Arctic Monkeys

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Are they the new Libertines? I hope so.

― Voodoo Child, Saturday, 27 August 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)

If be "I hope so" you mean "I hope one of them overdoses and dies", then I agree with you.

― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 27 August 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

No, I mean in it a "Man, we need a new Libertines" kind of way.

I really do like the Libs. These guys just might be the biggest thing since to come out of england since the Stone Roses.

I don't give an ass what anyone says, Just because a band gets a bit of hype doesn't mean you have to hate them.

Viva la Monkeys!

― Voodoo Child, Saturday, 27 August 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22gimmick+poster%22&hl=en&hs=E99&lr=&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&start=0&sa=N

― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 27 August 2005 23:15 (twenty years ago)

what's a gimmick poster?

― Voodoo Child, Saturday, 27 August 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)

This band are really boring. I can't believe that The Guardian wrote a fake article on how no-one writes good lyrics anymore, in order to give them hype as the only band around doing so, esp. for a shitty meta-pop song about other bands (Fake Tales of San Francisco) (OK I can believe it but....)

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 28 August 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)

"Check it out mate! I'm on the Domino street team. They gave me stickers!"

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 28 August 2005 12:49 (twenty years ago)

The Stone Roses weren't even the biggest thing to come out of England since the Stone Roses. Why do evil record companies continue to send kids on Kamikaze missions to ILM?

― I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Sunday, 28 August 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

I'm not from a record company. I've been posting on ILM for a while now.

I just think this band is going to be big in some sort of way.

― Voodoo Child, Sunday, 28 August 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

I realised the street team crack was off-beam after I'd posted.

But hype aside, the last thing anybody needs now is a new Libertines.

― I Ain't No Addict, Whoever Heard of a Junkie as Old as Me? (noodle vague), Sunday, 28 August 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, you've posted more than me! I hope you enjoyed The Stooges reissues. Arctic Monkeys and Libertines are lame though.

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 28 August 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

The kids went mad for them at Reading (turning up in monkey suits even), so whatever's going on is somehow real. Haven't seen them, but Larry Bell claims they're recording an album next week. And the world will continue to turn.

― snotty moore, Monday, 29 August 2005 00:00 (twenty years ago)

Here be where you can get all their demos etc. There's quite a lot. (Yep I'm street teaming now. They gave me a lollipop and a balloon.)

All the people that got wound up by the I Predict a Riot lyrics will be going crazy over A Certain Romance:

Well oh they might wear classic Reeboks
Or knackered Converse
Or tracky bottoms tucked in socks
But all of that's what the point is not
The point's that there ain't no romance around there

....

You know, oh it's a funny thing you know
We'll tell 'em if you like
We'll tell 'em all tonight
They'll never listen
Cause their minds are made up
And course it's all okay to carry on that way

And over there there's broken bones
There's only music, so that there's new ringtones
And it don't take no Sherlock Holmes
To see it's a little different around here

etc.

The singer has that really annoying 'check it out man I'm telling you THE TRUTH' voice that has become de rigeur in Brit indie, and they have that stupid half skanking motion that everyone seems to have today as well. They're like a muscular Libertines. I've got a can of lager and it's all lads together innit.

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 29 August 2005 10:50 (twenty years ago)

I prefer The Rakes to every single band mentioned above.

― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 29 August 2005 11:12 (twenty years ago)

The fact that they mention Sheffield's Hunters Bar in one track is their only redeeming feature.

― Blowhard, Monday, 29 August 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)

They are very different to what one could call the 'Sheffield pop tradition.'

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Monday, 29 August 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)

The one that dresses like a science teacher on the last day of term from The Rakes is a really nice person.

Doesn't excuse the band being shit, though.

― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 29 August 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...

I think you should give the monkeys a chance, im not gona compare them to any other band because i think they are very unique! The arctic monkeys are real there gigs are out of this world. They dont take any thing for granted they are genuinly glad to be where they are know. Yeah so they are getting a lot of hype but they deserve it they are an amazing band that write graet songs lyrics every one can relate to!

