RFI: Sisters of Mercy Comps.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A while back I picked up a used copy of A Slight Case of Overbombing and discovered it had every cool Sisters track I'd ever heard. But I keep hearing tell of the British Version of the same thing, but with extra stuff (Some Girls Wander by Mistake). I looked at the track list and don't recognize any of it. But folks keep insisting: Chuck Overbombing, Get Wandering Girls. So...should I plunk down the extra greenbacks for this imported record?
Anyhow: A Slight Case of Overbombing vs Some Girls Wander by Mistake, FITE!

Lord Custos, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Heres what really kills me: Why does the British version always have more stuff?
Over here we get XTC's Upsy Daisy Assortment, Other there they have Fossil Fuel. And us Yanks get gypped
Over here we get Jimmy Buffett's Songs You Know By Heart, Other there they have All the Great Hits. Again, Us Yanks get Gypped!
The Brit copy of Pearl Jams Ten, Midnight Oils Diesel & Dust and Nirvana's In Utero all have extra tracks. And the Brit versions aren't censored! No "Waif Me" on In Utero!a
Gyp! Gyp! Gyp!
And besides...Jesus of Cool is a much better title than Pure Pop for Now People anyway.

Lord Custos, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Same goes for Steve McQueen vs Two Wheels Good. What a crummy replacement title.

Lord Custos, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Grrr.

Lord Custos, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The two collections do not in fact overlap at all -- your friends are telling fibs or are malicious. ;-) Some Girls collects all the early singles from the debut up through the Temple of Love EP, 1981 to 1983 I think is the range. A Slight Case compiles, in reverse chronological order, the singles from "Body and Soul" to "Under the Gun" -- 1984 to 1993. Many of the versions included are extended or singles-only mixes. There is a rerecorded version of "Temple of Love" from 1992 on A Slight Case, but that's the only overlap per se.

John Darnielle has been vocal about not liking the Sisters after the early EPs, so I'll step up to the defense here saying that Mr. Eldritch has come up with plenty of winners over the years. The collaborations with Jim Steinman theoretically shouldn't have worked -- but they did. For me at least. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

why has this thread gone into some stupid font? I like reading about the Sisters of Mercy but I hate stupid fonts.

DV, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Demonic font, I REBUKE you!

Dan Perry, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned's right -- they're actually two completely different collections. But, on the larger scope, I do see your point (especially with XTC). The Brit/Euro editions are always filled with more stuff. Bastards. I suppose they feel the American market isn't going to scramble for esoteric b-sides that were never originally released here to begin with. Alas.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I should note that the versions of the early XTC albums released here in the States do in fact have all the same bonus tracks via B-side inclusion and all...

Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I just wanted you all to know that this thread made me go out and buy _A Slight Case Of Overbombing_.

Dan Perry, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Indeed? Go out and buy me the Charley Patton boxset, please.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Good, it's awesome. I don't know why people get down on the Sisters stuff with guitarz.

Jordan, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Um, doesn't all of the Sisters stuff feature guitars in one way or another?

Dan Perry, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The two collections do not in fact overlap at all -- your friends are telling fibs or are malicious.
Okay, let me get this straight...so Some Girls Wander By Mistake isn't a turbocharged version of A Slight Case of Overbombing, then. Overbombing merely continues where Some Girls leaves off?

Lord Custos, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, yeah...I know. Some smartass is about to post
"Noooo, Some Girls wasn't Sisters of Mercy at all, its a Rolling Stones Album." Haw Haw Haw.

Lord Custos, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Overbombing merely continues where Some Girls leaves off?

Yup.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I tried to resist this thread. I did.

gothlock=on

1. Though I don't remember where and when I made my stance on the SoM from First & Last & Always public, Ned's right: I think it's less distance from the lip of the Grand Canyon to the river at the bottom than it is from the wonderful, wonderful EPs to the flat, lifeless padding of F&L&Always. They were an interesting band before that: uniformly designed EP's that seemed to surface out of nowhere, U.S. tours that consisted solely of playing Danceteria in NYC for a night or two, really triffic lyrics. F&L&Always comes out, the lyrics have almost completely tanked & the album's best song ("On the Wire") isn't on the album but is a B-side to "Walk Away"; they make wretched videos; they stop picking out new and interesting in-concert cover versions (Hot Chocolate's "Emma" having been a longtime favorite) and just do a turgid version of "Knockin' On Heaven's Door" instead; all the air seems to go out of them.

2. Which doesn't mean that the Eldritch/Morrison incarnation didn't knock out a good song or two; they did. But knocking out a good song or two is a far cry from working up and sustaining a really interesting public persona and stubbornly releasing only EPs instead of albums for as long as they had.

gothlock=off

John Darnielle, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

...and I really liked the typewriter font, by the way.

John Darnielle, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess I'm a sucker for the big production singles on Overbombing...More, Dominion, This Corrosion naturally, all the rest.

Jordan, Friday, 8 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I just wanted you all to know that this thread made me go out and buy _A Slight Case Of Overbombing_.
And your verdict is...?

Lord Custos, Sunday, 10 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

six years pass...

