Christgau on Antony

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Maybe there's already a thread on this.

Dud of the Month
Antony and the Johnsons
I am a Bird Now

Whose voice touches who is personal, but that doesn't mean Antony will ever reach as many humans as Aretha Franklin or Billie Holiday, and up against the archer Brian Ferry, the artier Rufus Wainwright, and the grander Nina Simone, objective physical differences manifest themselves: he's thinner, drier, more strained. Not only is his willingness to express emotion commoner than indie denizens imagine, his failure to undercut that emotion with irony or humor is a spiritual weakness. Right, he suffers. But billions of humans have it worse, and while we who are luckier are morally obliged to remember that, we're not obliged to empathize with any of them. Those convinced of the metaphoric-political centrality of transgender issues and the AIDS epidemic will feel Antony's songs. Those who don't should find a record they enjoy. B MINUS

I was pretty much thinking "fair enough" through the first half. The second? Huh? First off he's either misunderstanding or just dismissing the way emotionalist stuff works in the indie world, and why Antony works as an "indie" record: indie tends to be interested in seeing things very stylized and aestheticized, to the point of camp or fairy-tale or just pure artifice, and so it wants Antony to remain uncut by "irony or humor" -- the same way it wants Joanna Newsom, on record, to seriously pretend she's a fairy-crone, and the same way it wants Cat Power to play the whole thing straight. (Irony is the province of the guitar bands.)

And then the closing: seriously? Does our appreciation of music really have that much to do with the "metaphoric-political centrality" of the subject matter? Why exactly is Christgau suggesting that I am a Bird Now is, umm, a special-interest record? And more so than the Comet Gain record up the page?

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:09 (twenty years ago)

indie tends to be interested in seeing things very stylized and aestheticized, to the point of camp or fairy-tale or just pure artifice, and so it wants Antony to remain uncut by "irony or humor" -- the same way it wants Joanna Newsom, on record, to seriously pretend she's a fairy-crone, and the same way it wants Cat Power to play the whole thing straight. (Irony is the province of the guitar bands.)

say what now?

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:11 (twenty years ago)

Bluntly put, I don't see Christgau's larger political comments as being any surprise coming from him. And frankly I think it's a cheap shot regarding how one is 'supposed' to enjoy art that's long since been played (and I don't care much about Antony and the Johnsons at all!).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:12 (twenty years ago)

christgau in dickhead shocker

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:14 (twenty years ago)

I still don't understand how a DUD OF THE MONTH can be a B MINUS. Why does he even hang on to the ridiculous grading schtick?

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:17 (twenty years ago)

Also, I love how there's not a single opinion expressed in that blurb that's not a violent counter-reaction to someone else's opinion.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:19 (twenty years ago)

He's like a one-man ILM, him.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:21 (twenty years ago)

i'm not sure even the christgau-ettes can defend the end of that blurb

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)

Actually, this sums up my feelings fairly well, and I think that's partially because it's all counter-reaction. I wouldn't care about Antony if it weren't for everyone else liking him so much, and once I started paying attention some of those reasons seemed really repugnant. A dud isn't something that's bad; a dud is something that fails to live up to expectations, and I think Christgau's trying to present a large gap between the critical image of the album and its reality.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)

That doesn't strike you as fair, Joel? Part of what defines an "indie audience" for me is exactly that pull toward things being stylized, no matter what the details. No one wants Chan to crack a smile in the middle of Moon Pix, you know?

Re: counter-reaction I was kind of thinking about that -- he reviews records really late! Antony is his "dud of the month" nearly a year after it was released; other records reviewed in this batch include Fiona Apple, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, Madonna, and Lady Sov. It certainly gives a person a lot of space to digest the conversation about something and come in with some authoritative-sounding pronouncement about it.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:25 (twenty years ago)

Eppy I'm cool with it being a dud, and I certainly understand why people are skeptical about its reception -- I am too, sometimes, and I like the album quite a bit. The part I'm skeezed out by is the ending. In my experience I know of exactly zero people who go for this record as some kind of transgender/AIDS special interest record. In my experience I know exactly "a whole bunch" who go for this record because it stretches one aesthetic to a kind of uncut, over-the-top purity.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:29 (twenty years ago)

Antony is his "dud of the month" nearly a year after it was released

No shit: I just checked, and the Stylus review of the album came out a year ago today!

