Dud of the MonthAntony and the JohnsonsI am a Bird Now
Whose voice touches who is personal, but that doesn't mean Antony will ever reach as many humans as Aretha Franklin or Billie Holiday, and up against the archer Brian Ferry, the artier Rufus Wainwright, and the grander Nina Simone, objective physical differences manifest themselves: he's thinner, drier, more strained. Not only is his willingness to express emotion commoner than indie denizens imagine, his failure to undercut that emotion with irony or humor is a spiritual weakness. Right, he suffers. But billions of humans have it worse, and while we who are luckier are morally obliged to remember that, we're not obliged to empathize with any of them. Those convinced of the metaphoric-political centrality of transgender issues and the AIDS epidemic will feel Antony's songs. Those who don't should find a record they enjoy. B MINUS
I was pretty much thinking "fair enough" through the first half. The second? Huh? First off he's either misunderstanding or just dismissing the way emotionalist stuff works in the indie world, and why Antony works as an "indie" record: indie tends to be interested in seeing things very stylized and aestheticized, to the point of camp or fairy-tale or just pure artifice, and so it wants Antony to remain uncut by "irony or humor" -- the same way it wants Joanna Newsom, on record, to seriously pretend she's a fairy-crone, and the same way it wants Cat Power to play the whole thing straight. (Irony is the province of the guitar bands.)
And then the closing: seriously? Does our appreciation of music really have that much to do with the "metaphoric-political centrality" of the subject matter? Why exactly is Christgau suggesting that I am a Bird Now is, umm, a special-interest record? And more so than the Comet Gain record up the page?
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:09 (twenty years ago)
say what now?
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:11 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:12 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:14 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:17 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:19 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:21 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:23 (twenty years ago)
Re: counter-reaction I was kind of thinking about that -- he reviews records really late! Antony is his "dud of the month" nearly a year after it was released; other records reviewed in this batch include Fiona Apple, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, Madonna, and Lady Sov. It certainly gives a person a lot of space to digest the conversation about something and come in with some authoritative-sounding pronouncement about it.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:25 (twenty years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:29 (twenty years ago)
No shit: I just checked, and the Stylus review of the album came out a year ago today!
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:30 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:30 (twenty years ago)
and Xgau likes his records/artists a little more universal than that. you can be niche, but you need to be better than this.
it stretches one aesthetic to a kind of uncut, over-the-top purity.
as an Xgau-acolyte, I'm tempted to recoil in horror
I still don't understand how a DUD OF THE MONTH can be a B MINUS.
because, per Xgau, 'in the era of grade inflation, read everything from a b on down as flunk' (paraphrased, at least). the dud of the month isn't the worst record of the month, it's the most interesting/talked-about/worth-commenting-on bad record of the month.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:31 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:31 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:34 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)
haha that's what I was thinking!
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)
more like compTROLLING hyack hyack
Sorry, I was as obscure as Xgau here. I meant that his reviews come very late in the game (as has been noted upthread) and sometimes read as conflict-resolution court decisions, the Last Word on an album: for instance, to understand his point on Antony, you need to not only have listened to the record but also have read all its major reviews.
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― cancer prone fat guy (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:37 (twenty years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:38 (twenty years ago)
Clap Your Hands have a groove that's reminiscent of that Feelies era (even if nothing screams Crazy Rhythms to me), but the vocal is this loud-ass Verlaine/Gano thing. I actually do like their stuff more each time I hear it, and I'm sure Xgau's given it more spins.
― 'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:38 (twenty years ago)
Does this mean Antony's gonna beat MIA and Sufjan?
― Mr Straight Toxic (ghostface), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:40 (twenty years ago)
― 'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:41 (twenty years ago)
this is where you should have ended the sentence
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:41 (twenty years ago)
Mark I'm certainly not denying the presence of irony and self-consciousness in indie! I don't think anyone would describe Merritt as an emotionalist in Antony terms, but yes -- I'm talking about a specific strain / brand of indie records. And I'm talking less about emotion, really, and more about aesthetics -- i.e., the same reasons Cocteau Twins don't throw a funny roots-rock song onto Treasure.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:42 (twenty years ago)
anymore
i actually don't like antony and the johnsons that much, but then again i only heard it once. it's that last couple of lines that put me off. who's to say what we should care about?
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:43 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:43 (twenty years ago)
but xgau hated the radio skits! the only difference songwriting-wise is the lack of funny sound effects, which you might have missed if you only played it once.
― 'Twan (miccio), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― Mr Straight Toxic (ghostface), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:45 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:47 (twenty years ago)
― edd s hurt (ddduncan), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:47 (twenty years ago)
that seems somehow sad to me. i don't really read reviews to read what the "audience" reaction will be/is, usually. tho mostly i'm not even sure what you were trying to say, other than "people react in this way to these things" which doesn't resonate with me so much. aside from being not sure about it, it doesn't even seem interesting to me, y'know, whatever the assumed "consensus" on things is. that's why we get 10-billion boring year-end lists.
No one wants Chan to crack a smile in the middle of Moon Pix, you know?
no one? i dunno about that. a l'il humor wouldn't hurt her music much, i think.
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:48 (twenty years ago)
Heed his words. And never ever listen to the Clap Your Hands lip-flapper sing.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)
xpost - J I'm not even really talking about the content of the Antony album, I'm talking about the approach to it at the end of that text. That and the mode of fandom: I really don't know that those metaphorical-political concerns are really that wrapped up in appreciation of the records. (You kind of separate them yourself, right; you rate the tunes and singing higher than the lyrical matter.) Possibly the issue is that Christgau is focused enough on the subject matter that he doesn't realize the album's boosters are enjoying something well apart from just that.
