2: Yes it is. No doubt about that
1: But shouldn't we include it in our year-end list then?
2: Are you out of your mind!?? He's OLD!!!
1: Yes he is, but the album is excellent.
2: Yes it is, but, I mean: Look at his fans. A lot of 60 somethings like him for Christ's sake! We cannot put a guy like that on our year-end list!!
1: Why not? The album is great
2: Our readership would never forgive us! Remember, our list of the best albums of 2005 is not the best albums of 2005, it is what we expect our readers to pick as their best albums of 2005.
1: Oh well, OK. I guess you're right. No McCartney in the list then...
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:18 (twenty years ago)
― GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)
any fule knos it's the marketing department and the advertis [contd page94.com]
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
and the magazine isnt terrorizer or touch, its blues & soul
― okoko, Monday, 5 December 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)
Along with McCartney (although his is the most obvious case), Kate Bush, Depeche Mode and Madonna are also victims of the same kind of ageism, as all should have been way higher in those year-end lists in general.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:35 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)
xpost, no Bright Eyes > Madonna now.
― GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:39 (twenty years ago)
And then there are the rest of the albums released that year. Some good, some bad, some overlooked, some oversold.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
Top 1000 Albums of 2005 @ rateyourmusic.comhttp://rateyourmusic.com/top_albums/year_is_2005_and_stop_is_1000
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:42 (twenty years ago)
Depeche did at least. But I am sweetly biased.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
I don't listen to black metal, regardless of Nationality.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)
Lewis Carrol, the election of 1876, and how aggregate sets of rational preferences can yield irrational results
― GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)
Well, Kate Bush, Bruce Springsteen and Ry Cooder all made the Mojo top 10, and you dont have to look too hard to see some other old timers. Problem is that there isn't enough young, new acts in most music lists.
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:56 (twenty years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
Putting aside the fact that the McCartney album is pretty overrated ("Flaming Pie" was much better), is it really such a shock that the NME, which finds itself under intense pressure from falling circ and heavy duty advertiser drift, would choose to calculate a top 10 that is more demo friendly?
Besides, McCartney has never had the kind of perceived cool Dylan, Neil Young or Bowie do that allow their "comeback" records to score high on "alternative" lists. Putting McCartney in the NME top 50 of 2005 is the equivalent of putting Elvis's "Moody Blue" in the top 10 in 1977.
― Swamp Thing (Swamp Thing), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)
I am most of all disappointed with Mojo and Uncut, since they are usually less ageist than other mags, but I guess they still rembember him as a Beatle, and judge everything he makes up against his Beatles heyday.
Besides, McCartney has never had the kind of perceived cool Dylan, Neil Young or Bowie do that allow their "comeback" records to score high on "alternative" lists.
His new album has received excellent reviews in the press though. And when it was possible for Brian Wilson (who doesn't have much "cool" among "alternative" fans either) to end up high in year-end lists last year, it normally should have for him too.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 5 December 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)
― Matt #2 (Matt #2), Monday, 5 December 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)
― nabiscothingyu, Monday, 5 December 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)
― Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Monday, 5 December 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)