Pitchfork: Top 50 Albums

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
they got it right for sure this year. Little surprised to see Cam'Ron and ARt brut so high, Edan missing and Wolf Parade and CHYSY so low. But with Sufjan on top, they got it right. Thoughts?

Tynan DeLong (TynanTynan!), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:18 (twenty years ago)

man i was sweating it out for awhile. I was browsing the list and I didn't see Sufjan for the first 49, and lemme tell you bro, i was getting FUCKING PISSED. the dude deserved to be NUMBER FUCKING ONE. and the BRO CAME THROUGH.

peace
gear

gear (gear), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:23 (twenty years ago)

Does Ryan S.'s #1 album always end up winning the overall vote, or does it just seem that way?

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:27 (twenty years ago)

where's jens lekman? by my quick and probably inaccurate count, he got 60 more points than orthrelm.

älänbänänä (alanbanana), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:32 (twenty years ago)

no kiki, no credibility. fuck pitchfork.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:36 (twenty years ago)

I thought the top 10 was a little unfortunate, esp. Art Brut so high, and I do not feel the Kanye at all. But overall, not a bad list. Interesting how they seem to be pushing into more electronic genres than they used to. Also, is Purple Haze really that good?

regular roundups (Dave M), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:41 (twenty years ago)

NO SURFJAN, NO CREDIBILITY

At least Pitchdork has found the sense of getting behind one decent band this year in Art Brut, and the blurb for Art Brut's entry pretty much summed up why they're awesome and you're not.

ESTEBAN BUTTEZ~!!, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:46 (twenty years ago)

Kanye was NOT as great as it's being touted. It's a good record, but not better than a lot of the other 48 records it placed ahead of for sure.

Also, I think I may be in the minority, but I don't think I'm feeling Sufjan as much as everybody else seems to be either.

Quinn (quinn), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:47 (twenty years ago)

is Purple Haze really that good?

yeah it is, but wasn't that from last year?


xpost -- definately not feeling Sufjan as much as i did when it came out, i only listen to 'John Wayne Gacy Jr.' now


rizzxxx, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:49 (twenty years ago)

where's jens lekman? by my quick and probably inaccurate count, he got 60 more points than orthrelm.

AFAIK, Pitchfork hasn't used the (50, 49, 48, ...3, 2, 1) voting system in a couple of years. Once the points are weighted toward higher votes, Orthrelm scores big with a #1 and a #2 vote, whereas Lekman was named on a bunch of ballots but didn't crack anyone's top ten.

(Sigur Ros were also named on a bunch of ballots -- including #3 and #5 votes -- but somehow didn't score enough to make the top 50)

I wonder if the weighting was particularly extreme this time ... this might explain why so many people chose not to list the full 50 albums?

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)

It's a really uninteresting list, and I say that as an obvious indie-head. But I guess big lists like that are just gonna average out.

Only 7 of the top 30 would crack mine, i think:

MIA, Clientele, LCD, Antony, Mountain Goats, Wolf Parade, maybe CYHSY.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:17 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, looking at it in more detail, probably their worst Top 5o in a few years (since they 'discovered' hip-hop). But that's no one's fault, i guess.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:19 (twenty years ago)

Sufjan Stevens is lame. Fucking choir kids!!

Jamey Lewis (Jameys Burning), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:37 (twenty years ago)

i think this is a better list then last year's. konono, alan braxe, keith whitman, sunn 0))), robyn and roisin murphy are all nice inclusions i didnt see coming. the top 10 was a bit unfortunate i guess, especially numbers 2 and 3. pforks album list is always kind of predictable though since so many of the albums come from the best new music and now recommended selections.

jmeister (jmeister), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:42 (twenty years ago)

didn't Kiki come out last year?