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:30 (twenty years ago)

The album came out Feb. 1, so Stylus reviewed it early!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:30 (twenty years ago)

indie tends to be interested in seeing things very stylized and aestheticized, to the point of camp or fairy-tale or just pure artifice, and so it wants Antony to remain uncut by "irony or humor"

and Xgau likes his records/artists a little more universal than that. you can be niche, but you need to be better than this.

it stretches one aesthetic to a kind of uncut, over-the-top purity.

as an Xgau-acolyte, I'm tempted to recoil in horror

I still don't understand how a DUD OF THE MONTH can be a B MINUS.

because, per Xgau, 'in the era of grade inflation, read everything from a b on down as flunk' (paraphrased, at least). the dud of the month isn't the worst record of the month, it's the most interesting/talked-about/worth-commenting-on bad record of the month.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:31 (twenty years ago)

I'm used to the way Xgau's every utterance inspires Talmudic parsing ("I think what he was trying to say was..."), but this is music-crit ombudsmanship masquerading as reviews.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:31 (twenty years ago)

ombudsmanship?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)

the first couple of consumer guides of recent years are filled with xgau going 'really folx? really?' to whatever the blogosphere/pfork/etc has been gushing over the previous year cuz he sees the pnj results. it's like an exit poll.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)

do clap your hands say yeah really sound like the feelies? do i actually need to hear that damn record?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:34 (twenty years ago)

his opinion isn't really worth a shit anyway, he's just another asshole. i'd trust most ILMers as much if not sooner than i'd trust him.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)

do clap your hands say yeah really sound like the feelies? do i actually need to hear that damn record?

haha that's what I was thinking!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)

blount you've got to be with it, it's the most talked about indie record of the year!

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)

Consider the possible gap between "sounds like the Feelies" and "is anywhere near as good as the Feelies."

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)

a grassroots success!

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)

also nabisco i think its dangerous to draw hard and fast lines about how emotionality works w/r/t to the indie demo; there's an indie-approved irony-heavy analogue (cf. magnetic fields) for every 'pure grade' raw nerve a la newsom, cat power and antony.

mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)

ombudsmanship?

more like compTROLLING hyack hyack

Sorry, I was as obscure as Xgau here. I meant that his reviews come very late in the game (as has been noted upthread) and sometimes read as conflict-resolution court decisions, the Last Word on an album: for instance, to understand his point on Antony, you need to not only have listened to the record but also have read all its major reviews.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)

gear i'm getting worried you're gonna m.d. chapman xgau one of these days

cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:37 (twenty years ago)

i'll drive the getaway car

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:38 (twenty years ago)

I'm more curious why Lullabies To Paralyze was a dud as opposed to the last two QOTSA albums - maybe it's too blase pop-metal-qua-metal or chauvinistic or something.

Clap Your Hands have a groove that's reminiscent of that Feelies era (even if nothing screams Crazy Rhythms to me), but the vocal is this loud-ass Verlaine/Gano thing. I actually do like their stuff more each time I hear it, and I'm sure Xgau's given it more spins.

'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:38 (twenty years ago)

xpost to Blount

Does this mean Antony's gonna beat MIA and Sufjan?

Mr Straight Toxic (ghostface), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:40 (twenty years ago)

nah, he already reviewed those two - positively

'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:41 (twenty years ago)

I'm more curious why Lullabies To Paralyze was a dud as opposed to the last two QOTSA albums - maybe it's too blase

this is where you should have ended the sentence

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:41 (twenty years ago)

Gabbneb I'm totally fine with his not being interested in niches, which is why I find the opening of the text just fine -- whose voices touches who is personal, but Antony isn't Aretha. The part I'm skeezed out by is the way he seems to misidentify the niche -- it's not some kind of transgender-issues niche, it's just indie aesthetics!