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)
― js (honestengine), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:50 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:52 (twenty years ago)
― Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)
like, fair enough that our timely friend doesn't like antony; what bothers me about the review is the way it is far more concerned with the alleged perceptions and opinions of some supposed indie scene hegemony than the music itself. "indie denizens"? dude is boxing shadows.
in my experience, too, it just doesn't cut it to judge who supposedly has one quality of life versus another. just 'cause someone's middle class and white or something doesn't innately give their life less suffering than someone from a third world country or whatever, if I am to parse the Poobah properly there. also, to say that the reason folks dig antony is 'cause he has a PC agenda is super lame. xgau just sounds like a prig, and yes i am writing this defensively 'cause i really *enjoyed* the fuck out of this record. i also enjoy never taking the dean seriously.
― Michael J McGonigal (mike mcgonigal), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 19:53 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:24 (twenty years ago)
Smog and Leonard Cohen- lotsa laugh lines, self-undercutting, and irony
Low: within the art there is some humor, but it's wayyyy dark and maybe primarily confined to cover choices. However, their between song banter can be hilarious.
Codeine: can't think of any humor going on at all, not that they come off as pompous or pretentious (I don't think they do), but I can't think of any clear "laugh lines".
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:27 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:33 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:35 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:42 (twenty years ago)
I had this one Jandek album that had some other guy singing these kind of blues songs. They weren't funny, but it was funny that they were on the album.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:46 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:49 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:51 (twenty years ago)
― miss michel legrand (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:55 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 19:57 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:05 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:08 (twenty years ago)
"But bleak/heavy/powerful isn't whiny/mopey."
i said he could be bleak and heavy AND he could be whiny and mopey. he does more than one thing.
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:26 (twenty years ago)
"and do you think *The Anal Staircase* is a humorous song title?"
Yes I do.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 20:37 (twenty years ago)
Current 93 also have a sense of humor, but it's sly and occasional- check out the deliberately goth-baiting EP "A Gothic Love Song". The whole Noddy imagery throughout the early years of Current 93 is half-humorous/half-unsettling.
― Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Sunday, 8 January 2006 21:48 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 8 January 2006 21:59 (twenty years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 8 January 2006 22:03 (twenty years ago)
Because during the week-long course of this thread I've also been trawling through the whole history of the Consumer Guide, and trying to figure out why it is that Christgau hates so much of everything I like, and apart from the obvious age and indie and other to-each-his-own stuff I come up with this: Christgau seems to want his music to have well-rounded personality. Cf the Antony review that started us off, where he wants the melodrama cut with something else. He spends a lot of time analyzing the personalities that people present (in words and music), and scrutinizing them on that pseudo-moral level, which is a cool enough habit that I don't even mind how much he points that skepticism at men ten times more than women. And so I can see why this makes him unhelpful to my personal tastes, sometimes: I kind of like art when it isn't well-rounded, when it gets to work on making one element of personality concrete. I like bands as stand-ins for states of being I don't plan on experiencing all the time. This is totally an "indie" sensibility as opposed to his "universal" one, which is totally fair-enough -- but it's good to have my own mental picture of why we're not on the same page.
(NB he uses the same formulation he uses with Antony a lot, or maybe just a lot for the kinds of records I'm interested in -- "those interested in [perceived personal/political aspect of record] will go for this." Does this mean the "indie aesthetic" basically amounts to the love of special interests?)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:24 (twenty years ago)
the new orleans show was cancelled because of katrina, so perhaps not all that surprising.
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 9 January 2006 20:43 (twenty years ago)
― surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
What a homophobic idiot. I would have "retired" him from the Voice on the basis of that doggerel alone.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
OK i don't even know what this means
― surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
you should see me on a scale. oof! did i have to eat the WHOLE pie?
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
― surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:52 (nineteen years ago)
― surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
As his advocacy of the Pet Shop Boys, early Rufus Wainwright, Imperial Teen, and the Scissor Sisters proves.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:55 (nineteen years ago)
Are you asking us to parse Robert Christgau's sentence?
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
― surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:00 (nineteen years ago)
― surmounter (rra123), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:03 (nineteen years ago)
― R_S (RSLaRue), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:12 (nineteen years ago)
I wonder whether he's off base with regard to the lack of humor in the music, too. I mean, I perceive some deadpan humor in the absurd, overstylized, insanely risky faux-grandeur of it. Whether or not that humor is intentional is another matter, but that's the way laffs work, right? Just 'cuz Xgau isn't laughing doesn't mean there isn't anything funny about it.
― french for cane break (Pye Poudre), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:01 (nineteen years ago)
― the new sincerity (Pye Poudre), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:12 (nineteen years ago)
― The Brainwasher (Twilight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:27 (nineteen years ago)
― feed latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
I wonder if Christgau shit a brick out when he found out that the Scissor Sisters derived a great amount of influence from one of the musical artists Christgau was most especially harsh on in the '80s. Need I name the artist in question? (BTW, if you don't know me, Google "scissor sisters" and "the reason we got into music" for the artist's name.)
― Phoenix Dancing (krushsister), Thursday, 25 January 2007 05:26 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 25 January 2007 05:32 (nineteen years ago)
A+ classic christgau clusterfuck
― velko, Thursday, 2 April 2009 04:48 (seventeen years ago)
they don't make 'em like this anymore
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Thursday, 2 April 2009 05:09 (seventeen years ago)
wow 804 posts
― strøm thurmond (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 2 April 2009 05:11 (seventeen years ago)