An all-new version of the ILX code is being developed. You can test and comment at sandbox.ilxor.com.

not liking the rolling stones - C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i fucking hate them
that horrrendous voice of jaggers
that lame, almost timid rhythm section
their country sucks (mostly cos of jaggers voice/accent)
most of their songs just sound the same - leaden, never come alive as they sound indebted to being faithful to their influences
i like various singles of theirs but cant find one album thats actually lived up to the hype
most overrated band of the classic rock canon

― hater, Monday, 12 September 2005 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)

"that lame, almost timid rhythm section."

Rather like this sentence.

― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 12 September 2005 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, say what you want about the Stones. But don't diss that rhythm section, ya mutha.

― Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Monday, 12 September 2005 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

th new record is the best bad album they have ever released and im not a fan of th bad stones

― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Monday, 12 September 2005 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree with the first poster.

― AaronK (AaronK), Monday, 12 September 2005 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

My mother continues to hold up Mick Jagger as the poster-boy for reprehensible, animalistic rock depravity.

"B-b-b-but, Mom, he's been KNIGHTED!"

"Oh, he's disgusting!"

"Mom, have you met GG Allin?"

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 12 September 2005 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Massive dud. If you like the Beatles or whatever, well, y'know, go with god, but if you just don't like the Stones please just keep quiet about it. Everyone else is right, and you are wrong, and you're just pooping in their oatmeal.

You don't hear me bitching about the Violent Femmes, do you?

― rogermexico (rogermexico), Monday, 12 September 2005 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Everyone else is right, and you are wrong, and you're just pooping in their oatmeal.

Damn well said.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 12 September 2005 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

sticky fingers is a damn fine album, I can't understand liking their singles and not enjoying that album.

― Jamey Lewis (Jameys Burning), Monday, 12 September 2005 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

You don't hear me bitching about the Violent Femmes, do you?

I hate them even worse than the Rolling Stones.

― recovering optimist (Royal Bed Bouncer), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud, mainly because most of these people find value in Linkin Park and the like.

― President Busch (dr g), Monday, 12 September 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Great point dude!! Groundbreaking stuff!!!

― noise dud, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)

My mother continues to hold up Mick Jagger as the poster-boy for reprehensible, animalistic rock depravity.

When the Monsters of Rock concert came to Memphis in 1985, my uncle took one look at Klaus Meine and Rudolf Schenker being interviewed on local television and said, "Goddamn, are those the Rolling Stones?"

He didn't really think that the Scorpions were the Rolling Stones, but meant it in the same way that we call every demon "Satan".

― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic, as it is the fuel that give people the energy to post anonymous comments.

― President Busch (dr g), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"Mom, have you met GG Allin?"

I note you didn't post her response.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

"that lame, almost timid rhythm section"

worth quoting again. really quite amusing.

― bugged out, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:05 (twenty-one years ago)

You don't hear me bitching about the Violent Femmes, do you?
I hate them even worse than the Rolling Stones.

-- recovering optimist (christbaitrisin...), September 13th, 2005.
well we do know . hahaa!

i like the new album.

― retroman, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:08 (twenty-one years ago)

The Beatles--"those drab, forgettable melodies"
Led Zeppelin--"that weak, limp-wristed drummer"
Ramones--"those tedious, pompous concept albums"
Stooges--"that quiet, self-effacing singer"
Marvin Gaye--"those chaste, unpassionate vocals"

― bugged out, Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Prince -- "that complete lack of any technical musical skill"
James Brown -- "his sloppy, grooveless band"
Husker Du -- "that barely-audible, almost timid guitar work"

― A|ex P@reene (Pareene), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I'd come up with the name "noise dud"

― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"Smithers, have the Rolling Stones killed!"

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

i normally dont care what people like and dont like to the point where it actually makes me worry about them and the future of society, and i can see how the last 20 years might make you suspicious of them as a whole, but, uh yeah, dud.

― strng hlkngtn (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 02:39 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2004/08/16/Charlie_Watts_narrowweb__200x270.jpg

― mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

BEST BAND EVER

― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 13 September 2005 07:19 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.