Mark I'm certainly not denying the presence of irony and self-consciousness in indie! I don't think anyone would describe Merritt as an emotionalist in Antony terms, but yes -- I'm talking about a specific strain / brand of indie records. And I'm talking less about emotion, really, and more about aesthetics -- i.e., the same reasons Cocteau Twins don't throw a funny roots-rock song onto Treasure.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:42 (twenty years ago)

i don't own a gat, CPFG : (

anymore

i actually don't like antony and the johnsons that much, but then again i only heard it once. it's that last couple of lines that put me off. who's to say what we should care about?

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:43 (twenty years ago)

yes, critics shouldn't take sides, it's unseemly.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:43 (twenty years ago)

this is where you should have ended the sentence

but xgau hated the radio skits! the only difference songwriting-wise is the lack of funny sound effects, which you might have missed if you only played it once.

'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:44 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco I think you sell Antony a little short, and I'm not even a booster. (Baby Dee's albums are in a similar neighborhood but leagues better and get completely ignored 'cause there's no rock band backing her up.) I think questions of gender have always been central to the whole indie dialogue/monologue if you prefer but are usually sublimated/coded; in Antony they're spelled out so plainly that you'd have to be deaf to miss them, which is partly why I don't find "reading" Antony very interesting, even if the tunes are OK and the singing usually top-notch.

Mr Straight Toxic (ghostface), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:45 (twenty years ago)

haha I played it three times and I just couldn't get into it, 'Twan. OTOH, I saw them at SXSW and they blew the roof off the dump (not easy considering it was an echoey stadium); I was really looking fwd to the album. maybe a fourth time will do it for me, but I sort of doubt it.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:47 (twenty years ago)

well, I hate that Antony record. I'm not its intended audience, I suppose... and yeah, I do agree with the line about irony and humor, or more precisely, the bit about humor. but I think that just...maybe...Christgau is outta touch with his audience, or the part of his audience who likes Antony, like that's not real obvious, right? having the last word and all that. he's hanging onto an aesthetic that I of course, being over 40 now, probably believe in too much for my own good (which is why I hate the record and also hate, for example, the Decemberists, which I believe he gives like Honorable Mention to, also practically a year late). I don't think that my or his aesthetic is any more universal than the emotions he's not down with coming from Antony. I dunno. and while I admire Xgau for the most part, the whole bit about how he's speaking for the more-suffering world and all that--the "global perspective" on what is after all a pop record, albeit one with, to my mind, insufferable pretentions and yep, no humor--seems, well, outta hand. but shit, the lesson I always get is that we all have own own aesthetic, and it's best to be jolly about being outta touch and maybe just not worry about it. or something like that.

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:47 (twenty years ago)

Part of what defines an "indie audience" for me is exactly that pull toward things being stylized, no matter what the details.

that seems somehow sad to me. i don't really read reviews to read what the "audience" reaction will be/is, usually. tho mostly i'm not even sure what you were trying to say, other than "people react in this way to these things" which doesn't resonate with me so much. aside from being not sure about it, it doesn't even seem interesting to me, y'know, whatever the assumed "consensus" on things is. that's why we get 10-billion boring year-end lists.

No one wants Chan to crack a smile in the middle of Moon Pix, you know?

no one? i dunno about that. a l'il humor wouldn't hurt her music much, i think.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:48 (twenty years ago)

Consider the possible gap between "sounds like the Feelies" and "is anywhere near as good as the Feelies."

