So what would the social repercussions be if universities the world over blocked access to Pitchfork?
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:29 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)
― nathalie, a bum like you (stevie nixed), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Black Elegance (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:34 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:38 (twenty years ago)
that was in the thread title. I guess i'm behind because i have no access to Pfork breaking news.
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)
― Confounded (Confounded), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)
― vinegar (Koens), Monday, 3 October 2005 12:44 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Monday, 3 October 2005 15:17 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Monday, 3 October 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Monday, 3 October 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)
am i right folks? am i right?
― jimmy glass (electricsound), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 09:56 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 09:57 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 09:58 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 09:58 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)
People who think they are hipper than Pitchfork readers and emotionally retarded enough to think that any sane person gives a shit would have to think of some other narcissism-of-small-differences target to sneer at. That's their forte, though, so they wouldn't stick.
― whocares, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 10:40 (twenty years ago)
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:04 (twenty years ago)
― marc h. (marc h.), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:21 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:31 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)
― Roxymuzak, Mrs. Carbohydrate (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:39 (twenty years ago)
― Roxymuzak, Mrs. Carbohydrate (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:40 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)
If you want to take issue with my post, read it first, and try to understand it as best you can. It's not difficult. To summarise, people it describes as "emotionally retarded" are those who:
1. Think they are hipper than Pitchfork readers; and2. Think this will impress people or that it is some kind of achievement.
Now consider the proposition that *everyone* who posts to the board is emotionally retarded. That's the proposition you didn't like and inspired your clever put down, isn't it? The only problem is - well, nobody but you made it, did they?
But it's always great when someone who thinks they are being super duper clever reveals with every utterance that....... how can put this nicely......... they're actually not, in fact, very bright at all.
― whocares, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)
Yes, it's like Ned and National Review Online.
I would like to know why Hari's university blocked Pitchfork. Is this the only site they blocked?
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 14:09 (twenty years ago)
You'd know.
A pungent comparison.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 14:11 (twenty years ago)
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), October 4th, 2005.
Im not sure its blocked...but everytime i try to load it instantly tells me NO.
Also, i only found this out when roxymuzac linked me there yesterday. I don't read the damn thing.
― Googley Asearch (Toaster), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)
I wondered who would come up with that one first. No points for guessing, originality or unpredictability never a strong suit, I give you arselicker extraordinaire, a man who can generate a ton of of bumptious self-importance from less than a gram of achievement, the World's Smuggest Man, Ned Raggett!!
― whocares, Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
Hari, that is revolting. You will give yourself food poisoning young man!
(It's so worrying mothering someone you've never met and who is only eight years younger than you.)
― Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
-- whocares (nowfuc...) (webmail), October 4th, 2005 4:15 PM. (link)
Welcome back C-Man.
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)
XD I actually know one guy online who fits every negative generalization of Pitchfork readers, but you're right for the most part. It's kind of like how everyone thinks everyone on the internet is a pervert and yet no one identifies themself as one. The criteria for being a "pervert" or "pseudo-hipster" is always associated upwards towards some delicious strawman.
― Cunga (Cunga), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)