Am I Too Cynical about U2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
he has been in a abnd for 25 years , is putting his money where his mouth his and using his influence for good ( The Debt Releif), He seems an intelligent man , yah U@ has a king sized ego but isn't that we expect from rock stars ?

anthony, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

He's been in a Munich-based group for at least 25 years, is putting his money where his mouth is and using his influence for good (building Autobahns and conquering new Heimat territory). He seems an intelligent man; jawohl, he's got a king-sized ego (note the clever hyphen) but isn't that what we expect from Our Hitler???!!

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

A bit much in comparison, surely? Haven't seen him start up any death camps lately.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Let me paraphrase the great Tanya Headon and state that Bono is doing for debt relief what the Specials did for eliminating racism ... FUCK ALL.

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's shit being a rockstar... if you blow all your money on crackmice everyone scoffs at your decadence, and if you attempt to use your position to communicate some right-on message everyone scoffs at you for being some preachy egomuffin.

DV, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Idea that Bono has done nothing to encourage debt relief is bollocks. However, idea that 'Walk On' or whatever it's called is "the record of the year" is also bollocks. Ho hum.

Jeff W, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, then, show me the proof that Bono has made life so much better for the Third World. He has done nothing, aside from creating photo ops for miserable politicians and his own miserable self. If Bono wants to truly make a difference for the Third World, I'd suggest that he give, say, an entire Third World community his vast fortune and spend the rest of his life picking rice for them. But I guess that doesn't quite compare to the glamor of G8 conferences and Super Bowl spectaculars.

I'd be more than happy to never have to see or hear another word about this self-righteous, smug bastard.

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah leave politics to the professionals they're doing a bang-on job

besides bono is a limey therefore = hitler

mark s, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought Limeys were only from Brittania and Bono was just a dirty drunken potato eating Catholic Irishman ...

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

he is a twat = he is an honorary colonial englishman surely?

heh i have forgot whose side i am on

mark s, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think very many individuals have a particularly huge influence on the world's problems, including full-time activists. He i doing something beyond talking about this debt relief thing, and that seems creditable.

DeRayMi, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And Sutcliffe, what exactly are YOU doing to aid debt relief, you smug smorgasbord of shit?

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

StarPower, StarPower, StarPower, StarPower....

What's-his-name is doing a good job. I'm totally sick of his mug, but he's doing something positive, which is more than I can say for a lot of other multimillion dollar stars. I don't know what he's doing with his personal fortune, but he is using his stardom to influence politics. And until I see evidence that he's diverting funds into his own pockets or skinning babies alive, I have nothing bad to say about him. (Except that I hate his glasses.)

Dave225, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What I hate most about U2 is their fans. Bono is the second coming to these wierdos. I was in a fight with fan a while back and the fool said something about Bono's attempt to free the third world from debt and how that was better than any other muscians charity. He said "Our country is sucking the life out of other countries", now that might be true considering your opinion of America but of course this boy worked for evil empire Barnes and Noble, loved the even more evil Dave Matthews Band, and bought a brand new Pontiac Grand Prix that he put himself into debt for (he always bitched about it too). I hate the fans, the name The Edge, men with crew cuts and earrings, and every little thing about Bono.

The music is bad too.

Lindsey B, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Another thing, I don't think music-makers should hang out with policy- makers. Just because you play the guitar and wear old jackets like you were in the Army at sometime in the past doesn't mean you get to make forgein policy.

Just say no to Bono.

Lindsey B, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyone can be a policy maker. If not musicians and actors, then who? Lawyers and philosophers?

Dave225, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

A friend of mine was present when the Pope was granted an audience with Bono, and he spotted that when Bono removed his sunglasses the Pope mistakenly accepted them as a gift, something which was cut out of the televised version. So, if any of you see the Pope anytime soon, can you tell him that Bono wants his shades back, as they were of great sentimental value to him. (He was wearing them when he met the Pope, you see). He can just send them to 'Bono, The Biggest House, Ireland'. They'll get there alright.

Snotty Moore, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Howabout Bono does something for all the Kidz -- the ones who were beaten and arrested in the streets while he was shmoozin it up with the politicos at the summit, eh?

Found the Carlo Guliani relief fund for medical aid to anarchists who had their heart in the right place and now have a shoulder dislocated?

Sterling Clover, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I suspect if Bono funded money for every time The Police State came down on the Kids, he'd be broke in two seconds. Which would be perversely funny, I admit.

Wasn't he calling the White House from the stage ten years ago? Now he finally gets through.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The type of people I know who get _super_ upset over stars trying to advance political causes make me laugh, because 'as proven by science' this type (=self-righteous) is the most likely to do precisely the same thing, and they would mostly do a worse job of it than Bono does. He has played with the self-obsessed stereotype of rockstars more than other true rockstar has. I mean, that's probably more interesting than his f'ing music (= bloated, static). He's probably the best of a bad lot. Sure, his recent US flag worship = lame. Hangin' with Jesse Helms = inscrutable, hilarious, insane? I hope Bono brings garlic and a wooden stake into his meetings with Jesse.

