properly (i.e. from the diaphram (sp?)), so I think that makes them "musically fudamentally WRONG".

Plus, it hurts my ears.

Aja (aja), Sunday, 17 July 2005 01:19 (twenty years ago)

Doesn't attempt, HITS. Give her that, at least. She fucking hits those notes.

But that's exactly my point. I mean when you hear her do that, it's obvious that we are SUPPOSED to give her credit for doing that. Never mind that it adds absolutely nothing emotionally or creatively to the melody or theme of the song. It's kindof like those speed metal guitarists my brother used to tell me about who just want to play as fast as they can just for the sake of doing it. I would wager that notes as high as that are probably a lot easier for trained women singers to reach than we might think, it's just that most such women have the good sense not to squeeze them into silly lovey dovey pop songs. Even Kate Bush in her early days, as high as the notes she sang back then, didn't even dare to venture where Ms. Carey is determined to make her home. Does it mean the sex was 5 times better than any human being could experience because she hit those notes? Does it mean she loves that guy any better or more than most people do in committed relationships? I doubt it. Take the fairy wings off and get real. Music is a language and there is such a thing as an out of place word.

Hydrochloric Shaved Weirds (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 July 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

All over Charmbracelet and Mimi.

Let me get this straight...she called an album "Charmbracelet"? FFS.

Hydrochloric Shaved Weirds (Bimble...), Sunday, 17 July 2005 02:11 (twenty years ago)

well its pretty clear that MARIAH is a language you dont understand!!

jeremy jordan (cruisy), Sunday, 17 July 2005 02:16 (twenty years ago)

No more fundamentally wrong than, say, Tuvan throat singing.
Hey, no mocking the golden throats of The Golden Horde!

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Sunday, 17 July 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

The new mariah album is great. HSW, I like how you've set up the game - "she attempts high notes!" "She doesn't attempt them, she hits them" "Thats the problem!!!!"

deej.., Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:06 (twenty years ago)

deej 1ce i stole a track called secret love and couldnt connect it to the alb at all, is it worth it? is yanc3y rt? haha yeah but itd be better if she attempted them and didnt hit those hi hi notes, how great wd that be

007 (thoia), Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)

oops is it on the new record, i wanted to know? i forget the producer, assumed you misnamed it if i got it thru you, shit ws v different then, in april

007 (thoia), Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)

track is worth everything

007 (thoia), Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

Deniece Williams hits some high-ass notes. I don't think she made a big deal of it, though.

Jordan (Jordan), Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)

but yeah hsw and keep in mind i dunno what it means to be in tune or a virtuoso or nothing but i dont think ppl buy mariah cuz they appreciate her on a technical lvl and until you start talking abt where tech proficiency if it is that, meets an affable, and undying audience your boring me?

007 (thoia), Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:19 (twenty years ago)

i mean, how cld a hi note add nothing emotionally? parts abt kate bush and committed relationships are classic obv

007 (thoia), Sunday, 17 July 2005 04:22 (twenty years ago)

http://www.sweden.se/upload/Sweden_se/english/factsheets/SI/portraits/Lind/Jenny_Lind_helspalt.jpg

you fuck with mariah you fucking with me so make sure you know because it's gon get swedish in here!!!

Dan I. (Dan I.), Sunday, 17 July 2005 06:30 (twenty years ago)

No more fundamentally wrong than, say, Tuvan throat singing.
Hey, no mocking the golden throats of The Golden Horde!

-- Lord Custos Omicron (l.custo...), July 17th, 2005.

Hey, I just meant singing really high with your throat is no more fundamentally right or wrong than singing really low with your throat and your esophagus.

M. V. (M.V.), Sunday, 17 July 2005 11:51 (twenty years ago)

Does it mean the sex was 5 times better than any human being could experience because she hit those notes?

Yes! We're talking R&B here, and Mariah's at least 50% classicist. A given R&B (/Mariah) song's vocal (interpretation) is almost always its most important component, not just because she's upholding a soul tradition, but also because her function is to be a diva. Her high notes add to her frazzled, larger-than-life (,camp) persona, and like it or not, there are many examples of her using them to shade in her emotion. When words fail and become even too trite for her, Mariah still has her notes as kind of a thesaurus.

Yeah, Mariah's often dim (which I forgive but wouldn't hold against anyone else for not forgiving), but she is not without nuance. I mean, c'mon, she has, like, the best voice in the world and she knows a thing or two about what to do with it.

