HAHAHA! Starbucks has really painted themselves into a corner this time!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So Starbucks much touted formula for success has always centered around making every location that comfy, homey "third place." And one of the ways they created this atmosphere in the past was by playing admittedly quite good, carefully selected reggae, jazz, folk, etc.

But now they have a record label, which means they have to promote their CDs. Which means they have to play them, loudly, in their stores ...

http://www.starbucks.com/hearmusic/images/product/192853_h.jpg

Which means people will subconsciously stop wanting to be there.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:06 (twenty years ago)

james blount?

cutty (mcutt), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)

I don't think I'd ever heard Mraz, Butler or Blunt before tonight, but MAN do they STINK! And all in the exact same way too!

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:19 (twenty years ago)

You haven't heard James Blunt? You lucky, lucky people.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)

It wasn't even like mildly pleasant music. It was severely obnoxious. It'd be less disruptive to play Black Dice records.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

oh no the hateful jon butler trio are taking over the world

gem (trisk), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)

The funniest thing was that it took me a minute (not knowing what CD was on) to realize that when Jason Mraz came on, it was no longer a woman singing.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)

I might actually start drinking coffee if Starbucks played Black Dice in-store.

cdwill, Friday, 12 August 2005 13:06 (twenty years ago)

John Butler Trio are the worst. Any Australian will confirm this

seuss, Friday, 12 August 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)

Why do all of these people have loosely reggae-influenced songs that consist of unmemorable non-melodies and the singer phrasing everything DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DADA

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:14 (twenty years ago)

Drain the veins in my head
Clean out the reds in my eyes to get by security lines
Dear x-ray machine
Pretend you don't know me so well
I wont tell if you lied
Cry, cause the droughts been brought up
Drinkin' cause you're lookin so good in your starbucks cup
I complain for the company that I keep
The windows for sleeping rearrange
Well I'm nobody
Well who's laughin now

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:18 (twenty years ago)

the girls at my local starbucks look like they want to hang themselves now

kyle (akmonday), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:20 (twenty years ago)

The image of starbucks baristas hanging themselves at the counter in protest is quite striking.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:22 (twenty years ago)

Love the sterile 1962-ish pseudo-Smithsonian Folkways album art on that sampler. Stereolab should rip that off (if they haven't already.)

Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:37 (twenty years ago)

Just the look of this guy annoys the living crap out of me:

http://echonews.com/921/images/lismore_john_butler.jpg

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

SERVE ME UP A SHIT LATTE WITH THAT BEAUT CD.

Lupton Pitman (Chris V), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)

ILM in discovering they are in the minority of the music-listening population SHOCKER

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)

I'm not yet convinced that's true. I think this CD is going to flop.

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:46 (twenty years ago)

I didn't think anyone could be worse than Damien Rice but James Blunt sure shocked me out of that complacent assumption.

Masked Gazza, Friday, 12 August 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

I think I'm going to dub this genre Newcoustic Crapternative

Hurting (Hurting), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)

I'd think the coffee was dreadful enough not to want to visit a Starbucks even if they paid you money. It tastes like toxic waste.

nathalie sans denouement (stevie nixed), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)

You know, I shouldn't admit this but I used to LIKE to go to S*bucks years back. Back when they had the old machines where they could draw the espressos at the proper speed. Back when they were playing some bands that are now cliched indie household names, but at the time were still in the early stages of rampup. I mean, they were playing Belle and Sebastian before Sinister was a twinkle in the Pinefox's eye.

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

Corny non-chain-coffee fuxxorz.

marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)

yes. they have painted themselves into a corner. BUT, that corner piled high with money.

my name is john. i reside in chicago. (frankE), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)

...AND STALE PASTRY

Lupton Pitman (Chris V), Friday, 12 August 2005 13:59 (twenty years ago)

JOHN OTM

The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Friday, 12 August 2005 14:38 (twenty years ago)

If they took to cranking up the Jewel to Mogwai-type levels, that'd be awesome. It'd be like some Tony Conrad shit, no doubt. Yes.

I go to Starbucks for the clientele and the lavatory. And the PSHHHH sound.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 12 August 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

It's not surprising that the disc is put out by XM, too.

XM has an entire channel devoted to starbucks-esque music: "XM Cafe".