So when some "politically engaged" star like Sting asks how much $ it is necessary to give away when you have millions in order to be a "moral" person, I say to the TV, "ALL OF IT YOU COCKFARMER!"

But I don't get super-upset over it. And someone revoke my '=' key, please!

Hunter, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sure, his recent US flag worship = lame
What about his long-standing worship of the US? This is not a recent phenomenon for Mr. Vox. Remember Rattle and Hum?

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd apparently repressed that particular trauma. Good point.

Is there a difference in fetishizing american musical culture vs doing it to a flag, which let's face it, which has a martial overtone in my book?

Hunter, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Uh, that looks weird, please delete "in my book". I didn't write any stinkin' book!

Hunter, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyone else think it's time for Bono to shave off his hair? He looks like a caffeinated homeless rat as of late. U2 are just going through the paces like so many other bands where everybody's best-of-friends. They seem to have no quality filter... it's all just "this sounds nice" and "this reminds me of times when our music meant something." With far too much, "let's let that Daniel Lanois joker have a go at things." They're not hurting anybody and they're only occasionally annoying (as on "Elevation") so it's not too grating to see Bono Money-Bags plastered on one's Happy Meals and Wheaties boxes.

Tim DiGravina, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"And Sutcliffe, what exactly are YOU doing to aid debt relief, you smug smorgasbord of shit?"

Mr. Carlin,

Living and working on the US-Mexican border, I can tell you firsthand that debt relief does not trickle down to the people who need help and/or government assistance. Surprise, surprise, all it ends up doing is mysteriously swelling the offshore accounts of corrupt Third World politicians. If you don't believe me, study the case of former Mexican president Carlos Salinas, currently comfortably ensconsed in exile in Eire after draining the Mexican coffers. (Also look into the facts of the Zapitistas.)

And I've yet to hear anything about Bono protesting THAT particular state of affairs. Certainly the Mexican people have, but neither their government, the US government nor the Irish government has done a damn thing thing about it.

When push comes to shove, Bono isn't about to place himself into a concrete situation close to home. Much easier to deal with matters of the abstract, sufficiently distant from his privileged existence.

So what do I do then, Mr. Carlin? For a start, I'm involved with several independent (i.e. - not grassroots, NOT government affiliated) organizations which bring food, clothing and education DIRECTLY to the poor in Mexico. And by that I mean hands-on, literally door to door. This makes a tangible, concrete difference in these peoples' lives, people who quite literally live in cardboard houses. And, believe me, IMF debt relief or no, these people will not benefit AT ALL from this shell game.

So pardon my French, Mr. Carlin, but FUCK YOU, you sanctimonius prick. What the hell are you doing???? Study the facts (the gospel according to Bono is hopelessly incorrect) and get your information straight before you go slagging off people.

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Correction: That should have said "grassroots, NOT government affiliated."

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Also look into the facts of the Zapitistas

Apologies for being obtuse, but you threw me on the context -- meaning the facts they bring to the table re: the government, or the truth of their leaders, or...?

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess I'm the one being obtuse there. Sorry. I mean to say that the Zapitistas have constantly and correctly pointed out how useless it is for "aid" (or "debt relief") to be placed into the hands of a corrupt government. So-called "aid" to Mexico (ostensibly earmarked for the feeding and education of the poor) has instead gone to purchase military equipment to kill Zapitistas and innocent civilians.

Bono appears to believe that debt relief = automatic improvement in standard of living of the Third World poor, which leads me to doubt that he's ever spent any time (aside from the quick photo op afternoon stroll through an African village) dealing firsthand with the daily lives of these people.

Just who do you think a reduction in Third World debt is going to benefit? This is not me being cyncial, just realistic.

Hell, even his buddy/mentor Brian Eno has written and written well about the National Defense and International Aid war machine shell game. You'd think he would've sat down and explained a thing or two about a thing or two to Bono, eh?

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That would be too easy.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

debt relief != aid. duh, mr. high and mighty. debt relief reduction in debt to IMF mainly = not being forced to "restructure" economy to extend loans = more social services, more job protection, &c. the money doesn't matter so much as the consequences of not paying.

Sterling Clover, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(sigh) ... Having lived through many US-to-Mexico debt forgiveness incidents, I ask you to tell me where the money saved went? Unfortunately, not to social services but rather it enabled the hoarders to hoard even more. Just why do you think so many Third World politicians just love Bono's campaign? Because they are licking their lips in anticipation of their soon-to-be-doubled Swiss accounts. And Bono is unwittingly these criminals' accomplice.