Rich (Rich), Sunday, 17 July 2005 14:49 (twenty years ago)

It never ceases to amaze me how little most of you people actually know about music.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 17 July 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

For example:

But that's exactly my point. I mean when you hear her do that, it's obvious that we are SUPPOSED to give her credit for doing that. Never mind that it adds absolutely nothing emotionally or creatively to the melody or theme of the song.

This is a blindingly ignorant, uneducated, nonsensical criticism that pretty much marks out the person saying as a musical Luddite who should never, ever, ever be listened to or taken seriously. Study some classical music and some gospel music and then come back when you've got a better handle on the music you're trying to criticize.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 17 July 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

At the very least, it strikes me as truly bizarre. "That there's a singer's singer whose singing adds nothing to her singing."

Rich (Rich), Sunday, 17 July 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)

Girl can sing. What she sings is somewhat questionable, in my mind, but there's no doubting her pipes. Gold.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Monday, 18 July 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

I don't really mind the high notes, if only because they're pretty impressive, but what I find REALLY annoying is her whisper/loud/whisper/loud way of singing, often in the same sentence or even the same word. She has a great voice and I don't know why she chooses to use it that way.

Seb (Seb), Monday, 18 July 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

She started doing the whispering thing because it gives the impression of being "sexy". Unsurprisingly, once she decided to start phonating again, people decided to start buying her albums again.

NOTE TO ALL SINGERS/VOCALISTS: Don't whisper on every single song; it pisses your fans off.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 July 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

Well I don't know if her fans were pissed off about it, but it just sounds bad. Has she stopped doing that on her new album? It seems to be selling well.

Seb (Seb), Monday, 18 July 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)

There's a marked difference in the way she's producing her sound on the singles, at any rate; she's rediscovered that she can sing without making that awful raspy racket that made everyone think her voice was completely gone.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 July 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

I actually really enjoy the "awful raspy racket." I feel like it really personified what was once an unstoppable robodiva. She sounds all the more vulnerable (hence loveable) from Butterfly to Charmbracelet.

And, yeah, she's still got chops, though, she sometimes flaunts them outrageously (I'm like, "Stop screaming at me" during "Stay the Night"). Also, some of the more vocally ambitious tracks tend to be like quilts of really good takes (I don't think she sings two lines of "Mine Again" successively on the album).

The new single, "Shake It Off," is pretty whispery. I dunno, though, it breaks my heart when she says, "You'll never ever find a girl who loves you more than me." Also, some high notes, so gather 'round, haters.

Rich (Rich), Monday, 18 July 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

There's this whole thing about singing "on" and "off" the breath; when Mariah does her whisper thing, she sings "off" the breath and produces these whistley overtones that obscure her pitch and diction to the point where I find her unlistenable. Compare this to the sotto voce stuff she does on most of the verses on "It's Like That", where she isn't belting at the top of her lungs but is definitely singing "on" the breath, allowing the core of the tone to come through and really clarifying the melody. (The technical term is "phonating".)

I haven't heard "Shake It Off" too many times but what I remember of it has her phonating a lot more than she does on, say "Through The Rain" or the track she did with Flipmode (both of which had me running for the hills).

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)

what I remember of it has her phonating a lot more than she does on, say "Through The Rain" or the track she did with Flipmode

You're probably right, and at the very least, "Shake" is a greater mix of "on" and "off" breath. I mean, I love it regardless, but I can see how it'd drive people less invested in her character carayzay.

Rich (Rich), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)

Mariah Carey, Tragic Mulatto -- by Richard M. Juzwiak

Mariah Carey, of course, was all of those things, the chart-reigning beneficiary of not committing to a side. Its tempting to box her into W.E.B. Du Bois theory of double consciousness to excavate how the discord between white societys maligning eye and her own self-image affects her psyche vis a vis her music, but its not quite right and damn near impossible, anyway (Du Bois theory spoke only about blacks, and not necessarily about those from a mixed race background). Mariah has more eyes on her than just whiteys. More accurately, she's a woman splintered- attempting to keep many demographics happy. But at the same time, she suffers from the effects of what Polish writer Witold Gombrowicz (via translator Danuta Borchardt) writes about in Ferdydurke in his Nth-degree revamp of double consciousness: a whole ocean of opinions, each one defining you within someone else, and creating you in another mans soul. "It's as if you were being born inside a thousand souls that are too tight-fitting for comfort!"

Black people -- they so crazy!

The Haunting, Tuesday, 19 July 2005 14:13 (twenty years ago)

I think that should read "Melodramatic Mulatto."

Rich (Rich), Tuesday, 19 July 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.