Taking Sides: Paul McCartney vs Jeff Lynne

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I don't think anyone would seriously side with Lynne, but maybe I'm wrong.

Yawn (Wintermute), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

How long you been here?

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

I wouldn't, but I bet you get a majority for Lynne, for some reason.

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

Lynne never wrote anything as ballsy as "Helter Skelter," and his hair is, was and always will be a thing worthy of ridicule.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

60s - mccartney
70s - lynne
80s-present - mccartney

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

60s - mccartney
70s - lynne
80s-present - no idea

Billy Pilgrim (Billy Pilgrim), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

During the 70s, Lynne was better. Otherwise, McCartney.

Both are underrated though.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Lynne was at his prime during the 70s. Those seem like apples and oranges statements to me.

McCartney never did any notable production work did he?

Mitya (mitya), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

Both are underrated though.

??? Being a member of what is considered generally to be the greatest band and greatest songwriting partnership of ALL TYMES IN HUMAN EXISTANCE=underrated?

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

If by ruining otherwise decent performances, I'm inclined to say no.

xpost

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

He produced the Bonzo Dog Band's "I'm the Urban Spaceman."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

Also some Apple stuff like the first Mary Hopkins album and Black Dyke Mills Band.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:39 (twenty years ago)

What was the name he used on that Bonzos record-"Apollo C. Something"?

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

Vermouth

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

WTF, I completely left out an entire 1/2 sentence. But you get it don't you....? (Jeff Lynne is a shitty producer.)

D.I.Y. U.N.K.L.E. (dave225.3), Monday, 5 December 2005 17:42 (twenty years ago)

lynne does one thing very well. but he doesn't have the range of mccartney.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 5 December 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

??? Being a member of what is considered generally to be the greatest band and greatest songwriting partnership of ALL TYMES IN HUMAN EXISTANCE=underrated?

Compared to Lennon, he is underrated. His solo work is also underrated.

Paul McCartney is the greatest composer since Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

lynne does one thing very well. but he doesn't have the range of mccartney.

As a matter of fact, McCartney would have benefited from a slightly smaller stylistic range.
He is perfect at dramatic, melodic ballads and somewhat twee midtempo melodic pop songs. He sucks at rock'n'roll though, and his pure music hall work isn't always on par with the rest of his output either..

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 5 December 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

Paul McCartney is the greatest composer since Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Here at ILM, we are in no way prone to hyperbole.

Myke Weiskopf (Myke Weiskopf), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)

Paul McCartney sucks at rock'n'roll? I admit his catalog has a heaping handful of would-be "rockers" that just completely fall flat (especially in the 80s and after), but he's got a pretty solid lineup of rock performances to his name, and he could do the upper-register shout-singing thing better than anybody else I can think of. "Jet" comes immediately to mind, and of course "Helter Skelter." Also: "Oh Woman Oh Why," "Hi Hi Hi," "Call Me Back Again" (or is that more of a plastic soul thing?) "So Glad To See You Here," "Soily," "Run Devil Run," "I'm Down"... There are tons of others that I love but which probably annoy many (like "Smile Away," "Girls' School," "Helen Wheels" etc) so I guess I'll leave them be.

I assume things like "Another Girl" end up in "somewhat twee midtempo melodic pop songs." I'm fine by that, although by many standards I think these would count as "rock and roll."

As for his pure music hall work, I think a lot of it suffers from the context - there's always that token music hall track, and they feel like such cutesy exercises in the middle of otherwise fairly consistent-sounding classic rock albums. It might be interesting to gather all of these together in one place and see how they hold up as compositions - what all is there? You Gave Me The Answer.. does Baby's Request count?

(I'm in the beginning stages of what will probably end up being a 2xCD McCartney covers album, so I've been thinking a lot about trying to recontextualize his songs by getting all the production aesthetics and instrumental combinations to sort of feel of a piece...)

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)

I still think that rock'n'roll was the only thing Lennon did better than McCartney. At least until he got "rootsy" around 1968 (after than Lennon hardly ever wrote a good tune other than the occasional ballad). McCartney was usually stuck with a very 50s sounding harmonically simple way of building the song, while Lennon managed to mix the raw energy of rock with some harmonically interesting stuff. McCartney has usually been very harmonically interesting in his more pop or ballad oriented stuff, but always became very simple when he wanted to rock.

