― lukeeluke (soulex45), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Andy_K (Andy_K), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― ZR (teenagequiet), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
― duh, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
― ~~~~~, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― ~~~~~, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
― dan. (dan.), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
no wonder steve albini loves them."he's a whore" is the perfect example.
― goood, Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Lloyd Bonecutter (Lloyd Bonecutter), Thursday, 9 February 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:01 (nineteen years ago)
yes, cause its ahead of time.(reminds also of the later mbv,"fall","birthday party","talking heads" etc...)
― ffffffffffffffff, Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)
not really the experimentalism of post-punk, but the first one is a pseudo-glam proto-punk record by an art rocker and the second is post-Roxy Music stuff by a band a bit energized by pub-rock and punk, esp. on the third LP.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)
― nerve pylon (flat_of_angles), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Dominique (dleone), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:30 (nineteen years ago)
I think part of that legend comes from Johnny Rotten playing that song on the infamous radio show he did while still a Sex Pistol.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:37 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.freakapuss.com/imgs/zarjazred.jpg
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
― James, Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:49 (nineteen years ago)
Right, so more like Aerosol Grey Machine, but of course that's not really a proto-punk glam record either.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
"roxy music - for your pleasure"
OTM
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
Amazed nobody has mentioned Zolar X yet though.
(Not to mention anything by Boney M. And about a hundred other things.)
Like say *U.K. Squeeze* (their first and most post-punk one).
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 21:57 (nineteen years ago)
Part of my problem is that I'm not really sure what people mean by "post-punk." (In 1980, I don't think it was a *kind* of music, or at least not a specific *sound*; people would have been more likely to call the stuff new wave or, uh, punk-funk {which was kinda stupid I admit.)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)
Or else *Crossing the Red Sea With the Adverts.* I don't know which.
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
(Which reminds me: When did Split Enz start? Weren't they some kind a glam band long before "I Got You"? Where are all the sheepfuxors when you need them?)
xp obv
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Mitya (mitya), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
Honestly, Roxy Music and Bowie are probably the best choices, for visibility reasons if nothing else. So I'm being half facetious. (Wait, though: What about Kraftwerk????)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:27 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:32 (nineteen years ago)
This is also the album that bridges the gap between glam and comedy.
― Lloyd Bonecutter (Lloyd Bonecutter), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:34 (nineteen years ago)
Actually, my new REAL nomination though (beat this) for somebody linking glam to post-punk is George Clinton. Not sure what album I'd pick though. But he's a link for sure.
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:36 (nineteen years ago)
― lickit, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
Not glam? What, with those shoulderpads?
http://ilyka.mu.nu/images/david_byrne_big_suit-thumb.jpg http://www.derbydeadpool.co.uk/images/celebs/glittg.jpg
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
> the post-punk ethos of the times...<
See, again, I'm not sure what people mean by this. Were there any bands at the time who actually defined *themselves* as post-punk? If not, how was there a "post-punk ethos"? I mean, I love those *New York Noise* compilation CDs as much as the next guy (the new edition is really great by the way), but I wonder if said "ethos" exists only in retrospect.
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:45 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Thursday, 9 February 2006 22:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:14 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:28 (nineteen years ago)
"Tim, I could go back and check, but refresh my memory: Who do you think this thread belongs to?"
I think there have been a lot of interesting cases made. My original thought was really glam oriented post-punk guys: Steve Treatment and Ziro Baby. The idea of Roxy Music and Bowie as post-punk oriented glam guys, on the other hand, was what I was questioning. (If the Berlin trilogy Bowie albums are "post-punk" records, then it was post-punk happening while post-punk proper was happening. Is a record like Heroes still a GLAM record, though?)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)
I mean, I get the idea you have extremely limited definitions of both genres. Which is fine, I guess, though I don't know what purpose the limits would serve. And either way, I don't know what your definition *is*, beyond "stuff I heard somebody call glam or post-punk once."
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:42 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 19:43 (nineteen years ago)
And if someone wants to call Duran Duran a post-punk band, that's fine. I'm just saying that it doesn't fit my sense of what that term means.
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:51 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 19:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
i'm kinda wondering if by 72/73 - when u.k. glam was hitting a peak - if american audineces weren't also just a little bubblegummed out. serious bubblegum efforts were being cranked out left and right up until the mid-70's and glam might have been overkill/overload in the u.s.
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:13 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Bidfurd (Bidfurd), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:19 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.kissfaq.com/casa/1974.htm#1974
kiss, t-rex, parliament, fanny, and the hudson brothers.
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:21 (nineteen years ago)
The mudrock element. yeah, i don't know, happy days and sha na na were huge in the 70's, but later on a little bit. people were still getting over the 60's fascination with the 20's.
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:33 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 10 February 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)
the same people who were buying nick gilder albums in 1978 (and who, in 1980, would be buying pat benatar albums?)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)
― don, Friday, 10 February 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
Besides the Clash, you mean? (And all of oi! ?)
― xhuxk, Friday, 10 February 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
They are still very popular in Germany and Norway.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Friday, 10 February 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Soukesian, Friday, 10 February 2006 22:46 (nineteen years ago)
If you back to the top of the thread you'll see I actually started off by describing this choice as "OTM", so you see when I subsequently recanted that choice as being lazy I was already driving by and shooting myself....
"Metal Urbain would be my pick."
You see? It's all about France. Told ya so.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 22:58 (nineteen years ago)
I don't know if you're consciously or subconsciously paraphrasing this, but I remember reading an interview with Jim Kerr, many years ago, in which he was asked to what extent he had been aware of Krautrock and how much of an influence it had been on Simple Minds in their early days.
His response was that the full extent of that knowledge and influence consisted of his having once purchased a copy of The Faust Tapes, solely because it was cheap, having played it once, hated it, and then used it as a frisbee.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)
― QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Friday, 10 February 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― don, Saturday, 11 February 2006 00:45 (nineteen years ago)
― QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Saturday, 11 February 2006 04:02 (nineteen years ago)
Tell me you're not going to nominate something by Sham 69, please....
".... one of the big Slade football hits was "You'll Never Walk Alone," from The Sound Of Music."
I believe Slade covered "You'll Never Walk Alone" on one live album that they released during the wilderness years between their early-mid '70's Glam Rock peak and their mid-'80's reinvention as a heavy rock band; but afaik they never released it as a single and they certainly never had a (UK?) hit with it.
Also it wasn't actually from The Sound Of Music, it was from Carousel which was written by the same people, Rodgers and Hammerstein - yes, the very same people who wrote that other giant Post Punk smash "Happy Talk" - and subsequently covered by Gerry & The Pacemakers and just about everyone who's ever been to a football (soccer) match; particularly Liverpool FC.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Saturday, 11 February 2006 10:46 (nineteen years ago)
― QuantumNoise (Justin Farrar), Saturday, 11 February 2006 15:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Fastnbulbous (Fastnbulbous), Monday, 13 February 2006 11:43 (nineteen years ago)
This was cited in something Julian Cope wrote. Apparently, they'd met one time, got on really well, until the subject came up about the Faust tapes album. Jim tells Julian about lobbing it off some skyscraper as a frisbee, and Julian then says about "right there, I realised we could never be friends."
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 13 February 2006 11:55 (nineteen years ago)