Heed his words. And never ever listen to the Clap Your Hands lip-flapper sing.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Oh come now Matos, you know it's not about taking sides -- seriously, let's talk about this notion that "metaphorical-political centrality" of subject matter is that central to liking records in general, and this Antony record in particular.

xpost - J I'm not even really talking about the content of the Antony album, I'm talking about the approach to it at the end of that text. That and the mode of fandom: I really don't know that those metaphorical-political concerns are really that wrapped up in appreciation of the records. (You kind of separate them yourself, right; you rate the tunes and singing higher than the lyrical matter.) Possibly the issue is that Christgau is focused enough on the subject matter that he doesn't realize the album's boosters are enjoying something well apart from just that.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Cotten otm.

js (honestengine), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Matos that's not really what i meant. i was put off because his last couple of lines seem to be a little dismissive of that particular POV, as if most people shouldn't care because those concerns don't apply to them.

gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

cat power shows are hilarious, she's got humor galore as is.

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:50 (twenty years ago)

yeah blount that lip-synching thing she did was pretty funny.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)

as far as "he's late, har har har" goes, I can't think of anyone, pro or not, who can ingest every "major" record as they pass the transom. I realized the other day I listened to at least 1,000 albums last year; when I sit down w/the P&J top 100 I doubt I'll have heard or formed opinions on half of them. that's fine, because I don't see it as my duty to have done so, but Christgau does, which is one reason you always get these year-or-so-after-the-fact CG reviews; he feels obligated to weigh in on what his peers adjudge the "important" releases of a year (i.e. the P&J top 100). I admire it even if I think it (and he, at times) are bonkers.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)

i'm so tired of the "important" releases. just sayin'.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:52 (twenty years ago)

I should've put some winky thing at the end of "taking sides," huh? I wasn't being entirely serious there, sorry for not being clear.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)

Stencil the reason I'm talking about how albums like this work for people (including me) is that Christgau brought it up -- because I think he's misidentifying the "mode" of these things.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)

there's a strain of music critic who cares more about music criticism and what other critics have to say than about music itself; xgau is a god to these people. kissing his ass is also a good way to have a career as he's had a hand in many writers' careers (there's really nothing wrong with that as it's the way of the world.) i have never understood why people outside the profession might profess to dig him; he can turn a phrase and is knowledgable about african pop music, but that's the nicest i can say about him.

like, fair enough that our timely friend doesn't like antony; what bothers me about the review is the way it is far more concerned with the alleged perceptions and opinions of some supposed indie scene hegemony than the music itself. "indie denizens"? dude is boxing shadows.

in my experience, too, it just doesn't cut it to judge who supposedly has one quality of life versus another. just 'cause someone's middle class and white or something doesn't innately give their life less suffering than someone from a third world country or whatever, if I am to parse the Poobah properly there. also, to say that the reason folks dig antony is 'cause he has a PC agenda is super lame. xgau just sounds like a prig, and yes i am writing this defensively 'cause i really *enjoyed* the fuck out of this record. i also enjoy never taking the dean seriously.

Michael J McGonigal (mike mcgonigal), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)

i find the song failure by swans very funny. not all swans fans agree with me on this.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:24 (twenty years ago)

This is a tough one.

Smog and Leonard Cohen- lotsa laugh lines, self-undercutting, and irony

Low: within the art there is some humor, but it's wayyyy dark and maybe primarily confined to cover choices. However, their between song banter can be hilarious.

Codeine: can't think of any humor going on at all, not that they come off as pompous or pretentious (I don't think they do), but I can't think of any clear "laugh lines".

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:27 (twenty years ago)

even the east river pipe dude has a sense of humor. if it weren't for the whiney part, i would just list tons of metal bands.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:33 (twenty years ago)

there are definitely some jandek albums bereft of ha ha moments. and he certainly knows how to mope. and he can whine pretty good.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)

The entire Jandek thing is one big haha.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)

you think? i don't think that.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:42 (twenty years ago)

It was interesting to read that one of the texts he did in one of the live appearances had something to do with Hurricane Katrina. I think he has serious themes, but seems to usually throw them away and say something ridiculous or, if not, maybe it's another "funny because it is SO NOT FUNNY" thing.

