Hannah Arendt, Rockist or Anti-Rockist?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Or - if Bobby Conn and Lenny Kravitz are twins, then WHICH ONE is the 'evil' one?

dave q, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Interpret any 'loaded' words in any terms you wish but please define said terms

dave q, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hannah Arendt: "world of appearences" gunk. (Cf. Rahel Varnhagen). Must make her a shape-shifting Vegas chameleon ala Bowie or other scum of that ilk.

Verdict: anti-rockist, vaudeville Vegas toe-tapper, kabuki-meets- dreck...ala Bowie.

(Also, Bowie fancied himself a Nazi at one point; Arendt fucked a Nazi [Heidegger].)

J Sutcliffe, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

When Arendt wrote, in 'On Revolution'

"The history of revolutions-from the summer of 1776 in Philadelphia and the summer of 1789 in Paris to the autumn of 1956 in Budapest-which politically spells out the innermost story of the modern age, could be told in a parable form as the tale of an age-old treasure which, under the most varied circumstances, appears abruptly, unexpectedly, and disappears again, under different mysterious conditions, as though it were a fata morgana. There exist, indeed, many good reasons to believe that the treasure was never a reality but a mirage, that we deal here not with anything substantial but with an apparition, and the treasure thus far has remained nameless. Does something exist, not in outer space but in the world and the affairs of men on earth, which has not even a name? Unicorns and fairy queens seem to possess more reality than the lost treasure of the revolutions.".

...she invented punk (well she invents Jurgen Habermas/Greil Marcus, anyway). So I guess it depends on whether PUNK is rockist or antirockist (going out with Heidegger = Siouxie Sioux wearing Swastika) - which is, of course, intractable.

Edna Welthorpe, Mrs, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Lenny is the evil one, and Arendt is the rockist.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Why not all three?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Arendt invented nothing. She simply read Merleau-Ponty (What is Life of the Mind if not regurgitated Merleau-Ponty and, er, Heidegger?), Benjamin, Brecht, et al.

J Sutcliffe, Wednesday, 20 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

five years pass...

man, that sutcliffe fellow was a twat and a half.

hannah arendt is CLASSIC. i've been reading "the human condition" for a few weeks, on and off, and it's astounding how much it mirrors half-formed thoughts about communities, politics, the public life, that i've had as long as i can remember but never was able to put into words. she's more akin to tocqueville, jefferson, et al, than the european crowd she's generally grouped with.

J.D., Thursday, 28 June 2007 01:27 (eighteen years ago)

Totally agree. On Revolution is one of those books I'll take with me to the grave. But let's move this to ILE...

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 28 June 2007 01:29 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.