The exception here being "Rock Show", which is a brilliant Badfinger/Big Star/Raspberries-like powerpop number and highly underrated.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)

I'm not entirely sure what you mean here about "harmonically interesting" things in Lennon rockers versus Paul rockers. Paperback Writer comes to mind, for example, although perhaps that's not quite what you're thinking of. Are we comparing, eg, I Should Have Known Better versus The Night Before? I could sort of see that, although I don't think it's quite the same thing to say that Lennon did better or more interesting rock and roll, and to say that Paul sucks at it.

Rock Show isn't bad, although it's the chugging "green metal suit" section that I get excited about moreso than the self-consciously "rock" part. I still think "So Glad To See You" covers about the same territory but with a more solid punch. Rock Show wins on lyrics though.

Me, I'm still waiting for "TS: Wino Junko versus Medicine Jar"...

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 04:43 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha, yes -- and maybe "Spirits of Ancient Egypt".

As for McCartney rock n' roll, I'm partial to "Get On the Right Thing" and "Mumbo" -- I mean, shit, "Mumbo's" fuckin' incredible.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 04:51 (twenty years ago)

Jeff Lynne's production work kills material that I might otherwise consider enjoying.

Here is a thread title I've been considering for awhile:
Jeff Lynne: So Much To Answer For

Edward Bax (EdBax), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:06 (twenty years ago)

Aw hell, throw "Morse Moose And The Grey Goose" in there, just cause I'm currently listening to the Freelance Hellraiser mix that mashes that up with "Coming Up" and possibly some other things, and it works (like so many things) shockingly well. Not sure if it has any bearing on his credibility as a rocker, but I fucking love "Morse Moose and the Grey Goose" and will take any opportunity to drop its name.

"Jeff Lynne: So Much To Answer For" could be wonderful. Blount was over the other night and was curious to some extent about the Traveling Wilburys. During "Margarita" he stopped in mid-sentence talking to somebody else and slowly turned towards me with a look of complete disgust. I love it personally, but hey...

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:08 (twenty years ago)

Exactly.

Edward Bax (EdBax), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

McCartney never did any notable production work did he?

He produced most of Wings' records. Many timies he's a better producer-arranger than songwriter (the doorbells and martial drums of "Let'Em In," the brass section on "Letting Go," the flamenco flourishes on "Goodnight Tonight").

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

Speaking of "Letting Go," it's a fierce track, and rocks like a mutha.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

Holy moly, I never realized that about his production work, but there it is on the Venus and Mars liner notes, "PRODUCER PAUL MCCARTNEY." Wow! A great-sounding album throughout. Unfortunately this means I have him to blame for the godawful vibe of Speed of Sound...

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:34 (twenty years ago)

The fact is that, while Paul McCartney is a godlike songwriter, he is completely helpless as a producer. Almost everything he has ever done as a producer is awfully underproduced, and with the bass way too obviously high in the overall sound.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)

Not.

k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)

Jeff Lynne has always wound me up - everything he produces seems to get 'tainted' by those bluddy backing vocals.

Jez (Jez), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)

I remember when 'Free As A Bird' came out my friend was apoplectic about JEFF LYNNE'S GODDAMN SPACE CHOIRS!!! ruining another song

Billy Pilgrim (Billy Pilgrim), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

For me all the latter-day application of this approach improved the standing of ELO, where at least this kind of thing seemed to be appropriate.

k/l (Ken L), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

I completely agree. When I finally got to ELO's back catalogue a few years ago I was totally astonished how well everything worked. You wouldn't have thought so after coming of age when Jeff Lynne's productions seemed so ham-fisted. But ELO's stuff is so, so right.

Billy Pilgrim (Billy Pilgrim), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)

Jeff Lynne's production of the Wilbury trifecta (George Harrison, Tom Petty, and Roy Orbison) are some of the best things he ever did.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

Yes, you're probably right. Opinions vary. For my part, I find his best work for them to be "admirable" and not "great." Or maybe it's the songs themselves. I should go back and listen again.

Billy Pilgrim (Billy Pilgrim), Wednesday, 7 December 2005 15:50 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.