taking sides: BOWIE vs DYLAN

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Both massively influential, both at the top of their game for a decade or so, both went through a long wilderness of mediocrity, both have partially redeemed themselves in more recent years, Bowie once wrote a song about Dylan, and Dylan once... er, actually no he didn't. They met back in the mid-seventies but apparently didn't get on. Dylan an obvious influence on Bowie's lyric style.

OK, so who's it to be BOWIE in the left-hand corner, or DYLAN in the right? FITE!

zowie zimmerman, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:14 (nineteen years ago)

from well outside the range of people who really care much about either, I'll say Bowie because his music is usually a lot more interesting

Dominique (dleone), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan an obvious influence on Bowie's lyric style

That should read: Dylan an obvious influence on Bowie's worst lyrics.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

As I explained on another thread, it's Bowie

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

an actual boxing match between these two would be an incredible sight, except that no one wants to see Bob with his shirt off.

patita (patita), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

Love'em both. But Dylan even singing his worst songs is a damn fine singer, while Bowie singing his worst songs is damn awful.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)

'dylan's a bigger deal, i listen to bowie more.' i suspect i'm not alone in responding to the question with this thought

prince rupert, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan = damn fine singer
Bowie = damn awful

Madness reigns

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)

dylan, easy

pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:26 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan influential blah blah I still don't listen to his stuff whereas I still like a bunch of Bowie's records so Bowie by a ton.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)

It just struck me that I don't think I have ever seen a picture of Dylan without a shirt on!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

Madness reigns

Just compare their covers.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie, now and forevermore.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

Eh? Their record covers? (xpost)

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)

If we're talking about their record covers, Bowie by a fucking country mile.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)

... DYLAN got in a few early uppercuts, BOWIE was looking shaky there for a moment but he's starting to rally now and it's still ANYONE'S FITE...

zowie zimmerman, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not convinced that Dylan has done anything as good as Station To Station.

jz, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:34 (nineteen years ago)

There so totally different in almost every aspect that there's hardly any point in comparing them

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan = 60s
Bowie = 70s

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:35 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan = 60s
Bowie = 70s

But Dylan's only a few years older isn't he?
Bowie's 1st release = 1964
Dylan's 1st release = 1961

Dylan's great, but in the final analysis I don't really buy into his rootsy, I-am-Woodie-Guthrie schtick, Bowie is more the man of the age.

jz, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)

I really try to like Dylan but I'm too shallow. I'll try again in ten years, maybe.
B O W I E

p.j. (Henry), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:39 (nineteen years ago)

Yes but being born in 1941 was very different from being born in 1946 (xpost)

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:40 (nineteen years ago)

I like Dylan, but I never listen to him and I don't find that my record collection is lacking for being Dylan-free. I'll go with Bowie, although personally to both chaps I'd prefer T. Rex and Neil Young.

gear (gear), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie, of course. (Can't stand Dylan.)

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

GROW UP JOHN

pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:45 (nineteen years ago)

It's a grandfather vs grandson question. Dylan has no antecedents, so his accomplishment is greater. Plus Bowie has never had the political/social relevance Dylan used to wield. Finally, Bowie has a great voice and Dylan doesn't, point to Dylan for doing more with less.

JB Young, Friday, 10 February 2006 17:46 (nineteen years ago)

To be honest, Pete, hating Dylan is getting kind of old.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:47 (nineteen years ago)

this is like comparing apples and oranges...
one thing is true, Dylan's lyrics at their peak are just about unbeatable

J. Lamphere (WatchMeJumpStart), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan has no antecedents

I doubt Bob Dylan would agree with you

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

thats what im sayin homie.

pssst - badass revolutionary art! (plsmith), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie has a great voice and Dylan doesn't, point to Dylan for doing more with less.

Haven't heard his cover of "God Only Knows," have you, JB?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

2 poseurs who never really got carried away with their own music. I pick Bowie b/c I think he atleast aspired to integrate himself. I think Dylan was doing something else. (I know this is incoherent)

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

But so then I try to like him, and gah, sorry.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 February 2006 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie for the tunes, Dylan for the lyrics.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

i really liked bowie's version of "day of the locusts"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

Look, people, it COMES DOWN TO THIS:

http://homepage.mac.com/danielmartin/Dylan/images/jpg/cds/1985-EmpireBurlesque.jpg


VERSUS THIS:

http://www.illustrated-db-discography.nl/12inch/pix/NLMDUS.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)

The last god-knows-how-many-times I tried to listen to Bowie, lots of what had once seemed like deathless appeal seemed to have vanished into the ether. Now, I listened to a lot of Bowie in high school, so maybe I just used up my lifetime allottment of Bowie appreciation. But even the classics (Ziggy, Diamond Dogs, the Eno trilogy) sounded so flat & empty: they sounded department store window displays look. Which isn't to say I can't really enjoy a good department store window display.