You remember that dude on your dorm floor who had the acoustic guitar? Well, check it out: an entire CHANNEL of the songs he'd play to try to dupe 1st-year-chicks into putting out.

the official description:

...Good to the Last Note

Growing up doesn't mean growing old. But it does increase your enjoyment of more challenging rock artists. If your ear can discern the difference, come to the XM Cafe - where we showcase adult alternative rock in a sophisticated, artist-friendly programming presentation.

At XM Cafe, the music doesn't blare and it doesn't bore. You won't hear wailing guitar solos...but you will hear thoughtful musicians doing more than just their hit singles...plus the first sounds off albums from artists like the Wallflowers, Dave Matthews Band, Sheryl Crow, Elvis Costello all in the XM Cafe!

[...]

What You'll Hear:

Dave Matthews Band
-Crash Into Me

Tracy Chapman
-Telling Stories

David Gray
-Babylon

Natalie Merchant
-Carnival

Sting
-Brand New Day

Shawn Colvin
-Sunny Came Home

Santana
-Love of My Life

Bonnie Raitt
-Nick of Time

Van Morrison
-New Biography

Sarah McLachlan
-Building a Mystery

All the Aimee Mann and Melissa Ethridge you could ever want, without any Los Lobos, tho they did play a Paul Westerberg solo track once. We tried to play "Find the Distortion Pedal" for a while, but after about 3 tracks, you really do want to hang yourself.

i do resent their implication that Led Zeppelin is not thoughtful music.

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Friday, 12 August 2005 14:54 (twenty years ago)

holy shit, it's not just a CD, but an actual 24/7 XM channel

What You'll Hear:

Diana Krall
-Stop This World

Cesaria Evora
-Sodade

Jill Scott
-A Long Walk

Nina Simone
-I Shall Be Released

John Coltrane
-My Favorite Things

Ray Charles & Norah Jones
-Here We Go Again

The Shins
-Gone For Good

Wilco
-A Muzzle of Bees

Josh Ritter
-Kathleen

Aretha Franklin
-I Never Loved A Man...

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

kingfish, that is giving me nightmares. I feel like I'm having flashbacks to some past torture.

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Still In Starbucks.

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Why do all of these people have loosely reggae-influenced songs that consist of unmemorable non-melodies and the singer phrasing everything DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DA-da-DADA

Crystal Waters?

PappaWheelie II, Friday, 12 August 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

"Corny non-chain-coffee fuxxorz."

haha I guess. Starbucks doesn't really serve coffee. ;-)

nathalie sans denouement (stevie nixed), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

kingfish, that is giving me nightmares. I feel like I'm having flashbacks to some past torture.

hahaha, just check out the channel description:


Live More Musically...

Hear Musicâ„¢, the Voice of Music at Starbucks, brings you Hear Music - XM 75.

Hear Music is dedicated to helping you discover your next favorite artist. Whether it's an emerging singer songwriter that shouldn't be passed up or a legendary artist essential to anyone's music collection, you'll hear it on Hear Music.

and there's a link to here: http://www.starbucks.com/hearmusic/

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

Tho i wonder if you can wage a campaign to get another artist added:

"but but but my personal most favorite singer songwriter is Guy Picciotto! Surely you have room for his music!"

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

How come they don't sell Dan Zanes at the S-buck?

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)

"You won't hear any wailing guitar solos"

"Santana"

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 12 August 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

The great thing about that XM text is the particular notion of "growing up" and "sophistication" that it sells, one that's maybe more appropriate to television or film than music. The implication is that "wailing guitar solos," like candy, are a simple, childish delight, like the hyperactivity of cartoons -- and that it's actually a refined skill to appreciate the nuance and subtlety of, you know, Shawn Colvin. The implication is that it's harder to listen to Shawn Colvin than the "wailing guitar," because the wailing guitar is a cheap easy thrill and the Shawn Colvin is an acquired, sophisticated taste, like caviar.

Which sounds funny from this vantage point, because it seems to sell the opposite of the actual appeal; it's assumed over here that the point of stuff like Shawn Colvin in the first place isn't that it's a challenging, "sophisticated" listen, but that's it's comfortable and relaxing and friendly and such. But I get the sense that plenty upon plenty of people who like this stuff actually look at it from the XM line -- that they used to go for obvious excitement (pop, maybe even hip-hop), and now they're getting into arty, sophisticated, high-art serious-musicians, like including people from other countries and people with jazz backgrounds. In image this stuff puts a big premium on trained musicianship + modesty, that whole "I'm a regular guy but music is my profession and my soul" NPR thing where they theoretically have dinner parties with their friends at their lake homes and then write songs about it.

