does it matter who runs glasto? isn't it just as much of a corporate fest as any of the other big festivals -- remember that ugly big smirnoff tent in 2000? or is glasto genuinely different in a way that would be lost if vince power took it over?
― rener, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
secondary question for people who've been to festivals like reading, leeds, t in the park etc - how are they different to glasto?
― Alan Trewartha, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Pete, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
To give him his due, he did turn Reading around in the late '80s, but that whole slew of festivals he runs sound very packaged. No, I've never been to any of them.
Maybe Barry Foundation could take over Glastonbury and get some stupid American band to pick ALL the acts.
― DV, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― barry hogan, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bob snoom, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I reckon a Mean Fiddler run Glasto would equal:
1. Less money donated to charidee. 2. More corporate sponsorship. 3. FAR fewer marginal stages and fewer acts, with 'major' bands who would never make the current Glasto bill (Limp Bizkit, fr'instance) paid far more in order to pull the punters. 4. Overly aggressive security policy - wristband checks round all the stages, loss of the 'open' feel to it. 5. No fucking Rod Stewart... so I suppose every cloud has it's silver lining.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 19 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― bob snoom, Saturday, 23 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)