― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 18 November 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 18 November 2005 08:17 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 18 November 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 18 November 2005 08:24 (twenty years ago)
― cw (cww), Friday, 18 November 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)
― rsyouth, Friday, 18 November 2005 11:50 (twenty years ago)
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Friday, 18 November 2005 12:05 (twenty years ago)
Indeed!
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 18 November 2005 14:10 (twenty years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 18 November 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)
― lf, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
Those Neil & Leonard covers are indeed quite hideous.
― Myonga Von Bontee (Myonga Von Bontee), Friday, 18 November 2005 16:52 (twenty years ago)
― biz, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)
― detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Friday, 18 November 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 18 November 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)
― derrick (derrick), Saturday, 19 November 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)
― giboyeux (skowly), Saturday, 19 November 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)
― kit brash (kit brash), Saturday, 19 November 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 19 November 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 19 November 2005 03:42 (twenty years ago)
Just try it and you will see!
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 19 November 2005 11:53 (twenty years ago)
ihttp://img470.imageshack.us/img470/9876/abbeyroad1jd.jpg
and with cutout applied to the whole thing:
ihttp://img470.imageshack.us/img470/4190/cutoutabbey4qm.jpg
i quite like that version actually.
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 19 November 2005 11:56 (twenty years ago)
― Hairy Asshurt (Toaster), Saturday, 19 November 2005 11:57 (twenty years ago)
― mzui (mzui), Saturday, 19 November 2005 12:30 (twenty years ago)
I don't know anything about Photoshop.. But this looks like a "make it look like a painting while it is a photo"-filter.
― Ludo (Ludo), Saturday, 19 November 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)
The first is FLASH. Not Photoshop. Definitely. "truly noisome random palette" my ass.
The question we should be asking ourselves is "would these and all other lame filters be so bad if we weren't aware of the simplicity of the process?"
― Graphic Artist, Saturday, 19 November 2005 13:49 (twenty years ago)
-- Hairy Asshurt (lindseyloha...), November 19th, 2005.
What you've proven is that it is not the cutout filter, but that it is obviously the trace bitmap feature in FLASH. There is much more detail and it is much more vector-y with those smooth, Flashed-out treatment of corners.
― Graphic Artist, Saturday, 19 November 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 19 November 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)
― Roxymuzak, Mrs. Carbohydrate (roxymuzak), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
― Bimble The Nimble, Jumped Over A Thimble! (Bimble...), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)
― Roxymuzak, Mrs. Carbohydrate (roxymuzak), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
― //////>>!, Saturday, 19 November 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)
Sorry, couldn't resist
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Saturday, 19 November 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)
Yeah it almost approaches Alien vs. Predator levels of dorkery huh?
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 19 November 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)