How well can you HEAR?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Inspired a little by this thread ? Should I get a Bang & Olufsen stereo? (this is the thread where you tell me that I could get a much better system for that kind of money) ? and also by Nabisco?s talk on this thread about hearing things better through headphones - Albums You Don't Expect To Be "Headphone Albums," But Are ? and also by a writer, who shall remain unnamed, at Stylus who professed to not being able to tell that different people were singing on different songs on the new SFA album. (I was? perturbed? to say the least.)

How well can you HEAR music? Is your stereo up to the job? Are your EARS up to the job? Do you listen exclusively through tinny PC speakers? Do you only ever listen to MP3s? Is your hearing / concentration / attention to detail good enough to really pick out details in music, to notice instruments, textures, production styles, even something as basic as different singing voices? Do you pump the bass up so it?s fat and sludgy, fiddling with tone controls and graphic equalisers? Do you consider yourself a skilled listener? If you don?t, and you write about music, do you feel that you are adequately doing your job, or do you feel that you are selling your readers short? Would you base a record review on hearings of an album on a bus via tiny in-ear headphones, surrounded by noise and distraction? Can you really pass judgement on music if you haven?t properly heard it? How can you properly hear music in the first place?

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)

Well, I would say this, because I have the shittiest stereo in the world (it was bad even before it got an entire White Russian spilled down it) but honestly... a good stereo is nice, and it's nice to hear music properly. But seriously, if a piece of music doesn't sound good on my piece of shit tinny transistor stereo, then the producer hasn't done his or her job!

(I once worked with a producer who had a pair of speakers nicked from a cheap car stereo for this exact purpose...)

Please Snap StressTwig (kate), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the idea that the only "proper" way to listen to music is through zillion-dollar speakers is completely moronic, and always has been. (And, uh, whoever SFA is, maybe the two SFA guys just have really similar voices? How is that the *listener*'s fault?)

xhuxk, Tuesday, 29 November 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)

There were four SFA guys...

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

.. went into a bar.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)

It's not about having zillion-dollar speakers anyway - my speakers cost £170, my amp £150, my CD player £170. Factor in cables and speaker stands at another £120 or so, and that's little over £600 for something that I use several hours a day, which I run my DVD player through, which is the centre of my living room, essentially, and I don't think it's that expensive at all. Sure you can spend thousands and thousands, but I think that's taking things too far.

And the Super Furry Animals thing is that a; this guy is a fan, b; they've had one dude singing for all their previous albums and c; all of a sudden there are very obviously different people singing different songs on their new album, and I'm not for one second buying a "but they're all Welsh!" excuse.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Actually, I forgot who SFA were. (Sam Foster's Army?) Maybe Super Furry Animals fans have no business writing about music. Just kidding.

Either way, sometimes music is meant to be heard blating out of a passing car. And I know at least one critic who says music isn't good unless it sounds right through the tinny little speakers on his TV.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

Also, sometimes distraction is PART OF THE MUSIC. Or part of the experience, anyway. That's the way it's *supposed* to be heard.

xhuxk, Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

Also, sometimes distraction is PART OF THE MUSIC.

What, you're telling me that Guided by Voices Sandbox was s'posed to sound that way? ;-)

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:20 (twenty years ago)

I don't disagree with the passing-car thing, or the idea that distraction and external noise is part of experiencing music - this and this are about just that idea.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)

Also I don't want this thread to just be about fidelity.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

I think I understand what you're talking about here...

I have a friend who has an amazing ear for music. Just amazing. One of those guys who finds little things hidden in the music, picks out the counter melodies played by other instruments on the first listening, etc. And he doesn't have a good stereo AT ALL. While not state of the art, I have a pretty nice stereo, in addition to pretty nice headphones through which I listen to music often. And this guy picks up stuff that takes me three or four attentive listenings to pick up. I also play music with this guy, and have for quite some time, so I am very familiar with him.

Now, at the same time, I have actually been thinking about my own progress as a musician/listener to music. Unfortunately, its much more of the second than the first right now (fuck school), but I still find myself much more able than three years ago even to pick out parts of music, understand the song's structure, and even to predict the changes, like where the bridge is going to go, etc. So, in terms of aural progress, it happens. And its NEET.

As for listening to music - if I could do it and be effective with all else that I do, I would do it non-stop. Seriously. Like Jack Slade with my theme music all the time. But, since it is relegated to the back ground sometimes, I find myself listening to a lot of music at polite office volumes, making mental notes to go back and listen to it more attentively later, and then doing so.

Since I've used it twice, what does attentive listening mean? I would say that, regardless of medium, setting, or equipment, attentive listening is the type of listening where it is the primary activity you are engaging in. You would shush someone if they started talking to you, or would pause the music while they finished with their interruption and would then recommence to listening.

And it all depends upon how much you want to emmerse yourself in the music - if you're writing a review of the album, I suppose you want to listen to it more than while writing a term paper, but maybe not as much as if you were attempting to learn the song itself. If you're commuting, and your commute is fairly robotic, you could totally emmerse yourself in whatever you were listening to on your headphones/car speakers - I've missed exits/train stops b/c of this very thing.

So, bottom line, I think that its all about what YOU want to do with your listening, and that, given the desire to do that, you can pretty much listen at whatever level of attention that you want in any situation. You just gotta want it.

Big Loud Mountain Ape (Big Loud Mountain Ape), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)


I got into a debate about this with my roommate over Thanksgiving.

HIM: Let's face it, people that actually think that drumming *really matters* are full of bullshit. You could swap out X drummer for X other drummer and the band wouldn't be THAT different. It's all about supporting the guy writing the songs/melodies.
ME: ...wha?


Now, one of the big differences between me and my buddy (musically) is that I have been played in large instrumental groups (through school) and jazz bands/trios/etc. and, as a result, really enjoy paying close attention to instrumentation, etc. He ('sup Danjer!) is more, shall we say, "rockist" in his tastes. While I'm not sure exactly WHY this makes a difference, I'm pretty sure it does.


giboyeux (skowly), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

(I once worked with a producer who had a pair of speakers nicked from a cheap car stereo for this exact purpose...)

all producers do this in one way or another, don't they? and they all like to tell a story about it, or brag about it, or something about it. but when it comes right down to it, it's their JOB, isn't it?

i'm convinced that whoever buys and maintains the stereo and speakers and sets the volume at just such a level for the main floor of kim's on st. marks place is the world's greatest audio person. every single record ever made sounds great on that thing. if i were a reviewer and i was reviewing records through that system, i'd give five stars to everything. which would make me a fairly useless reviewer, i'd think.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

all producers do this in one way or another, don't they?

No, not all producers do. Only the *good* ones do. I've worked with a couple of really shitty ones who get offended if you take your rough mix out to the car to listen to it on little speakers.

Please Snap StressTwig (kate), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

I've worked with a couple of really shitty ones who get offended if you take your rough mix out to the car to listen to it on little speakers.

in those cases, you should take your rough mix out to the car along with all your raw files and your car keys, and drive to a better producer's place.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)

Bump.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 30 November 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.