Long-winded, but it's still weird to me: much of this stuff is all comfort-and-ease, and yet it reads to its fans as sophistication and difficulty and obscurity. Which I guess isn't so different from the way plenty of early-teenagers get into poppy indie-rock.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 August 2005 16:39 (twenty years ago)

yeah, it reminds me of some sorta early-mid '60s thing, where "rock & roll"(read: pop) was seen as "children's music", and look how special you were for "growing up" and embracing such "adult" music like jazz or folk.

heh. both genres, of course, were predominant in coffee shops. NOTHING EVER CHANGES.

christ, even talking about this stuff lends to an over-deluging of quote marks.

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Friday, 12 August 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

I have stopped going to Starbucks. I found a cafe called Suburb where they are heavily playing this divine compo: http://www.nme.com/news/110791.htm

Zora (Zora), Friday, 12 August 2005 16:58 (twenty years ago)

The root idea seems to be that the newest musical developments are basically exciting candy-coated fads designed for children to enjoy before they're old enough to appreciate sophisticated music -- sort of like kids drinking juice and soda until they're old enough to appreciate the subtle, challenging flavors of coffee and wine.

Which is the opposite of the ILM / music-elite view, which holds that the newest musical developments are the challenging vanguard, subtle and challenging developments that you enjoy right up until you're old and tired enough to revert to comforting traditions -- sort of like kids being filled with revolutionary idealism until they're old enough to think more about property taxes and lumbar pain.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 August 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)

These views are actually not totally incompatible, now that I think about it.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 August 2005 17:04 (twenty years ago)

much of this stuff is all comfort-and-ease, and yet it reads to its fans as sophistication and difficulty and obscurity.

you have nailed every radio station's programming philosophy--sell them one thing but make them think it's another. But in their world it is the same so perception is reality etc etc.

teeny (teeny), Friday, 12 August 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)

where they are heavily playing this divine compo:
That sounds right up my alley, since I've just been looking for one divine compo.

k/l (Ken L), Friday, 12 August 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

I get the sense that plenty upon plenty of people who like this stuff actually look at it from the XM line -- that they used to go for obvious excitement (pop, maybe even hip-hop), and now they're getting into arty, sophisticated, high-art serious-musicians, like including people from other countries and people with jazz backgrounds. In image this stuff puts a big premium on trained musicianship + modesty, that whole "I'm a regular guy but music is my profession and my soul" NPR thing where they theoretically have dinner parties with their friends at their lake homes and then write songs about it.
Long-winded, but it's still weird to me: much of this stuff is all comfort-and-ease, and yet it reads to its fans as sophistication and difficulty and obscurity. Which I guess isn't so different from the way plenty of early-teenagers get into poppy indie-rock.

-- nabisco (--...), August 12th, 2005.

yeah, it reminds me of some sorta early-mid '60s thing, where "rock & roll"(read: pop) was seen as "children's music", and look how special you were for "growing up" and embracing such "adult" music like jazz or folk.

Nabisco totally OTM here. But I don't quite agree with Kingfish about the analogy to jazz and folk in the 60s -- these genres were often associated with people who fancied themselves intellectuals, who believed their revolutionary politics were more sophisticated and well-thought-out than the hippies' and rock and rollers'.

Newcoustic crapternative is more for the guy or girl who landed a great job in sales and is going to buy a boat soon but still fires up a doob once in a while.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 13 August 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)

What really struck me most about the stuff on this CD (especially the three doods) was the lack of songcraft. Mraz, Butler and Blunt all seem to rely on this vague reggae-funk groove and lots of vocal and instrumental pyrotechnics, and there's rarely a memorable melody. At least a lot of the people listed above can write a damned song.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 13 August 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)

nabisco otm, and this fits perfectly with Starbucks' general business model - sell elite coffee culture to non-elites. those who disdain Starbucks are preserving their class status.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 13 August 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)

music-elite view

one wonders what would happen when the two different threads of elite folks would meet. One could only play that it'd end in knife-fights.


these genres were often associated with people who fancied themselves intellectuals, who believed their revolutionary politics were more sophisticated and well-thought-out than the hippies' and rock and rollers'.

i would hold that the first part is still true, but the other parts have faded aways in the winds of time. i'm reminded much about one of the hipster-backlash threads we did where the article was posted, talking about how mid-60's hipsters were kinda the last of their kind, before any and all underground subcultures lost any guiding philosophies and became little else but just another commodity.

as mentioned upthread, the pitch line for this stuff is the congradulatory "now that you're adult, look how smart and worldly you and your tastes have become. here's some new shit to buy". Still playing on the self-perceptions of the consumer/participant that they were better than the rest/masses/mooks/mouthbreathers/etc.