As a Mexican friend of mine has often stated, "We don't give a damn what they say about restructuring the economy. We don't have anything, and the only thing we can always be sure of is is that we'll never get anything. When you have been cast out of the economy, you really don't care what games they are playing with it."

Bono doesn't have a clue about the reality of the situation, and neither, apparently, do you. Money is simply not circulated in Mexico. There is zero "trickle down" effect. In ideal terms, Bono's issue is a just and noble and neat abstraction, but it rests on a patently false premise and is oblivious to the economic and political reality. In the end, all it accomplishes is that Bono can feel better about himself. Meanwhile, the rich get even more richer and the poor still have nothing.

Sorry to rain on your parade, son.

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And, by the way, I believe that Bono is sincere, earnest and true in his motivations here. And that is the problem. His willful naivete and wide-eyed martyrdom will, in the end, cause more harm than good (perpetuating and increasing corruption), methinks.

As previously stated, wouldn't it be more constructive he if were to, say, campaign to have Salinas expelled from Eire (along with his billions), returned to Mexico and rightfully jailed, and see to it that the Mexican people get their money back? If that were to actually happen, it might make an actual difference.

No, Bono isn't about to put his neck on the line and risk dealing with real politics and real issues that may (gulp) infringe on his daily existence. It could create trouble for him with the Irish powers that be. Best to cast your wayward glance to an abstracted issue far, far away.

But for all I know, Salinas is a well-paying client at Bono's hotel.

J Sutcliffe, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Irish powers that be": i'm quite happy to be ultra-cynical abt bono's motives, but i don't think he's *that* complete a roll-over pinhead. eire causes the slightest wiffle of possible irritation for u2 => they take they ball home (well, away) = eire loses, not u2

i don't have the irish fortune 500 to hand, but surely mr vox is up in the single figures

mark s, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sutcliffe: I hate to say it, but it looks like you are the one who is sort of missing the point of debt relief. It's not intended to be of direct benefit to the people of the Third World, much as it helps it sound nice to put it that way; the reason it even gets as much traction as it has in the west is that it's essentially a macroeconomic approach, wherein removing the massive debt burden allows nations to actually gain some economic traction of their own. (You can twist this around to sound evil, as well: i.e., "The slow drain of Third World resources via debt servicing strikes me as a pittance compared to the trade-drain potential of industrialized Third World nations. . . . Relieve their debt, Smithers." I'm not, however, contending that that's the reality.)

Nitsuh, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hey has anyone on ilx ever met anyone whose ACTUAL NAME is smithers? my sistah has a cool theory: see a 30s or 40s brit film, a character is called smithers => many ppl in uk at the time were named smithers BUT they were all gay => only person in world now called smithers = a cartoon character, also not straight in gentle hommage to his true-life forebears now extinct :(

mark s, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What about JAN SMITHERS, aka Bailey Quarters from WKRP in Cincinnati? Surely she's not gay too? Say it isn't so, Mistah Sinkah??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

well i never met her, did you sean? perhaps it's a stagename, to discourage "enquiries" (or to encourage em heh heh)

mark s, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I've never met her either, but IMDB says she used to be married to James Brolin. Looking back on the WKRP years, she did have a bit of butch appeal to her, though, and was probably a huge dyke magnet, so maybe she still qualifies.

Sean Carruthers, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What exactly is Bono arguing for? The way I understand it, the IMF has a debt relief policy contingent upon the nation adopting a plan for political and economic reform (specifically poverty reduction). This is good for everybody, since these reforms will presumably make a developing nation more attractive to foreign investment. Similarly, it's in the creditors' interest to make reasonable arrangements with these countries, seeing as the developing nation is their investment, the future of which they have a financial stake in. Simply cancelling third world debt isn't likely to allow a developing country to gain economic traction, since they would essentially be destroying their credit and their prospects for continued/future investment (it's analogous to a very poor person declaring bankruptcy...sure it keeps them out of jail, but does it really improve their future economic prospects?) I don't think Bono is arguing that developing nations adopt communist governments, is he? If he just came out and said that I'd have a lot more respect for the guy.

Kris, Thursday, 28 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

At the Grammys, U2 went up to accept one of their many awards (I think this particular one was for "Best Song" or something; I don't remember.) Anyway, they go up to the podium, and The Edge starts giving a thank-you speech. Bono elbows him off the mic, says in a condescending, explanatory tone "He's our guitar player," and then says "I'm the singer." Then Bono gives a speech of his own, while The Edge and the rest of the band members stand in the back, looking stupid and forlorn. If I was The Edge, I would have kicked Bono's ass right there on stage. I don't like any of the members of U2 much, or their anthem-rock music, but I have a particular hatred for Bono, the preachy diva with serious god-complex issues and an ego the size of the moon.

geeta, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Now, Dastoor, Clarke, Brown et al, THAT'S how to insult properly! Fact-based, genuinely angry and yet lyrical. Read and learn.