― hollie longden, Wednesday, 14 September 2005 13:32 (twenty years ago)

I agree with everythimg youve just said. I saw the monkeys in Hull and it was just amazing, id do anything to live that night again. Its unfair to compare the them to the libertines as they were SO different and so influencial to british music.However theres something special about this lot! They deserve all the hype they get and all you haters can FUCK MAGGLE

― hulligan, Thursday, 15 September 2005 09:45 (twenty years ago)

fukin love them i even slept with the singer backstage that night. he's awesome in bed! james powell sucks cock

― paggle gaggle, Thursday, 15 September 2005 09:48 (twenty years ago)

yeah you're comepletely right, i think it's realy unfair how some of you just criticise them, they're just doing what they want and you slaughter em. they are talented and interestin and generally warm people and they deserve a chance so just lay off. anyway i'm seeing em on the 15th october at club zero and me and my mates cant even wait so all of you wish you were me.

― Clo, Thursday, 15 September 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)

They had a bed backstage? Wow, they're makin' it

― DJ Mencap0))), Thursday, 15 September 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

LISTEN PPL, ARCTIC MONKEYS ARE A PRETTY KL NEW BAND. BUT COME ON, NO ONE
CAN COMPARE TO THE LIBERTINES LYRICALLY OR MUSICALLY. THEY`RE SELF
TITLED ALBUM IS LIKE LISTENING TO A MARRIAGE BREAK UP BETWEEN PETE AND
CARL, ITS JUST SOOOO AMAZING.THE LIBS COULD HAVE BEEN THE BIGGEST BAND
IN BRITAIN IF IT DIDN`T GO PEARSHAPE, BUT HEY HOPEFULLY THE MONKEYS CAN TAKE THAT CROWN IN THE FUTURE CAUSE THEYRE THE ONLY BAND OUT JUST NOW WHO ARE REAL. OH BTW MUSE ARE SOOOOOO UNDER-RATED WATCH THEM LIVE, S
UPERB!!!!

― DOMINIC MIRZAI, Saturday, 17 September 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

just listen to em and make up youre own mind. ill bet you anything that you love them though because they are bloody brilliant. i would even say better than the libertines, because they are more my kinda thing, not too poetical like, just honest, funny and you can sing along

― alice, Sunday, 18 September 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)

PINE ELEVEN

― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 18 September 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

Try comparisons other than the Libertines please!

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 18 September 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

Really enjoyed reading everyones thoughts on the artic monkeys. I discovered them through zane lows show when he played 'fake tales of san fran' and then a few weeks later 'bigger boys'

I have to say they are fuckin wicked and funny 2. can see why people are comparing them to the libertines in as much as they are british and good. But they are very different too.. for a start there northern and havent got some sort of romantic illusion with poppies/herion that carl and pete seemed to have.

I'm a big fan of the libertines self titiled album and the lad who wrote about that above is dead rigth.. its a classic already.

But there's no need to slag of a band for gettin hype.. if anyone had heard the interviews theyve done they sound like proper decent lads. good luck to em!

and that bird who shagged the lead singer.. haha quality! glad to see rock stars, even lads from yorkshire get groupies and shags back stage!

Live the dream :-)

― Rennie, Friday, 23 September 2005 15:31 (twenty years ago)

I'd never heard of these guys, name is a bit rubbish, but in a who is tipped to be big in 06 article in the Guardian yesterday they were mentioned by most everybody (well, 6 of the 9 people in the article).

Looking around a bit seems like you can grab some of their songs here. The first thing that comes to my mind is Libertines.

― gspm (gspm), Saturday, 1 October 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

Here's a movie of them performing. It's pretty interesting, they've got a lot of energy and expensive looking mod haircuts. There's an early Oasis vibe about them. This is all I've seen of them but I smell a phenomenon.

http://www.dominorecordco.com/site/downloads/Arctic_Monkeys/I_Bet%20You_HIGH.mov

― holojames (holojames), Saturday, 1 October 2005 17:21 (twenty years ago)

If they think "big" means "being ubiquitous at indie discos and played in the background twice on Hollyoaks," those tipsters need to get a good look at the real world.

― Don King of the Mountain (noodle vague), Saturday, 1 October 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

Stew's capsule review: "Pish!"

What has become of Domino? You'd think with the Franz money they'd sign some good acts, but instead we've got Artic Monkeys and Archie Bronson Outfit. I don't begrudge Domino having another cash cow, but y'know, Franz are actually good!