Dylan on the other hand seems to get richer as he ages for me: for one thing, the whole "Woody Guthrie troubadour!" accusation really only seems to pertain to pre-'67 Dylan; once you hit Blonde on Blonde, he's considerably more chameleon-like (chameleonic?) than Bowie. He gives so many different looks, and is so much harder to pin down: his sources (or "influences" if mark s isn't listening) are more disparate and harder to predict, and what he does with them is much more surprising than what Bowie does with his (i.e., for example, Aladdin Sane: "Say, I've been listening to Brecht/Weill! What if someone like say me were to try & update that whole sort of thing for the wild adrogynous seventies, that'd be somefink else eh?") (and before anybody gets real defensive about this, I love Aladdin sane to bits, but the longer you look at it, the less brainy it seems)

Having said all that, Bowie as his most pop (some of the stuff on The Lodger [or Lodger if you insist/prefer], "Sound and Vision," "Ashes to Ashes," some of the underrated post-Let's Dance singles e.g. "Blue Jean") has a weightless depth that Dylan can't really touch - Bowie's interested in dance, Dylan never has been, so Bowie wins when it comes to the physical realm of music experience: which realm is no small part of the bargain!

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)

at least Dylan only has one button left unbuttoned unlike Bowie who only has one button buttoned

J. Lamphere (WatchMeJumpStart), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

sounded like, it should say up dere in the first paragraph

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

I don't really buy into his rootsy, I-am-Woodie-Guthrie schtick

he had a lot more than just that schtick! rent one don't look back!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah my Guthrie line was a little glib. But even beyond his Guthrie phase, Dylan seems primarily concerned with roots, authenticity. Musically, he remains pretty conservative, even when his lyrics sparkle.

jz, Friday, 10 February 2006 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

i can't tell based on the pics either, which one i should choose.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

I like Bowie's Brian Setzer haircut on Never Let Me Down there.

jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

But even beyond his Guthrie phase, Dylan seems primarily concerned with roots, authenticity.

I don't know about this! I think John Wesley Harding is a pretty harrowing evisceration of a lot of the roots/authenticity tropes - certainly the only time I can think of post-Highway 61 that he invokes the guy-with-guitar-lettin'-his-voice-be-heard!!! trope is "Hurricane," which is rather more savage than what one usually means by "roots" stuff

also, Dylan's eyeliner on the Rolling Thunder tour > Bowie's eyeliner once he got into the nose candy

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:18 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan seems primarily concerned with roots, authenticity.

Yeah, tell that to Joan Baez, Pete Seeger, and the Japanese novelist from whome he wittily and shamelessly pilfered ideas.

Dylan's always been as much a poseur as Bowie, which is why Bowie's always been attracted to him.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:20 (nineteen years ago)

Is this the thread where we pretend like we don't get the whole Dylan thing and praise the perennial also-ran Bowie to the heavens? Sign me up!

o. nate (onate), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

Musically Dylan is pretty conservative, changeover to electric guitars apart, silly to argue otherwise. Nothing necessarily wrong with that.

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan's always been as much a poseur as Bowie, which is why Bowie's always been attracted to him.

or MORE of a poseur, probably.

yeah, jeez people are acting almost willfully ignorant of dylan on this thread.

p.s. i loves david bowie a whole bunch.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:27 (nineteen years ago)

Since when is "conservative" a pejorative?

(releasing John Wesley Harding at the height of psychedelia was as shocking as Bowie cutting Young Americans after Diamond Dogs, btw)

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

I like Bowie too - don't get me wrong. He's not afraid to be silly, which is endearing - except when he doesn't seem to realize he's being silly. He's at his best when he doesn't invest too much of himself in his music - when he tries to get real it usually comes across as overwrought histrionics - but as long as he sticks to glossy pop art constructions, he's fabulous.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 10 February 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

ned lives in a state of endless bemusement

It's most relaxing!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 12 February 2006 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

Another essential diffrence between the two is that Dylan looks backwards and basically hears no music that happened after 1950 or so, plugging in not withstanding.

