― 11V (11V), Thursday, 17 November 2005 08:52 (twenty years ago)
Personally I think Scott 3 is a more considered, cohesive work than 4, which though wonderful is a bit all over the place. And the Bergman song is not so good either.
― jz, Thursday, 17 November 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)
― jz, Thursday, 17 November 2005 09:25 (twenty years ago)
but yeah if you loved climate and tilt the next logical step is nite flights.
― mullygrubbr (bulbs), Thursday, 17 November 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 17 November 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)
Well if this is the case, then you should definitely get the two long tracks he did with Ute Lemper, Scope J and Lullabye, because they are the female version of Tilt.
― Jacques Buried Her, Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:09 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)
I don't hear a great deal of stylistic variation between 1 and 4, though 3 is probably the most easy listening of the four. Agreed that Nite flights is the way to go, patchy but immaculate in parts.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)
Yes, that's the one, it has Scope J on it. Lullabye was a bonus track, now available on the Scott Walker box set, but you can probably find it on Soulseek or something.
My inside sources at 4AD tell me that the new Scott album is finished except for recording the vocals. Apparently scheduled for March 2006 release. Apparently being the key word.
― Jacques Buried Her, Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)
my thoughts on the first four are that 4 > 3 = 1 > 2. that said, having them all is the best idea. plus, theyre not that expensive, hard to find, etc.
i never understood the hate for "the seventh seal." i mean, its very different from the rest of the album, but i always thought it made for a bracing beginning. i understand im gonna fight a losing battle if i try to argue for it around here, but i still love it. "get behind me" is the closest thing to a throw-away, as far as im concerned.
― petesmith (plsmith), Thursday, 17 November 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)
You won't fight a battle at all, if I have anything to do with it, Pete. Nice meeting you a few weeks back, btw...
― Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Thursday, 17 November 2005 22:49 (twenty years ago)
not key at all.
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 November 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)
Now Get Behind Me I love! It's like his rocking soul number!
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 17 November 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 17 November 2005 23:25 (twenty years ago)
― 11V (11V), Friday, 18 November 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)