― Stew (stew s), Saturday, 1 October 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)

I found the 'who is tipped to be big in 06' Guardian piece' pretty sickening. The band sound like absolutely generic UK indie to me, but it seems 'the industry' has decided and I suppose I'd better get used to it

I just suspect that there's a better band playing in a bar about twenty minutes from where you are now, wherever that might be.

― Soukesian, Saturday, 1 October 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

Why is it sickening exactly? It's a bunch of people doing their job(s)

― DJ Mencap0))), Saturday, 1 October 2005 21:56 (twenty years ago)

It's a bunch of people doing their job(s) badly and then feeling smug about it.

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Saturday, 1 October 2005 22:39 (twenty years ago)

Just seems to me like getting angry at a dog for barking, that's all

― DJ Mencap0))), Saturday, 1 October 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)

I'd get angry if a dog kept barking at me.

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Saturday, 1 October 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

Surely they are the new The Others rather than the new Oasis. Judging by the random googlers on this thread, they're also the new Dave Matthews Band.

In that Guardian article Conor McNicholas also recommended Carl Barat's new band, who will surely turn out to be the new McAlmont and Butler, only shit.

― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Sunday, 2 October 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

He might be the new Robbie to Doherty's Gary Barlow.

― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 2 October 2005 00:13 (twenty years ago)

sort of nice to see the excellent mystery jets mentioned in that article

― jimmy glass (electricsound), Sunday, 2 October 2005 03:31 (twenty years ago)

fucking google idiots/fucking street team knobs, one or the other.

this band is utterly mediocre! wtf?

― Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 2 October 2005 10:39 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, big ups to the Mystery Jets.

I don't understand the Arctic Monkeys appreciate either. I downloaded a couple of tracks about six weeks ago, and they went straight into the trash. Who has time for this kind of generic British indie? Of course, I see no appeal whatsoever to the Kaiser Chiefs, either, so what do I know.

In real life, I like the online "tastemakers'" picks way more than the print ones, frankly. Give me Fluxblog and Pitchforkmedia's darlings over the NME and BBC, any day.

― sean gramophone (Sean M), Sunday, 2 October 2005 10:47 (twenty years ago)

there's no tunes to the the 2 that i've heard. suss swagger all that pish but like, where's the melodies?

and they're going nowhere looking like a spotty Coral.

― piscesboy, Sunday, 2 October 2005 10:59 (twenty years ago)

*cough* spottier Coral.

― Don King of the Mountain (noodle vague), Sunday, 2 October 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)

Notice a trend:

rubbish lite singalong tripe with crap production:

Kaiser Chiefs
Hard Fi
Dead 60s

...Arctic Monkeys

On a site like rateyourmusic.com which has contributors across the world these crap bands are rightly ignored.

Because Britain has useless playlist stations such as Xfm, Virgin, Radio 1 and no weekly competition for NME, rubbish tripe like this rises to the top like slime on a stagnant pond.

― DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 2 October 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

where are these rateyourmusic.com street teamers coming from?

― jive session (elwisty), Sunday, 2 October 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)

That rateyourmusic list is a piece of crap. There are a dozen worse albums than the Kaiser Chiefs or Hard-Fi. Some people really overreact this thing in this board.

― zeus (zeus), Sunday, 2 October 2005 16:43 (twenty years ago)

Actually, on rateyourmusic, the Kaiser Chiefs album is rated at 3.43 stars on average, which means it falls just outside of rym's Top100 of 2005. (Oasis' latest ranks at 99 with an average of 3.44)

― vinegar (Koens), Sunday, 2 October 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

The other thing: the Kaiser Chiefs album has been sold in 100 000 copies in the USA alone. And I really don't think there are so much NME readers there...

― zeus (zeus), Sunday, 2 October 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

Conclusion: it's not just a British disease, they like tripe everywhere.

― vinegar (Koens), Sunday, 2 October 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

More to the point, the Kaiser Chefs have a very distinctive sound and write decent songs. The Arctic Monkeys? I've already forgotten everything I've heard.

― Soukesian, Sunday, 2 October 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

Skipping 136 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/release/h3hj/

start from about 2/3 of the way down. my first, but not my last, music-forum flame-war!