That's pretty bizzare. You might want to read his book or check out his radio show when it gets up and running. Or maybe listen to almost anything he's recorded since about 1978. It might surprise you.

dan. (dan.), Monday, 13 February 2006 03:34 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan had his dud periods, remember born-again bob? But no "major" artist has been responsible for something as embarassingly bad as Tin Machine, so Dylan wins.

jumbo dog, Monday, 13 February 2006 03:37 (nineteen years ago)

I like some music from Bob's born again period.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Monday, 13 February 2006 03:42 (nineteen years ago)

'property of jesus' fucking rocks

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 13 February 2006 03:45 (nineteen years ago)

In fact, I think I'd rather listen to Slow Train Comin' than Blood on the Tracks.

Rockist_Scientist (RSLaRue), Monday, 13 February 2006 03:48 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan can i have your msn plz

kendel le-ann taylor, Monday, 20 February 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

I really like Christian Bob.

Ian in Brooklyn, Monday, 20 February 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

Dylan never wrote a tribute song to Bowie. Bowie wins :)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 20 February 2006 19:06 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, there are some godawful Dylan records for sure--I'd say most of Knocked Out Loaded and Down in the Groove (and "Dylan") are at least as bad as even Tin Machine II.

Some of the born-again Dylan stuff, especially on Saved, is terrific--play "Solid Rock" really loud sometime if you don't believe me.

The fundamental-reinvention-of-songwriting-technique thing is something I think Dylan's done even more than Bowie. I mean, most of "Love and Theft" would've seemed VERY weird on any previous Dylan record...

Douglas (Douglas), Monday, 20 February 2006 19:26 (nineteen years ago)

And there are really, really good Bowie songs on Tin Machine. "Heaven in Here," "I Can't Read"...I even have a fondness for the skilled rip of "Wild Thing" in "Cack City."

I think hating Tin Machine is more a reflex than a reality. I mean, when it comes to horrid Bowie, the Glass Spider period stuff is pretty horrid.

Ian in Brooklyn, Monday, 20 February 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

Let's count!

Bowie:

1. Fake Brit R&B guy
2. Mod rocker
3. Donovan-y Hippie twit
4. Ambisexual folk crooner
5. Ziggy
6. Burroughs-style debauched Diamond Dog
7. Plastic soul Bowie
8. Coke-addled, proto-fascist Bowie/Thin White Duke
9. Dissasociative art recluse
10. Clean cut international pop star
11. 80s content-sucked shadow of himself
12. Simulated hard rocker
13. A sort of futurist goth Dirk Bogarde/Damian Hirst fusion for Outside
14. Jungle oppoutunist
15. AOR contender (...hours)
16. Fairly-normal-if-insanely-wealthy-guy-writing-terrific-pop-songs Bowie

Vs Dylan's what?

Ian in Brooklyn, Monday, 20 February 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

You missed out one of my favourite Bowies, though: cockerney Tony Newley croonalike.

jz, Tuesday, 21 February 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)

Ian, you didn't read a thing upthread, did you?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

He didn't need to, he already had an opinion

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:26 (nineteen years ago)

Regardless, that Bowievolution is pretty accurate.

willem -- (willem), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

... apart from ignoring completely what he was doing between 1966 and 1968

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

... and his first album

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 21 February 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

I was so much older then....

most people on this board are choosing bowie over dylan, and i reckon most are over 30, and idealise the teenage space cadet, the mindless futurism, the bright feathers and colours of the dream. Cos as serious young men and women we underrated it, and dearly wish to compensate for that now.
dylan was young when he made his great music and that old cracked voice spoke exclusively to the young, its faux ancient wisdom and prophecies heralding a time of iconoclasm. Key moment: the hysterical laughter that greets the audacity of Bob Dylan's 115th dream. Dare to mock the founding fathers! too bad the muse flew and he spent the rest of his years searching for it again. But don't under-rate him now when that voice is needed more than ever.

dr x o'skeleton, Tuesday, 21 February 2006 13:28 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
Vs Dylan's what?
1. Folk singer
2. Folk rocker
3. Fundamentalist preacher
4. Ageing but still occasionally "cool" old-timer

Bowie still wins.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 20 May 2006 01:26 (nineteen years ago)

OK. ELO Member with Traveling Wilburys as well. :)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 20 May 2006 01:31 (nineteen years ago)

You startin' somethin'?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 20 May 2006 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie's 70s beats Bob's 70s by quite a lot. (Bowie's 70s beats everybody's, except maybe Neil Young)

But Bob's obviously got the 60s on him. 80s, let's call it a draw, or give Bob the nod if you count unreleased songs like Blind Willie McTell.