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:48 (twenty years ago)

i suppose i should hear this sufjan fella then? what should i expect? listening to jens lekman now, mmm lovely.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:51 (twenty years ago)

hip hop wasnt so great this year as far as a ton of great albums coming out but i was surprised to not see edan while young jeezy, the game and beanie sigel made it. i guess while indie gets favored as far as rock goes the mainstream takes it with hip hop at pitchfork.

i think it is interesting to see how much communication happens between staffers at publications. specifically pfork and stylus. there were definitely some albums that seem revered by only pfork (serena maneesh, love is all, boy least likely to, etc,)While with the stylus list im sure will include girls aloud and kelley polar(is that him on the front page?)

jmeister (jmeister), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)

no herb, no credibility. fuck pitchfork.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:52 (twenty years ago)

It's just peculiar. I'm basically an indie-kid-who-listens-to-pop (ie, Pitchfork-material), but only 3 of my top 10 even made their top 50. (Robyn, MIA, Okkervil River.)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 09:59 (twenty years ago)

If you ask me the entire top 5 is wrong. Can anyone really stand MIA? Kanye West - his first album was good, the new one is average. Anthony & the Hohnsons, the guy's voice gets to me after a while and the music is nothing incredible. Another poor Pitchfork list, but I've come to expect that from them.

m scott, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:05 (twenty years ago)

I'm really beginning to think, too, that Sufjan may top Pazz & Jop. Which is pretty annoying. (I even love a few of the songs, but the album's really not fantastic.)

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:08 (twenty years ago)

Music sucks.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:21 (twenty years ago)

ha.
sufjan could top pazz & jop. Id say its the forerunner (over bloc party, mia, kanye, antony)
I think the list isn't bad. As others have noted, art brut, lcd soundsystem, are surprizingly high. I like the list- that said I like sufjan.

Stephen C (ihope), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:47 (twenty years ago)

The list:

50: Orthrelm - OV [Ipecac]
49: Fiery Furnaces - EP [Rough Trade]
48: Okkervil River - Black Sheep Boy [Jagjaguwar]
47: The Boy Least Likely To - The Best Party Ever [Too Young to Die]
46: Fiona Apple - Extraordinary Machine [Jon Brion Version] [mp3]
45: M83 - Before the Dawn Heals Us [Mute]
44: Vashti Bunyan - Lookaftering [Fat Cat]
43: Spoon - Gimme Fiction [Merge]
42: My Morning Jacket - Z [RCA]
41: Róisín Murphy - Ruby Blue [Echo]
40: Young Jeezy - Let's Get It: Thug Motivation 101 [Def Jam]
39: Robyn - Robyn [Konichiwa]
38: Devendra Banhart - Cripple Crow [XL]
37: Dominik Eulberg - Kreucht & Fleucht [Mischwald]
36: Keith Fullerton Whitman - Multiples [Mischwald]
35: The Game - The Documentary [Aftermath/Interscope]
34: Silver Jews - Tanglewood Numbers [Drag City]
33: Bloc Party - Silent Alarm [Vice]
32: Beanie Sigel - The B.Coming [Roc-A-Fella]
31: Konono No. 1 - Congotronics [Crammed Discs]
30: Franz Ferdinand - You Could Have It So Much Better [Domino]
29: Serena Maneesh - Serena Maneesh[Honeymilk]
28: Sunn O))) - Black One [Southern Lord]
27: Jamie Lidell - Multiply [Warp]
26: The Decemberists - Picaresque [Kill Rock Stars]
25: Alan Braxe & Friends - The Upper Cuts [PIAS]
24: The Mountain Goats - The Sunset Tree [4AD]
23: Ladytron - The Witching Hour [Rykodisc]
22: Broadcast - Tender Buttons [Warp]
21: Bonnie "Prince" Billy & Matt Sweeney - Superwolf [Drag City]
20: The Hold Steady - Separation Sunday [Frenchkiss]
019: Sleater-Kinney - The Woods [Sub Pop]
018: Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - Clap Your Hands Say Yeah [Clap Your Hands Say Yeah]
017: The Clientele - Strange Geometry [Merge]
016: Love Is All - Nine Times That Same Song [What's Your Rupture?]
015: Clipse - We Got It 4 Cheap, Vol. 2 [mixunit.com]
014: Vitalic - OK Cowboy [PIAS]
013: Various Artists - Run the Road [679]
012: New Pornographers - Twin Cinema [Matador]
011: Isolée - We Are Monster [Playhouse]
10: Wolf Parade - Apologies to the Queen Mary [Sub Pop]
09: Cam'ron - Purple Haze [Roc-A-Fella]
08: LCD Soundsystem - LCD Soundsystem [DFA]
07: Animal Collective - Feels [Fat Cat]
06: Deerhoof - The Runners Four [Kill Rock Stars]
05: Antony & the Johnsons - I Am a Bird Now [Secretly Canadian]
04: M.I.A. - Arular [XL]
03: Art Brut - Bang Bang Rock & Roll [Fierce Panda]
02: Kanye West - Late Registration [Roc-A-Fella]
01: Sufjan Stevens - Illinois [Asthmatic Kitty]