― "Don't listen to people like Louis..." (Haberdager), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:33 (eighteen years ago)

The original, unedited outpouring can be found here: http://tms24.proboards40.com/index.cgi?board=offtopic&action=display&thread=1124830733&page=22#1138763563

I'm really not proud of a lot of what I said (ESPECIALLY the 'saviours of British rock', whoops), not to mention the manner in which I said it, but hey, a rant's a rant!

― You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

I prefer the Arctic Monkeys to MUSE ffs

― //// (fandango), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:43 (eighteen years ago)

today is the first time i've heard the record. i'd only heard the look good on the dancefloor song before.

i guess i had low expectations.

a lot of it sounds like pretty typical u.s. indie rock w/english accents, but the best songs are pretty good. the lead dude has a good way about him sometimes.

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:48 (eighteen years ago)

like maybe he could be the paul weller for kids that play playstation or someting someday.

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

They do have a pinch of charm about them, despite the cliches and hackneyed subject matter. Especially in comparison to their competition (ok maybe I doo need to hear the Long Blondes & Gossip albums too... ), enthusiasm though, is something that they don't quite spark in me.

― //// (fandango), Friday, 12 January 2007 22:57 (eighteen years ago)

Look (on Metacritic) at which publications'/reviewers' end-of-the-year lists they topped. Bit of an Atlantic divide, whatwhat?

― M. V. (M.V.), Friday, 12 January 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)

Ive only heard a few songs and i think they're above alright, but not half as stunning as the hype suggests. My point is a dry one though. The 'working lads and lasses' et al who apparently will love this record, probably won't. The middle class fans (rock is pretty middle class these days, admit it!) who wish the proles would dig t'monkeys are missing one thing. Youth proles dig Mc'ing, rap, and other such genres, not rock! Round my area they don't anyway. Im afraid that the belief in, and empathy with the modern; 'gawd bless em workin' claas' which may give t'monkey's added cred, is a lie! Rock aint these kids main thing at all. Its just t'middle class kids hoping that a few kitchen sink lyrical snippets and regional accents might make it such. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. So there.
Dom, london

ha ha

― acrobat (elwisty), Saturday, 13 January 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

still never heard an arctic monkeys song :D

― lex pretend (lex pretend), Saturday, 13 January 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)

Please keep us informed on this, lex.

― Clothing the Gotterdammerung Doors (noodle vague), Saturday, 13 January 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

it seems like you could have any opinion of this band, depending on how charitable you feel like being and how much credit yr willing to give them cuz of how young they are.

i guess my default position is that every new "buzz band" of the UK is going to be a big huge pile of shit, so when something's kinda decent i'm all like "oh that's kinda nice, good for them!"

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Saturday, 13 January 2007 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

Lucky you, Lex!

Srsly, are these losers still around?

― SAVE IT FOR THE CAKE LIST YOU CRAZY BROAD (patog27), Saturday, 13 January 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)

Just listen to NME, MTV2, Q and any other half decent journalists... they are brilliant

― DavidM* (unreal), Saturday, 13 January 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

that's a good one, but for nuclear holocaust in ABOUT ZERO SECONDS:

had to laugh at the reviewer here..what a shoddy review. Of course nothing in guitar based music is groundbreaking anymore,,its just impossible, its all been done before. However as someone who has not been particularly touched by anything musically since the Stone Roses debut this album is phenomenal, as good as you can get.

― You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Saturday, 13 January 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

~~Poor~~ Destitute Man's Carlin.

― SAVE IT FOR THE CAKE LIST YOU CRAZY BROAD (patog27), Sunday, 14 January 2007 01:08 (eighteen years ago)

Hnestly, 4 shit versions of a top zing rly serve to bang the msg hOm.

― Clothing the Gotterdammerung Doors (noodle vague), Sunday, 14 January 2007 03:50 (eighteen years ago)

does the british press shorthand their name to "the arctics in glasto dust-up" or "the monkeys in glasto dust-up?"

― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Sunday, 14 January 2007 04:20 (eighteen years ago)

three months pass...