Bob crushes in the 90s, and that's before the really big guns come out with Love and Theft.

Dylan wins

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Saturday, 20 May 2006 02:42 (nineteen years ago)

Again with the not remembering OUTSIDE is the best record of Bowie's career, numbass narrative skits and all.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Saturday, 20 May 2006 05:37 (nineteen years ago)

1995 -- Music rag editorial offices worldwide

So Bowie's got a new CD eh? What's that about?

Oh, he's just inventing entire new genres, brilliantly co-opting others, rocking his brains out, writing songs with about 37 chords and several key changes, none of which you notice and in general taking a massive crap on the skills of 99.9999999911999% of all songwriters on Earth.

(Yawn.) Oh. More of that, how dull. So I hear Dylan's working on a new CD.

Yeah--it's supposed to be a fairly live-spunding retro collection of moderately tuneful song about getting old.

BLOODY BRILLIANT!!!!!!!

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Saturday, 20 May 2006 05:43 (nineteen years ago)

1995 -- Music rag editorial offices worldwide

So Bowie's got a new CD eh? What's that about?

Oh, he's just inventing entire new genres, brilliantly co-opting others, rocking his brains out, writing songs with about 37 chords and several key changes, none of which you notice and in general taking a massive crap on the skills of 99.9999999911999% of all songwriters on Earth.

(Yawn.) Oh. More of that, how dull. So I hear Dylan's working on a new CD.

Yeah--it's supposed to be a fairly live-sounding retro collection of moderately tuneful song about getting old.

BLOODY BRILLIANT!!!!!!!

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Saturday, 20 May 2006 05:43 (nineteen years ago)

sounds exactly right to me!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Saturday, 20 May 2006 06:18 (nineteen years ago)

Out.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 20 May 2006 06:58 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie a million times over as a performer/recording artist.

Dylan a hundred times over as a writer.

So ? I guess.

John Justen (johnjusten), Saturday, 20 May 2006 07:03 (nineteen years ago)

I hate that this thread get's Bowie's song about Dylan stuck in my head, since it is such a crappy song

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 20 May 2006 11:44 (nineteen years ago)

Participating in this thread may have been the last time that artery in my forehead throbbed.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 20 May 2006 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

If for nothing else, Bowie wins for inspiring Nina Hagen.
Dylan is just a second-rate Jimmy Thudpucker.

shieldforyoureyes (shieldforyoureyes), Saturday, 20 May 2006 12:21 (nineteen years ago)

as of this morning the correct answer to this TS is "Robert Forster"

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Saturday, 20 May 2006 12:22 (nineteen years ago)

Let's check out some recent lyrics, starting with Bowie:

"Little Wonder"

Stinky weather, Fat shaky hands
Dopey morning Doc,
Grumpy gnomes
Little wonder then, little wonder
You little wonder,
little wonder you
Big screen dolls,
tits and explosions
Sleepytime, Bashful but nude
Little wonder then, little wonder
You little wonder,
little wonder you
I'm getting it

Intergalactic, see me to be you
It's all in the tablets,
Sneezy Bhutan
Little wonder then, little wonder
You little wonder,
little wonder you
Mars happy nation,
sit on my karma
Dame meditation, take me away
Little wonder then,
little wonder
You little wonder,
little wonder you

[CHORUS]
Sending me so far away, so far away
So far away, so far away
So far away, so so far away
So far away, so far away
So far away, so so far away

Little wonder
You little wonder, you
Little wonder
You little wonder you


And here's Dylan:

"Mississippi"

Every step of the way we walk the line
Your days are numbered, so are mine
Time is pilin' up, we struggle and we scrape
We're all boxed in, nowhere to escape

City's just a jungle, more games to play
Trapped in the heart of it, trying to get away
I was raised in the country, I been workin' in the town
I been in trouble ever since I set my suitcase down

Got nothing for you, I had nothing before
Don't even have anything for myself anymore
Sky full of fire, pain pourin' down
Nothing you can sell me, I'll see you around