plus: Individual writers' Lists

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

I've heard exactly nine of these (S-K, Animal Collective, FF, S. Jews, Cam'ron, etc.), 10 if you count the 10 minutes of Sufjan I listened to before getting fed up and selling the CD.

Raymond Cummings (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

Surfjan @ #1 LMFAO!

Josh Timmermann (Josh Timmermann), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)

Sufjan's lovely, but a bit * nice * to be indispensable. He sounds every inch the devoted Christian he is, which is a quality that doesn't go down too well on this side of the pond. I still want his babies though.

Bloc Party I look on as a bit 'work in progress'. Silent Alarm was good but not great, in a way that suggested they'll make better albums in the future.

It was also interesting that Broadcast and Ladytron ended up next to one another. They, along with M83's inclusion, could mean one thing: shoegazing's back. Hurrah (perhaps). I love the Clap Your Hands Album, but am still not feeling LCD Soundsystem one little bit.

I'd disagree with them on detail about Roisin Murphy's album though. Matthew Herbert's arrangements ARE what make it sound distinctive.

klee (klee), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)

No Lightning Bolt?

Joe Grassby (sloejoe), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:46 (twenty years ago)

HANG ON HANG ON where is kate bush?!

oh you cannot be serious. it's KATE BUSH. she's a living legend. she's made an album on a completely different plane of existence to 100 of that list. show some respect!

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

i mean, reading the ilm thread had convinced me the entire world had recognised aerial as a work of genius.

i thought indie kids liked kate bush?

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:50 (twenty years ago)

yeah but most of it is naff

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:51 (twenty years ago)

aerial? all of it is a masterpiece.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

yes it's a masterpiece but that doesn't necess. mean it's any good/you're going to want to listen to it a lot.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:54 (twenty years ago)

looking at the actual list, i highly doubt that those are factors for anything else making it in.

The Lex (The Lex), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:56 (twenty years ago)

it's a masterpiece but that doesn't necess. mean it's any good

Just felt this piece of wisdom needed to be highlighted...

Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:03 (twenty years ago)

no venetian snares? no roots manuva?

hrrmph

rentboy (rentboy), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:09 (twenty years ago)

Bloc Party I look on as a bit 'work in progress'. Silent Alarm was good but not great, in a way that suggested they'll make better albums in the future.

re-listening to it right now for the first time in a few months and this is precisely my conclusion too. it no more deserves nme album of the year than i do. they'll make some amazing music one day, though.

art brut at number 3? that's right up there with them hitting the cover of rolling stone in germany! fair play to 'em.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)

looking at the actual list, i highly doubt that those are factors for anything else making it in.

oh don't worry i wasn't claiming that was the reason it wasn't in amongst this largely sorry lot.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)

surprised that: Fiona Apple made the list, LCD and MIA placed high

not surprised that: Kanye and Sufjan finished in the top 2 slots

still not getting: Antony

Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

How no Sigur Ros?