Wow, that's odd, when I bought a cheapo DVD player recently, there was a CD already in it when I took it out of the box... I played a bit of it and then put it away 'cos I thought it'd be some crappy compilation being given away as a freebie. However when I put it into iTunes just now it turns out it's the first Arctic Monkeys album... what gives?

― Tom D., Tuesday, 1 May 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

must be an evil dvd player.

― funny farm, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

they can't give 'em away! except in this case obv.

― blueski, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

Was somebody listening to it in the DVD factory and forgot to take it out?

― Tom D., Tuesday, 1 May 2007 16:21 (eighteen years ago)

love the idea of the Arctic Monkeys album being used as a Reference cd to check the DVD player works ok with audio cds.

― mark e, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)

Someone probably returned it and forgot to take their CD out. Bummer!

― musically, Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

five months pass...

Someone please explain why "Fluroscent Adolescent" is meant to be a modern classic. Thanks.

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)

that's a clever title.

― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 12:09 (eighteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a3/Drastic_Fantastic.jpg

― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 12:21 (eighteen years ago)

Would smash the shit out of.

― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)

alex turner is a smug, snidey little cunt.

― max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)

IS he? in person? i'm genuinely surprised if so cause that's not what i've heard.

― pisces, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:55 (eighteen years ago)

in the lyrics, obvs. i reckon he is in person as well tho.

― max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

i always wondered why people go to such elaborate trouble to "pretend" they're a twat. why not spend the same amount of energy pretending to be funny and engaging and insightful?

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:33 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Link

― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:58 (eighteen years ago)

so true, so true.

― max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:59 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

This band has a song called "Brianstorm"

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 30 June 2009 03:33 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

new album 'Suck It And See' l£4k£d.

― piscesx, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 00:04 (fourteen years ago)

(i kno)

― Mark G, Wednesday, 18 May 2011 00:05 (fourteen years ago)

first single sounded a bit non descript/oasis-ish

― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 13:33 (fourteen years ago)

Single is a horrible choice but the last third of the record is pretty great.

― We need to talk about Bevan (DL), Wednesday, 18 May 2011 14:00 (fourteen years ago)

it took a while to sink in but it's a pretty fine album. a couple of dud-ish trax but the good ones are a-ok-imo.

funny to read the haters up thread: pretty sure that a.turner is as far away from a snidey littlecunt as max r and others are close to it.

― nultybutnice (whatever), Tuesday, 31 May 2011 19:05 (fourteen years ago)

single worked on the letterman performance. tight band.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr5U1A94IRM

― nultybutnice (whatever), Tuesday, 31 May 2011 19:08 (fourteen years ago)

That single is awful.

― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 31 May 2011 20:05 (fourteen years ago)

Good album -- I guess they've entered their Morrissey circa '89 phase where it's all jangle and semi-acerbic couplets.

― The Edge of Gloryhole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 June 2011 21:06 (fourteen years ago)

Like this album a lot.

― the fey bloggers are onto the zagat tweets (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

the lyrics he wrote for the submarine were dreadful. hopefully he doesnt overwrite the life out of each line on this album like he did there.

― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 8 June 2011 16:36 (fourteen years ago)

two years pass...

new single! won't win over any naysayers but it's sweet enough to be going on with

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2013/jun/19/arctic-monkeys-do-i-wanna-know?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

― piscesx, Wednesday, 19 June 2013 16:52 (twelve years ago)

Jeez, this is great. Dunno why I didn't expect it because they always deliver, but this is a belter.

― Ismael Klata, Monday, 24 June 2013 17:43 (twelve years ago)

When Album?

― Mark G, Tuesday, 25 June 2013 08:00 (twelve years ago)

September

― Iain Mew (if), Tuesday, 25 June 2013 08:27 (twelve years ago)

one year passes...

lol. glad i get to bump this thread, some good posts above like that dave matthews thread.

anyway, watch this fucking asshole:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOVT5ujsr8s

lololol

― global tetrahedron, Sunday, 31 August 2014 01:18 (eleven years ago)

i love the parts when you can see people milling around in the background just not even paying attention or giving the slightest shit

― global tetrahedron, Sunday, 31 August 2014 01:21 (eleven years ago)

oh well this is old i guess (july) so there was probably already a thread about it. never mind, carry on

― global tetrahedron, Sunday, 31 August 2014 01:31 (eleven years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.