What a good lambasting, Sutcliffe. Cheers, cuntface.

Marcello Carlin, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"hey has anyone on ilx ever met anyone whose ACTUAL NAME is smithers?"
Yes, my Year 8 maths teacher was Mr Smithers. He was a nice chap but totally unable to control the class, principally cos he wore sandals with socks which everyone found funny.

DG, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

marcello never calls me cuntface, its not fair. maybe on wednesday night?

gareth, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Suts: the majority of funding for the war against the zapatistas came not from "education" but from "war on drugs" direct military aid, including training, equipment, &c. Cf. columbia, where again the "war on drugs" provides the funding for both the govt. troops & the paramilitary troops.

& true, this won't give ultimately a road to true modernization & development, debt relief at least stops the govt from being forced to "restructure" away extant social services & labor laws. (& you're not going to try and claim that there are NO social services & labor laws in Mexico, are you? Because that would make you a real assface).

Sterling Clover, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I dreamed I saw U2 last night.

Sean, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Naked?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Now, that's even MORE evil. Yucky.

Sean Carruthers, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm a well paying client at U2s nightclub.

BUT ITS SOOOOOOOO GOOD...........................FORGIVE ME.

Ronan, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So U2 is your pimp, then. Or something.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It's humorous because tourists come in there having read that it's U2s nightclub and then are horrified to hear what's known as "HOUSE MUSIC" or whatever else.

Ronan, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What is this "HOUSE MUSIC" of which you speak?

Sean, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The Kitchen? Ahbah do.

My cousin is married to the edge's sister

his name isn't smithers

i don't like bono

there was a thing in the paper on guitar playing

and the edge said he didn't play guitar for pleasure and he didn't play unless it was rehearsing, recording or performing and ni fact said he wasn''t a guitarist, how very very gittish no?

i saw them at slane last year. talk about hysteria. fools. i managed to get tickets from a friend who's dad worked in RTE. our tickets were meant for Shay Healey. hehehehehhe

Major Alfonso, Friday, 1 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

six years pass...

http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/news-gossip/

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 5 January 2009 12:47 (seventeen years ago)

oops.
http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/news-gossip/bonos-friendship-with-war-criminals-makes-me-cringe-1587158.html

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Monday, 5 January 2009 12:48 (seventeen years ago)

Another thing, I don't think music-makers should hang out with policy- makers. Just because you play the guitar and wear old jackets like you were in the Army at sometime in the past doesn't mean you get to make forgein policy.

He couldn't possibly have done anything worse than George W. Bush.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:24 (seventeen years ago)

These are pretty strong words though

Do I think George Bush is a war criminal? Probably -- but the difference between him and Tony Blair is that Blair is intelligent. So, he has no excuse."

;)

Worse, they are kind of true. Although Blair wasn't intelligent enough not to fall into the Iraq-trap set up for him by Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Powell (well, in fact, the others made Powell fall into the same trap too, I guess)

Geir Hongro, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:27 (seventeen years ago)

the most hilarious part of the recent joe strummer doco was when bono announced that the biggest tragedy about the clash is that if it weren't for the in-band tension and subsequent breakup, they'd still be around making records. just like U2, hey?

Charlie Howard, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:27 (seventeen years ago)

the most hilarious part of the recent joe strummer doco was when bono announced that the biggest tragedy about the clash is that if it weren't for the in-band tension and subsequent breakup, they'd still be around making records. just like U2, hey?

Oh, but there is a huge difference. The Clash debuted in 1977, U2 debuted in 1979. That's two motherfucking years man! ;)

Geir Hongro, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:30 (seventeen years ago)

But anyway, had The Clash been still around, and making albums as great as the most recent couple of U2 albums, then, well, that would be fine with me.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:31 (seventeen years ago)

Jeremy Clarkson on the Best of Top Gear:

"hmm, 1979, the Clash were just about finished.."

Never took him for a purist!

Mark G, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:47 (seventeen years ago)

haha, i guess my comment wasn't allowing for the fact that people like the last couple of U2 records :)
but the actual music on the records was never really my main gripe with it all really. i guess it's the band's apparent indifference to the fact that its current call to arms is reaching the most pedestrian, undiscerning type of non-music fan out there that irks me.

Charlie Howard, Monday, 5 January 2009 13:50 (seventeen years ago)

i guess it's the band's apparent indifference to the fact that its current call to arms is reaching the most pedestrian, undiscerning type of non-music fan out there that irks me.

You mean, they appeal to fans of hip-hop and miminal techno? Because that is what should be defined as non-music fans.

Geir Hongro, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 10:20 (seventeen years ago)

Actually, U2 just sucks.

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 6 January 2009 11:10 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.