Global Users Of Slsk,BT, DC etc to be sued

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The global recording industry has launched its largest wave of legal action against people suspected of sharing music files on the internet.

The latest move targeted 2,100 alleged uploaders using peer-to-peer (P2P) networks in 16 nations including the UK, France, Germany and Italy.

File-sharers in Switzerland, Sweden, Argentina, Singapore and Hong Kong are also facing cases for the first time.

Thousands of people have agreed to pay compensation since the campaign began.

The number of cases brought by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) outside the US since March 2004 now stands at more than 3,800.

In the US, civil lawsuits have been brought against more than 15,597 people since September 2003 and there have been 3,590 settlements.

'Significant escalation'

The IFPI said users of P2P networks including FastTrack, Gnutella, eDonkey, DirectConnect, BitTorrent, WinMx and SoulSeek were facing action.


Countries targeting file-sharers
Argentina, Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, US

"This is a significant escalation of our enforcement actions against people who are uploading and distributing copyrighted music on p2p networks," said IFPI chief John Kennedy.

"Thousands of people - mostly internet-savvy men in their 20s or 30s - have learnt to their cost the legal and financial risks involved in file-sharing copyrighted music in large quantities."

Individual cases are generally brought by the national associations representing the recording industry, and in some cases by the labels, as civil complaints.

In some nations, including Italy and Sweden, file-sharers are subject to criminal prosecutions.

The UK record industry has so far brought 97 cases, with a further 65 covered by the latest action.

More than £140,000 in compensation has been paid to the British Phonographic Industry by 71 individuals. Those who fail to resolve cases face civil court action.

The IFPI announcement comes after court rulings in the US, Australia and South Korea found P2P services can also be held liable for downloading by their users.

Earlier this month, US file-sharing group Grokster agreed to halt distributing its software to settle a long-running copyright case launched by the entertainment industry.

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 12:11 (twenty years ago)

From http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/4438324.stm

Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 12:12 (twenty years ago)

http://www.ctgilles.net/images/pictars/sharing.jpg

nancyboy (nancyboy), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)

Mute: Simple, Anonymous File Sharing

nancyboy (nancyboy), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 12:25 (twenty years ago)

Damn you Stylus!

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

lucky cutty is law-yer
WHARS YOUR "RECORD COLLECTION" NOW?

detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)

how does lim3wir3 always slip through the cracks?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

Maybe the RIAA don't know about the LIMEWIRE FILESHARING network.

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)

hey, that MUTE website is really interesting.
check out his MONOLITH project, and also his FREE DISTRO essay.
lots of food for thought......

m0stly clean (m0stly clean), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

well I never offer RIAA stuff for upload (or at least not knowingly) so hopefully I'm fine and hopefully slsk wont' disappear.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)

WHARS YOUR "RECORD COLLECTION" NOW?

THEY'LL NEVER CATCH ME.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

try and sue us here in russia

HA HA HA HA


/losers

nique (nique), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)

Anyone know which particular artists the RIAA downloaded in these lawsuits? The point of which being, are they any less likely to bust me if I'm tradin' old Bo Diddleys as opposed to Gwen Stefani? And just to clarify, I pay Bo Diddley whenever I can. Viva Diddley!

Roe Joe, Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

I know my copious Giacinto Scelsi collection has raised their ire.

Brakhage (brakhage), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)

this kind of stuff has only recently begun to scare me, though thankfully it's coincided with a near complete lack of interest in major label music (for the moment).

firstworldman (firstworldman), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 03:27 (twenty years ago)

and it seems to be true, yes, that they only go after people who offer those things for upload? (i guess it's hard to get around that with BT but regular progams it's quite easy to choose what to share and what not to share)

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 05:08 (twenty years ago)

Global Users Of ILM to be STFUed

amon (eman), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.