All my powers of expression and thoughts so sublime
Could never do you justice in reason or rhyme
Only one thing I did wrong
Stayed in Mississippi a day too long

Well, the devil's in the alley, mule's in the stall
Say anything you wanna, I have heard it all
I was thinkin' about the things that Rosie said
I was dreaming I was sleeping in Rosie's bed

Walking through the leaves, falling from the trees
Feeling like a stranger nobody sees
So many things that we never will undo
I know you're sorry, I'm sorry too

Some people will offer you their hand and some won't
Last night I knew you, tonight I don't
I need somethin' strong to distract my mind
I'm gonna look at you 'til my eyes go blind

Well I got here following the southern star
I crossed that river just to be where you are
Only one thing I did wrong
Stayed in Mississippi a day too long

Well my ship's been split to splinters and it's sinking fast
I'm drownin' in the poison, got no future, got no past
But my heart is not weary, it's light and it's free
I've got nothin' but affection for all those who've sailed with me

Everybody movin' if they ain't already there
Everybody got to move somewhere
Stick with me baby, stick with me anyhow
Things should start to get interesting right about now

My clothes are wet, tight on my skin
Not as tight as the corner that I painted myself in
I know that fortune is waitin' to be kind
So give me your hand and say you'll be mine

Well, the emptiness is endless, cold as the clay
You can always come back, but you can't come back all the way
Only one thing I did wrong
Stayed in Mississippi a day too long

shookout (shookout), Saturday, 20 May 2006 21:31 (nineteen years ago)

Recent being ten years ago?

EZ Snappin (EZSnappin), Saturday, 20 May 2006 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

Lyrics. Feh.

Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Saturday, 20 May 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

Ah Ian, you are a good man.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 20 May 2006 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie --- by about a quadrillion light years.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Saturday, 20 May 2006 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

"Little Wonder" has a cool-ass skipping beat (though some junglists were very tedious, when the song was new, in pointing out that it was hardly on the cutting edge) - "Mississippi" is in straight 4/4

Dylan is quite obviously a better lyricist, even his Jesus songs beat Bowie's best, but lyrics are only half the game

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 21 May 2006 01:38 (nineteen years ago)

bowie looked a lot better in makeup

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 21 May 2006 01:53 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie's 90s albums are underrated. Sure they may not be as good as his classic 70s work, but there is still some interesting stuff there from "Outside" onwards.

And in the 00s, Bowie has been constantly way better than anything on "Love Theft".

Bowie wins, with Dylan being the 60s champion among them (and hadn't it been for "Scary Monsters" I'd say "Infidels" and "Oh Mercy" made Bowie the obvious 80s winner among them too)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 21 May 2006 02:08 (nineteen years ago)

Made Dylan the obvious 80s winner, I mean

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 21 May 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

Bowie.

Heath Raymond, Sunday, 21 May 2006 05:02 (nineteen years ago)

A higher number of reinvetions of sound/image doesn't necessarily mean a better musician/songwriter/etc.

Mr. Silverback (Mr. Silverback), Sunday, 21 May 2006 06:55 (nineteen years ago)

shhh! you're not supposed to mention that!

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Sunday, 21 May 2006 08:40 (nineteen years ago)

And in the 00s, Bowie has been constantly way better than anything on "Love Theft".

now you are talkingn crazy, Love & Theft is outstanding

Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 21 May 2006 08:54 (nineteen years ago)

love & theft is easily one of dylan's 5 best, and time out of mind ain't far behind.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 21 May 2006 09:15 (nineteen years ago)

"Love And Theft" is probably the most overrated Dylan album. I can hear some greatness on "Time Out Of Mind", but "Love And Theft" is mainly a collection of boring, tired blues songs.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 21 May 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)

why did i start a seperate thread? because it was a different question... debating the merits of either of their output is really not the point...we can all go on for ages about why exactly "black country rock" rocks more or less than "highway 61". its really of little use to noone.

maybe we should switch the thread tittle to "bob dylan" vs. "david bowie"?

i guess what i was starting to push at when i started this update was wondering about the effect of an artist completely subsuming themselves as a fabrication; wondering why/how some people can pull this off, and create an artist/persona which is as much, if not more so, art than their output. this also brings in how the public reaction is almost necessary in creating this "artist". itsa very strage participatory process of creation.

bb (bbrz), Monday, 22 May 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)

geir you crazy!

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 22 May 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.