I had this one Jandek album that had some other guy singing these kind of blues songs. They weren't funny, but it was funny that they were on the album.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:46 (twenty years ago)

some of his stuff is pretty bleak. and heavy! and powerful, even. his record covers can be funny. xgau must hate that guy.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)

But bleak/heavy/powerful isn't whiny/mopey. I think when Jandek is whiny or mopey it's usually kind of funny?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)

i wonder if xgau likes neil hamburger.

miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:55 (twenty years ago)

and can i just say that current 93 are shite? i only ever had a tape of one of their albums but it was supposed to be the best one, i think.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)

dude, they have like 400 albums. you can't judge them on one. they aren't for everyone. i'll bet xgau hates them.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:05 (twenty years ago)

well, you can judge that album. but they are all over the map, is what i'm trying to say. xgau has probably never heard them.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:05 (twenty years ago)

Do you think there's an undercurrent of humor to them that's similar to Swans?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:08 (twenty years ago)

yeah, i do. same with nurse with wound. they just like fucking with people.


"But bleak/heavy/powerful isn't whiny/mopey."

i said he could be bleak and heavy AND he could be whiny and mopey. he does more than one thing.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:26 (twenty years ago)

do you like coil? and do you think *The Anal Staircase* is a humorous song title?

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:26 (twenty years ago)

I've never listened to Coil. I find Throbbing Gristle more tolerable when it's "Hot on the Heels of Love" or something than when it's "Hamburger Lady."

"and do you think *The Anal Staircase* is a humorous song title?"

Yes I do.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:37 (twenty years ago)

There's all sorts of humor going on in Coil's work- for god's sake, the new album ends with an over-the-top, operatic cover of the theme-song to "Are You Being Served?" . . .

Current 93 also have a sense of humor, but it's sly and occasional- check out the deliberately goth-baiting EP "A Gothic Love Song". The whole Noddy imagery throughout the early years of Current 93 is half-humorous/half-unsettling.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Sunday, 8 January 2006 21:48 (twenty years ago)

calm down, nobody said coil weren't funny. i always found them funny. and creepy. like the addams family. and yeah, i agree about current 93 too. the humor is there. sometimes.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 21:59 (twenty years ago)

I always wondered if the Fall's "Shoulder Pads" was supposed to be like the theme to "Are You Being Served."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 22:03 (twenty years ago)

Thread-end update: I think I figured something out!

Because during the week-long course of this thread I've also been trawling through the whole history of the Consumer Guide, and trying to figure out why it is that Christgau hates so much of everything I like, and apart from the obvious age and indie and other to-each-his-own stuff I come up with this: Christgau seems to want his music to have well-rounded personality. Cf the Antony review that started us off, where he wants the melodrama cut with something else. He spends a lot of time analyzing the personalities that people present (in words and music), and scrutinizing them on that pseudo-moral level, which is a cool enough habit that I don't even mind how much he points that skepticism at men ten times more than women. And so I can see why this makes him unhelpful to my personal tastes, sometimes: I kind of like art when it isn't well-rounded, when it gets to work on making one element of personality concrete. I like bands as stand-ins for states of being I don't plan on experiencing all the time. This is totally an "indie" sensibility as opposed to his "universal" one, which is totally fair-enough -- but it's good to have my own mental picture of why we're not on the same page.

(NB he uses the same formulation he uses with Antony a lot, or maybe just a lot for the kinds of records I'm interested in -- "those interested in [perceived personal/political aspect of record] will go for this." Does this mean the "indie aesthetic" basically amounts to the love of special interests?)

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:24 (twenty years ago)

It was interesting to read that one of the texts he did in one of the live appearances had something to do with Hurricane Katrina.

the new orleans show was cancelled because of katrina, so perhaps not all that surprising.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:43 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
something about antony really pisses me off. it's like, he got so much credit for being uber-emotional on a scale. i dunno.

surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

Somehow I'd previously missed this.