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Saturday, 13 August 2005 04:47 (twenty years ago)

The Starbucks in Union Square will let anyone use the bathroom, and what's great is that there's a SIDE DOOR that leads DIRECTLY TO IT so you don't even have to skulk by anyone on the way. However, there is only one, so there is always a line. Actually, there are two bathrooms, but the other one, situated right next to the first one, with an identical door, is for employees only and lies empty for most of the day.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Saturday, 13 August 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)

you can't even smoke at the outside tables at starbucks anymore. wtf? it's a coffee shop!

also: the john butler trio is unbelievably huge huge huge in australia. they are also fucking crap.

nicholas de jong (nicholas de jong), Saturday, 13 August 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

Oh fuck, it just hit me. When my band played at Starr Hill in Charlottesville VA earlier this year, the owner was really coked up and wouldn't stop talking about "this great Australian band, the John Butler Trio" and then aurally raped us with it. I think I had blocked it out until now.

Hurting (Hurting), Saturday, 13 August 2005 05:27 (twenty years ago)

The Starbucks in Union Square will let anyone use the bathroom

The biggest plus of mushrooming chain stores and restaurants in New York is that most of those places include public bathrooms as a matter of corporate policy. Mostly because they're used to opening stores in strip malls and "power centers," where they don't worry so much about homeless people taking 25-minute baths in the sinks and junkies shooting up in the stalls. I notice, however, that Kmart and Barnes & Noble at Astor Place have both closed their bathrooms. No wonder there's lines at Starbucks. (Old Navy has very nice bathrooms, if you ever need one in the vicinity of Madison Square Garden. Is there an online list somewhere of decent public bathrooms in New York? There sure should be.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 13 August 2005 07:07 (twenty years ago)

That this thread has gone from James Blunt to shitters seems appropriate.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 13 August 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

The version of Vindigo on my cellphone can map the nearest bathrooms and even offers REVIEWS of many.

nabiscothingy, Saturday, 13 August 2005 15:07 (twenty years ago)

when in malls, my pee location of choice is the Pottery Barn.

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 13 August 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

How do you paint yourself n a corner? I never hear the Metaphore before.

Voodoo Child, Saturday, 13 August 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)

nabisco the contrast is illusory: those are two versions of the same view!

the amount of venom reserved for artists working in this style - sort of transparent (or evidently transparent) production, largely "organic" instrumention, listen-or-ignore-at-your-leisure dynamics - always surprises me rather a lot. I always want to ask: wait, how much Jason Mraz have you actually listened to? (If the answer is "enough to know he sucks!" then y'know very clever and all but isn't there more interesting discussion to be had than "this sucks"?) It's a flipside of rock fans avoiding music with synths, really.

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Sunday, 14 August 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

Wait, though -- how much Jason Mraz have YOU listened to? ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 14 August 2005 01:24 (twenty years ago)

the amount of venom reserved for artists working in this style - sort of transparent (or evidently transparent) production, largely "organic" instrumention, listen-or-ignore-at-your-leisure dynamics - always surprises me rather a lot. I always want to ask: wait, how much Jason Mraz have you actually listened to? (If the answer is "enough to know he sucks!" then y'know very clever and all but isn't there more interesting discussion to be had than "this sucks"?) It's a flipside of rock fans avoiding music with synths, really.

-- Banana Nutrament (straightu...), August 14th, 2005.

I turn on WFUV (NYC AAA station) fairly often, actually. I hear stuff I think is good often enough to flip to it when I'm in the car from time to time. I just really dislike this small group of reggae-funk tinged singer-songwriter-jammers that seem to be all the rage lately.

And yes, I think I have heard enough to know what I think, and I've also looked at their lyrics. And I sat through this entire XM CD while in Starbucks, and it was not just bad, but actually opressive.

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 14 August 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

If you'd like to defend the indefensible on this one, Banana, I'd love to see you do it.

Hurting (Hurting), Sunday, 14 August 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.