SOMEDAY SOMEDAY SOMEDAY DOMINION
COME A TIME

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 13:31 (seventeen years ago)

(I wonder what I did with my copy of A Slight Case Of Overbombing?)

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 13:49 (seventeen years ago)

If you sold it back or something you are crazy.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 14:17 (seventeen years ago)

I still maintain that the dropoff after the early EPs is a huge drag. I like Dominion pretty good and all but for about two years they were the biggest badasses, EPs with no band pics on 'em all consistently designed and cryptic and weird and a fuckin cover of "1969" with the drum machine of all things, and then actually coming over the NY & doin shows at Dancefuckingteria in support of EPs that weren't even widely available...and then, boom, label deal, videos, they're still a good band but they're no longer inscrutable. They're just some dudes with a contract.

J0hn D., Friday, 21 March 2008 14:21 (seventeen years ago)

haha whoops looks like I said all that six years ago

J0hn D., Friday, 21 March 2008 14:22 (seventeen years ago)

I guess I might feel that way if my first exposure to them hadn't been seeing a ten-second clip of the middle of "This Corrosion" on a countdown show. As it stands, I feel like they got glossier as time went on but the seam of bombast they decided to inhabit was really gonzo-awesome.

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 14:23 (seventeen years ago)

(lol and yet I still think Some Girls Wander By Mistake is my favorite thing of theirs that I own)

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 14:24 (seventeen years ago)

My starting point was hearing about Floodland in some year end review of 1988 in a magazine with a photo of the cover and going, "Hm." But I think the first thing I heard was a couple of months later when I played "Temple of Love" at my radio show and went, "Oh RIGHT."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)

A friend of mine made a conscious decision at the age of 23 or so to go through a goth phase and got a Sisters Of Mercy tattoo. I hadn't heard them at that time and since haven't been able to bring myself to give them an honest chance. Should I?

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)

Back up to the story of your friend here.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

Oh lord, I wouldn't know where to start.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

Any other conscious decisions of interest/amusement?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)

"I am 24 now. I do believe I will engage in dipsomania. At 25, I shall embrace rehabiliation."

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)

(And yes, give the Sisters an honest chance.)

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)

Did your friend get the Merciful Release logo? I'd get the FALAA logo, m'self, but am far too much of a girly man to get a tattoo.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)

You're on the right trail. He hasn't got to the rehabilitation phase yet, though sometimes when he's drinking weird Brittany Spears concoctions I urge him to do so (gastric bypass, not safe). But he's always pulling this stuff. For a while he wouldn't stop talking about his denim cape. Then it was his kilt. Then it was "all my friends' wives and girlfriends want to fuck me." He still brings an animal horn of some kind to the bars to drink from instead of the little plastic cups.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:32 (seventeen years ago)

Just months before the goth phase he was telling me "I could never get into the Cure because they invented goth! Like six months or a year later he was dumped and listening to the Cure really loud in our living room. Awk-ward!
And yes it was the Merciful Release one.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)

There should be an end-quote there after the bold type...should I be telling these on the internet?

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:38 (seventeen years ago)

The Cure did not "invent goth".

Alex in NYC, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:41 (seventeen years ago)

His words, not mine.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)

should I be telling these on the internet?

I'm starting to think this needs a dedicated thread!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)

Believe me, I know...but he's a good friend, just constantly being ridiculous, and I feel a bit bad saying these things.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

DON'T

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:09 (seventeen years ago)

WHAT HE SAID

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)

I WANT MORE

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)

I would enjoy "More" a lot more w/o the backup singers

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)

What, don't you need all the love that you can't get?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)

The Cure did not "invent goth".

I know rite I mean how pissed would Jaz be if heard ppl were spreading lies like this LOL

J0hn D., Friday, 21 March 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)

http://rofl.wheresthebeef.co.uk/Pelican%20Oh%20Snap.JPG

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)

Okay okay, one more: He's drunk and in the recording studio doing vocal tracks for a rock opera about a chick who dumped him after like three months (good album if you can deal with the lyrical content). He turns the lights out (sure Jim Morrison) and insists he have his whiskey with him. He does take after take after take ad nauseum, and despite nailing it every time he's insisting on more. Somewhere in all this he claims it got too emotional, makes a big production out of it, and has to step outside to have a private moment, regain composure. But the real kicker is that just before going into the vocal booth he fucking goes on myspace to look at pictures of his ex girlfriend in some attempt to get himself in the proper state of mind to sing. That night after recording the vocal tracks he's telling my friend he could never listen to that song again because it's "SO. FUCKING. SAADDD!" He listened to it the next day.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)

I gotta go to bed now, I've got a graveyard to work tonight.

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)

ysi?

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)

What?

(ok, not QUITE yet)

RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 21 March 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)

Better and better.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)

I really really really want to hear a song that is SO. FUCKING. SAADDD!

HI DERE, Friday, 21 March 2008 18:22 (seventeen years ago)

a rock opera about a chick who dumped him after like three months (good album if you can deal with the lyrical content)

Vole Out of Heck

Ned Raggett, Friday, 21 March 2008 18:31 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.