What a homophobic idiot. I would have "retired" him from the Voice on the basis of that doggerel alone.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

"But billions of humans have it worse, and while we who are luckier are morally obliged to remember that, we're not obliged to empathize with any of them. Those convinced of the metaphoric-political centrality of transgender issues and the AIDS epidemic will feel Antony's songs. Those who don't should find a record they enjoy."

OK i don't even know what this means

surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

"he got so much credit for being uber-emotional on a scale."

you should see me on a scale. oof! did i have to eat the WHOLE pie?

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah that doesn't make any sense to me.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

MUSICAL scale, silly!

surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:52 (nineteen years ago)

when you have to use hyphens like that, you should reconsider your style of writing.

surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)

What a homophobic idiot. I would have "retired" him from the Voice on the basis of that doggerel alone

As his advocacy of the Pet Shop Boys, early Rufus Wainwright, Imperial Teen, and the Scissor Sisters proves.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

OK i don't even know what this means

Are you asking us to parse Robert Christgau's sentence?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

please i don't even know if i have the strength. i'm asking the world to not give me sentences like that. ever again.

surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:00 (nineteen years ago)

OK i think i get it now. but i still think "metaphoric-political" is slightly ridiculous, as an expression

surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

Great German philosopher disguised as a rock critic.

R_S (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:09 (nineteen years ago)

The equivalent was Bohn in the NME reviewing the first Bronski Beat album: "No one gives a shit what they get up to in the dark and that's what bothers them."

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)

It's been said a thousand times, but God, that's embarassing. Cotton's right: it's as though Xgau were reacting to some invisible straw man spouting thoughtless, gay-pride hosannahs from the margins. And regardless of the man's credentials in other respects, it does seem grotesquely homophobic. The entire second half is like a "death before disco" slap in the face.

I wonder whether he's off base with regard to the lack of humor in the music, too. I mean, I perceive some deadpan humor in the absurd, overstylized, insanely risky faux-grandeur of it. Whether or not that humor is intentional is another matter, but that's the way laffs work, right? Just 'cuz Xgau isn't laughing doesn't mean there isn't anything funny about it.

french for cane break (Pye Poudre), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:13 (nineteen years ago)

Everything's funny.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:57 (nineteen years ago)

Or, to put it less flippantly: everything that can be derided as lacking a sense of humour can automatically be defended as funny, because ppl without humour are mostly regarded as buffoons.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

Good point. Still, I wonder whether Antony sees any humor in his own work...

the new sincerity (Pye Poudre), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)

"Fistful of Love" is very funny, and I'm sure it was intentional.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

"I accept, and I collect upon my body / The memories of your devotion"

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

Often makes me think of "He Hit Me (It Felt Like a Kiss)"

Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

I thought it was about an abusive relationship, which of course isn't funny, but then someone suggested that it's actually about fisting/bondage which makes it hilarious.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)

This thread is like Groundhog Day.

Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

except Groundhog Day ends

feed latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:34 (nineteen years ago)

As his advocacy of the Pet Shop Boys, early Rufus Wainwright, Imperial Teen, and the Scissor Sisters proves.

I wonder if Christgau shit a brick out when he found out that the Scissor Sisters derived a great amount of influence from one of the musical artists Christgau was most especially harsh on in the '80s. Need I name the artist in question? (BTW, if you don't know me, Google "scissor sisters" and "the reason we got into music" for the artist's name.)

Phoenix Dancing (krushsister), Thursday, 25 January 2007 05:26 (nineteen years ago)

el debarge??

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 25 January 2007 05:32 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

A+ classic christgau clusterfuck

velko, Thursday, 2 April 2009 04:48 (seventeen years ago)

they don't make 'em like this anymore

鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 2 April 2009 05:09 (seventeen years ago)

wow 804 posts

strøm thurmond (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 2 April 2009 05:11 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.