Sufjan is a novelty act. Feels is the real #1, obviously.

PB, Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

This whole Pitchfork/Dipset thing goes over my head.

Whiney G. Weingarten (whineyg), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)

youre not sad enough, dom!

petesmith (plsmith), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

nice orthrelm blurb, btw - ive been meaning to check that one out.

petesmith (plsmith), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)

now in a rateyourmusic.com list format:

Pitchfork 50 Best Albums of 2005
http://rateyourmusic.com/list/ijkidd/pitchfork_50_best_albums_of_2005

DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:53 (twenty years ago)

youre not sad enough, dom!

haha, I've been told this before!

Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

I have some major issues with the Fiona Apple album being so low, but also the blurb that accompanies it. Spoon and the Fiery Furnaces also got shafted, and for what - a lot of chumpy records that will age horribly.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

This whole Pitchfork/Dipset thing goes over my head.

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

How could Get Behind Me Satan not make the top 50? And Nada Surf's The Weight Is A Gift is the most underrated record of the year.

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

matthew doesn't the idea of "longevity" kinda fuck up yr whole fake pop thing?

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

Not really. I certainly wouldn't consider the chumpy hackwork I'm dissing en masse as pop anyway.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

TS: Hating lyrics vs. loving music?

marc h. (marc h.), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)

why did the national get so much blogger love but none from pitchfork?

Cuz they toured with Clap Your Hands?

mcd (mcd), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

Because PFM writers sit around eating Cheez-Its and reviewing albums they get in the mail instead of going to shows? Did this "national" play Intonation or not?

the burning (mike h.), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 14:59 (twenty years ago)

Lemme slip into a clean mumu & check on that for you, Mike.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 15:05 (twenty years ago)

Hah! All couch potato-baiting aside, it always amazes me how some people I know seem to miss out completely on some albums because the band didn't tour, while some publications have very little on bands that tour but don't do much promo work.

mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

Because PFM writers sit around eating Cheez-Its and reviewing albums they get in the mail instead of going to shows? Did this "national" play Intonation or not?
-- the burning (trogdo...), December 21st, 2005.

roffles

Nick Sylvester, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

national/cyhsy tour was reviewed on the site; write-up was much more kind to the national

scott pl. (scott pl.), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

What I would like to know is how come 98% percent of the records on their list were complete crap? Please could someone tell me that? Most of the turds on their list could have been better rendered by an autistic 7 year old. I guess if you can't play your instrument or sing a song believably, then you're in the running. Maybe them Bitchfork fellers need to loosen up their trucker caps or stop toxifying they's heads with cheap American beer. If you don't believe me, just listen to Okkervil River's holocaust of a Tim Hardin cover. Poor guy can't just lie in the ground safely dead from a heroin overdose they have to tar his name with whiny, pansy-assed, embarassingly self-conscious version. Hmm, come to think of it that kind of sums up most of the stuff they tend to think is real great: whiny, pansy-assed & embarassingly self-conscious.

Keep up the good work suckas!

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

Valdemar OTM

save the robot (save the robot), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco's blurb on the "consensus effect" is spot on, I think. The inevitable carping about such lists is expected I think on a board like ILM, which is by nature elitist. Of course most of us are going to have some "gem" that we love but doesn't get the year end love: because for a lot of us, it's finding that rare gem that's part of our love of it.

What is more interesting to me is gauging the attitude of a group like ILM (I'd say: a group of cultural (critical) elites)) on those "casual readers" Nabisco mentions. This is something that's changed in rock criticism, I think: when I read Lester Bangs, I get the impression this guy is writing for that casual reader. Even though the music may not be all that accessible to that casual reader, Bangs wrote like it was his divinely appointed mission to convince that ordinary guy that he hadda love "Fun House", that it was just like "Wooly Bully" but MORE SO...and now I read rock crit and I'm not so sure that this is a goal anymore. Why exactly is this? Is it because of continuing mistrust of the mainstream out of fears of being coopted by the establishment ("just another way to be right wing")? Or is it that the rock market has shrunk and so we know that e.g. Nelly's got a better chance of reaching the common guy than most of the elite-loved stuff and so as a consequence we ignore the common guy? Or is all this just a Freud/fraud and crits these days are still just looking for the great songs, other cultural/instituitional biases be damned, and by def. great = accessible to anyone?

