(secretly knowing this will collapse into a DiCrescenzo/Pitchfork hater thread)
― Jack L., Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)
― Jack L., Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)
― edward o (edwardo), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)
― Jack L., Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)
― Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)
― Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)
― steve hise, Tuesday, 8 November 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)
If the line feels out of place on an otherwise eccentric but earnest album, that may be the point. "I was with this guy from the band Bunny Brains and he was saying, 'I heard your record, man, it's gonna be in, like, Starbucks, whatever.' And I was like, man, I don't want it to be in Starbucks! I'm going to write a song that will guarantee that it is not in Starbucks."
― dan bunnybrain (dan bunnybrain), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)
― marc h. (marc h.), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)
2) Fiona just got too famous too fast too young and seems to be OK now. I think she realized the "emotionally fragile / kind of kooky" thing is a hook and plays to that a little while also staying generally stable.
3) "If Fiona Apple wrote and performed "Little Boys", she'd be featured on Fox News, facing the boycott threats of Bill O'Reilly." -- I remember people saying this about MIA too.
― Eppy (Eppy), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 21:36 (twenty years ago)
― Jack L., Tuesday, 8 November 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)
― Patchouli Clark (noodle vague), Tuesday, 8 November 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)
― nabiscothingy, Wednesday, 9 November 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)
This is wrong. for a start by DiCrescenzo's own definition he's freak-folk, not folk, which in itself suggets a rupture with tradition. And then what are 'ordinary people'? Everyone except Banhart? And all folk 'tradition' is now in some way a recreation of tradition, a revival. What is tradition in an age of recording and printing of gtr tab and a break from sounds belonging to strictly local areas (and that's by mid-last century.) Folk music in the twentieth century was at it's strongest and most creative when the traditions were called into question and contested and remade (periods which then became set as new orthodoxies with the divisions consequently less visible.)
And there's loads of utterly fantastical folk music about goblins and witches and fairy kings etc. Songs about frogs marrying mice! (all of which actually 'reflects' reality, just like Banhart's music does.)
By these standards this feller must think Dylan has no connection to folk music either.
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 00:38 (twenty years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)