In short: how important is it to you that a song/record be something we (in pretty broad terms, "we", not just ILM or indie kids or whatever) can reach a reasonable consensus on? Is that a virtue or a vice or a non-factor?

Euler (Euler), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

hey valdemar, Orthrelm beg to differ you

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

with

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Orthrelm, save your begging for Bitchpork. They need to give all of us a break. Go back and read your Lester Bangs schmucks! Maybe a day or two on a cough syrup nod will set you straight and give you some perspective. Hint: don't take yourselves seriously, wankers.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

ok guys i give up i'm valdemar

Nick Sylvester, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

SYLVESTROLL

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)

I wonder if anyone posts to bitchpork anymore

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, now I understand your Orthrelm reference. Please forgive me, I am an old man whose mind is addled from reading the very complex new Medicare rules.

Perhaps Orthrelm is not whiny or pansy-assed or even embarassingly self conscious (or Sunn(((()___________0)??? for that matter), but those are two examples, pork thrown to dangerous lovers of all things metal. Would you want to anger them? I think not! Though the fact that the Snicksnack review of this mentions Steve Reich, Can, alcoholism induced painting and mathematical concepts only serves to tell us how boring the whole thing likely is. If it's so great, how come it didn't beat out Sufjan Stevenson? Is Bitchwork secretly controlled by neo Christian suburban art punk hippies? Most likely.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

how important is it to you that a song/record be something we (in pretty broad terms, "we", not just ILM or indie kids or whatever) can reach a reasonable consensus on? Is that a virtue or a vice or a non-factor?

I almost never count on this anymore - very few bands today reach beyond a narrow audience. Arcade Fire and Sufjan are becoming popular, but a lot of my favorite albums of the last couple years stick to a niche (Rehearsing My Choir). Or think about Othrelm - they deserve recognition, but I wouldn't recommend OV to any of my friends.

save the robot (save the robot), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

Musicianship is a crutch for people devoid of ideas. How do you play this thing?

Jason Toon, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 26,100 for neo Christian suburban art punk hippies. (0.19 seconds)

NoTimeBeforeTime (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

For Jason Toon: Oh no! How wrong you are! Let's think of building a house, would you want to live in one designed by a blind, retarded troll or one built by an architect who studied Japanese joinery with Takao Minosa?

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

Which house would rock harder?

save the robot (save the robot), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:39 (twenty years ago)

Save The Robot: That is a good point, but Mr. Toon's point was about *Musicianship*, not rocking hard. It's possible that the troll house would rock harder, but Japanese joinery can be very rustic and aggressive.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

Music is different from houses.

OK, my original comment is an exaggeration. I don't own any Old Skull recordings (anymore). But I'm weary of all things tepid and tasteful. So very, very weary...

Jason Toon, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

Jason Toon: Prove that music is different than houses.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:56 (twenty years ago)

if you try to live under an mp3 of "candy shop" during the winter, you will die

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)

U Saved Me: That is likely true. But if you lived under a WAV of Black Sabbath's "The Wizard" you would not die.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

well a wav is larger than an mp3, i agree.

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

It is also better constructed and designed.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

now here, sir, we must differ. the world is moving towards smaller and more compactly built formats. evovle or die, as they say.

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

the blurb doesn't actually say anything about Can - but does concede that you might very well find it boring. I don't. To be honest, I can't believe it made the list (happy as I am that it did). It's not a very user-friendly record, even for people that are into metal or prog or whatever. in conclusion, thanks pfork for letting me write about it, hopefully someone reads about it and doesn't think it'll be totally boring

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

I'm in the "put me to sleep" camp but I'm still glad I heard it.

Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:15 (twenty years ago)

Dominique Leone: You'll notice that if you carefully parse my statement above I clearly said the *review* mentioned Can, not the blurb, whatever that is. Here is a snippet from the REVIEW:

"...not to mention Neu! and Can..."

Also, what in God's name is "math-jazz"?

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

jazz that is like math-rock, only it is jazz

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

Does anyone else think the Gorillaz album should be on there?

Nigel (Nigel), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:29 (twenty years ago)

Probably because Hitchcock has some sort of Pol Potian concept of purity that will not allow them to include more than 2 albums on a major label.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:39 (twenty years ago)

Late Registration is both a sonic cathedral and a cathredal of sonic details.

Nigel (Nigel), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)

ok, the review. chances are, if you don't like minimalist music, you won't like the record (and even if you do, this is a lot less forgiving on the ears than anything philip glass ever did). in any case, if mentioning Can means it's boring to you, we're not exactly coming from the same place. (in fact, allow us to see how non "pansy assed" you are, what are your fave records this year?)

Dominique (dleone), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

I think Sufjan is a hotty. Thank the lord baby jesus for his #1 album. If he were to ask me for oral favors, I'd probably say yes, but I don't know about sex. Save it till marriage, right? That's my thoughts. I bet it will rock after I get married though. Do you think he'll like me if he's more experienced than I am? I hope experience won't really matter like some people say it does. I'm gonna be a virgin until marriage.
-(713)553-1256

Hot to trot, Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)

I like maximalist music, it's less fussy and less concerned with perfection. Who needs perfection I ask you! Not me!

As for my favorite recordings of the past year that is hard for me to say. As I mentioned before I am a feeble old man and I live in far northern Canada where it is cold and desolate and there is a dearth of independent music stores. So I am a pauper when it comes to experiencing the avant garde of what's "groovy" these days, and I can barely hear anymore due to my years of studying Ligeti's studies in dissonance and inonation at extremely loud volumes.

That said, I would say that William Oldham's most recent recording gave me some pleasure. Album covers with blood-covered feminine hands and songs about werewolves surely don't qualify as pansy assed. William Parker's Sound Unity recording raised a few eyebrows up here, but it's certainly not his best (also not pansy assed or maudlin). And that band called Deerhoof can really cobble together an quite an interesting array of grinding sounds and lilting sounds (possibly maudlin at times, but never pansy assed). Most everything sucked though, and showed us all how very difficult it is to make good music.

valdemar (nubbin), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)

ok just so we're clear here i'm *not* actually valdemar

Nick Sylvester, Thursday, 22 December 2005 05:50 (twenty years ago)

That's right, you ain't. You a sucka.

valdemar (nubbin), Thursday, 22 December 2005 06:07 (twenty years ago)

the most depressing one yet

corey c (shock of daylight), Thursday, 22 December 2005 08:52 (twenty years ago)

comments, go:

http://www.stereogum.com/archives/002172.html

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 22 December 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)

i'ma get you for that one, mark

u saved me (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 22 December 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

four months pass...
Hi

100% Porno
100% Video
100% Free

[b]http://www.porno-video-free.com[/b]

Bye


Porno-Video-Free, Wednesday, 17 May 2006 07:42 (twenty years ago)

what's become of you, tynan?

the confusing situation Enrique currently endures (Enrique), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 07:46 (twenty years ago)

no slutjism, no credibility

late to the bloom to the er (latebloomer), Wednesday, 17 May 2006 07:53 (twenty years ago)

Hi all!

100% Porno
100% Video
100% Free

[b]http://www.porno-video-free.com[/b]

Bye


Richik777, Tuesday, 23 May 2006 12:38 (twenty years ago)

[b]no html, no credibility[/b]

Dominique (dleone), Tuesday, 23 May 2006 12:43 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.